Tab Content
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 06:27 PM
    If they came here those same supporters would be crucified for working together to get Rand's stuff passed by the usual suspects.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 05:50 PM
    Not an insult, rather statement of fact based on your continued 2.5 year campaign of violating NAP against me. You undermined my past efforts to do grass roots work for Rand in 2015 offline by using this forum and advocating others offline to come here to do the same. The behavior was so out of hand no one was willing to post in an openly hostile environment with people so willing to tarnish reputations with lies. This all happened regardless that I told both you and the ring leader that started this that Rand was still my first choice and that I was publicly promoting Rand using this forum for grass roots with my handle. So not only did you damage my reputation with your lies in forum for some laughs you did so at the expense of Rand Paul outside these forums. I am not the only one your little club drove out the forum there are many other long time posters that no longer use the forums or post here because you and your deviant cabal are completely incapable of having a civil discussion. I have let the past go when I post here yet you and others insist in keeping up the lies and attacks. Obviously this all means you cannot possibly be libertarian or Rand supporters when your efforts have proven to be detrimental to the forum and offline recruitment of supporters. How many people did you drive away with Rand with these tactics, did you keep count?
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 04:37 PM
    Oh look another so called libertarian that promotes censorship when it comes to the policies of certain forum member politician that posts here. Birds of a feather.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 03:11 PM
    Ender, to refresh both our memories here is what started all this in 2016. I was posting links to back up what I was saying in the thread and this is how you responded. Read my reply. Does that sound like someone that was trying to offend you? "hell bent" for a particular belief is not an insult.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 02:32 PM
    Over three years of shit from this asshole no doubt I called him far worse but he had it coming. But I do not remember calling him a Muslim. Send me the link? Never insulted anyone FIRST.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 02:25 PM
    There it is, basically the admission of what started all this, choosing Trump as my second choice. Something that irrational #nevertrumpers just can't handle.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 02:20 PM
    I and do not think anyone here is a hard core Trump supporter and basically knew what we are getting. But rational people are not going to bash and oppose policy when it is along the lines of something we agree with. Particularly legislation that Rand has also promoted and worked with Trump to get passed. For that people get attacked here all the time and pretty viscously, seen and unseen. This despite I and others have called Trump out on legislation I and any liberty minded supporter would oppose. Although I do not leap to Trump's defence as you describe, I could certainly see others responding that way as a reaction to the irrational behavior of the anti-Trump crowd here out of spite.
    82 replies | 930 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 01:45 PM
    Prove it. Not once have I ever attacked or insulted anyone in these forums first. Two frauds that are clearly not who they present themselves to be conversing with one another. One the so called libertarian that has spent the last 3 years promoting censorship and the other the so called man of Christian faith bearing false witness.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 01:19 PM
    Stay out of it Ender, this has nothing to do with you. I never inferred that he is a Muslim. As for you for the 100th time I asked you not to be offended for me asking if you are a Muslim. This since you attacked me for supporting Trump and Rand's immigration bans. Like I said either one was fine with me whether you call it a Muslim ban or do it geographically. Your reaction indicated a personal stake in immigration from terrorist regions since no reasonable person would start insulting people based on a policy discussion. Therefore it is a valid question to ask about whether you have a vested interest of immigration of family from those regions and whether you are a Muslim that would be effected by the ban.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:03 PM
    Looking at it from the authoritarians, they use this event as an opportunity to take the guns from poor youths knowing historically they have been responsible for revolution. More easy to control and less of a threat when revolt becomes more of a probability due to poverty of that generation.
    82 replies | 930 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:46 AM
    Trying to censor Danno now to? You and your obnoxious lying cabal already drove half the people from the forum with your crap in 2015, are you trying to finish off the rest now so there will be no one left to post?
    82 replies | 930 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:29 AM
    He just won't stop, it has been going on a few years now. I usually ignore him but figured time to refute his lies and expose him again for what he has done.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:14 AM
