Tab Content
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-18-2019, 11:52 AM
    False. I said it is wrong to replace the racial majority in any country and listed the reasons that had nothing to do with racism, rather historical facts. Supporting majority replacement as policy anywhere else would be considering a racist policy. Being a white minority at times I do experience racism. No where did I see that only non-whites are racist. I said specifically whites do not have a monopoly on racism.
    476 replies | 4896 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-16-2019, 06:49 PM
    You keep raising accusations of racism into a factual discussion about race playing a role in people actions and policy. If you emotionally cannot handle facts without blurting out racist and Stormfront then perhaps this is not the discussion for you. Here you are post #135 interjecting Stormfront again but there is many more. You just can't help yourself. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?532490-New-Zealand-Terror-Attack-Australian-gunman-shoots-dead-several-people-in-Christchurch-mosque&p=6767628&viewfull=1#post6767628 Ron's policies. Unsaid but it does play a role in protecting that majority. http://web.archive.org/web/20120105091116/http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/immigration/
    476 replies | 4896 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-16-2019, 06:21 PM
    Hypocrite. When I posted point by point Ron's immigration platform from those years not referencing they are his policies you always oppose it and play the race card. You an acptulsa are the only ones here that keep bringing up Stormfront. As for replacing the white majority with something else those are not my exact words. These are my words and they did not come from any site or your whipping post Stormfront. Nothing racist about it.
    476 replies | 4896 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-16-2019, 06:05 PM
    If you really believe in that you would be for protecting your region from invaders that believe otherwise to protect your property rights.
    96 replies | 1357 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-16-2019, 05:55 PM
    Yeah I started to fall asleep reading it and it was getting redundant. "socialist hispanic" falsehood? The data and graphs have been posted over and over again here show the opposite. Here are some others.
    476 replies | 4896 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-16-2019, 02:35 PM
    I can't believe anyone takes her seriously. How she got elected I am assuming is from people simply selecting the "D" candidate since I cannot see anyone in their right mind who would admit to voting for someone so partisanly mentally challenged as this woman. Her and Maxine Waters are the only two people I would say this about. AOC is right up there but not this extreme.
    24 replies | 507 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-16-2019, 09:42 AM
    I guess you have not read the shooters manifesto. It is still out there if you can find it although authorities are going through great lengths to have it removed everywhere.
    476 replies | 4896 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-15-2019, 09:46 PM
    Still spreading your anti-white lies I see. When confounded with facts you just can't help yourself and start blurting out Stormfront or playing the race card in some fashion. If we go by you no doubt Ron's 2008/2012 immigration platform would be considered racist and out of Stormfront.
    476 replies | 4896 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-15-2019, 11:34 AM
    More context on his statement. https://nypost.com/2019/03/15/australian-politician-blames-mosque-shooting-on-muslim-immigration/ The shooter wrote a manifesto about it but anyone that points out the shooters stated motivation is a racist or hate monger. Stating facts is spewing hate or racism as usual. “He is a disgrace to the Senate and what is worse, by spreading hatred and turning Australians against each other, he is doing exactly what the terrorists want.” Says the anti-white or anti-Christian. I hate these lying anti-white, anti-Christian news media scum and their lying politicians almost as much as I hate what the shooter did.
    476 replies | 4896 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-14-2019, 10:03 AM
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/13/ann-coulter-trump-by-the-numbers/
    12 replies | 327 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-13-2019, 08:36 PM
    I was wondering that when I wrote the post above yours. One thing that crossed my mind was the possibility it is all one big sham. People are managed into one of two camps. When camp A is in power for 8 years they are placated somewhat and civil strife is avoided. After awhile however Camp B after too many years out of power will eventually reach a boiling point. At that time they are placated with 8 years to avoid civil strife.
    32 replies | 591 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-13-2019, 08:22 PM
    The Democratic party has learned nothing with their candidates doubling down on extremist policies. The further left and into lunacy they go the higher percentage point Trump will win by.
    32 replies | 591 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-13-2019, 05:10 PM
    For legal non-refugee immigration what really was really the point of these offices anyway when in this day and age it can all be done online. That sounds like a load a crap. Fear mongering so government employees do not lose their jobs since why could it not be done via mail or internet.
