Tab Content
  • HitoKichi's Avatar
    Today, 04:57 PM
    Keemstar And “Sir” Tony Ray: Internet Mob Mentality On Saturday a post titled “Keemstar’s Drama Alert makes a 62 year old man cry” hit the front page of Reddit. Keemstar is a YouTube celebrity, who hosts a show called “Drama Alert.” The show centers on Keemstar talking about the personal lives and drama of YouTube celebrities. Recently, Drama Alert’s popularity exploded, with their recent exposure on pedophiles in the YouTube Minecraft community, specifically LionMaker.This video, created by Scarce, told a disturbing story. On Saturday, Keemstar had uploaded a video called “Runecape Sex Offender Returns” that a man called John Phillips, a convicted pedophile who used Runescape to try to have sex with teenagers online, had been released from jail and was now streaming on Twitch, a popular video streaming service.Turns out that the man Keemstar was talking about was still in jail, and the man streaming was someone else entirely. ‘Sir” Tony Ray is a 62 year old man who does nothing but stream Runescape. He has been streaming for 12 hours a day, for about a month. He would regularly interact with the few viewers he had, and would just spend time enjoying the game.The internet went insane, grabbing every pitchfork and racial epithet they could find, and headed straight for this guy’s stream. No way are we going to let this pedophile stick around! They bombarded him with hate on his Twitch stream, his Twitter, and his YouTube page. Eventually Drama Alert realized that they had made a mistake and took down the wrongful video, and issued an apology.Tony, after dealing with all this hate, starts to break down on stream. He says, while crying: “Now everyone in the world knows my real name is Tony Ray Winchester, I’m 62, I’m retired, I haven’t got my first social security check yet, but I’ll get it soon… I’m not going to let someone run me off… but you guys know I’m a good guy now, so I’m going to go take a break.” You May Like The People Behind the Pixels
    2 replies | 34 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 03:27 PM
    Why is that safe to say? What leads you to that figure? It seems very high to me. My estimate would be more between 1% and 0.1%. But, I would be very willing to change my mind on this estimate based on reality and evidence. So if you have any....... I'm all ears!
    133 replies | 2089 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 03:15 PM
    But what's so bad about hypocrisy? Does it really matter if the system is "hypocritical" in some way? Do we care about that? If so, why? Well, again I don't know that we should necessarily care about hypocrisy (but I could be convinced!). I don't want to be hypocritical (I don't think. Depending what that means), but I don't necessarily care if other people are being hypocritical. Let's say that all that matters is results. Just hypothetically. What result would we be trying to optimize for here? I think a sensible thing to optimize for would be "fewest number of innocent people killed per decade." So, what kind of system would minimize the innocent-person-killings (IPK)? I think an argument could be made that brutal, public executions of murderers would be that optimized system we're looking for (or would be looking for, were we trying to optimize for that variable, IPK, discussed above). I think it would work pretty well. If we were to test out various systems in a parallel experiment on similar populations over a hundred year period, I think chances are good that a brutal punishment system would come out on top or near the top. Eliminating IPK is a goal that we're very far away from. So minimizing it seems like a worthy interim goal. If we could bring it down from 150,000 per decade to 75,000, that would be massive improvement! We cut in half! That is not morally perfect, but I think that would still be a worthwhile accomplishment. Let's say we got it down to 10,000. Wow! If 90% of those 10,000 innocents killed had been killed by the State in erroneous executions (or misguided: witches, drug dealers, etc.), that's too bad, but that still would be a massive improvement in IPK. Then maybe at that point it makes sense to hone in on the 9,000 IPKs done at the hands of the State and whittle that number down, whereas previously maybe it made more sense to focus on the much larger number of IPKs done by private criminals. If what we actually care about is minimizing IPK, then we should do whatever sequence of actions will bring down that number as rapidly and as permanently as possible.
    133 replies | 2089 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 01:59 PM
    Yeah, I think you did the same Google search I already did. :D The description of his work didn't seem familiar, though. I don't think it was him. Upon a little further searching, maybe it is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_G._Pollard I'm thinking of. Anyway, does Quantum Reality cover pilot wave theory and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_Broglie? Is it one of the eight?
    54 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 01:55 PM
    I am very much in favor of this reform. I love it. No lawyers in the courtroom (unless a party to the dispute). No one can ever be a judge who has ever done any legal work for a fee. On penalty of death. ;)
