Tab Content
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 05:59 PM
    You fucking idiot his reply and my response was not even about me so how the fuck am I the victim you dumb piece of shit. Yeah I saw your vulgar bullshit in my rep bar in the past. You are just another jackass that people tell me as the reason they will never use these forums. If you do not like my language too fucking bad I am only echoing the shit you fucking piece of shit garbage assholes have said to me and the hundreds of decent people that you drove out of here.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 05:50 PM
    ^How is it this douchebag is still allowed to post here when all does is come in threads, attack people, lie and drive the grassroots out of the forum. Been watching him do this shit for years here. I guess 43,000 low value posts some how makes him some supporter. Then you have Phill4paul that regularly is getting to forum spats with various members telling them to go fuck themselves in the public forum. Add that to 3 obnoxious and rabid Muslim immigration activists that call everyone racist. We lost half the forum members due to this crap, decent people and are left with this lunatic fringe. Examples why the future looks grim using RPF for grassroots for Rand 2020 or other liberty candidates unless something is done. Either these people should be purged from the forums for their behavior, or make everyone use a real name, with citizenship verification, real picture avatar and paid access.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 05:10 PM
    I am still down two of your fu's. Two the mods deleted and 1 in rep. Thread is gone now, which was your plan all along.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 04:33 PM
    Ender, confirmed liar, hate monger and non-Christian. You brought these posts on yourselves by disallowing me to post anything without getting attacked for your lies from years ago.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 04:22 PM
    Again, the entire discussion is listed below. At no time was I discussing the 1st Amendment with you. The exchange between you and I is pretty clear. There was no name calling on my part at all despite your repeated lies in that thread that I support abhorrent genocidal policies. Despite after your continued attack on me, I was nice enough to simply ask if you were a Muslim. I also asked you "So where is this slander, insults and innuendos? How have I mis-characterized your beliefs? That is not my intention." So despite after all the insults you threw back at me I was nice enough to reply that way. I was also nice enough every time you bring it up these last two years to say it was not my intention to offend by asking you a question. You did not deserve me giving you that benefit but I did for the good of these forums something a few people could learn here as we ramp up to campaign season. If I was like some of the others posting here and did not give a shit about this forum I would have told you to go fuck yourself and blasted you with negative reps for two days. This is the last reply you will ever get from me unless you want to apologize for this crap. Until then I will doubt you are the Christian you say you are.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 02:02 PM
    Here is the entire exchange in order which shows at no time were we discussing the 1st Amendment. ^After I post a history of links based on US legislation, your first reply sounds like you are trying to make the claim that I support abhorrent beliefs.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 01:13 PM
    You do not like my sarcasm?
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 01:10 PM
    You present yourself as a Christian preacher yet repeatedly keep bearing false witness against me over a claim two years ago were you think I insulted you when I did not. I posted the original exchange in this very thread that proves I did not insult you or name called you. I even said that my beliefs in supporting Rand's immigration ban were NOT intended to offend you. You continued to take offence where no offence was intended, so I then asked if you are you a Muslim? Which was a valid question considering your offence of the discussion. For two years going you have thrown this exchange in my face every single time I post here. Each time I said to you it was a question, NOT to take offence by it. Since then you continued on your campaign to promote Muslim immigration, misrepresenting our discussion, misrepresenting my beliefs and calling me out for that original exchange. You also give aid and comfort whenever anyone attacks me in these forums. You did multiple times in this thread despite me asking you to stay out of the exchange with acptulsa. That is not very Christian of you at all and represents someone who has a vested interest in Muslim immigration.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:54 PM
    I do not care where it came from it is technically accurate. You know it is coming, some loons on the left have already started claiming the Constitution and Bill of Rights are racist since they were written by slave owners. Some even calling it hate speech. Some here have a head start on that several years ago when I posted excerpts from the Constitution as a point of discussion in the Philosophy forum. The quote was censored due to complaints from some forum members as the mere words from the Constitution offended them.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:38 PM
    Coming from the king of vitriol. Was here from 2007-2015 where no one said anything about my posts spouting vitriol. Then suddenly from 07-2015 on half the forum went full retard with unwarranted attacks on many people here including myself. You think maybe that had something to do with my replies back to obnoxious pricks. edit: btw prove it, post this so called vitriol. Posts defending myself from unrelenting attacks are vitriol now?
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:23 PM
    Does not matter where it came from it is spot on.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:12 PM
    LMAO, not true. I guess you have missed the forum history. Not going to rehash it for umptenth time but ultimately from the unwarranted attacks based on simply posting policies. It is very telling when people lie, get that angry and viscous about Muslim immigration. If I said Acptulsa is a Muslim no doubt it was just sarcasm to trigger him since he has been such an unrelenting asshole whenever I post here. If you are a Muslim, had no idea but sorry you have to go back. It is just the way it is. The internet is everywhere so at least you can still post and cause allot of grief to the people trying to get things done from whatever Muslim country you are from. :D
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:01 PM
    Wrong and I am not familiar with that site. I posted excerpts from the Constitution in a Philosophy thread about immigration and the demographic majority the founding fathers perceived going forward using the term "posterity". If this Stormfront site you are talking about says that then at least quoting the Constitution in that case was technically accurate.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:51 AM
    If "non-whites" are posting in the manner that I describe in my above posts then I am going to start thinking there is something to that. :eek:
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:47 AM
    A contingent of RPF from 07-2015 forward. - Anyone that posts excerpts out of the Constitution is storm fronter. - Anyone who is not for open borders and wants to restrict immigration is a racist and a storm fronter. - Anyone that supports Rand's immigration ban from terrorist nations is a Neocon, racist, a storm fronter and anti-Muslim. - Anyone that posts policies or articles on any candidate or topic automatically supports that candidate and topic.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:32 AM