    3 replies | 110 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-13-2019, 02:03 PM
    All I can remember about her years ago is I felt bad people were picking on a kid for a mistake but to single out Tucker on a current events topic years ago on a shock jock program is ridiculous. With these programs even as a young guy I thought if you are a grown man or worse an old man acting like a 13 year old talking about teen sex or mocking teenagers on a public medium then that is pretty degenerate and you should be simply called out for it - at that time. Doing this now, not considering the venue and the time period of what was acceptable humor on these shows is just ridiculous. I never understood why people go on these shows and play along rather than just play it straight. There is no net plus for your career in doing so if you are already somewhat known. When you hear it you always know it will come back to haunt them in the future, taken out of context of the venue the jokes or edgy humor being made.
    43 replies | 933 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-12-2019, 04:22 PM
    The dishonesty is you calling out people as racist for stating facts. Pointing out your anti-white racism in this thread and stating facts does not make me or anyone racist for doing so. Perhaps when you are able to get control your emotions you can understand posts like below without reading it through your anti-white racial lens.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-12-2019, 02:17 PM
    This is like saying someone said something outrageous on Howard Stern. Who cares, the whole point of these shows is to be shocking, hence the term "shock jock".
    43 replies | 933 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-12-2019, 11:29 AM
    All I know is here in NY I have been having a real hard time getting good meat and it has been getting worse year after year. I also notice the meat sections in the supermarkets are getting smaller and smaller. The quality no matter what I buy tastes disgusting and you cannot even chew it half the time. It is almost as if they are doing it intentionally to get people off of meat. My beef consumption in some form or other has dropped significantly simply because of it and not because I want to stop eating it.
    28 replies | 435 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-12-2019, 11:17 AM
    They are preparing the narrative for future generations to say that if ___ candidate wins he will be the first black President. The Obama years will be ignored as if they never happened or they will say he was not really black since he had a white mother. His policies of course will be completely ignored in the quest to feel warm and fuzzy inside by electing the first real black man.
    13 replies | 169 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-11-2019, 10:28 PM
    I was thinking more like world time, UTC, same as GMT. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time Coordinated Universal Time (abbreviated to UTC) is the primary time standard by which the world regulates clocks and time.
    48 replies | 578 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-11-2019, 10:09 PM
    I would say get rid of time zones to and everyone just goes by universal coordinated time but that would be too hard for some people to get used to.
    48 replies | 578 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-11-2019, 09:52 PM
    We heard this before, how hard can this be. H.R.1556 - To make daylight savings time permanent, and for other purposes. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1556 Rep. Buchanan, Vern (Introduced 03/06/2019) Cosponsors: (1) H.R.1601 - To allow States to elect to observe daylight savings time for the duration of the year, and for other purposes. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1601 Rep. Bishop, Rob (Introduced 03/07/2019)
    48 replies | 578 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-11-2019, 08:53 PM
    I think it is pretty clear to everyone what you stated above since it is just way too damn obvious. Just going through this thread and reading the absurdity of you and other long time members stating the obvious in the real world not some philosophical implementation of libertarian ideology in a non-existent fantasy realm. I think what we see not only here is people intentionally ignoring that fact for the real purpose of advancing the anti-liberty position. It is what the elites are using the libertarian party for which on fools follow their lead or those that are also using the LP as a tool to advance anti-liberty positions. The other segment of folks that have not been mentioned may simply support the invasion due to tribal, ethnic or racial allegiance to foreign peoples or powers. A few here are always barking "racist" or "storm front". It is probably more likely there are zero to none white racists on their forum and it is actually the other way around.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-08-2019, 05:05 PM
    You were yelling like a lunatic seeing what was not there in peoples posts that simply agreed with his policies during the campaign. Side by side comparisons with Ron's 2008/2012 platform on border security was posted showing the similarities yet you still blew a gasket despite everyone told you they do not know if he is scamming are not. He has followed through on quite a bit however he then walks it back and the gives lip service, then walks it back again with the threat of undoing some of his accomplishments. We do not know the full outcome but we do know it is still far better in some cases or status quo than we would have received with your Hillary Clinton.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-08-2019, 04:55 PM