    133 replies | 2089 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 01:19 PM
    Right, I know. Yeah, there's no reason the whole thing should be so expensive. One of the advantages of execution should be that society doesn't have to pay for the killer's upkeep for the rest of his life and thus avoids wasting resources. Gotcha. Now I understand. It isn't just a "what if they wrongfully execute someone?" problem, it's a centralization vs. decentralization problem. And I, like Occam and like you, am definitely going to come out on the side of decentralization. If nothing else, for the unrelated practical strategic benefits: decentralization in and of itself will make it easier to accomplish the broad liberty agenda, even if decentralization on a particular issue does nothing to further libertarian goals, or even contradicts them.
    133 replies | 2089 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 10:00 AM
    North Korea is the object of a long(-ish; couple decades) term vilification campaign. The media has been pumping out the anti-Nork propaganda for years now. Whenever you hear "North Korea has nuclear weapons, and is ruled by an insane, crazy, unhinged dictator" the obvious, unavoidable subtext is: "And it would be good if we or someone were to put a stop to that." When you call someone Hitler, you're making it OK to kill/war against that person. Because it's always OK to kill Hitler. Right? So, to answer your question: Everyone. So if we do have a war against the Norks, most Americans will be basically fine with that. They'll be supportive. It will be popular. I just don't predict that happening at this time.
    25 replies | 639 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 09:39 AM
    I know professional physicists. Just had one over to dinner last week. Everybody likes philosophizing! Now should one keep it separate from one's scientific work? Probably (at least somewhat). But I think most are aware of the Many Worlds story (I say story, not theory, because it's not a theory until you can disprove it) and many subscribe to it. And, as you say (and as I said) it is even more popular and influential out among the people at large. For the past decade it has been gradually becoming an important part of our culture, and an unfortunate, corrosive one in my opinion. A grand new element in the West's secular religion, joining nature-worship, Freudian-Kinseyanism, egalitarianism, and all the other wonderful tenets we've come to know and love. ;) Sounds really good! You might know, then: who was the theologian-physicist I was thinking of who proposed the "God decides" explanation? I don't recall his name. Anyway, the pilot-wave theory is getting some new attention lately, thanks to NASA's EM drive. One explanation the researchers proposed involves the pilot-wave theory. Interesting stuff!
    54 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 09:16 AM
    Do they really have such an abysmal record? I'm not so sure. They might. I just don't know. How many innocent people have states in the USA executed over the past couple hundred years? And then how many innocent people have mobs killed in the same time-frame and geographical area? What's the percentages? Philosophically, people are people. Right? Whether they've organized themselves in one way, or another. So your limited objection to certain executions seems to basically be procedural. You want people to use the best possible procedures in order to ensure those deserving death receive it, and the undeserving do not. Is that right?
    133 replies | 2089 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 08:56 AM
    Exactly. I mean, we've gotta choose our cause celebres carefully. Look at Black Lives Matter: every hero they pick turns out to invariably be a horrible criminal gangbanger who, any normal person would look at and say, probably totally deserved to get shot! We don't want to be Black Lives Matter. This guy was a criminal scum. I have only so much sympathy to go around. The general populace has even less. Let it go. Executing murderers is not a problem high on the to-do list of important things to solve so that our country isn't destroyed.
    133 replies | 2089 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    54 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 08:36 AM
    Well, that would be nice. But, I have a little bit different view. Call me romantic, but as I study and look at history, most of the advancements made, most of the steps forward for the European Mind have come from single individual geniuses. The story of history, at least all the edifying parts, is not the story of the masses, it is the story of Geniuses. You need not despair at the impossible task of energizing 50 million people. That goal is insurmountable, but it's also not required. All it ever takes is one. Just one Voltaire. The one to call to action is yourself. I, for example, have built a financial institution that will enable us to use gold as money. Michael Maresco rode a bicycle across the country. AF won northern NH for Ron Paul by buying newspaper ad space. Bill Greene went through the lengthy process of becoming a part of the Electoral College and cast his vote for Ron Paul. Lew Rockwell founded the Mises Institute and has been running it for the past 35 years. Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug) is building us a new, free internet; he's been working on it since 2002. Pericles wrote a book -- that takes a lot of effort. The point is: these men are working hard, over long periods of time. It takes a sustained focus and effort to accomplish anything. It takes a long time. Libertarianism and Conservatism are K-Selected philosophies. We are K-Selected. So how are we going to win? By being K-Selected! The way to win is to play to your strengths. Push your advantage. Be true to your nature. And that means, in case you're not familiar with r/K theory: thinking long term. Working long term. Not being impatient. Fighting the war, not the battles. I always try to be helpful, or at least supportive, when anyone has a Project, when anyone's actually trying to do something. So, whatever your ideas are/were, give the thread a bump and if I see it I'll try to help.
