Today, 12:38 AM
So your counter-argument is this connection cannot pertain to anything criminally sinister, but is simply attributable to a lack of journalist integrity concerning something that you have made the self-determination (with no supporting evidence mind you) was nothing more than a "fluff piece?" Further noting that Gentlemen's Quarterly (GQ), an international publication, is not just some local community rag--it prides itself with being a forefront of male fashion, art, events, and political awareness. Further still, D.C. has long been riddled with sexual perversion, pedophilia, and felonious crime; so the discovery of (yet another) politically connected pedo-ring operating there, is it really all that far fetched? I think not.
There are at least 10,000 other people in D.C. that are 150-times more qualified to fill that spot than Alefantis.
So you admit he is politically connected (because he seems to be downplaying this aspect of his life) and that he likely receives favors from the Democratically aligned David Brock--who is himself head-over-heels fawning aboard the Clinton band wagon-- (among others, e.g., the Podestas.) Therefore, by association Alefantis may just very likely covert relationship with the Clinton crime family.
The way you describe Alefantis is really sounds like he is some sort of covert political operative, being bank-rolled by someone highly powerful and wealthy--that is Rockefeller and Soros level stuff. So the question is who is funding this strange dude?
Also interesting check out #50: