bobbyw24
Banned

Point of order - Snowden did not defect to Russia. Obama trapped him there.

Unfortunately this is one thing Ron is wrong about. Everything the government does is the result of politics. If you want to change government policy, you have to use the political process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNpiUY00PmI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNpiUY00PmI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNpiUY00PmI

You seriously lack critical thinking skills if this is what you believe. And you're not pro-freedom. You must like big government and want more. What are you even doing here?

There's also Tim Scott and Vivek Whatshisname. Scott's bad on Ukraine. I vaguely recall Vivek's bad on something. (I just can't stand Nikki Haley so I won't even count her).

Okay. That prompted to look this up on YT. Thoughts: 1) Other people had called the sheriff about the firecrackers and the sheriff's office didn't do anything. There is a San Clemente ordinance against fireworks within city limits.

So....your argument is that it's a made up story because nobody picks mushrooms (I do) and nobody is ever 13 years of age? Ummm....okay.

1663930838440988677 So....this happened in Australia. When guns are banned bad people will still find a way to do bad things. But....a battle axe? Conania the barbarian?

Misgendering her rapist is a hate crime.

Yeah. Reminds me of the "electability" trope Fox threw at Ron Paul in 2008. While it didn't help in that election cycle, Ron Paul eventually made it safe for Republicans to be anti-war again. Maybe RKJ Jr's impact will be felt years later if not now. One can only hope.

I'm not even going to say it but...

A) Nobody brought up your favorite candidate. B) You analogy doesn't hold water. If I'm a single issue voter than each time someone violates my single issue I'm going to be against it. And I can have more than one single issue. So, I'm against biometric chipping. Somebody supports that I'm not going to vote for him. Funding global initiatives? That's kind of vague. Is your favorite candidate against funding the U.N.? (I haven't heard him say that). In 2008 my "single issues" were 1) you had to be against the Iraq war and preferably from the beginning 2) you had to be against the unPatriot Act 3) you had to be against the Department of Homeland inSecurity. Was I wrong for ruling out any candidate that failed on any one of those 3 issues? I don't think so. You're free to disagree. Now I was a democrat up until 2008. I liked Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul. Both hit all 3 of my "single issues." What tipped the scale to Ron Paul? Dennis Kucinich was antigun. By that time I was convinced that 9/11 was an inside job. So I thought to myself "If I can't trust the government to not kill innocent Americans, how can I trust it to disarm Americans? And...I have a problem with a politician who can't see that." I STILL like Dennis Kucinich! If Ron had not been running in the primary I would have voted for Dennis. If Dennis had somehow want the Democratic nomination I would have voted for him over McCain in the general election. In 2020 I voted for Democrat Tulsi Gabbard in the primary. Trump had no (real) competition. We'll see how this election cycle plays out.

If being against the constitution is a crime, Fetterman can now plead the "diminished capacity" defense.

Let me rephrase. It's a non-existent argument. It's one thing to say "person A had a particular stock in his own portfolio and didn't know it." It's another thing to say "Person B's cousin person C had a particular stock in his portfolio and didn't know it." Person B can in no way be held accountable for what person C has in his portfolio. Imagine in Jerry Farwell was found to have stock in Penthouse and Hustler. Most people would have a problem with that. But NOBODY would take issue with Jerry Farwell's cousin that had publicly attacked Farwell for being a moralist had Penthouse and Hustler stock.

Ummmm....that's the weakest Trump defense I've ever seen. People have no control over what stock family members own. Some of RFK Jr's family have even come out against his run for president.

I'm not even sure what your point is. Nothing I said was unbiblical. But...whatever. Edit: And I would bet a bitcoin I know the Bible better than you.

Unless you're showering anywhere near the Ganges river. I remember seeing this video years ago when it first happened. It's sad but also very meme worth. "Dilution is the solution of pollution." (At 6:00 in)

:rolleyes:

His position is imminently logical. So logical that in Star Trek it confounded a Vulcan. And it should resonate with democrats, especially when juxtaposed with the memory of the Iraq war. Interestingly enough a slight majority of Democrats supported the Iraq invasion, but most have amnesia about their support. https://news.gallup.com/poll/24760/republicans-democrats-disagree-iraq-war-support-troops.aspx https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poll-dems-more-likely-to-forget-supporting-the-iraq-war

Literal David vs Goliath.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to acptulsa again.

Yet another reason for Operation Warpspeed dannno.

I find it interesting that Ron himself gives Thomas cover here. I disagree, because I think the bill is indeed that bad. And the idea of Thomas going along with a deal is nauseating. I tend to be in the camp of "what good is having power if you don't use it for the cause?"

Wrong answer. If money wasn't coming out of my pocket before, and it is now, then it's a tax hike. There is no other description that fits. Try all of the mental gymnastics you want, but DeSantis raised taxes on millions of Floridians because they weren't paying taxes previously and now they are due to his signature. Nice try.

meh I disagree with him, but interestingly Ron Paul actaully gave Thomas cover here: (16 minute mark) -- https://rumble.com/v2qynla-escalation-lindsey-graham-applauds-dead-russians-as-drones-hit-moscow.html