    42 replies | 685 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 07:43 AM
    What makes it happen "more than once"? Oh: the Multiverse theory. The same magical, non-disprovable metaphysical framework that makes everything happen more than once. No profound Revelation there. Nay, it is exactly what you were saying earlier: We are here, therefore things are going to be suited for life. The odds of all conditions being perfectly tuned and life having arisen in a Universe being observed is 100%. Because it's being observed. Or, as you pithily put it: "Given we exist, what is the probability that at some point we would question our origin?" The Anthropic Principle is a true principle. Using it as a proof for one's Creation Story -- whatever that story may be -- is also a gross misapplication of the principle, in my opinion. Used in that manner, it is basically a way of ignoring the question. It is a way of defining away impossibility by stipulation. It is a way of "refuting" glaring holes and huge problems in the story you've concocted via, well, waving your hand. Dismissively skeptical: "Your story is wildly improbable to the point of complete unbelievability! There's no way it happened that way."
    54 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 07:17 AM
    OK, thank you for the accuracy correction. That's what one gets when writing without bothering to look things up. I'm just happy there's still someone here (out of the three people or whatever who read the post) smart enough to notice and willing to correct the error! I would have to push back slightly on this point, though: If that doesn't count as dominant, I don't know what does. It clearly has strong mind share among professional physicists, as well as (and I would say even more-so) among the general laymen who have heard of it. Let us call it the "currently ascendant story."
    54 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Today, 07:08 AM
    No Big Crunch = No infinitely yo-yo-ing Universe = Not Enough Time (not even close).
    54 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:20 PM
    Right. And yet, there was -- and hopefully still is! -- a thread tying us all together. In our particular case, it was the great project of Murray Rothbard, as implemented by the hard work and tireless integrity of Lew Rockwell and Ron Paul, that binds us. Murray's great integrating vision was able to see the wholesome or worthwhile elements in a panoply of American traditions, movements, and intellectual Giants, and then his genius was able to stitch them into a system that could have great appeal to them all, to all these seemingly unrelated groups. Furthermore -- and this is where his genius goes beyond sheer inventive cleverness and reaches that rare height of the universal -- Murray's final creation in no way feels like a patchwork quilt, but like Michealangelo's Sistene Chapel, a unified and coherent whole, much greater that the sum of its parts. But without the parts, already existing, already active and alive, it wouldn't have worked. Movements, especially political movements, cannot simply be created whole cloth out of nothing. They grow and morph out of existing movements. So, you need to figure out: what is your John Birch Society? Who was your Lebanese Mencken, your Jefferson, your Spooner? Where is your Young Americans for Freedom to proselyte in, your National Review to write in (and feud with), your Ayn Rand to love (and laugh at)? These are the kinds of questions you must answer if you are to discover whether it is possible to construct a Libertarian Movement in Lebanon. And again, I wish you the best in doing so.
    42 replies | 685 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:12 PM
    My guess is that it will be no big deal, actually. Just theater.
    25 replies | 639 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:43 PM
