• DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:41 PM
    Sorry Comrade! Thank you for the kind unbad correction to my abhorrent thinking!
    8 replies | 94 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:38 PM
    Right back at it. No the Thread Title does NOT state the Facts.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:27 PM
    Stating something that has not been determined in a COURT OF LAW as OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. They would have originally made the statement because they BELIEVE the statement they made to be true, and were coerced into redaction. It is NOT FACT. Look, I believe that YOU believe Trump lost, and there is no election fraud. And you can believe that. You can even express those beliefs all you want. But now youre basically demanding that "False Claims" are Objective in their nature and we must change ourselves to suit your view of the world. You are twisting information to suit your narrative. That is called BIAS. And exactly WHY we have such a problem with MSM. Youre merely repeating what the MSM has said because you believe it. Fine if you believe it but it does not make it Objective or True. The type of thinking down the road will lead you to want to pass laws to censor us, but it will backfire on you and you wont be given permission to speak either. If this was Twitter, everyone who has expressed doubt in you would already be banned and ONLY YOU would remain. Fortunately for all of us we have some great Moderators here, and they are not about to ban us. Kind of like the Fact Checkers ONLY "Fact Checking" those expressing Conservative views, but anyone on the Left gets a Free Pass. And for the record, "Fact Check" just means they googled something, which, again does NOT make it true. I am not sure that you understand the difference between Objective and Subjective.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 02:25 PM
    No truer words have been spoken.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    8 replies | 94 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 02:17 PM
    Pfffftt!! That's all in the past. Fact checking will no longer be necessary. They promise ... https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1353879721361219584 1353879721361219584
    8 replies | 94 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:12 PM
    Again BULLSHIT. You can NOT use the phrasing of a Title as evidence that there is no election fraud. -REP
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:04 PM
    OMG Dominion sues Rudy Giuliani therefore Giuliani MUST BE LYING! Rudy Giuliani Sued by Dominion Voting Systems For Defamation https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/rudy-giuliani-sued-by-dominion-voting-systems-for-defamation See? Since they are suing then there can not be ANY election fraud!
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:59 PM
    Bullshit. "American Thinker Statement Retracting False Claims about Dominion" The difference between False and Not False is subjective. The thread title is presented as Objective, as if it is Fact and Evidence. I believe Trump WON the election. And I believe there IS massive election fraud.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 01:47 PM
    COVID was a "dry run"...God save us from what they have waiting in the wings.
    7 replies | 178 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    14 replies | 125 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    14 replies | 125 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:44 PM
    One other thing that needs to be pointed out is Correlation does NOT mean Causation. Here is an example of how that can go wrong. Statistically crime is much higher in summer than winter. Also, ice cream sales are much higher in summer than winter. Thus, Ice Cream CAUSES Crime. That is associating Correlation and Causation. Same thing as a Correlation is being manufactured between Republican / Libertarian / Christian / Conservative and Terrorist. The two terms are not mutually exclusive. The Title of the thread is using that Correlation as Causation. This is akin to using the number of people that believe that there is Election Fraud as evidence. They are pissed, I believe they do believe, but it is NOT evidence. With the Title of this thread, the Correlation is that American Journal withdrew their statement as evidence. It is not evidence, they simply redacted their statement because it was challenged, but does not mean that the statements were in fact "False". Period.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 01:43 PM
    Doting fathers don't go on four day drug benders, freak out with dey Glock and act out to kill mama, baby mama and any person unfortunate enough to be in close range. 10/10 for perfect marksmanship...much as I hate to give cops credit for anything, but they did their job and took out the trash.
    14 replies | 125 view(s)
  • luctor-et-emergo's Avatar
    Today, 01:17 PM
