Tab Content
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 08:36 AM
    All you claim may in fact prove out, but only time will tell. So my question to you then is what would you see done? And here I ask not for pie in the sky things that were never going to happen, but actual things that one could do in the real world. Take up arms and start shooting? Say "fuck it, get me a beer woman" and sit and do nothing as you wait either for someone else to make things all better? The sorts of change we need in the context of an environment of unbridled tyranny cannot be had along "normal" avenues. So what, then, do we DO?
    5 replies | 257 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:54 AM
    And what does all this reveal? We are at war, literally. We are, and have been, in a civil war for decades. It is not a hot war. It is our own domestic roll of cold warfare, yet so few have been able to see it. It has only been since 9/11 that this truth has been coming progressively more apparent. Why Theye have chosen to reveal themselves, who can say? Seems a gross miscalculation to me. Perhaps Theye thought we'd been so thoroughly marinated in fear that we would do their bidding no matter what it might be? Or are Theye not really on the ropes as it now appears? We must bear in mind that while Theye do not likely have their hands directly on the silo captains' hands, they most likely have them on the hands of those who work in places like the Wuhan bioweapons facility. I would not be too fast to cheer Trump's reascension... not just yet. Time will tell. Foists of apocalyptic "if we can't have it, nobody can" plagues upon the world aside, we nonetheless are far from recovered from the ravages of the globalist cabal. The comments of that rageshrieking Democrat dreg the other day about being at war is actually true, only not in the sense she meant it. If you look at the major political movements of the past 100+ years through the lens of Quiet Wars†, everything begins to come into sensible focus. This is why though very wary of Trump's current wave of measures, I nonetheless welcome them in any event because up until now we've been doing the same political things over and over, decade over decade expecting different results. Given the direction in which things have been going, especially these past four years, we no longer have that much to lose, except our cheap and petty comforts and conveniences, given how whittled down as our rights and freedoms have become. I say throw the dice, come what may. Let us have courage for once and act like men. Nothing is worse than sitting in that pot as the water grows ever warmer.
    5 replies | 257 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:28 AM
    osan started a thread AI Forum? in Science & Technology
    Barring a return to the stone age due to social collapse, due in its turn to human Stupid, AI is here to stay and should have its own forum. I've now had hundreds of "conversations" with various AIs. There is much to discuss.
    0 replies | 21 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:17 AM
    Oh no... a Democrat....
    2 replies | 53 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 03:38 AM
    Words are important. They are the most important things in our lives, believe it or not. Therefore, our choices of wording is perforce important, and to that point I would turn your attention toward that which has come to be known as the Non-Aggression Principle, AKA the "NAP". While the spirit of the NAP is righteous, the choice of "aggression" in the moniker is quite unfortunate. It states that the initiation of aggression is always a bad thing, but fails to what constitutes "aggression". Because of this, I have witnessed endless examples of gross misunderstanding of "aggression", more specifically its initiation, such that some of those cases tap dance right past the absurd. Words are important. Therefore, and because the term "aggression" seems to evade far too many in terms of a sufficiently precise meaning, I suggest leaving that term in the rear view mirror in favor of "transgression". Transgression is always incorrect as a matter of definition, whereas aggression is not. It is the fact of the latter that we run into the problem of semantics. Let us illustrate with an example. Johnny tells Janey he is going "let her have it". Is that aggression? There are those who say that it is, and those who deny it with some nontrivial vehemence. This is the key of the problem. As for my view and taken all else equal, Janey stands well within her right to self-defense to take whatever measures she sees fit to remove what we may conversationally take as a threat to her welfare. If she walks away, fine. Kick Johnny in the balls? OK, if imprudent in practical terms. Draw a sidearm and drill him a deep fathom down? You bet. And yet there are those who would argue that any such physical action against Johnny would constitute an initiation of aggression, whereas his ravings would not. Forgetting that this is sheer stupidity, prima facie, we can at least state as a fact that the difference of opinion exists. Counter example: siblings have their moments. Janey irritates Johnny in some manner and Johnny blithely lets her know "I'm going to murder you". Kids say the darnedest things. In all good likelihood Johnny was not to be taken literally, and to Janey's retrieval of dad's 686 revolver, whereby she holds Johnny at bay until police arrive is probably not justified. And yet, Johnny uttered words that under differing circumstances might justly see him interred. Words are important, but so is context.
    2 replies | 53 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 01:12 AM
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rand-paul-introduces-legislation-to-return-power-back-in-the-people-s-hands/ar-AA1yzzIS?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c6a8cb14d61c4a35a53f8f579840f831&ei=10 Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) introduced the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act in the Senate on Thursday. His bill intended to take action to “put power back in the people’s hands instead of the administrative state,” read a press release about the bill. This specifically applies to the current process involving legislation in the government in which regulations go into effect unless explicitly disapproved by Congress. Under Paul’s proposal in the REINS Act, major rules would need to be approved by the legislative branch before going to the president for signature and approval. “The purpose of this Act is to increase accountability for and transparency in the Federal regulatory process,” read the text of the bill. “Section 1 of article I of the Constitution of the United States grants all legislative powers to Congress.” Additionally, Paul’s REINS Act highlighted a recent history of a reduction in oversight and accountability in legislation that is passed by Congress.
    1 replies | 47 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 12:22 AM
    Let's assume absolute proof comes out that the CIA was behind 9/11. Using your logic the war in Iraq was justified because....reasons. You really didn't think that one through.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 12:19 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Snowball again.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 PM
    And that sort of outcome in a nation such as America manifest as a result of the failure of its people to be the government. When people pawn off their responsibility to be part of the governance of the nation, choosing to trust strangers with their freedoms, they effectively take to their knees in supplication to evil men to rape their rights in every orifice. We are the reason everything is shitty. We failed ourselves, our fellows, our children, and so on by not being the smartest, morally soundest, and most involved we can be for the sakes of all Americans. To defend your rights is to defend my own.
    8 replies | 431 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:15 PM
