Tab Content
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 09:00 PM
    Are you seriously arguing the Democrats aren't? Are you seriously arguing that GM would be making cars with an eighty mile range and a six hour refuel time if the government wasn't forcing them to? Really? Trump isn't telling them to build something they don't want to, he's wondering why Congress and Obama-era bureaucrat regulations told them to build stuff they don't want to build. Who do you think is going to buy that lame spin? Why do you wake up every morning assuming we turned stupid overnight? Why don't you stop making an ass of yourself and watch the Chargers get beaten?
    11 replies | 67 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 08:56 PM
    Oh, really? And if Rivers wasn't taking chances as he always does, how many of those sacks would have led to punts?
    525 replies | 10046 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 08:09 PM
    Where was this alleged holding? Are they calling holding for breathing on people now?
    525 replies | 10046 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 08:02 PM
    A chance of what? Being embarrassed at home by a wild card team? There are years taking charge of the NFC East is about as impressive as licking a popsickle. Stuff your Cowboys blather. I hear enough of it. The Chiefs are playing.
    525 replies | 10046 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:23 PM
    I don't expect that to improve on this windy night. If Williams keeps running like that, he'll do what Hunt did--change his name from Spencer Ware to Spencer Who?
    525 replies | 10046 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:21 PM
    I'm sure the fact that the hemp rider was attached to a thousand pages of pork was the only thing that got it this far.
    7 replies | 77 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:18 PM
    What do you know? Another disincentive to work. Well, it should free up some highway funds. Congress will have incentive to turn the whole country into a construction zone. We all knew they'd find a way to make GPS mandatory, right? I think vintage car enthusiasts will be the most effective lobby against this intrusion.
    6 replies | 70 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:15 PM
    Is only the younger son of a baronet.
    435 replies | 9458 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:13 PM
    And the Chiefs may not have Spencer Ware. But it seems to have stopped raining.
    525 replies | 10046 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:09 PM
    I'm sure we're all heartbroken to hear the DEA isn't pleased about it. https://www.businessinsider.com/farm-bill-legalizes-hemp-boom-marijuana-cbd-industry-2018-12
    7 replies | 77 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 06:25 PM
    No. Maybe they'll use it to impeach him and remove him. But one thing never changes among the political brats. The consequences they face for their actions don't include prison. Prison is for mundanes.
    4 replies | 82 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 02:32 PM
    This all raises the uncomfortable issue of trustworthiness. The way things are going these days (and have been since 5000 BCE) everyone is so crooked and full of lies, it becomes impossible to know who is telling truth, lies, and most deleterious of all, deceptive mixes of the two. I don't trust the Chinese to the end of my nose. They are nasty, vile people. But so are we. So in the end, humanity is just what it is. We appear incapable or unwilling to escape that which we are, so perhaps we should just put the pedal to the metal and go for broke without all the nonsense pretenses of nobility.
    6 replies | 248 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    9 replies | 146 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 10:19 AM
    Socialist banana republics often fail. But how often do they fail this fast and this spectacularly without a lot of help?
    6 replies | 113 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:22 AM
    But one definition of a republic is a representative democracy. So good luck with that.
    8 replies | 254 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 06:50 AM
    So, I don't really care about campaign misdeeds. I just assume they all do it. Any one of them could be prosecuted at any time if the political winds are against them. That being said, I hope this keeps the government tied up in this stupidity for as long as possible. Beats having them actually do things. The biggest concern I have here is that the Executive is prone to creating "distractions" when things like this come down.
    19 replies | 287 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:55 PM
    Troll fight!! “Let’s take my path to tyranny!” “No! Your way sucks! We need to take my path to tyranny!!”
    58 replies | 634 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:29 AM
    Trade. Cities were formed because they were places to trade things. You'll notice most cities were formed at ports or rail junctions. Someplace to easily transport what you have for what you want. And... any time there are groups of people gathered doing trades with each other, there will be always "brokers" to help "regulate" the trade. Then, they ask for taxes to help "regulate" the trades and to build infrastructure. Thus, cities. States are an extension of cities in that the city "managers" and war mongers wanted to expand their own brand of control over the trades.
    6 replies | 111 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:03 AM
    The first thing I'd do is stop throwing out treats for the dogs (welfare state), and stop watering the mud holes for the pigs (drug war). And the private property argument is ludicrous. Shouldn't private property owners have the right to decide who works for them or who they sell their property to? Should the government tell them they can't hire, rent or sell to certain people?? Look, PAF had it right with his 2 options: 1. Grow government to keep them out - leads to less liberty. 2. Let them in to eventually vote for bigger government - leads to less liberty. It's pointless to watch you all debate which is the better option since the results are exactly the same. Funny how the government set it up this way, eh?? It's great for division, fundraising and growth of government, but it will always reduce liberty.
    58 replies | 634 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:47 AM
    osan replied to a thread Daily Anti-Federalist in History
    Antifederalist No. 13 THE EXPENSE OF THE NEW GOVERNMENT Part 1: From The Feeeman's Oracle and New Hampshire Advertiser, January 11, 1788, by "A FARMER" Part 2: An unsigned essay from The Connecticut Journal, October 17, 1787.
