Tab Content
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:55 PM
    The Pine Tree riot, its interesting as this isn't one of the events traditionally recognized as one of the events leading up to the revolutionary war, and yet it seems like it would qualify for that designation https://nhpbs.org/wild/karnerwhitepineriot.asp
    15 replies | 361 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:01 PM
    I would also casually point out, that in the prior scenario, James still has $70 in his pocket at the end. He could use that to buy an entirely new chair from China, if he wanted to. :D (a lounge chair perhaps, just not a lawn chair, cus that's under tariff ^.^
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:44 PM
    The modern day Ministry of Truth, at it again
    15 replies | 361 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:24 PM
    If the question becomes, would we rather have $60 worth in time and materials, or $60 worth in waning FRN's, consider this: Implicit in the assumptions in the scenario, is that there exists someone in America who is ready and willing to work for $20. (If there wasn't, the labor would had to have been valued at a higher price so someone would work on it) If you ask that guy, the American who is willing and able to work for $20/hour, he would say yes, absolutely, he wants the job. As far as materials go, materials are only useful if they are, uh, used. Their entire purpose is to be used (and not conserved). It is objectively better, for America, to build the chair and give its citizens the opportunity (that they are ready and willing to do) to earn a livelihood, than to spend the same equivalent resources to buy the same thing from China.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:51 PM
    edit: I didn't read the full post. Still interested in what constitution-violating "emergency powers" actually mean, in which case: This should be 0
    4 replies | 253 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:09 PM
    Prior to an exchange with Li Zhao: (A) 1) James has $40 of materials 2) James has an hour of time (valued at $20) 3) You have $70 4) You don't have a chair 5) James has $0 After an exchange with Li Zhao: (B) 1) James has $40 of materials 2) James has an hour of time (valued at $20)
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    No, my understanding of economics is just fine. You're just not considering my perspective. From the perspective of America, that wealth is already accounted for in the chair itself. If I personally build a chair, for my own use, do I gain a chair and $10 dollars? No, of course not. The wealth I gained with my labor was the chair itself, which I'm gonna use to sit on personally. Same thing with America, when considered as a group. If America builds a chair, for its own use, it gains a chair. If I pay James Dean $10 dollars or $10,000 it doesnt matter to America, what matters to America is that it gained a chair and lost X amount of human hours to build/assemble a chair. If America used foreign trade for the materials, it also lost $40 in addition to whatever human labor was used to assemble the chair. But nowhere in that equation, is that $10 important. The wealth and cost is already accounted for.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:28 AM
    That's some massive trolling right there :up:
    2035 replies | 153109 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-23-2024, 10:01 PM
    You make a compelling case. I may have to invest. Need to make some money first, but …
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-23-2024, 09:31 PM
    Why wouldn't he branch out into manufacturing lawn chairs? Lawn chairs are a gold mine of opportunity. The how is quite obvious... he'd just use a time dilating necromantic generator which is gonna be built in approximately 24 years from now after robots have conquered the world. But the more pertinent question is, will we still need lawn chairs at that point? (And the answer is yes, even robots will want lawn chairs)
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-23-2024, 07:00 PM
    Why would a male porn star branch out into manufacturing lawn chairs? ETA: Wrong spelling apparently. In that case why would a dead actor branch out into manufacturing lawn chairs? Even more curious as to HOW he might accomplish that feat.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-23-2024, 05:18 PM
    Your example has glaring problems. Below is one of them: This is blatantly wrong on its face, because $10 can't just be created out of nowhere. From America's perspective, exactly $0 money has moved -- or $40 if the materials were bought through foreign trade. The below is still missing a very important factor that you keep ignoring. (Or doing mental gymnastics so that you don't have to address it)
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-23-2024, 03:00 PM
    It's really not that complicated though. Organizations of large enough size often face a "build vs buy" decision. Is it cheaper to build it, or buy it? In the examples provided, it would cost America $40 + $20 (in labor) to build the lawn chair, and it would cost $60 to buy it. So the question really is, do you want the industry or not? And do you want to keep the $40 within the American economy, or not?
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-23-2024, 02:43 PM
    There's two separate components in your argument, "materials", and "time". For "materials", you have built into the assumption that James has $40 of materials lying around. I could address your points by basically re-posting all of my scenarios with that assumption built into it and show that it doesn't affect the outcome. But it's a lot easier to address your point on this by assuming that James does not have materials laying around. Can we just agree to assume that James does not have materials laying around, and that he purchases the materials immediately prior to assembly of the product? If that's not satisfactory for whatever reason I'd be happy to provide the scenarios with your assumption included into the scenarios... but ugh... it's tedious. As for "time", you are somewhat right. One "benefit" of purchasing from China is that you are saving your labor so it can be used on something else. I say "benefit" because it depends on whether or not you want a job. If the goal is higher industry, then it's not really a benefit. You can say the labor will still be used, but "on something else". That "on something else" however is an abstract concept whereas the labor for the lawn chair is a very concrete opportunity. Considering that the labor is valued at $20/hour and you'll get paid that in either scenario, a concrete opportunity is better than an abstract one down the line. If however you choose to indeed save your time for "something else", you're still losing $60. Is it worth saving $20 worth of of time, just to lose $60 anyway? If the item was made in America, you're "losing" $20 worth of time but you keep your $60. (again, "losing" is in quotes as it may be a good thing if you want the increased industry)
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 07:35 PM
    I didn't "forget" the materials. Materials don't just generate out of thin air. They are produced or purchased and that requires effort or spending. That effort and spending (or lack thereof) is accounted for in my examples. If you want to build into the assumptions that James has $40 of free materials lying around it doesn't change the math. Ok. So you saved $10 that will be spent on something else (for your benefit we can assume its spent in America and not again on foreign trade). As a group, the nation still exported $60 dollars to a foreign economy that you're not accounting for.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 06:40 PM
    Fair point. I didn't take that into consideration
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    100 replies | 9742 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 06:34 PM
    Fair enough :up:
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 06:04 PM
    This is flawed logic and I can demonstrate so. Imagine that: James Dean has a lawn chair factory and he sells lawn chairs at $40 material cost, $20 labor, $10 dollars profit for $70 each Li Zhao has a lawn chair factory and he sells lawn chairs at $40 material cost, $10 labor, $10 dollars profit for $60 each If I buy a lawn chair from Li Zhao the net result is: 1) Me and James (collectively) gain 1 lawn chair and we lose $60 2) Li Zhao gains $10 3) $50 goes to third parties for material and labor -- in China
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 07:27 AM
    Well, what else would one expect? After all, Swordy is a “draconian top-down” kind of guy.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 04:21 AM
    Yes, people CAN watch it for themselves. Ironically enough, and unfortunately so wrt your claims, Ron is making the same exact point in this video that I tried to make in that last thread on this topic, namely that the higher prices invariably caused by protectionist tariffs, ON TOP OF the increased prices caused by monetary inflation are really putting the squeeze on American consumers. You tried to disingenuously claim that I said that tariffs caused inflation in that one. At least you’re a consistent liar.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 01:57 AM
    You’re lying again. As I noted above, Ron SPECIFICALLY STATED that tariffs DO NOT cause inflation. The “adds fuel” comment was explained to mean that the higher prices caused by tariffs all by themselves add to the consumers burden when added to the higher prices caused by inflation. NOWHERE did Ron even I’m-ly that tariffs in any way cause inflation. As for the rest, your claims have been dealt with by myself and several others multiple times. Fletcher got it all wrong and his book is fit for composting and that’s about it.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-22-2024, 01:38 AM
    The bold above is a lie. Ron nowhere said that tariffs cause inflation. In fact he repeated several times that tariffs DO NOT cause inflation but do cause higher prices. He then several times noted that the higher prices caused by tariffs combined with those caused by inflation were really hurting American consumers. The rest of your comments are just more of the same anti-freedom garbage you always post on this topic that I don’t have the time right now to deal with. Nor the inclination, for that matter since truth on this topic falls upon deaf ears where you and a few others are concerned. I’ve wasted enough of my life trying to convince obdurately resistant people that freedom is better than their familiar, and therefor comfortable, slavery. Enjoy your chains.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-21-2024, 10:47 PM
    The timestamp and context of what exactly? I'm at a loss as to what you're looking for here.
    65 replies | 2647 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    17 replies | 460 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    05-21-2024, 07:08 PM
    As usual we are reminded that it’s best to leave state matters to the state.
    16 replies | 1117 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-20-2024, 01:36 PM
    And people sometimes wonder why I have no hope for mankind.
    5 replies | 326 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-19-2024, 10:25 AM
    Well, it's not homophobia, cus that would be exclusionary of the many other letters in the LGBTBBQ acronym. qu***ophobia? Same issue. LGBTQIAA2Sophobia? Doesn't quite roll off the tongue. The only thing that seems to quite match is weirdophobia
    22 replies | 803 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-19-2024, 12:55 AM
    Everything has practical limits; otherwise such a thing would be impractical. That's ok. You still are in my book :)
    66 replies | 2637 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    05-18-2024, 11:51 PM
    I would choose whichever was best for me at the time. If option 2 had a wonderful economy and a culture that I liked, I would probably choose that over a "less authoritarian" option that had an economy/culture I didn't like. That's what freedom really means, is to be able to choose your own path -- even if it is "authoritarian". I would never dare to question "true anarchy" :cool:
    66 replies | 2637 view(s)
More Activity
About TheTexan