    Mr. Rock, meet Mr. Hardplace. The problems here are manifold, but the essence of the root problem is that the nature of all American "government" has degenerated to such a degree that we can no longer rely on the so-called "system" to correct itself via the instrumentalities intended for such purposes. This has arisen largely due to the fact that the American people are not united in the fundamentals of what it is to be American. The schism between "left" and "right, "conservative" and "progressive" is so deeply radical, we see these yawning chasms between what Republican and Democrat agents of "government" want and do in terms of policy and the passage of legislation. Herein we see a very profound flaw in the architecture of "government" in America. Furthermore, the mission of the federal government has experienced vast scope creep. The intent of the Constitution was to limit the fedgov to a precious few tasks including the common defense and courts. That's it. But perversions of the Constitution have lead to welfare states, regulatory empire, promotional empire, military empire, and so on down a dreary list of powers that have been assumed in gross violation of the metes, bounds, and intent of our foundational document. Governmentally speaking, as things currently stand America is a failed nation. As such we are faced with the choice of how to proceed. We could allow things to continue as they have been for the past 150 years and more, or we could decide to make corrections. If we choose the latter, as is apparent with the reelection of Trump for a second term, then we face the question of how to proceed. Given our current state of political reality, it is quite unlikely that there exists any meaningful possibility for making the necessary adjustments working within the normal delimiters of the system. That is because the system is so very broken. This fact then narrows our choices to "do nothing" and "take extraordinary measures". The latter carries huge risk, but is the only way that holds any reasonable chances of succeeding. And so we can wring our hands and do nothing because of the grave risks associated with extraordinary action, in which case we as a nation are as good as dead, or we can take extraordinary action, and bear the risks like men rather as shrinking violets. The worst that can happen in the latter case is that we meet with failure and are doomed the same as in the case where we default. The fact that the extraordinary measures being taken by Trump are, for many, very scary is good. Not only should they be scary, they should be terrifying for everyone. It has been our collective failure to BE the "government" which has lead to our currently atrocious circumstance. Let it linger in the hearts of all that we don't ever allow ourselves to fail ourselves again.
    5 replies | 257 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:48 AM
    :rolleyes: You're just going to keep blithely ignoring the fact that Hamas is Netanyahu's false flag army aren't you? ^This.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:33 AM
    :rolleyes: God took Northern Israel from the Jews and gave it to the Samaritans. The current people calling themselves Jews aren't Jews. Revelation 2:9 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. Many of the founders of modern Israel were atheists. See: https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2017-01-21/ty-article/.premium/how-israel-went-from-atheist-zionism-to-jewish-state/0000017f-e918-dc91-a17f-fd9d87a00000 If you actually read your Bible you would know that atheists have no business claiming God's promises.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:43 AM
    A fact that everybody is ignoring. Gaza NEVER belonged to the Jews, not even in Bible times. It belonged to the Philistines. (That's where the word "Palestinian" comes from). Northern Israel, after the kingdom was divided by God, didn't belong to the Jews either. It was the kingdom of Israel AKA the Samaritan kingdom. As pointed out in John chapter 4 "The Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans." The funny thing is, the Samaratins still exist. And..they get along both with Jews and Arabs. So give the Samaritans back THEIR land, let the Jews have historical Judea, the Palestinans have what was Philistia and "problem solved." Of course the Samaritans are small in number now so they'll need some backup. But at least there's not an ongoing blood feud right now between them and anybody else. https://www.timesofisrael.com/film-projects-spotlight-on-israels-tiny-samaritan-community-fighting-for-its-future/ The Samaritans have lived in the Land of Israel for 3,600 years. Some may be familiar with references to them in the New Testament, but few know who they really are. A new multi-faceted project by the Yeshiva University Center for Israel Studies introduces the Samaritans to a wide and varied audience, and explores how they have managed to survive for millennia despite efforts by conquering powers to erase them. Crucially, the project asks how the Samaritans plan to continue to survive into the future when today they number a mere 862.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:30 AM
    Do you realize how self contradictory your analysis is? They aren't be removed permanently but they will go back to killing and burning until they are removed permanently and in the meantime Trump wants to build a resort? For who? Suicidal tourists?
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:40 AM
    Its not a great airplane, it's a dog. The only thing great about it are the advanced avionics inside of it. This is what happens when Congress builds an aircraft.
    1 replies | 65 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:22 AM
    Apparently a great airplane that can't stand the cold? And our main adversary (for some stupid reason) again is Russia which is infamous for cold weather.
    1 replies | 65 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:14 AM
    Fixed it for you. https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:59 AM
    :rolleyes: Okay. So I guess your an equal opportunity lover of fascism. Everybody is innocent if they're right wing (all the January 6th prisoners) and must all be guilty if a right winger imprisons them. Whatever dude. And I know it's a waste of time arguing with you because you have zero honesty or credibility. But for anyone else who might read this, even the El Salvadorian government knows that innocents are getting swept up in the dragnet. People are getting arrested on nothing but anonymous phone calls. You've never heard of SWATTING in the U.S.? This is many times worse. https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-08-27/el-salvador-the-hell-of-the-innocent-sent-to-prison-on-an-anonymous-phone-call.html
    25 replies | 562 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:51 AM
    Rand Paul calls out Trump for his Gaza takeover plan. Ron Paul > Rand Paul >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5128041-rand-paul-trump-gaza/ Rand Paul knocks Trump Gaza takeover plan: ‘I thought we voted for America First’ by Alexander Bolton - 02/05/25 11:26 AM ET
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Brian4Liberty again.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 06:44 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRQ9mbwSObs
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 06:44 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ5uKAyd4lg
    8 replies | 431 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 06:43 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqJdvNsKbsU
    60 replies | 6588 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 03:45 PM
    https://x.com/reason/status/1886565167019766049 1886565167019766049
    0 replies | 56 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 03:43 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBHZfjAZAxU
    0 replies | 83 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 03:42 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzM6Wlm6p-s
    3 replies | 96 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 03:41 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svktRVVNJO8
    74 replies | 1559 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 03:41 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svktRVVNJO8
    129 replies | 57160 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 03:39 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svktRVVNJO8
    68 replies | 1950 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 03:34 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_P9avZ6Omzo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdw31c6HPCI
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
More Activity

