Tab Content
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-28-2020, 10:00 PM
    http://archive.is/plLb4
    1 replies | 114 view(s)
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-28-2020, 09:42 PM
    I recommend using qmap.pub and read all the Q posts yourself and make your own judgement. But if you absolutely must use a youtube channel, I suggest watching the videos from youtuber prayingmedic. His videos are geared towards "normies" who aren't familiar with conspiracy theories and the chan boards. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSio3E7kYvPeHKhfuYZWriA
    2 replies | 225 view(s)
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-24-2020, 03:23 PM
    The effective treatment against Covid-19 is a combination of hydroxychloroquine & azithromycin. The dosages and the way dosages are combined together does matter.
    20 replies | 478 view(s)
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-23-2020, 11:47 AM
    Kinda sorta. Most cities own/control the public roads and sidewalks. Often using eminent domain to do so. So even if they aren't condemning the private property directly, they could shut down traffic on roads and sidewalks they control. The chance of the property owner being compensated is likely zero, since the authoritarian measures aren't being executed directly against the property itself.
    3 replies | 262 view(s)
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-19-2020, 05:06 PM
    That's how national sovereignty works. Calling it "communism" is a mischaracterization. The government doesn't own the land. They just control the borders with other countries. If you want to end national sovereignty and have the only borders be property borders, then you might as well end national sovereignty altogether.
    97 replies | 2418 view(s)
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-19-2020, 11:44 AM
    1) Only if you're attempting to cross the border. 2) Again, it's none of their business if you're not crossing the border. 3) Utilizing eminent domain is part of the constitution. If you don't like it, talk to the Founders, or try amending the Constitution. 4) Border security has existed long before the Federal Reserve or the 16th amendment was ever established. Private contracts don't need to be eliminated to provide border security. 5) Private security can also be utilized by private property owners in addition to border patrol. 6) I don't understand this statement. 7) Again, I don't see what this has to do with border security. Border security isn't a fix. It's a responsibility assigned to the federal government by the Constitution, and it keeps private property owners protected from trespassing by foreigners.
    97 replies | 2418 view(s)
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-19-2020, 10:27 AM
    I don't understand "libertarians" who support open borders. Closed borders protects private property owners on the border from trespassing by foreigners. The constitution gives the federal government the responsibility to protect our rights. Including our property rights.
    97 replies | 2418 view(s)
  • revgen's Avatar
    03-03-2020, 10:57 AM
    Barr is typical of the mindset of most prosecuting attorneys. To them, it's the job of congress to make laws, and the judicial branch's job to decide if the laws are unconstitutional. Barr seems to forget that he took an oath of office to uphold the constitution. This oath doesn't mean that he should follow the Supreme Court's interpretation of the law. It means that he must make his own judgement on whether the laws he's been tasked to enforce are constitutional. And if he believes they are unconstitutional, then he must not enforce those laws.
    12 replies | 376 view(s)
No More Results
About revgen

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
322
Posts Per Day
0.10
General Information
Last Activity
03-29-2020 12:11 PM
Join Date
11-06-2011
Referrals
0
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

03-20-2020


03-19-2020


03-03-2020


01-25-2020


01-20-2020


01-13-2020


01-12-2020


01-08-2020


01-07-2020


01-04-2020



Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast