otherone
Member

https://x.com/DefiantLs/status/1834244666247520289 1834244666247520289

https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1834221386321023257 1834221386321023257

https://x.com/ThoughtSlime/status/1833863616107348122 to: https://x.com/CanuckCrusaderX/status/1833940143528452275 https://x.com/PhilipPetrunak/status/1833910595135127847 & https://x.com/GooseAndItsOwn/status/1833942300583498035

https://x.com/Sargon_of_Akkad/status/1833910823045198321

"'Our democracy' is always code for 'our hegemony'." -- Michael Malice https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1834215798858207667

https://x.com/ajtourville/status/1834212840376344899 1834212840376344899 Australia threatens fines for social media giants enabling misinformation https://www.reuters.com/technology/australia-threatens-fines-social-media-giants-enabling-misinformation-2024-09-12/ {Byron Kaye | 12 September 2024} Breaches face fines up to 5% of global revenue

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1834287045335994551 & https://x.com/Sargon_of_Akkad/status/1834290599639318532

https://x.com/SaltyCracker9/status/1834271952179236913 1834271952179236913 https://x.com/TRHLofficial/status/1834290607550042305 1834290607550042305

Quis custodiet fact-checks ipsos custodes "fact checkers"? https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1834079194600669580

https://x.com/dbenner83/status/1834080344502354312 1834080344502354312 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1834157436737126488 https://x.com/RonPaul/status/1834252925956194533

Livestream in three hours or so: Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard Fights With Dolton Trustees For Control. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk9N_isqapc {Nate The Lawyer | 12 September 2024} Special Board Meeting

So your justification for Harris being held less (read: "not at all") accountable by the "moderators" of the "debate" for her lies is ... an ancient and moldy quip that originated as a joke about politicians in general (long before Donald Trump ever even made the scene) - precisely because politicians in general (of which Kamala Harris s one) are so notorious for being liars - but specially repurposed to apply to Trump, but not to Harris? Ummm ... okay. Sorry, but no goalpost-move for you! The issue at point is the on-the-spot, real-time "fact checking" by ABC's "moderators" (LOL) which was applied to Trump's lies, but not to Harris' lies - not some after-the-fact article from an entirely different venue. The latter does absolutely nothing to excuse the former.

If I could afford all that other stuff I wouldn't be eating goose.

Don't forget the full moon. There should be a full moon, too.

Don't forget voters! Voting, after all, is an act of aggression - and as such, retaliatory violence is warranted under the NAP.

Dave Smith | Debate RECAP | Part Of The Problem 1168 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t-YQQZFxqA {Dave Smith | 11 September 2024} On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by co-host Robbie "The Fire" Bernstein to discuss everything about the presidential debate, where key shots were missed by both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, bias on behalf of the moderators, previous debates and presidential seasons, and so much more!

Why Trump Won the Debate https://odysee.com/@mises:1/why-trump-won-the-debate:5 {Mises Media | 11 September 2024} On this episode of Radio Rothbard, Connor O’Keeffe joins Tho Bishop to talk about last night’s debate. How should we think about the political circus? Will any of it matter in November? And what should we think about the corporate press’s role in the current election? Tune in for this and more. @mises:1/why-trump-won-the-debate:5

Kamala FAILS At The Debate https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/kamala-fails-at-the-debate:9 {Actual Justice Warrior | 11 September 2024} In this video I discuss Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump at the 1st and possibly only debate between Trump & Kamala. I explain how despite Trump not destroying her. She didn't get what she wanted out of the debate & immediately demanded another chance. Sources: Full Debate: https://www.youtube.com/live/VgsC_aBquUE Harris Debate Strategy: https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/harris-campaign-says-muted-mics-handcuffed-their-debate-strategy/

EXCLUSIVE New Footage and UPDATES of Warrantless Entry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksQPi9fwkEE {LackLuster | 11 September 2024} Help Adele Fight This: - GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/571bfc67 Riverside Sheriff: - https://www.facebook.com/riversidecountysheriff/

Not to give the U.S. or Israel a pass for anything, but I'm pretty sure there are quite a large number of people in North Korea and China with grievances about jackboot thuggery that are at least as legitimate (and quite possibly more so). Of course, it's the jackboot that happens to be on your own neck that's always the most troublesome - but even so, of the four, I know which boot I would prefer (at least, so far).

Release the Chappaquiddick files!

So then ... it's not okay for you to say or imply things that are not empirically factual (such as that someone else said or implied that New York is in the Midwest) in service to your "emotional truth"? (Or is it okay, but only if the first person who said it was not a "literal neo-nazi" ... ?)

Ah, I see ... So it's okay for you to go around saying or implying things that are not empirically factual (such as that someone else said or implied that New York is in the Midwest) in service to your "emotional truth" - but when people you disagree with do that sort of thing, they're "neo-nazis". Got it. :up: I am curious about one thing, though: do you actually consider their "neo-nazism" to be empirically factual - or is it just something that is "emotionally truthful" for you?

The "confusion" you previously expressed - and to which I previously replied - was your pretense that anyone had somehow said or suggested that "New York is in the Midwest". So this is a nice attempt at a goalpost-moving bait-and-switch. I'll give it a 6.5 out of 10. Unfortunately, as to your present "confusion" (wink-wink), I have to go back to being disappointed again. I mean, "undocumented migrants" don't "seem to have anything to do wit Haitians, refugees, or immigrants"? Really? Come on!

Understood. But from a historical POV, you understand the friction? My last question: " you, being an intelligent individual, can understand the pitfalls of introducing an alien culture upon an established one, in a short period of time, at such a grand scale?"

I've been enjoying Chat GPT: "The argument fallacy of rejecting an argument based on one point or a trivial point is called the "Cherry Picking" fallacy. "Cherry Picking occurs when someone selects specific evidence or points that support their position while ignoring other relevant information that could contradict it. This selective use of information can lead to an unbalanced or misleading argument. The fallacy often involves focusing on one minor or less significant point to undermine the entire argument, rather than addressing the argument as a whole." I don't think this explanation fully describes your argument...my younger, more sober self could suss it out...but you, being an intelligent individual, can understand the pitfalls of introducing an alien culture upon an established one, in a short period of time, at such a grand scale?