Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 07:11 AM
    I'm sure if Rand had been on the Supreme Court he would have voted to strike down Chevron Deference. And if this law had been passed sooner the Court wouldn't have NEEDED to strike down Chevron Deference. So Rand is doing exactly what it seems you're saying needs to be done. And Court decisions can be reversed. The left is now kicking itself for not codifying Roe v Wade with federal legislation when Obama was president and they had the house and a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. The republicans don't have that 2/3rds majority so this may be tilting at windmills, but if the Dems are forced to vote to protect bureaucracy that is also a win.
    10 replies | 288 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:24 PM
    Well..considering that the pistol brace ban didn't not get passed after the ATF rule got struck down by the courts it seems the answer is no. The administrative state clown car drives much faster. https://www.cato.org/cato-handbook-policymakers/cato-handbook-policymakers-9th-edition-2022/reining-administrative-state#restore-popular-accountability-domestic-policymaking Agencies regulate through a combination of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions by issuing rules with the force of law, policing those rules, and adjudicating their enforcement. In 2021, for example, the Biden administration issued 3,257 regulations with the force and effect of law, whereas Congress passed 81 laws during that time. The last available year for comprehensive data about administrative adjudications is 2013, when the five busiest agencies convened 1,351,342 executive branch tribunals; that same year, there were 57,777 total cases (civil and criminal) filed in the U.S. district and appellate courts.
    10 replies | 288 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:32 PM
    Ron Paul: The Afghan people did nothing to deserve another war. The Taliban, of course, is closely tied to bin Laden and the al Qaeda, but so are the Pakistanis and the Saudis. Even the United States was a supporter of the Taliban's rise to power. How are you enjoying that copium?
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:16 PM
    You're honesty quotient is low. And I fully explained my position. You either lack the reading comprehenion to understand it or you lack the honesty to admit it. Most people here reject the idea that the war in Afghanistan was somehow justified based on the theory that all the CIA did was merely help the mujahadeen back in the 1980s and then Al Qaeda attacked America because they hate us for our freedom. Even though Ron Paul voted for authorization military action to take out Al Qaeda, as early as November 2001 he said: The Afghan people did nothing to deserve another war. The Taliban, of course, is closely tied to bin Laden and the al Qaeda, but so are the Pakistanis and the Saudis. Even the United States was a supporter of the Taliban's rise to power.
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:12 PM
    Oh, and your claim that "noone in the Arab world seriously denounces Hamas" is provably false. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/palestinian-president-blames-hamas-continuing-war-gaza-2024-07-13/ Palestinian president blames Hamas for continuing war in Gaza By Reuters July 13, 20242:47 PM CDTUpdated 7 months ago RAMALLAH, July 13 (Reuters) - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said Israel and the United States were responsible for an attack that killed dozens in the Gaza Strip on Saturday, but the Western-backed leader also blamed Hamas for the continuing war in Gaza. His comments signal rising tension between Abbas's Fatah faction and the Islamist Hamas group, which accused the Palestinian president of taking Israel's side.
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:07 PM
    Have you been drinking with Kamala Harris? Because ^that is some serious word salad.
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:05 PM
    Ron Paul clearly says ^here that he didn't come out and say everthing he thought for political reasons. Here at 1:30 in Ron Paul says "Building 7 going down...that raises a lot of questions." So contrary to your false assertion he certainly entertained conspiracy theories about 9/11. But that's a straw man argument. I didn't say "Ron Paul believes 9/11 was not done by Al Qaeda" I said "A lot of people here do not believe 9/11 was done by Al Qaeda." So please keep your argument honest. The issue is did Snowball's "a-okay" to your post about 3,000 Americans being killed by Al Qaeda mean he was okay with 3,000 Americans being killed, or was he really saying "Whatever you say dude" to your claim that Al Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans? You and I both know it's most likely the latter and not the former. You asserted the position was the CIA only helped the mujahadeen fight the Soviets. That's different from the CIA helping Al Qaeda carry out 9/11. So now that you're arguing the honest position here is my response. If the CIA helped Al Qaeda, a group of non Afghan terrorists who simply used Afghanistan as a base, carry out 9/11, then does that justify killing a bunch of Afghanis especially considering that we KNEW Osama Bin Laden was no longer in Afghanistan BEFORE we invaded? Osama Bin Laden likely escaped Afghanistan in November 2001. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunduz_airlift) Hamas consists of about 4,000 people. Israel killed about 40,000+ Palestinians. Do the math.
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:46 AM
    So do you think Congress would have passed the pistol brace ban?
    10 replies | 288 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:48 AM
    And to break this down for you Swordsmyth: 1) Not everybody here believes Al Qaida had anything to do with 9/11. You've been around enough to know the various conspiracy theories that exist on that. 2) If Al Qaida did do 9/11, the CIA involvement is much more than just that they "promoted the mujahadeen against the Soviets." At the very least the CIA helped the 9/11 terrorists into the U.S. 3) If the CIA had operational control of Al Qaeda throughout the attack, as Benjamen Netanyahu seems to have had operational control over Hamas throughout October 7, then it's not justified to kill Muslims, even in Afghanistan who were not part of Al Qaeda or the Taliban, when we're not actually going after the people really responsibile. (The CIA).
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:57 AM
    You're either being dishonest over very stupid. The "A-OK" wasn't "A-OK" to 3,000 Americans being killed! It was "A-OK" as in "I know you're full of shyt but I'm not going to argue with you!"
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 09:16 PM
    1888298425814290817 https://x.com/BasedMikeLee/status/1888298425814290817
    4 replies | 138 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 09:04 PM
    Yeah when I want to research a specific political topic, RPF is one of the first places I come to. There is a ton of excellent information buried in these discussions. It's also why I post the same video in multiple threads of the same topic... kind of like leaving bread crumbs for the future.
    8 replies | 1020 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    1 replies | 86 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 06:18 PM
    It's taking power back from the bureauracy and requiring a vote by congress. Bureauracts don't have to get re-elected. Congress does. The current standard is that the bureauracrats have to put up their new rules for public comment which is supposed to mean something but really doesn't.
    10 replies | 288 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 06:13 PM
    And this is why this forum is still relevent. r3volutionary memory. Good find Anti Federalist and good bump Matt.
    8 replies | 1020 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 05:11 PM
    :rolleyes: So now you're claiming Ron Paul hates America? Because that's exactly what you're implying. Yes, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. And the PLO had nothing to do with October 7th. They HATE Hamas. And yet Israel used October 7th as justification for land confiscation and attacks in the West Bank which is run by the PLO. That's ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENT than the U.S. using 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq. Oh? You say that Palestinians in the West Bank cheered October 7th? Well there were Iraqis that cheered 9/11 too. But the Iraqi government did not PARTICIAPATE in 9/11 and yet Iraqi civilians suffered from U.S. agression in the aftermath. Edit: And the fact that you conflate people not supporting Trump's plan, which you yourself have had to admit at least twice now that YOU don't support, and people not supporting the Netanyahu government with somehow people hating America means you must think Netanyahu = America. You're exposing yourself.
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 05:05 PM
    God's promises are conditional. Solomon broke the covenant so God took 10 of the tribes away from the Davidic line and created the Northern Kingdom known as Israel also known as Samaria. See: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Kings%2011%3A26-12%3A33&version=NIV Also see: 1 Kings 16:29 In the thirty-eighth year of Asa king of Judah, Ahab son of Omri became king of Israel, and he reigned in Samaria over Israel twenty-two years. And yes, Ahab was one of the most wicked kings Israel ever had. But Elijah was the prophet of Samaria sent to pronounce judgment on Ahab and kill the prophets of Ba'al. Also those who were cut off because of unbelief, according to the God were no longer considered Hebrews or part of the covenant. I gave you chapter and verse explaining how people could be cut off. You're simply ignoring the Bible. More on how God made his covenant conditional:
    108 replies | 1535 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:26 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    8 replies | 1020 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:26 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    53 replies | 5712 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:25 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    25 replies | 2092 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:24 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    12 replies | 717 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:23 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    9 replies | 1035 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:23 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    11 replies | 834 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:22 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    1 replies | 418 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:21 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    21 replies | 1611 view(s)
  • Matt Collins's Avatar
    02-08-2025, 04:20 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFikB4unZgo
    68 replies | 4747 view(s)
More Activity