    I agree with the spirit of the argument but I can also see a hypothetical time in the future where the opposite could be said by Massie. If the offence is committed right near the end, the procedure cannot be completed before the end of their term. Hypothetically, if you agree with the barring of holding office part, you may still want to follow through on the impeachment for that purpose. But it's a funny comment and I do think it's about time to stop FDR from holding office again. :D I mean, dead people voting is one thing but dead people holding office. :rolleyes:
    5 replies | 87 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 01:16 PM
    Elections still matter. Voting still matters. This is real policy with real changes that is going to hurt real people. It's not a panacea, it's not the ultimate solution, but it should not have been walked away from, thus leaving the field empty and victory by default to the Marxist mob because "muh agorsim!" or "Orange Man BAD!"
    10 replies | 124 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    10 replies | 124 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:08 PM
    Its a setup. When the vaccines start killing people en masse, the plan is going to be to blame it on some new strain of COVID. Thing is, I think there very well may be a very dangerous bioweapon that is planned to be deployed, but it sure as fuck aint COVID. COVID is just an excuse to deprive the people of their property and ability to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. ... which are now words of Terrorists.
    7 replies | 178 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:06 PM
    Far too often the difference between true and false is subjective. It very much sounds like what you may be insinuating is that people should not have ANY RIGHT to speak, instead, make it a PERMISSION that is ONLY GRANTED if the individual will express statements that are in line with "official narrative". And THAT is DANGEROUS. Guess what. I make mistakes. I own them. I learn from them. And I look at those "mistakes" as an "opportunity to learn". Thus, if I am not making mistakes at something, then I am not trying. The current narrative does not allow for ANYONE to make a mistake, or to change their minds. Also HIGHLY DANGEROUS and ONE SIDED NARRATIVE. Guess what else. I express beliefs that I DO NOT AGREE with quite frequently. Its not necessarily about ONLY BEING PERMITTED to express things that "I agree with" because what I am trying to do is express a train of thought and how I arrive at certain conclusions. And I dont think there is ANYTHING MALICIOUS about that. Nor do I think American Journals words are MALICIOUS by any reasonable interpretation. Now, would you hold the same point of view if instead of it being American Journal it was a Petty Criminal and Known Liar? The "damage" is only done to themselves. So by all means I would allow them to continue expressing themselves as much as they want. Many people believe that everyone else does not challenge information that is presented to them. I said "cats are tasty", which implies that I have eaten a cat. I have not. Well thats a good expression of something I dont agree with. But more importantly I do not believe that everyone that reads that statement will accept it without challenge. Thats what idiots do. "I told that cop I did not eat no chocolate cake" while having a face covered in chocolate. Its childish, immature, and shows an inability to recognize that other people have intelligence enough challenge information.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 01:05 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Brian4Liberty again.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:24 PM
    Even if they are flat out WRONG, they still have a Constitutional RIGHT to express their Beliefs. Freedom comes in two parts, the Freedom to do what you want, and the Freedom to do what you ought. What we OUGHT to do is protect the Right of the People to express beliefs than we do NOT agree with, rather than ONLY those which support an "official narrative". That means you are just as protected, and we can disagree, and STILL get along just fine because we will agree on MANY other things. The thing is, the Popular thing to say will NEVER need to be afforded the Protections of the 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment exists to protect the Unpopular thing to say. And right now on this topic, the Unpopular thing depends on who you ask and where you are. Unpopular here means "the election was not stolen" but I still have to take the higher road and DEFEND your Right to express that belief. The Unpopular thing pretty much country wide is still that "the election was not stolen". But, the Unpopular thing as far as Media (not all journalists are MSM, like Ben Swann) is "the election was stolen". The 1st Amendment exists so we ALL have the right (notice how that is inclusive of EVERYONE without regard to race color or gender?) to express our beliefs. Now, in a court of law, we also have Innocent Until Proven Guilty. So is American Journal Guilty of expressing incorrect information? Not until it is PROVEN in a Court of Law. Until it is PROVEN, to me, it is simply a Belief, which does allow room for errors and lets me and everyone else change their minds. Which would you prefer? A one sided narrative, or expression of beliefs that differ by everyone equally?
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    58 replies | 1436 view(s)
