Tab Content
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:55 AM
    Another post that confirms for me you are not who you say you are as a Christian Preacher since you continue to bear false witness against me. In the Muslim religion it is okay to lie to the infidel, right Ender?
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:52 AM
    Again.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:40 AM
    You think I should apologize to you when you started an unprovoked and unwarranted campaign against me that started from 07/2015 for which I am guessing the reason that it has something to do with "open borders"? How the hell I am supposed to know what is in your head, maybe simply loyalty to the person that started the unwarranted attack? A campaign that has continued ever since that people in and outside of these forums were appalled over and decided not to join here because of it? If that is not it then you tell me the reason you started this nonsense that damaged my efforts for Rand and others.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:27 AM
    Lets assume you are not since you claim not to be and the thread no longer exists. Then what was the basis for you starting your onslaught on the immigration reform thread in 07/2015 that continued to a point of trashing me in your signature, neg reps and following me around the forum. This despite you were told Rand was still my 1st choice regardless of the policy discussion and that I told you I promoted this forum for grassroots using my handle, in other words cut the shit out since it is damaging to the work we are doing here?
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:20 AM
    Despite the intentional triggering posts as payback for your shit and others, I voted for Rand in the primary. I did vote for Trump in the general but said in advance I knew what I was getting and it is still worth it compared to Hillary. Not happy if he in fact does pass any gun control measures but that remains to be seen, likely 4d chess. Besides gun confiscation would have occurred under Hillary through EO. There was no 3rd party option. Every time I read here I am convinced more and more by people like you and acptulsa that I made the right choice. In fact you guys have done such a good job that it makes me consider campaigning for Trump in 2020 if Rand is not in the race.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:00 AM
    Anyone can go through all the exchanges between you and I, it is all me defending against and responding to YOUR personal attacks from 07/2015 on. The 7/2015 thread, the neg reps and emails that started this no longer exist. The discussion was over immigration reform and I was pretty clear that Rand regardless was still my first choice. If you browse the 2016 forum prior to 07/2015 you could see the 2016 forum daily discussed the merits of policy from all 17 candidates in a civil manner. Your #nevertrump group however made that no longer possible for any candidate after 07/2015. Any policy discussion that took place after 07/2015 was automatically deemed support for X candidate. It drove many from the forum to the point the mods even had a couple people demanding their accounts be closed. Because of YOU and your cabal, drove Rand supporters from these forums.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:34 AM
    You have not provided a shred of prove about your claims against since your campaign started since 07/2015. Why not be honest of what promoted you to start this campaign in 07/2015 to destroy my grassroots work for Rand offline using these forums?
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:22 AM
    Not me.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:20 AM
    You mean any reasonable person can see that some forum members here like you are not really a Rand Paul supporter due the history of actively working to drive many people from these forums. More delusions not based on the facts.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:05 AM
    Here is a post from Brian4Liberty during Rand's campaign on Rick Santorum with no other details. If we go by you and your open borders contingent this would be considered campaigning for Santorum while Rand is in the race. Therefore by your reasoning Brian and such posts were actively sabotaging Rand. A reasonable person however that is not running a sham in this forum realizes that it was the 2016 campaign forum where articles about opposing campaigns were discussed and it was not an endorsement of Santorum by Brian. acptulsa, your 3 year campaign against me has been exposed for what it is, a total farce or worse intentionally engineered attacks to drive support from Rand to other camps.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 08:41 AM
    That was exactly what I was doing and the open borders contingent were attacking me for it. Before the quotes above in 2015 I was defending both Ron and Rand's immigration policies and getting slammed by the open borders cabal. Like I said then and said now, there is a number of people on this forum that are anti-grassroots campaigning against the Pauls pretending to be supporters with the specific intention to drive people from here. You may not be one of them, your just an ___ that has the same effect.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 08:10 AM
    The quotes do not indicate I am bashing Rand or supporting Trump. These posts were after your vile and extreme RPF open border contingent, that was totally misrepresenting Rand in that matter, sparked posts like that after Rand supporters like myself were beaten over the head here for months. I spent months here prior to that defending Ron/Rand's immigration policies from their website showing their sound immigration platforms. It was met with posts, reps and email filled with hate from people like you for it. So more like a concerted effort by your faction to generate frustration on that issue for the purpose of intentionally turning long time supporters here into supporting Trump. Ultimately you and your clan did more to drive people away from Rand to other camps than any other site or campaign did.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:55 PM
    WOW. This should be pinned somewhere.
    355 replies | 6196 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:53 PM
    I read the #nevertrump cabal are now trying to blame their pathetic behavior over the last few years on John Bolton supporters. John Fcking Bolton, LMAO!. You should get a job with CNN or MSNBC.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:45 PM
    wtf does Bolton have to do with anything. You are delusional.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:34 PM
    I never inferred that but you rather than assist in helping Rand or sit on the sidelines your actions and the actions of others that followed your lead damaged the grassroots efforts here instead. 3 years on your still a dick every time I post.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:29 PM
    wtf do you care if people had Trump as a second choice. Who the fuck are you to say who is allowed to have second choice. Why did it even matter if Trump was a second choice while Rand was still in, he was still a 2nd choice. Like I said in the other thread no doubt any spamming was payback for the behavior of obnoxious assholes like yourself over the 2nd choice burn people at the stake Neocon witch hunt.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:33 PM