    I have no uppercase posts and you replied to me in each thread I created or participated in where I bashed Trump on "legal" immigration. At one point you told me "I told you so", yet that is inaccurate to since I said when he was running he cannot be trusted. I said better to go with the candidate that is telling you want you want to hear over the candidate that is saying the opposite. If that candidate is lying at least it moves the conversation - overton window in the right direction. So either you are being disingenuous, have really bad memory or are mixing me up with someone else.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-08-2019, 02:22 PM
    That is what they tell you since they want you to surrender the country to others. They use virtue signalling anti-government language to do it. I am no fan of big government but border and immigration controls are needed to stop that from happening. If Trump's or Ron's 2008/2012 were implemented it would go along way to decelerating the problem.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-08-2019, 10:12 AM
    You are taking words out of context. I said it is unfair for any native population whether white or black if they are being displaced as the majority in overwhelming numbers by people of a different language and culture in their own communities. Nothing racist about stating facts but you are too emotional to understand these concepts. Being racist and racism is supporting policy against people that live their entire lives in their community only to find themselves foreigners in their own land, discriminated against and unable to speak the language. I accuse you of being an anti-white since you have been hurling insults and calling me racist for simply stating the facts about how this world actually works and not what we want it to be. Like I said I would like to see people treat people that are different from them like they do on Star Trek but that is not the reality of the world we live in. You would not support what I am describing below. However you do support it in the United States. This clearly makes you an anti-white racist.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-08-2019, 12:21 AM
    One way to look at it is to use another country to apply US immigration policy to. For example to say there are too many <insert race>s in <country X>. That the US should send an overwhelming number of whites to displace the <insert race> majority in <insert country X>. That would clearly be a racist policy so how is saying we should do the same in the US not racism against the white majority here? You do not have to insert race above either. Just insert a different religion or culture, same thing. But for some retarded reason we cannot discuss that in the US without being called a racist or anti something or other for pointing it out.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-08-2019, 12:07 AM
    Your posts with false accusations of racism as well as insults are all still there. It is a problem and I have explained the reasons why that have nothing do with racism. To overwhelm communities with immigration where the native population finds they no longer speak the language, are discriminated against and become foreigners in their own land is wrong. Saying that is not racist. Wishing that on people like you do is racist. The US has been a majority white country through most of it's existence. If it was a black majority I would have said the same thing. You are just consumed with hate and see everything through a racist lens instead of having these discussions based on facts and not emotions.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-07-2019, 11:47 PM
    You just contradicted yourself again. Go back, read your insults and false accusations of racism for simply stating how race plays a role regardless whether people want to admit it. That fact is not racist. If they were going to displace the demographic majority, yes, for reasons already described. If it was a race from a different planet coming in overwhelming numbers it would be a problem to. It is a problem.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    03-07-2019, 11:31 PM
    If they were like Mexico yes it would be a problem. England and Sweden as whole completely on our southern border would not present a problem. I would still want border controls but assimilation, language, culture and understanding the concepts of liberty would be far less of a problem.
    652 replies | 7079 view(s)
More Activity
About kahless

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a &quot;Stand with Rand&quot; badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
8,560
Posts Per Day
2.03
General Information
Last Activity
Today 08:14 AM
Join Date
09-06-2007
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. adissa adissa is offline

    Banned

    adissa
  2. LibertyEagle LibertyEagle is offline

    Paleoconservative

    LibertyEagle
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

03-17-2019


03-13-2019


03-07-2019


02-23-2019


10-31-2018

  • 10:16 PM - Hidden

04-24-2018


04-06-2018


03-17-2018


02-04-2018


01-05-2018


11-04-2017


10-11-2017

  • 03:59 PM - Deleted Posts

09-30-2016

  • 09:38 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 09:33 PM - Deleted Posts

09-07-2016

  • 03:10 PM - Hidden

08-03-2016


07-29-2016


07-20-2016


07-19-2016



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 112 1231151101 ... LastLast

03-18-2019


03-17-2019


03-16-2019


03-15-2019


03-13-2019


03-12-2019


03-11-2019



Page 1 of 112 1231151101 ... LastLast