    Nope, full context below. I even pulled out my first ever exchange with him in the forum where he spreads lies about me and I posted my early quotes proving I did not.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:55 AM
    Another post that confirms for me you are not who you say you are as a Christian Preacher since you continue to bear false witness against me. In the Muslim religion it is okay to lie to the infidel, right Ender?
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:52 AM
    Again. We have more liberty campaigns coming up so it is time to shut your shit down so we can get back to work here. So take your fucking crap and attitude of attacking others to another forum if you do not want to work with others here to achieve the same goals as the forum mission.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:40 AM
    You think I should apologize to you when you started an unprovoked and unwarranted campaign against me that started from 07/2015 for which I am guessing the reason that it has something to do with "open borders"? How the hell I am supposed to know what is in your head, maybe simply loyalty to the person that started the unwarranted attack? A campaign that has continued ever since that people in and outside of these forums were appalled over and decided not to join here because of it? If that is not it then you tell me the reason you started this nonsense that damaged my efforts for Rand and others.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:27 AM
    Lets assume you are not since you claim not to be and the thread no longer exists. Then what was the basis for you starting your onslaught on the immigration reform thread in 07/2015 that continued to a point of trashing me in your signature, neg reps and following me around the forum. This despite you were told Rand was still my 1st choice regardless of the policy discussion and that I told you I promoted this forum for grassroots using my handle, in other words cut the shit out since it is damaging to the work we are doing here?
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:20 AM
    I did vote for Trump in the general but said in advance I knew what I was getting and it is still worth it compared to Hillary. Not happy if he in fact does pass any gun control measures but that remains to be seen, likely 4d chess. Besides gun confiscation would have occurred under Hillary through EO. There was no 3rd party option. Every time I read here I am convinced more and more by people like you and acptulsa that I made the right choice. In fact you guys have done such a good job that it makes me consider campaigning for Trump in 2020 if Rand is not in the race.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:00 AM
    Anyone can go through all the exchanges between you and I, it is all me defending against and responding to YOUR personal attacks from 07/2015 on. The 7/2015 thread, the neg reps and emails that started this no longer exist. The discussion was over immigration reform and I was pretty clear that Rand regardless was still my first choice. If you browse the 2016 forum prior to 07/2015 you could see the 2016 forum daily discussed the merits of policy from all 17 candidates in a civil manner. Your #nevertrump group however made that no longer possible for any candidate after 07/2015. Any policy discussion that took place after 07/2015 was automatically deemed support for X candidate. It drove many from the forum to the point the mods even had a couple people demanding their accounts be closed. Because of YOU and your cabal, drove Rand supporters from these forums.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:34 AM
    You have not provided a shred of prove about your claims against since your campaign started since 07/2015. Why not be honest of what promoted you to start this campaign in 07/2015 to destroy my grassroots work for Rand offline using these forums?
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:22 AM
    Not me.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:20 AM
    You mean any reasonable person can see that some forum members here like you are not really a Rand Paul supporter due the history of actively working to drive many people from these forums. More delusions not based on the facts.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:05 AM
    Here is a post from Brian4Liberty during Rand's campaign on Rick Santorum with no other details. If we go by you and your open borders contingent this would be considered campaigning for Santorum while Rand is in the race. Therefore by your reasoning Brian and such posts were actively sabotaging Rand. A reasonable person however that is not running a sham in this forum realizes that it was the 2016 campaign forum where articles about opposing campaigns were discussed and it was not an endorsement of Santorum by Brian. acptulsa, your 3 year campaign against me has been exposed for what it is, a total farce or worse intentionally engineered attacks to drive support from Rand to other camps.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 08:41 AM
    That was exactly what I was doing and the open borders contingent were attacking me for it. Before the quotes above in 2015 I was defending both Ron and Rand's immigration policies and getting slammed by the open borders cabal. Like I said then and said now, there is a number of people on this forum that are anti-grassroots campaigning against the Pauls pretending to be supporters with the specific intention to drive people from here. You may not be one of them, your just an ___ that has the same effect.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 08:10 AM
    The quotes do not indicate I am bashing Rand or supporting Trump. These posts were after your vile and extreme RPF open border contingent, that was totally misrepresenting Rand in that matter, sparked posts like that after Rand supporters like myself were beaten over the head here for months. I spent months here prior to that defending Ron/Rand's immigration policies from their website showing their sound immigration platforms. It was met with posts, reps and email filled with hate from people like you for it. So more like a concerted effort by your faction to generate frustration on that issue for the purpose of intentionally turning long time supporters here into supporting Trump. Ultimately you and your clan did more to drive people away from Rand to other camps than any other site or campaign did.
    328 replies | 3797 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:55 PM
    WOW. This should be pinned somewhere.
    363 replies | 6359 view(s)
More Activity
About kahless

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
7,708
Posts Per Day
2.02
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:03 PM
Join Date
09-06-2007
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. adissa adissa is offline

    Banned

    adissa
  2. LibertyEagle LibertyEagle is offline

    Paleoconservative

    LibertyEagle
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2

02-04-2018


01-05-2018


11-04-2017


10-11-2017

  • 03:59 PM - Deleted Posts

09-30-2016

  • 09:38 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 09:33 PM - Deleted Posts

09-07-2016

  • 03:10 PM - Hidden

08-03-2016


07-29-2016


07-20-2016


07-19-2016


07-17-2016


07-16-2016


07-11-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 76 1231151 ... LastLast

02-23-2018



Page 1 of 76 1231151 ... LastLast