    See response above again. You mean after spending 10 years here telling people to post here and use the forum for grassroots, you decided to spread false accusations against me in forum because you think I supported Trump at the time when I did not at that point and because of your head up your ass defence of a certain totally paranoid screw lose forum member? Then when I fight back after getting called everything under the sun by you clowns you would bitch to the mods and get threads deleted? Is that what you mean? Where? Gary Johnson? I call out Libertarians to when they are not very Libertarian or are we at that level of censorship that you want those types of discussions banned to now? There is a difference between promoting and discussing policies that were in the news cycle in the "2016 Campaign Forum". Again you promoted censorship of policy discussions because that is what the Neocons told you to do. Seeing you getting triggered every time something was posted was however glorious.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:26 AM
    No one here ever said he was. We gain some things we lose others and it put the brakes on slightly from where we would have been under Hillary. It is unfortunate there was no viable funding for 3rd parties.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:14 AM
    False. You keep bringing it up every time I post here going on almost 3 years now. You cried because I agreed and discussed the merits of certain aspects of Trump's policy in the 2016 discussion forum where we discussed ALL candidates policies. Something we were always able to do here since I joined here in 2007. I never told anyone they had to chose Trump, you are delusional with that crap. With no viable 3rd party option I still believe that was the better choice. It slightly put the brakes on far worse policy so we suffer less. You want to blame me for the state of affairs if that makes you feel better then go ahead and enjoy wallowing in your own delusions. Again, false. 3 years on and you are still pushing that false narrative that started from that one night. STOP. Back then everyone had an opinion of what Rand was doing wrong with the campaign and I offered mine. The mistakes were obvious to everyone at the time it and history has proven it to be a mistake. Up until then for 10 years I was also able to post policies from different campaigns, discuss the merits and compare aspects of policy. What was different that time was it was the same weekend the Neocons released the #nevertrump tactic memo to shout down any discussion of Trump policies and to use false accusations against those that discuss his policies. It was a member that I shall not name that brought that Neocon nonsense to these forums and you continued it for now going on 3 years. So the fact is you sheep that followed the Neocon think tank tactics interrupted the efforts here. A number of grass roots supporters followed that exchange closely that night and the ensuing aftermath, whom were intending to use these forums and spread the word. But not after what they saw from your efforts and the false accusations you scumbags levied against me and other forum members here. No one wanted any part of your lunatic fringe behavior. You two that started this Neocon crap should be ashamed of yourselves for what you did in driving people away and damaging reputations with false accusations here during Rand's campaign.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:31 PM
    What do you think we are all glued to RPF 24x7? Maybe all that soy in your diet effected your memory since it was the other way around. "we", what TDS we? You and the "we" lost all credibility here adhering to the #nevertrump think tank tactic and were intellectually destroyed by those that simply stuck to discussing the facts at hand. Then stop bringing it up every time I post here.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:29 PM
    Never happened, not my style to ever name call people that disagree with me here. He was putting up policy I agree with it whether he was lying or not I am not going to bash policy I agree with because it came from Trump. Besides the personal attacks are more the irrational #nevertrumpers style. Like I said then she was someone we knew exactly where she stood on issues and what she was going to do versus a bullshit artist that that may or may not by lying on policy I approve of. Despite my complaints the fact is there is much more that has already been achieved with Trump that would not have been achieved under Hillary. There is still a chance this goes no where but I am not as hopeful as Danno and some others here.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:58 PM
    When does he attack the deep state? I think it is more like this -> "It's a balance between reaching his own goals based on who is stroking his ego the most, appeasing the deep state, appeasing Ivanka, appeasing GOP-E, attacking the media, appeasing the media and giving the appearance of appeasing his supporters."
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:24 PM