    No problem! I also would suggest dumbing down any message you want to present. A lot. Really, really a lot. The average IQ of your country is about 80. Average. None of these people can even understand the pronunciation of the word "libertarian," much less why they may want to pronounce it. I don't even know why they would. They probably wouldn't! So actually, I would suggest one of two possible paths (not that you can't do both... if you have unlimited time and resources): either radically dumb the message down, or radically intellectually juice the message up. This second option is that you just ignore all the people in your country who are completely incapable of understanding libertarianism (as well as being incapable of pronouncing the word, which is going to be just downright annoying for you) and focus on the upper-class elites, who are capable. Option One: Make Lebanese libertarianism synonymous with something really popular to the plebes in Lebanon. In your case, possibilities would be: Islam, and.... OK, just Islam. That's pretty much the only horse you've got. So hitch 'er up! Option Two: Make Lebanese libertarianism extremely exclusive and high-level stuff that the elite and only the elite will be attracted to, or even have the equipment to understand. By refusing to compromise, water down, or even simplify, you will gain a cachet of exclusivity. By utterly refusing to attempt in the slightest to seem attractive to, or even palatable to, or even non-horrifying to, or even comprehensible to the idiotic masses, you will draw at least some curiosity from one group: powerful, intelligent, contrarian/independent young men in wealthy families with high IQs. If your ideas are as sensational as you think, this group will then adopt them. And, turns out.... that's the only group you need! True story.
    42 replies | 685 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:48 PM
    No insult. If you want to not lose, you have to not think like a loser. Did I say you are a loser? No. Are you, in fact, going to be a loser? That is for you to decide.
    42 replies | 685 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:55 AM
    Step One: Start thinking like a Winner: Corollary: Stop thinking like a Loser. All the best!
    42 replies | 685 view(s)
  • HitoKichi's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:51 AM
    0 replies | 80 view(s)
  • HitoKichi's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:41 AM
    https://archive.org/details/fav-w_dewils0n This might be helpful for coming up with good arguments
    42 replies | 685 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:14 AM
    There is, however, more than one interpretation of the practical (real) data. The big question is: when an uncertainty resolves (a quantum state collapses), what decides which way it resolves? What decides whether the electron goes left or right? Who decides whether the cat lives or dies? One answer is the now-standard, vanilla Copenhagen answer currently ascendant story: both happen. "We haven't found any causal factor that would make that choice one way or the other, so both must happen! The universe splits (actually, duplicates)." A quite extreme measure to take to solve the problem! So you get an extremely large number of parallel time tracks (aka "the Multiverse"). A second answer, just as reasonable and coherent actually, and advocated by at least one great quantum physicist, is that God decides. This answer was.... not generally popular. So, instead of accepting the possibility of a cause we have not (yet) observed, we end up with a universe that's having infinite babies. Interesting. The first answer just fits more satisfyingly to the modern Zeitgeist. After all, it makes humans completely impotent and freedom and free choice utterly meaningless, and that is always a plus, believe me. Anything that makes you a victim with no control over your environment is very appealing to the r-selected mind. The Multiverse just happens! You may think you can choose excellence and beauty and self-improvement, but actually even if you do there's another copy of you that will choose the opposite. Ha, ha, loser!
    54 replies | 1261 view(s)
  • helmuth_hubener's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:44 AM
    You use a Midas Liquid Gold Card. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?509813-The-Return-of-Sound-Money This is a card which you can use anywhere, to pay for anything, backed 100% by gold. Believe me, I know what you mean. I am not one of those.
    162 replies | 2378 view(s)
  • HitoKichi's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:57 AM
    By Matt Agorist - April 21, 2017 On Thursday, John Podesta took to Twitter to post a link to a Washinton Post piece written by James Alefantis, the owner of the now famous Comet Ping Pong Pizzeria in Washington, D.C. In his Tweet, Podesta made the tasteless and terrible joke, while downplaying actual concern about the pedophilia and child trafficking that currently plagues the planet. Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/john-podesta-just-tweeted-terrible-joke-pizza-internet-tore-new-one/#cRZMpRhyvA1ZmTzh.99
    1 replies | 183 view(s)
  • HitoKichi's Avatar
    04-23-2017, 06:16 PM
    ScanlationFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Part of a series on Anime and manga
    30 replies | 747 view(s)
More Activity
About Xenliad

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed state:
North Dakota
Displayed country:
USA
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
3
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
633
Posts Per Day
0.31
General Information
Last Activity
Today 05:01 PM
Join Date
10-13-2011
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. helmuth_hubener helmuth_hubener is offline

    Member

    helmuth_hubener
  2. HitoKichi HitoKichi is offline

    Member

    HitoKichi
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2
No results to display...
No results to display...

03-25-2017


03-23-2017


02-21-2017


01-28-2017


11-25-2016


11-15-2016


10-16-2016