Yesterday, 07:11 PM
It's just not that simple. Too many libertarians go in for the "litmus test" approach to "testing libertarian orthodoxy" and if somebody "fails the litmus test" by... talking to "the wrong people", then they're clearly not libertarian. Milei met Bill Clinton after the election and a lot of people tried to make a big hoopla about it, as though this somehow indicates that Milei agrees with Clinton or his policies. But it's pretty simple to understand why Milei met him. It was a mutually beneficial meeting because Clinton is getting beaten up post-Epstein, and I'm willing to guess he extended the invitation, not the other way around, to remind people he was once a President, and important. Milei's motives for accepting the meeting are similar -- it bolsters his "presidential image" back home, and it's also important to remember that the world economy experienced a global economic boom during the 1990's (not due to Clinton, but political figures always get credit for the good times, no matter how little credit they deserve), and so meeting with Clinton is a way of saying to Argentinians back home, "I'm bringing back the good times." Does it make rational sense? Of course not, but that's not how the mind of the masses works. It moves on heart-thinking, not head-thinking.
Even though it's quite false, the Ukrainians have captured the status of sympathetic heroes (TPTB have been very adept at painting them in a sympathetic light). As already mentioned, Milei is president of Argentina not President of the US global empire... so his "support" of Ukraine is purely symbolic. Given that Ukraine has sympathetic status, it's simply makes no sense for Milei to die on the hill of not meeting Zelensky. Privately, Milei might have nothing but contempt for Zelensky/Ukraine... he might understand all the geopolitics involved. But no matter what, he doesn't benefit from trying to "end the war in Ukraine"... it's not his fight. It's our fight but only because our corrupt DC Establishment keeps sticking us up for another $100 billion and shipping it off to Ukraine. But that's not Milei's problem, that's our problem. So the "Ukraine litmus test" makes no sense when applied to Milei.
Connect With Us