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed country:
USA
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Signature


It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
- Kim Kardashian

Donald Trump / Crenshaw 2024!!!!

My pronouns are he/him/his

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
24,081
Posts Per Day
5.18
General Information
Last Activity
Today 01:58 AM
Join Date
09-01-2011
Referrals
0

16 Friends

  1. BV2 BV2 is offline

    Member

    BV2
  2. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline

    Banned

    cajuncocoa
  3. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  4. CCTelander CCTelander is offline

    Member

    CCTelander
  5. cstarace cstarace is offline

    Member

    cstarace
  6. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline

    Member

    DonVolaric
  7. Ender Ender is offline

    Member

    Ender
  8. fr33 fr33 is offline

    Member

    fr33
  9. green73 green73 is offline

    Member

    green73
  10. orenbus orenbus is offline

    Member

    orenbus
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 16
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast

05-15-2024


05-02-2024


03-06-2024


11-19-2023


09-15-2023


09-04-2023


08-31-2023


08-27-2023


06-05-2023


05-30-2023


05-12-2023


04-20-2023


03-02-2023


02-23-2023


12-29-2022


12-24-2022



Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast

03-04-2020


Page 1 of 408 1231151101 ... LastLast

05-24-2024


05-23-2024


05-22-2024


05-20-2024


05-19-2024


05-18-2024



Page 1 of 408 1231151101 ... LastLast