26 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    I thought you were banned
  2. View Conversation
    Thanks for your help in the past Bobby.

    I think you'll fit in better as a member than a mod.
  3. Tom Woods is Spam???
  4. View Conversation
    Hey man, what's w/ the forum spam?

    Title: Article: Tom Woods: How to Make History for Ron Paul
  5. View Conversation
    Hey Bobby!

    Why use the drudgetw referrer link instead of a direct link to politico?
  6. View Conversation
    hxxp://michellemalkin.com/2011/02/21/happy-presidents-day-comment-registration-is-open/

    Last time she trashed us (over Kokesh) there was much moaning that "we" didn't have people registered there to counter the points they put out.

    Pass it on to grown ups.
  7. View Conversation
    Thanks for that article. I enjoyed it.
  8. View Conversation
    Hi bobby,

    I'd like to buy Rothbard's book from you. What is your mailing address and I'll send the $10

    yum
  9. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
  10. View Conversation
    As is the case with any online situation, opinions change over time (ideally). I have no idea why that thread was resurrected, but I'm glad it was so I could state my change of opinion.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 26
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
About bobbyw24

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
14,097
Posts Per Day
2.22
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
26
Most Recent Message
02-18-2013 11:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
06-26-2014 10:08 AM
Join Date
09-10-2007
Referrals
2
Home Page
http://www.twitter.com/AbolishTheFed

121 Friends

  1. Acala Acala is offline

    Member

    Acala
  2. Adam Kokesh Adam Kokesh is offline

    Member

    Adam Kokesh
  3. AlexanderSnitker AlexanderSnitker is offline

    New Member

    AlexanderSnitker
  4. AlexMerced AlexMerced is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via AIM to AlexMerced
    • Send a message via Yahoo to AlexMerced
    AlexMerced
  5. American Nationalist
  6. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  7. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  8. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
  9. Aratus Aratus is offline

    Member

    Aratus
  10. aravoth aravoth is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to aravoth
    aravoth
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 121
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
No results to display...

05-12-2022


02-10-2019