    Yeah, I just imagined assuring people it was okay to post here and demonstrated to them by posting their concerns in the Philosophy Forum in early July 2015. After posting here 8 years without issue I would have expected a reasonable response as usual. Then your politician friend who I believe was drunk that Saturday night had a hissy fit about my concerns, went ballistic which was immediately followed by your campaign against me in support of that. This included you changing your forum signature, attacks in rep system and attacks every time I posted. Of course met with 4-5 others in support of your false claims and his. People I directed to this forum and forum members that no longer post were appalled by it as well as your behavior that still continues 3 years later. So I do not have to prove shit since you are still an asshole. Many of these threads are gone now anyway. Now why would I bring this up, you would think it is ancient history, let it go. Obviously some here cannot let it go since these bullshit lies are thrown back in my face every time I post. You want to pull out threads that happened after that you consider insults, then you and whatever other asshole had it coming.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:00 PM
    "That could be the end result if <RAND> does not make it." You quoted me saying the most logical choice for the anti-establishment votes is Rand Paul. Right and I stand by that. If you want to misconstrue that then again that post is dated 8-15-2015. You violated NAP with that all out war around 7-15-2015. Where are the insults other than you continuing to spread lies and me calling you out on them?
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:40 PM
    You are pathological liar since your all out assault started this in early July 2015 when I was working grassroots offline. As far as the quote you just posted, we always report any mentions of Rand/Ron by the news media and other candidates. We have done that here since 2007 and you know that.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:14 PM
    NAP applies since this was before I posted anything about Trump and I was still working offline to get support for Rand.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:56 PM
    This was before there were any Trump supporters here. It was simply people discussing policy and out of 17 candidates running some like myself saying probably Trump would be second choice if no 3rd party option.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:44 PM
    How is it self-defense when the conversation that started your bullshit 3 years ago was not even between you and I. I also never attacked you, it was the other way around. I had to ask the mods to remove your signature but it was too late before it was all over google. The same time I was working grass roots outside the forum. So one could say sure I am the victim, this forum is the victim and so is Rand. Further how far did your efforts here go to drive supporters from the forum? So perhaps one could say the entire country is the victim for you torpedoing the grassroots to help Rand get elected. :p
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:27 PM
    If they came here those same supporters would be crucified for working together to get Rand's stuff passed by the usual suspects.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:50 PM
    Not an insult, rather statement of fact based on your continued 2.5 year campaign of violating NAP against me. You undermined my past efforts to do grass roots work for Rand in 2015 offline by using this forum and advocating others offline to come here to do the same. The behavior was so out of hand no one was willing to post in an openly hostile environment with people so willing to tarnish reputations with lies. This all happened regardless that I told both you and the ring leader that started this that Rand was still my first choice and that I was publicly promoting Rand using this forum for grass roots with my handle. So not only did you damage my reputation with your lies in forum for some laughs you did so at the expense of Rand Paul outside these forums. I am not the only one your little club drove out the forum there are many other long time posters that no longer use the forums or post here because you and your deviant cabal are completely incapable of having a civil discussion. I have let the past go when I post here yet you and others insist in keeping up the lies and attacks. Obviously this all means you cannot possibly be libertarian or Rand supporters when your efforts have proven to be detrimental to the forum and offline recruitment of supporters. How many people did you drive away with Rand with these tactics, did you keep count?
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:37 PM
    Oh look another so called libertarian that promotes censorship when it comes to the policies of certain forum member politician that posts here. Birds of a feather.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:11 PM
    Ender, to refresh both our memories here is what started all this in 2016. I was posting links to back up what I was saying in the thread and this is how you responded. Read my reply. Does that sound like someone that was trying to offend you? "hell bent" for a particular belief is not an insult.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:32 PM
    Over three years of shit from this asshole no doubt I called him far worse but he had it coming. But I do not remember calling him a Muslim. Send me the link? Never insulted anyone FIRST.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:25 PM
    There it is, basically the admission of what started all this, choosing Trump as my second choice. Something that irrational #nevertrumpers just can't handle.
    270 replies | 3174 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:20 PM
    I and do not think anyone here is a hard core Trump supporter and basically knew what we are getting. But rational people are not going to bash and oppose policy when it is along the lines of something we agree with. Particularly legislation that Rand has also promoted and worked with Trump to get passed. For that people get attacked here all the time and pretty viscously, seen and unseen. This despite I and others have called Trump out on legislation I and any liberty minded supporter would oppose. Although I do not leap to Trump's defence as you describe, I could certainly see others responding that way as a reaction to the irrational behavior of the anti-Trump crowd here out of spite.
    83 replies | 968 view(s)
More Activity
About kahless

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a &quot;Stand with Rand&quot; badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
7,691
Posts Per Day
2.01
General Information
Last Activity
Today 10:55 AM
Join Date
09-06-2007
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. adissa adissa is offline

    Banned

    adissa
  2. LibertyEagle LibertyEagle is offline

    Paleoconservative

    LibertyEagle
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2

02-04-2018


01-05-2018


11-04-2017


10-11-2017

  • 03:59 PM - Deleted Posts

09-30-2016

  • 09:38 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 09:33 PM - Deleted Posts

09-07-2016

  • 03:10 PM - Hidden

08-03-2016


07-29-2016


07-20-2016


07-19-2016


07-17-2016


07-16-2016


07-11-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 75 1231151 ... LastLast

02-23-2018


02-22-2018



Page 1 of 75 1231151 ... LastLast