CaptUSA
Member

Well, they can now compel Hunter to testify under threat of perjury... If they actually wanted to uncover the corrupt system, it wouldn't take that long at all. But since none of them have an interest in uncovering it, we all know this doesn't even get started.

Interesting twist for the incoming AG... https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hunter-biden-faces-potential-5th-amendment-headache-after-pardon/ar-AA1v7uZW?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=48b448824a7f4175a4a0e46e5493603e&ei=13

Anyone with 2 functioning neurons knew this would be the outcome.

I think a lot of that has much more to do with the facts that: 1) Back then women actually put forth an effort to BE attractive, and 2) Nowadays a great many women try very hard to be UNattractive. If you add to that the fact that the attitudes and beliefs held by many women today tend to render them unattractive regardless of any pure physical beauty they may possess, and well…

Why don’t they just buy some Sea Monkeys out of a comic book like everyone else?

What a load of shit!

The “wins” just keep piling up, don’t they?

I. Can’t. Stop. Laughing.

My prediction is that they make some short-term cuts to make it appear like they are doing something, but everyone will await the final report due July 4th 2026. That report, while it will show areas for further and long-lasting cuts to government, will become a focal point of the 2026 mid-term election. The left will try to tag their opponents with supporting the plan for draconian cuts to "vital services that people depend on", and the right will try to appeal to the base, while only supporting "parts" of the plan. Musk, Vivek and the Twittersphere will aim to put political pressure on the right to run on it fully. Then, once the election is over and the dust settles, it'll be a distant memory like every other government commission that offers up practical solutions that aren't remotely politically viable. The only interesting part will be which message carries the mid-term elections.

Clearly they lacked sufficient tariffs to protect domestic agricultural producers. Allowing all that free trade was no doubt a major causative factor in the wars with the indiginous peoples that came later. Fortunately we know better nowadays.

Neither of your fake sources have put there supposed original dataset anywhere that it can actually be downloaded. Nice way to be able to keep someone from independently verifying their claims.

Your people overwhelming voted for gay marriage when blacks, Mulsims and Latinos voted against it so STFU. And there weren't enough secular Jews in California to account for that. Also Clinton and Obama didn't pass the Patriot Act or create the Department of Homeland Insecurity or lead America into a disasterous war in Iraq. Obama actually got us out of that war even though he later f'ed up with Libya and Syria.

So since two people tell the same lie that makes it the truth? :rolleyes: I actually went through the numbers and told you how to do it if you wanted to. But you would believe a lie rather than the truth.

You're right. We'll never know. But notice that even your reasoning for why Ron Paul might not have done so well with blacks also goes back to an obvious appeal to white racism that was done in his name. Those newsletters are the only blot on an otherwise great record. I can explain away his Civil Rights Act vote. On the newsletters I just say "Well he didn't write them" but that's still not good. If the newsletters were pushing for gender affirming surgeries for minors I doubt many here would give them a pass just because he didn't write them. I'm willing to look past race baiting to a certain extent. Not everybody is. Trump did a lot of race baiting this time and still made modest gains percentagewise and didn't trigger a major voting "blacklash." Oh, and by the way, that's the answer to the "What happened to the millions of Biden voters from 2020" question. They stayed home. Anyhow, Trump could make some real inroads in these next few years. He could follow through on the Platinum Plan. He could pardon the Uhuru 3. (Black people that Biden prosecuted for speaking out against the Ukraine War and going to the U.N. to speak out against genocide of African people in the U.S. and around the world.) He could get Tim Scott's police reform bill passed. He basically could complete being George C. Wallace. (Progressive who cloaked himself in segregationist rhetoric but ultimately came out of the closet as a progressive.)

:rolleyes: Ah. So voting for George W. Bush is something for your race to be proud of? And it's funny that you bring up race and then you lie and say I "drag it back to race." Then you, being a consumate liar, ignore the fact that the overwhelming majority of those involved in drag queen story hour are white people, then cherry pick one story of illegal immigrants hosting a drag show, you ignore the fact that Muslims and Latinos and blacks voted for to ban gay marriage while white people in California voted against they ban, and you lie and say it's all about voting patterns. Whatever dude.

You are the racist. You are the one obssessed with race. You attack other people's cultures and when I call you out on it by showing facts from European culture you lie and claim I'm the one who brought up race. GTFO. This is how these conversations go racist. Racist Swordsmyth : "These immigrants are degrading American culture." jmdrake: "Eurpoean culture is just as degraded as any other culture." Racist Swordsmyth : "You're racist for talking about European culture."

Bullshyt. The "second source" was just a Chinese language version of the Epoch Times which went to the same Pennsylvania Database. Your original bullshyt. The so called "second source." So a second person went supposedly went to the same database and gave the same bullshyt? It's the same damn source liar.

But at the same time you were wanting Trump to specifically appeal to white people. He did that with the racist "Eating the cats, eating the dogs" campaign angle. You got what you wanted. You want more black people voting Republican? You need to run someone like this: Edit: And Donald Trump doesn't have a bad record when it comes to black people. Obama had taken millions of dollars earmarked for HBCUs and instead put it in the general education fund for everybody. https://www.tmcf.org/events-media/tmcf-in-the-media/scold-in-chief-the-love-hate-relationship-between-hbcus-and-president-obama/ Trump restored the HBCU funding and then made it permanent.

This belongs here.

I already gave you the evidence but I don't see what that matters anyway. Considering the whole "Eating the cats eating the dogs" like I'm surprised he got any black votes. But millions of blacks stayed home. That's a big reason why Biden lost.

You are correct. I saw Scott Ritter bring that up on the Sabby Sabs podcast. You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to WarriorLiberty again.

No one is trying to change your principles. It's a matter of making you aware of the vision you hold and getting you to understand that it's one that most of us do not share. The unconstrained vision is the one held by leftists, only their utopia is different than yours. But your comments and actions mimic them since you share the lens in which they view the world. We all care - otherwise we wouldn't be here. For some reason, you think it's beneficial to call me leftist, which to me is insane. Again, it's the constrained vision thinking the unconstrained vision is detached from reality. I'm an individualist, first and foremost. When it comes to most policy, I lean right.

Case in point.