26 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    I thought you were banned
  2. View Conversation
    Thanks for your help in the past Bobby.

    I think you'll fit in better as a member than a mod.
  3. Tom Woods is Spam???
  4. View Conversation
    Hey man, what's w/ the forum spam?

    Title: Article: Tom Woods: How to Make History for Ron Paul
  5. View Conversation
    Hey Bobby!

    Why use the drudgetw referrer link instead of a direct link to politico?
  6. View Conversation
    hxxp://michellemalkin.com/2011/02/21/happy-presidents-day-comment-registration-is-open/

    Last time she trashed us (over Kokesh) there was much moaning that "we" didn't have people registered there to counter the points they put out.

    Pass it on to grown ups.
  7. View Conversation
    Thanks for that article. I enjoyed it.
  8. View Conversation
    Hi bobby,

    I'd like to buy Rothbard's book from you. What is your mailing address and I'll send the $10

    yum
  9. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
  10. View Conversation
    As is the case with any online situation, opinions change over time (ideally). I have no idea why that thread was resurrected, but I'm glad it was so I could state my change of opinion.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 26
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
About bobbyw24

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
14,097
Posts Per Day
2.22
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
26
Most Recent Message
02-18-2013 11:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
06-26-2014 10:08 AM
Join Date
09-10-2007
Referrals
2
Home Page
http://www.twitter.com/AbolishTheFed

121 Friends

  1. Acala Acala is offline

    Member

    Acala
  2. Adam Kokesh Adam Kokesh is offline

    Member

    Adam Kokesh
  3. AlexanderSnitker AlexanderSnitker is offline

    New Member

    AlexanderSnitker
  4. AlexMerced AlexMerced is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via AIM to AlexMerced
    • Send a message via Yahoo to AlexMerced
    AlexMerced
  5. American Nationalist
  6. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  7. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  8. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
  9. Aratus Aratus is offline

    Member

    Aratus
  10. aravoth aravoth is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to aravoth
    aravoth
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 121
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
No results to display...

05-12-2022


02-10-2019