Yesterday, 05:53 PM
Come on, Danno, you can't seriously believe this. Political donations are used in several ways, but one of the most expensive ways is to buy media ads. So, while the media is making their political donations to Hillary on the books, they are giving HUGE sums of money to Donald free of charge in the way of airtime and print. They did it all through the primary to boost him. Even Podesta said as much in one of the Wikileaks docs.
In fact, if the media had to declare the amount of "money" that they donated to Trump's campaign, they'd be listed as the biggest special interest group in the country! They ensured he was the GOP nominee to split/damage the party to make sure Hillary would have a sure path.
Now, I'm not sure if Trump was a plant, or if he's just their useful idiot. At times, it seems like a little of both. Whenever some new damaging info on Hillary comes out, he's always there to redirect the public's attention. He's certainly not a liberty candidate and he's most definitely part of the establishment that craves power above all else. He's played that game his entire life. Now, that doesn't mean he's playing for the GOP establishment or the DEM establishment, but we should all know that the D and R don't really matter anymore. They are one. And Trump is part of them.
Finally, this guy is playing a part and will say exactly what he thinks you want to hear. Do you really think he cares about the Constitution in any way? Do you really think he's had a revelation on private property rights, abortion, foreign interventions, trade, universal health care, or any other major issue?! Because if so, it has only been since he began eyeing the Presidency using the Republican party. If you're falling for his con because of his current rhetoric instead of evidence, then we can't help you. While his rhetoric on some things may be better than Hillary, they will BOTH turn their backs on their rhetoric in a heartbeat if it suits their current interests.
Sorry to burst your hope bubble, but this election is lost. And it was lost as soon as people starting falling for the con job. You're asking for "convincing evidence" but you can't allow yourself to objectively perceive this evidence. People believe what they want to believe.