  • Philhelm's Avatar
    Today, 12:12 PM
    My problem with entertaining that there was no fraud is that I would have to dismiss the obvious mail-in voting scheme, a coordinated stalling of ballot counting in critical swing states that Trump was leading, Trump having coattails but no coat, Trump outperforming 2016, Biden not campaigning, all of the anomalous voting data, etc. Even the appearance of impropriety should have been avoided, but the response was "Fuck you, there was no fraud and in order to prove it we are going to censor you." 9/11 truthers, who accused the government of murdering thousands of Americans, weren't treated with such censorship. There was definitely fraud and I'll never be convinced otherwise. The problem is that Trump performed so high that they had to use 4:00 a.m. ballot dumps in order to supplement the massive, baked in fraud. Otherwise, I agree that there are still tens of millions of voters who are a threat to liberty. The good news is that despite the juggernaut of media, big tech, Hollywood, academia, etc., a similar number of Americans (I'd argue more due to my stance on fraud) actually see through the bullshit. That's actually quite amazing, and shows that we aren't as stupid and isolated as we would have thought. And for those who may have disdain for "Trumpkins," many of them like Ron Paul, and are much more libertarian than they were ten years ago.
    185 replies | 3953 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:02 PM
    Dont believe ANYTHING that ANYONE says to be true. Even things that I say. Do some actual research and not just "Fact Check" which mostly means "ask Google", I mean to get your own hands on the ACTUAL EVIDENCE or as close as you can. That is the difference between BELIEVING and KNOWING. I believe, but I do not KNOW. I think it is worth while to have someone with integrity examine the EVIDENCE, the same EVIDENCE that has NOT BEEN EXAMINED and is thrown out "for other reasons" other than being not true. Peoples Belief Systems can shift quickly, but what I always think is funny is how hard they will fight to protect those beliefs, even if those beliefs are not true. The ability to change their mind lets a person be a bit more mentally flexible where by they can change their minds, which really allows them to decide what kind of person they want to be, and not defined by Identity Politics. Mind if I ask you something else? Are you happy with who you are? Not so much what other people think of you, but by yourself, left to your own devices and decisions, are you happy? What if you could "just choose" to be happy? What would allow you to be able to make that choice?
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:56 AM
    Well, I do think Dominion is guilty of Election Fraud. I have seen enough evidence, as well as understanding that they have motive and opportunity. I will maintain that redaction does not mean that the fraud did or did not take place. That really is something that needs to be determined in a court of law where the evidence is examined. There is a problem tho. If the PRESIDENT OF THE FUCKING UNITED STATES can not get SUPREME COURT JUDGES to examine the evidence, which has been dismissed on "technicalities" and not "interpretation of evidence presented", how the hell could a tiny online website publisher have a snowballs chance of a FAIR TRIAL IN COURT? This would be the most politically influenced legal case in history, and they would lose. Not because there is no evidence, but because the JUDGE HAS BEEN COMPROMISED. I suppose a good analogy would be a guy swimming with little rubber ducky arm floaties having the ENTIRE US NAVY POINT THEIR BIGGEST WEAPONS against him. What is that guy gonna do? Spit water at them? I believe that the American Journal was INTIMIDATED into redacting their statements.
    98 replies | 482 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:50 AM
    Perhaps "Double Think"? Let them understand what the definition of Double Think is. Two types of incorrect thinking that usually mirror each other. Cognitive Dissonance, and Double Think. Cognitive Dissonance is a conflict in the mind between two conflicting ideas. "I want to buy my kid the cool shoes but I cant afford it. Which do I do?" Double Think is kind of the OPPOSITE of Cognitive Dissonance, where two ideas that should conflict exist in the mind, but do not conflict because they have not been compared. "Republicans are Pro Life but Pro War", vs "Democrats are Pro Abortion and Anti War". The idea to focus on there is that an individuals chosen party "protects the sanctity of life". Really, BOTH support DEATH, Republicans by War, and Democrats by Abortion. Both worship DEATH. Same people pulling strings on both sides. One of the things they do that paralyzes people mentally is to CONFUSE people. They achieve this by trying to to confuse as many people as they can. MSM does this all the time, where in a debate, if they can not win based on FACTS, they try to CONFUSE their opponent with Cognitive Dissonance and Double Think. The only way that people can overcome their confused types of thinking REQUIRES that first it is identified and explained to them.
    19 replies | 455 view(s)
More Activity

