• Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 04:52 PM
    I hate these fucking things and will not use them. I also hate this new trend of table top devices, that dun you with noise, ads and games, have a camera and microphone that god only knows who is watching and listening, and then make you finger fuck the fool thing to pay. Fuck that, I pay top dollar to have a good meal with good service and that includes taking my order and handling the bill and not shoving surveillance literally, right in my face.
    15 replies | 147 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:50 PM
    I actually agree with you on all points. Murder being legal, we need look no further than US Military or Cops. Also, Self Defense. Just to validate both sides of the point.
    12 replies | 108 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:36 PM
    Well, a Civil Liberty would say that when I am in your house and it is your property, I have a Liberty to use the bathroom, but do NOT have a Right to smoke in your house. I would have a Right to smoke in my own house, but not yours, as it would be your permission (Civil Liberty) to grant in that specific situation. What neither one of us would have a Right to do is to decree that the other may not smoke, ever. Recognizing the difference between a Right and a Civil Liberty (Permission) is a very important concept to understand. Trouble with this understanding is that for most people, the Definition between Rights and Permissions has been heavily confused. Whether that Confusion is intentional or not, the consequences are the same. Rights end where the Equal Rights of others begin. So yes, a person you once invited into your house has Rights, but by coming into your house, where you are Sovereign, King, and there is NO higher authority, they choose to temporarily give up their own Rights and abide by your rules. Outside your house, you would have zero authority over what they do. You could say that based on their behavior outside your house that you will no longer allow them to come inside your house, but, being Sovereign over your own property, you do NOT need ANY reason to say "no, you may not come in". A "Civil Liberty" would be nothing more than a Permission you chose to grant, and have valid authority to revoke that Permission at any time. Can I have one of your beers? That is your Permission to grant, but most importantly, I should not think for a second that I have any authority to take your beer without your permission. Ron explained a form of this as Entitlement. Immigration I do not believe is a Right, but a Permission to be granted by the We the People, and we can pick and choose, and even cherry pick who we will allow to come into the country for what ever reason, if any, that we want. Also, this isnt directed specifically at you, just an in general reply.
    30 replies | 216 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 04:27 PM
    Yup, Pete's right. Keep in mind these things are slow, under-powered and difficult to maneuver. Any well found passenger vessel would not have had nearly the trouble in riding out that breeze and sea, seas that are really nothing more than wind chop.
    25 replies | 162 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 04:22 PM
    That's called "isinglass", although a somewhat incorrect term. It's a heavy gauge clear vinyl, without a knife, you're not going to tear it open. It looks like it happened pretty quickly, and it's pointless to say "well I wouldn't have been in that position" but at the last moment, when it appears that the starboard deck is awash, I would have, literally, tossed people off after securing their PFDs. It's a lake, the water is warm, even if a non swimmer the PFD will keep you afloat and it looks like the shoreline was 100 feet away or less. Get them out of the enclosed vessel...I will bet hard money the investigation shows that most people drowned while stuck inside the boat, or being beaten up alongside the vessel while it sunk. Trained mariners cannot abandon ship under bad weather conditions...remember the El Faro.
    25 replies | 162 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:19 PM
    Making anything illegal only creates a Black Market for it. If you want any sort of control over it, it needs to be legalized. Trouble with this concept is that it isnt Mexico that is consuming all the drugs, its the US.
    12 replies | 108 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:18 PM
    Since Privacy is gone, if you buy Plus Sized Jeans, expect your Health Insurance Rates to go up. The poor and unhealthy pay even more than the rich.
    4 replies | 101 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:16 PM
    I guess Minimum Wage is too expensive for the company to afford and still make a profit? Oh well, it seems to solve the problem of Livable Wage by rejecting all humans and also takes care of the problem of companies that exploit people with Minimum Wage being subsidized by govt thru Welfare... --- War on Cash. Debit Cards are as dangerous to Privacy as Cell Phones and Google and the NSA.
    15 replies | 147 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:13 PM
    Then the People have Rights, both at an individual level, and at a national level? Would that also mean (and yes, stretching here a bit) to collectively say "we dont want every immigrant that wants to come here"? Would the People have the Right to do such a thing? Again, extending, if one of the foundations of Rights is "I own myself", as a collective (and yes, being careful with that), would "The People" technically own the country? And same as Private Property Rights where if you own your Property like your house, you have a Right to say you may / may not smoke in my house, and that is MY Permission to grant. A homeowner would also a Right to say you may / may not enter my house. Abstracting to larger scale and extension, collectively you may / may not enter our Country? Abstract to small scale, I think what has happened is a homeowner allowed a person to come into their house, and the invited person is now inviting other people to come into the homeowners house, even though they do not have the Right to do so. I believe that concept is why there is a major difference between Constitutional Rights and Civil Liberties, where the Rights protect the Individual and Civil Liberties protect the community as a whole. Feel free to challenge the idea, but is that thinking rational?