    4d chess and Trump having more tact than Ann Coulter, LOL. You pegged some Trump supporters right with that, so much so it has become a meme. If you are being serious then I would say Trump has no backbone to use his political capital. He gives it away caving at the slightest bit of news media opposition after ranting on Twitter for a few days since he cannot handle anyone not liking him, instead of growing a pair. Significantly altering the policies he ran on is not good use of his political capital. If he thinks he can keep using "The Wall" to appease Trump supporters that is bs since that was only a small part of why people voted for him. The immigration issue was way more than just the wall. If he thinks that tactic is going to work as he caves to GOP-E with each campaign promise he is going to in for a rude awakening in lost support since the tide is turning on him especially if after 8 years of Obama he is the one to cave on gun control.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:00 PM
    Why should she or anyone have blind loyalty to a candidate? She has been pretty spot on about Trump repeatedly betraying his base by deviating from the platform he ran on.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:28 PM
    The problem with that is with the head of the party - the President appearing to be behind gun control, the rest of the spineless Republicans after seeing this may cave.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:33 PM
    He went further, all devices that turn legal weapons into machine guns. Trump supporters and so called Conservative media can spin it however they like but here it is directly from the horses ass mouth. See bold. Presidential Memorandum on banning Machine gun to "Bump Fire" Stocks and Other Similar Devices... https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-application-definition-machinegun-bump-fire-stocks-similar-devices/
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:06 AM
    Would Pence have caved? Maybe join with Dems calling of impeachment of that SOB.
    207 replies | 2513 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 07:28 PM
    Good point, almost forgot about her. I am not sure about AR confiscation but I think they are stupid enough to push mental health laws regardless of the fine details. We would end up with something like if you were ever prescribed an SSRI or some other mind altering medication in your lifetime you would lose your gun rights.
    329 replies | 5779 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 06:55 PM
    Democrats' Confidence in Mass Media Rises Sharply From 2016 http://news.gallup.com/poll/219824/democrats-confidence-mass-media-rises-sharply-2016.aspx It has always worked for them so far why stop now. Just look at the term white nationalism, which is essentially the immigration policy that existed for the majority of US history to maintain an white majority that nobody every batted an eye about. They have fear mongered the term so much people are learning to equate the term with racism, discrimination and Nazis. The media is ensuring people cannot determine the difference between White Nationalism and White Supremacy.
    329 replies | 5779 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 05:03 PM
    964230000957259776 964231208795164672
    329 replies | 5779 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 04:53 PM
    So you have the law enforcement saying no connection but this Jereb guy telling the media something different. Local law enforcement: No ties between militia and Florida high school shooter http://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/02/15/florida-school-shooting-suspect-nikolas-cruz-member-white-nationalist-militia-tallahassee-leader-say/341751002/
    329 replies | 5779 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 04:25 PM
    Perhaps, but not all alt-right are Nazi's. Probably quite a few Paul supporters over there.
    329 replies | 5779 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 04:02 PM
    Was reading there yesterday, saw quite a few posts about talking crap to a reporter. The Gateway Pundit also got played by the fake Buzzfeed article, that got me to until I found it did not exist since it sounds like something they would say after a tragedy. Imposter tweets made it even harder for a reporter to cover Florida school shooting https://www.poynter.org/news/imposter-tweets-made-it-even-harder-reporter-cover-florida-school-shooting
    329 replies | 5779 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 03:25 PM
    All over the media now that he was a White Nationalist. It sounds fake and I bet the media knows it is fake but I believe they just don't care since it helps their narrative. Between the media's activism, outright lying or exaggerating on just about everything and the usual complete incompetence in vetting sources this sounds like bs. Did the media just get played again by 4chan?
    329 replies | 5779 view(s)
More Activity
About kahless

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
7,668
Posts Per Day
2.01
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:33 PM
Join Date
09-06-2007
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. adissa adissa is offline

    Banned

    adissa
  2. LibertyEagle LibertyEagle is offline

    Paleoconservative

    LibertyEagle
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2

02-04-2018


01-05-2018


11-04-2017


10-11-2017

  • 03:59 PM - Deleted Posts

09-30-2016

  • 09:38 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 09:33 PM - Deleted Posts

09-07-2016

  • 03:10 PM - Hidden

08-03-2016


07-29-2016


07-20-2016


07-19-2016


07-17-2016


07-16-2016


07-11-2016


No results to display...
Page 3 of 74 FirstFirst 123451353 ... LastLast

02-10-2018


02-09-2018


02-08-2018


02-07-2018


02-06-2018


02-05-2018


02-04-2018



Page 3 of 74 FirstFirst 123451353 ... LastLast