181 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Erowe
  2. View Conversation
    You’ve got a mind like a steel trap.
  3. View Conversation
    Hey old friend. Your inbox is full or else I'd have sent this there.

    This election has me at the point of no hope for the future of this nation. And I occasionally remember the good people from RPFs and all the time we had exchanging ideas and creating our own little online community.

    I read a bit of your latest comments about holding the line so maybe we can gather a counter-force. Whelp. Time is up. I'm a bit sad the forum is not as active as in days gone by, but things change.

    Thank God Ron is still alive to be a voice of reason in a sea of dystopian technocrats.

    Just wanted to drop in and say hello and I hope all is well with you and yours.

    Cheeeeeeers!
  4. View Conversation
    Hey what's your facebook?
  5. View Conversation
    Your inbox is full.

    Happy Father's Day!

    Hope you have a great day!
  6. View Conversation
    Thought of you the other day. I saw a misspelling on Poshmark. The girl was selling shortallls (overall shorts) and had them listed as shartalls, lol.
  7. View Conversation
    Your inbox is full.
  8. View Conversation
    Swiss gun ownership: one of the perks of maintaining a healthy, national identity, while remaining cosmopolitan, liberal, and rather open. Legal immigration there is actually well regulated and up in the past 30 years, according to some articles. Its a shame our national ethos is immature or nonexistant by comparrison.
  9. View Conversation
    HAHA! I just saw your post in another thread (I was catching up on forum drama) about Mr A putting me on a leash. I don't think he would do that to me if he could. Even though he complains about my oversharing sometimes (not on the forum but IRL. I'm not good at filtering), he knows I'm a good girl and despite my outward personality, I'm a surprisingly solid and committed person underneath. We've been together since I was 23 (24 years/married 20), he knows everything - even stuff he'd rather not know.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 181
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast
About Anti Federalist

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
Ad buys, NH const. amendment work. RP 2008 -2012 GOTV drives
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
3
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.

Signature


We must picture Hell as a state where everyone is perpetually concerned about his own dignity and advancement, where everyone has a grievance, and where everyone lives the deadly serious passions of envy, self-importance, and resentment. - C. S. Lewis

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
93,516
Posts Per Day
19.09
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
181
Most Recent Message
01-08-2021 01:48 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 02:07 PM
Join Date
08-30-2007
Referrals
6

69 Friends

  1. acesfull acesfull is offline

    Member

    acesfull
  2. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  3. Becker Becker is offline

    Banned

    Becker
  4. BlackJack BlackJack is offline

    Member

    BlackJack
  5. Bsouljah Bsouljah is offline

    New Member

    Bsouljah
  6. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline

    Banned

    cajuncocoa
  7. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  8. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  9. CCTelander CCTelander is offline

    Member

    CCTelander
  10. Christian Liberty
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 69
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
View Anti Federalist's Blog

Recent Entries

Why we are taxed so much

by Anti Federalist on 06-09-2017 at 01:07 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
Some interesting history.

Beardsley Ruml is the man who came up with the idea of income tax withholding during WW2 as a "temporary" wartime measure.

It worked so well in fleecing the people, and AmeriKunts, being idiots for the most part, were happy to see big fat "refund" checks show up every April, so there was, and has been, no real effort to repeal or remove income withholding policies after the end of the war.

I have said for

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

“Toning Down The Rhetoric” Means Obeying Big Government

by Anti Federalist on 01-10-2011 at 05:32 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
“Toning Down The Rhetoric” Means Obeying Big Government

Despite the fact that Jared Lee Loughner was a psychotic loner with “left-wing” beliefs according to those who knew him, the establishment has hastily exploited yesterday’s tragic shooting in Tucson to demonize conservatives, libertarians and gun owners while ordering Americans to “tone down the rhetoric,” which is nothing more than a euphemism for stifling dissent and coercing people to roll over on Obamacare, bailouts and

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

(Older post - bumped)Chinese made fluoride damages Mass. town's water supply machinery

by Anti Federalist on 01-07-2011 at 07:56 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
WTF, I mean, really, WTF...we have to import our poison from China???!!!

Chinese Fluoride In Mass. Water Raises Concern

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/inve...88/detail.html

Team 5 Investigates After Amesbury Pulls Sodium Fluoride From Water Supply

AMESBURY, Mass. --

Fluoride is added to the water most of us drink because the government believes it's a safe and inexpensive way to prevent tooth decay.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Leading Conservatives Openly Support a Terrorist Group

by Anti Federalist on 01-06-2011 at 04:28 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
Leading neo conservatives, Glenn.



Leading Conservatives Openly Support a Terrorist Group

Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com

http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl2/cons...errorists.html

Imagine if a group of leading American liberals met on foreign soil with – and expressed vocal support for – supporters of a terrorist group that had (a) a long history of hateful anti-American rhetoric, (b) an active role in both the takeover

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Aaron Zelman - Director of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership - dead at 64

by Anti Federalist on 12-30-2010 at 02:59 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
Aaron was a tireless, ferocious defender of the 2nd Amendment.

Apparently he passed away last week at 64.

His activism will be sorely, greatly, missed.

Shalom and R.I.P.

http://www.ammoland.com/2010/12/29/a...f-jpfo-passes/
Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

01-08-2021


01-07-2021


01-02-2021


12-19-2020


12-15-2020


12-07-2020


12-02-2020


12-01-2020


11-19-2020


11-08-2020


11-06-2020


11-05-2020



Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 806 1231151101501 ... LastLast

01-26-2021


01-25-2021


01-24-2021


01-23-2021


01-22-2021



Page 1 of 806 1231151101501 ... LastLast