    30 replies | 216 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 04:04 PM
    Lets play with an idea here... The idea is how to shut down InfoWars instead of how to keep them going, or if InfoWars is protected by First Amendment. And, lets do it legally. Easy concept that respects Freedom of Press, called Free Market. So, if we wanted InfoWars shut down, then people would not watch, and companies would not associate with InfoWars by advertising products. First, InfoWars would adjust their prices for Law of Economics, for Supply & Demand. If that did not work, then InfoWars would go out of business because no one listened and no one bought advertising or sold products or provide services. Free Market and Free Press both work as neither Right is even remotely infringed. The reason that Free Market has not worked in shutting down InfoWars is exactly because of Free Market, protected by Free Press. InfoWars has a Demand for people to get information that does not fit the MSM's Official Narrative about more war and bigger govt and terrorists and socialism / communism. InfoWars offers their own flavor with the exact opposite, that bigger govt is not the solution, socialism / communism does not work, more war hurts everyone, and individuals and small groups in high positions of power really are out to cause harm to people in various forms. Both Alex and MSM offer different flavors of Sensationalism. That Sensationalism is a drug that can get people addicted as it plays on Emotions. Trouble is, people stop watching for the Truth, but rather how much information is Sensationalized in the way it is presented.
    29 replies | 461 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:53 PM
    Hmm... If people are not given Rights from Govt, but rather their Creator, and Govts are created by people, would that make the People the Creator of Govts, and, in turn, again since Rights are granted by their Creator and People created Govt, can the People grant very specific Rights (really Privileges) to the Govts they create? I am sort of testing the concept of Abstraction at both Macro and Micro scale, so I need to hear both sides to the argument... The idea is that things which work at the small scale also work on large and very large scale, abstracting back and forth between very small and very large, so I am curious.
    30 replies | 216 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:43 PM
    Information is the new Gold. Those who have the most information will have the most power over people.
    12 replies | 110 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 03:35 PM
    I honestly think this is fake news coming from the NY Slimes. These people are throwing everything they can at the wall hoping it will stick.
    8 replies | 129 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 03:17 PM
    Whoop, Whoop, Whoop...DefCon 1!
    9 replies | 219 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Today, 02:47 PM
    btw, suz-when you get really good, you might want to look into a shopify store so you can own your traffic (no sharing with ebay and no fees :D ). https://www.shopify.com/ They have a free trial if yer interested. Since yer selling your own stuff, it would be especially good for you, IMO.
    38 replies | 566 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 02:14 PM
    "Nearly impossible." Yeah, it's probably nearly impossible to split the atom, fly to the moon, or run a sub 4 minute mile.
    29 replies | 256 view(s)
  • jllundqu's Avatar
    Today, 02:12 PM
    It's for the children.... unless YOU JUST WANT PEOPLE TO DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    29 replies | 256 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 02:06 PM
    Most of France's water supply is privatized.
    29 replies | 256 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 01:37 PM
    The examples are historical and present day. If you have never heard of electric utility deregulation, then you must be from the past. You did not even bother to read the article. Neg rep for game playing, fake "supporting member."
    29 replies | 256 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 01:23 PM
    No. There is this pervasive idea that large scale operations must be public utilities. History and present day reality contradict that. It's not an either/or proposition. Excerpts from Mises' The Myth of Natural Monopoly:
    29 replies | 256 view(s)
  • Root's Avatar
    Today, 12:26 PM
    I'm not surprised. NJ will tax the air soon enough.
    29 replies | 256 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 12:16 PM
    That's Zippy's M.O.
    29 replies | 461 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:13 PM
    Yeah, they were making water somewhere, big time...pump failure or overwhelmed.
    25 replies | 162 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:10 PM
    Oh yeah, I can see that...just watching this makes me want to fucking scream.
    9 replies | 96 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:05 PM
    ♪ You can sail the seven seas... ♪
    9 replies | 107 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    Today, 12:04 PM
    Zip always hates it when his own game playing is turned on him. Double when it's his own thread! Ooops!
    10 replies | 255 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 11:56 AM
    Already been done...for boats. The problem is not so much the enclosure, but the vessel itself, which was never designed to have an enclosure. These "DUCKs"... (the acronym is based on GM's model assignment: D Designed in 1942 U Utility K All-wheel drive W Dual-Tandem rear axles) ...are not the most seaworthy of vessels at all. They were yet another bastard hybrid that came out of WW2 designing, they can crawl on land or wallow through water, they exist only because they do both, rather poorly.
    25 replies | 162 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 11:41 AM
    We laugh about "taxing the air". Let the green creeps have their way, and that is exactly what will happen.
    29 replies | 256 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    29 replies | 461 view(s)
More Activity

