CaptUSA
Member

True. Not just Trump but Biden as well. Both sides support the same "solution" and claim the other side is just playing politics. Nobody talks about the money. https://truthout.org/articles/biden-is-rejecting-trumps-border-wall-but-proposing-his-own-virtual-wall/ President Joe Biden signed a number of immigration-related executive actions Tuesday continuing his reversals of former President Donald Trump’s harsh policies toward undocumented immigrants, asylum seekers, and refugees as part the new administration’s effort to pursue a more humanitarian approach to immigration and border enforcement. However, at least one of Biden’s proposals suggests that while he rejects Trump’s “big, beautiful wall” approach, he favors a different kind of “wall”: a ramping up of technology-driven surveillance at the border. https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/trump-virtual-border-wall/2020/07/02/7b380490-b0ac-11ea-a567-6172530208bd_story.html

Gee. If there was only a presidential candidate who would make the money issue front and center of the immigration debate: Rand Paul/Thomas Massie 2028. It's not like you have to convince a majority of Americans on the immigration issue:

Well....

FFS dude! Admit what? That accusations are sold proof of anything? How many accusations are there about Trump and Trump supporters? Some turned out to be true and some turned out to be false. You are a freaking cultist. There could actually be a fruitful discussion about what people agree on, like the fact that there is a gravy train of government spending that should be dealt with, and instead you want to double and tipple down on stupid. Trump shouldn't have said "Their eating the cats" without having anything but accusations that "they're eating the cats." He could have said "The federal government is subsidizing migrants to work for less than Americans, black white or other, are willing to work for in Springfield Ohio. And these migrants are getting cars and driving them without drivers licenses and its dangerous." Nobody would have had any come back to that. It would have gotten the same amount of positive coverage and no negative coverage. If Trump loses it will be because of stupid stunts like this where he takes a winning issue and makes it a losing one.

You forgot the third possibility: Like any prog, he just wants to be put in charge so he can kick out anyone he doesn't like.

Isn't it interesting how they take a question that more and more people are asking -- why do these "assassins" keep missing? -- and attach it to Jewish Space Lasers? SOP -- standard operational psyop. All conspiracy theories are always equally ridiculous. It's a special kind of guilt by association, the Alex Jones Gambit. If you believe that then you'll also believe this. And if you believe this you'll be wanting some dick pills.

There ya go, Trumpworld! Blame it on Jewish space lasers! That'll ensure America that you're not insane. Look, I don't know what happened, and a laser may be one of a hundred possibilities, but going down that path - even if it turns out to be true - is stuupid.

How hard I try to spin..? Well, your basic point is certainly correct. Trying to make you dizzier than you already are would be like trying to make the Pacific flood by pissing in it.

Nothing is obvious here, least of all that you posted that to disagree with it. Except that I wasn't appealing to any "authority" that you posted. I've attacked americanthinker tripe which you had posted before.

I'm simple minded enough to want my questions answered directly (so I don't know why I ever attempt to converse with you) but that doesn't look anything like a contradiction to me. You're still reserving rights unto yourself that neither you nor any other mortal can lay claim to.

So you completely disagree with what that article says. Why?

Dizzy yet?

So what did your fundie preacher teach you about why Jesus told us to turn the other cheek? Just a typo? You want permission to kill people. So name the one who is taking away your living, who is taking food out of your mouth. You don't think God prefers we allow people who wrong us a chance to repent? So why did He say vengeance is His, not ours?

You never heard of redundancies??

No, I asked you how he was no longer a Democrat. If you responded by not answering the question, while not making it obvious that you were refusing to answer the question, that makes you the one obfuscating. But, of course, you did answer the question, whether you realize it or not: You do realize that his loyalties could well still lie with the DNC, even if it is no longer what he considers ideal, right? Or are we all relying on your ability to read his mind again? In any case, what you said about him sure reads like the definition of RINO.

Which thief? Let's just explore how much of a collectivist you really are. Which thief came to kill? I don't want to deal with it because asking you to be specific and properly cite your "facts" is even less productive than asking Kamala Harris to do the same.

What part of He is the Potter and you're not, He has the sure knowledge and the right, and you do not, are you hoping people will ignore?

The thread's about the current race. His record is relevant to the current race, both as to intent and as to ability. You said, "We are talking about the current campaign" to begin that statement. And you think it's me who is being confusing? Do you ever read what you write?

Maybe he should read the things he writes. He isn't proposing such and such. He's just reserving the right to do such and such. The Bible says we should have faith in God, not men, but he says we should trust him. So how is he not claiming to be God?

You keep making ASSumptions thinking you're making an ass out of me with them. But you only make an aSS out of yourself -- over and over. God is the Potter. He has that right. You don't. Read your own Bible. Start with the first three Commandments. Show me where God issued you written orders to kill people.

Let's try this again, alleged Christian. Which part of "all" and "unalienable" mean the opposite of what everyone thinks they mean? You figure shooting them is just as justified as deporting them, do you? "Thou shalt not kill" doesn't apply if someone steps over an imaginary line in the sand? How do you square that with, "Give unto Caesar what is of Caesar, and give unto God what is of God"? Because that imaginary line is of Caesar, not God. You can see that, right?

Stronger candidate? Stronger candidate? Are we talking about Biden or Harris? According to you, those footprints were left on him by people like Bolton, Pelosi and Fauci. And he had the power to fire two of the three at any time, and didn't.

Why don't you just tell the world where I do get my politics? That way I can look it up and post all the differences between that and where I stand, exposing your delusional condition for all to see. A real American also considers it heresy against God. Like Coolidge said, if all men are endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights, that's final.

https://x.com/scrowder/status/1836737026281836727 1836737026281836727

Something something "veto proof" something. He has footprints all over him. And an army of hypocrites making excuses for that.