174 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Swiss gun ownership: one of the perks of maintaining a healthy, national identity, while remaining cosmopolitan, liberal, and rather open. Legal immigration there is actually well regulated and up in the past 30 years, according to some articles. Its a shame our national ethos is immature or nonexistant by comparrison.
  2. View Conversation
    HAHA! I just saw your post in another thread (I was catching up on forum drama) about Mr A putting me on a leash. I don't think he would do that to me if he could. Even though he complains about my oversharing sometimes (not on the forum but IRL. I'm not good at filtering), he knows I'm a good girl and despite my outward personality, I'm a surprisingly solid and committed person underneath. We've been together since I was 23 (24 years/married 20), he knows everything - even stuff he'd rather not know.
  3. View Conversation
    Mr Animal had a midlife crisis.
  4. View Conversation
    I hit a button before I completed my thought when I sent you a rep yesterday (or the day before). Anyway, I was going to say, I don't believe in Hell. It doesn't jive with me. Pete actually touched on it a bit in one thread.
  5. View Conversation
    Ever since you made that comment, I picture this every time I see you get riled up in a post.

  6. View Conversation
    Hi AntiFed,

    I believe it was you who posted a great quote by a political theorist explaining why enforcers were a worse evil than politicians because they enforce bad laws without question. Do you remember this quote and who it was by? (Maybe Chodorov, Chomsky or someone else).
  7. View Conversation
    Sending Positive energy your way!

    I love you, more!
  8. View Conversation
    New thread about the latest Vermin Supreme ad is up. Check it out and share with friends/family!
  9. View Conversation
    Check this out. An exchange with a friend of a friend of mine on Fedbook who is a cop. (also in the bestest picture thread nao) This policing for profit attitude is apparently quite pervasive. The future is EPIC fail. :'(
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 174
Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast
About Anti Federalist

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
Ad buys, NH const. amendment work. RP 2008 -2012 GOTV drives
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
3
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.

Signature


Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
79,724
Posts Per Day
20.05
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
174
Most Recent Message
06-15-2018 07:44 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 04:53 PM
Join Date
08-30-2007
Referrals
6

64 Friends

  1. acesfull acesfull is offline

    Member

    acesfull
  2. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  3. Becker Becker is offline

    Banned

    Becker
  4. BlackJack BlackJack is offline

    Member

    BlackJack
  5. Bsouljah Bsouljah is offline

    New Member

    Bsouljah
  6. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline

    Banned

    cajuncocoa
  7. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  8. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  9. Christian Liberty
  10. Conza88 Conza88 is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via MSN to Conza88
    Conza88
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 64
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
View Anti Federalist's Blog

Recent Entries

Why we are taxed so much

by Anti Federalist on 06-09-2017 at 01:07 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
Some interesting history.

Beardsley Ruml is the man who came up with the idea of income tax withholding during WW2 as a "temporary" wartime measure.

It worked so well in fleecing the people, and AmeriKunts, being idiots for the most part, were happy to see big fat "refund" checks show up every April, so there was, and has been, no real effort to repeal or remove income withholding policies after the end of the war.

I have said for

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

“Toning Down The Rhetoric” Means Obeying Big Government

by Anti Federalist on 01-10-2011 at 05:32 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
“Toning Down The Rhetoric” Means Obeying Big Government

Despite the fact that Jared Lee Loughner was a psychotic loner with “left-wing” beliefs according to those who knew him, the establishment has hastily exploited yesterday’s tragic shooting in Tucson to demonize conservatives, libertarians and gun owners while ordering Americans to “tone down the rhetoric,” which is nothing more than a euphemism for stifling dissent and coercing people to roll over on Obamacare, bailouts and

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

(Older post - bumped)Chinese made fluoride damages Mass. town's water supply machinery

by Anti Federalist on 01-07-2011 at 07:56 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
WTF, I mean, really, WTF...we have to import our poison from China???!!!

Chinese Fluoride In Mass. Water Raises Concern

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/inve...88/detail.html

Team 5 Investigates After Amesbury Pulls Sodium Fluoride From Water Supply

AMESBURY, Mass. --

Fluoride is added to the water most of us drink because the government believes it's a safe and inexpensive way to prevent tooth decay.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Leading Conservatives Openly Support a Terrorist Group

by Anti Federalist on 01-06-2011 at 04:28 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
Leading neo conservatives, Glenn.



Leading Conservatives Openly Support a Terrorist Group

Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com

http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl2/cons...errorists.html

Imagine if a group of leading American liberals met on foreign soil with – and expressed vocal support for – supporters of a terrorist group that had (a) a long history of hateful anti-American rhetoric, (b) an active role in both the takeover

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Aaron Zelman - Director of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership - dead at 64

by Anti Federalist on 12-30-2010 at 02:59 PM
Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
Aaron was a tireless, ferocious defender of the 2nd Amendment.

Apparently he passed away last week at 64.

His activism will be sorely, greatly, missed.

Shalom and R.I.P.

http://www.ammoland.com/2010/12/29/a...f-jpfo-passes/
Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

07-19-2018


07-01-2018

  • 03:30 PM - Hidden

06-16-2018


06-13-2018


05-26-2018


05-23-2018


05-16-2018


04-18-2018


04-17-2018


04-12-2018


04-09-2018


04-08-2018


04-06-2018


03-31-2018


03-23-2018


03-19-2018


02-21-2018


02-11-2018


02-08-2018



Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 409 1231151101 ... LastLast

07-20-2018


07-19-2018


07-18-2018


07-17-2018



Page 1 of 409 1231151101 ... LastLast