    13 replies | 577 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:38 AM
    osan replied to a thread Daily Anti-Federalist in History
    Antifederalist No. 12 HOW WILL THE NEW GOVERNMENT RAISE MONEY? "CINCINNATUS" is an Antifederalist writer. In this essay, from an Address to a Meeting of the Citizens of Philadelphia, the writer responds to James Wilson's statements about Congress' powers to tax under the Constitution. It appeared in the November 29 and December 6, 1787, New-York Journal, as reprinted from a Philadelphia newspaper. On the subject of taxation, in which powers are to be given so largely by the new constitution, you lull our fears of abuse by venturing to predict "that the great revenue of the United States must, and always will, be raised by impost"-and you elevate our hopes by holding out, "the reviving and supporting the national credit." If you have any other plan for this, than by raising money upon the people to pay the interest of the national debt, your ingenuity will deserve our thanks. Supposing however, that raising money is necessary to payment of the interest, and such a payment requisite to support the credit of the union-let us see how much will be necessary for that end, and how far the impost will supply what we want. The arrearages of French and Spanish interest amount now to--1,500,000 dollars; Interest and installments of do. for 1788--850,227; Support of government; and its departments, for 1788-- 500,000; Arrears and anticipations of 1787-- 300,000; Interest of domestic debt-- 500,000 {total} 4,650,227 The new Congress then, supposing it to get into operation towards October, 1788, will have to provide for this sum, and for the additional sum of 3,000,000 at least for the ensuing year; which together will make the sum of 7,650,227 .
    13 replies | 577 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:33 AM
    osan replied to a thread Daily Anti-Federalist in History
    Antifederalist No. 11 UNRESTRICTED POWER OVER COMMERCE SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT Scholars regard James Winthrop of Cambridge, Mass. to be the "Agrippa" who contributed the series to The Massachusetts Gazette from November 23, 1787 to February 5, 1788. This is a compilation of excerpts from "Agrippa's" letters of December 14, 18, 25, and 28, 1787, taken from Ford, Essays, pp. 70-73, 76-77, 79-81. It has been proved, by indisputable evidence, that power is not the grand principle of union among the parts of a very extensive empire; and that when this principle is pushed beyond the degree necessary for rendering justice between man and man, it debases the character of individuals, and renders them less secure in their persons and property. Civil liberty consists in the consciousness of that security, and is best guarded by political liberty, which is the share that every citizen has in the government. Accordingly all our accounts agree, that in those empires which are commonly called despotic, and which comprehend by far the greatest part of the world, the government is most fluctuating, and property least secure. In those countries insults are borne by the sovereign, which, if offered to one of our governors, would fill us with horror, and we should think the government dissolving.
    13 replies | 577 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:31 AM
    osan replied to a thread Daily Anti-Federalist in History
    Antifederalist No. 10 ON THE PRESERVATION OF PARTIES, PUBLIC LIBERTY DEPENDS This essay follows a theme similar to Federalist No. 10, and appeared in the Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 18, 1788. The opposite qualities of the first confederation were rather caused by than the cause of two parties, which from its first existence began and have continued their operations, I believe, unknown to their country and almost unknown to themselves-as really but few men have the capacity or resolution to develop the secret causes which influence their daily conduct. The old Congress was a national government and an union of States, both brought into one political body, as these opposite powers-I do not mean parties were so exactly blended and very nearly balanced, like every artificial, operative machine where action is equal to reaction. It stood perfectly still. It would not move at all. Those who were merely confederal in their views, were for dividing the public debt. Those who were for national government, were for increasing of it. Those who thought any national government would be destructive to the liberties of America . . . assisted those who thought it our only safety-to put everything as wrong as possible. Requisitions were made, which every body knew it was impossible to comply with. Either in 82 or 83, ten millions of hard dollars, if not thirteen, were called into the continental treasury, when there could not be half that sum in the whole tract of territory between Nova-Scotia and Florida. The States neglected them in despair. The public honor was tarnished, and our governments abused by their servants and best friends. In fine, it became a cant word things are not yet bad enough to mend. However, as great part of the important objects of society were entrusted to this mongrel species of general government, the sentiment of pushing it forward became general throughout America, and the late Convention met at Philadelphia under the uniform impression, that such was the desire of their constituents. But even then the advantages and disadvantages of national government operated so strongly, although silently, on each individual, that the conflict was nearly equal. A third or middle opinion, which always arises in such cases, broke off and took the lead-the national party assisted, pursued steadily their object- the federal party dropped off, one by one, and finally, when the middle party came to view the offspring which they had given birth to, and in a great measure reared, several of them immediately disowned the child. Such has been hitherto the progress of party; or rather of the human mind dispassionately contemplating our separate and relative situation, and aiming at that perfect completion of social happiness and grandeur, which perhaps can be combined only in ideas. Every description of men entertain the same wishes (excepting perhaps a few very bad men of each)-they forever will differ about the mode of accomplishment-and some must be permitted to doubt the practicability. As our citizens are now apprized of the progress of parties or political opinions on the continent, it is fit they should also be informed of the present state, force and designs of each, in order that they may form their decisions with safety to the public and themselves-this shall be given with all the precision and impartiality the author is capable of.
    13 replies | 577 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:27 AM
    osan replied to a thread Daily Anti-Federalist in History
    Antifederalist No. 9 A CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT IS A TYRANNY "MONTEZUMA," regarded as a Pennsylvanian, wrote this essay which showed up in the Independent Gazetteer on October 17, 1787. We the Aristocratic party of the United States, lamenting the many inconveniences to which the late confederation subjected the well-born, the better kind of people, bringing them down to the level of the rabble-and holding in utter detestation that frontispiece to every bill of rights, "that all men are born equal"-beg leave (for the purpose of drawing a line between such as we think were ordained to govern, and such as were made to bear the weight of government without having any share in its administration) to submit to our Friends in the first class for their inspection, the following defense of our monarchical, aristocratical democracy. lst. As a majority of all societies consist of men who (though totally incapable of thinking or acting in governmental matters) are more readily led than driven, we have thought meet to indulge them in something like a democracy in the new constitution, which part we have designated by the popular name of the House of Representatives. But to guard against every possible danger from this lower house, we have subjected every bill they bring forward, to the double negative of our upper house and president. Nor have we allowed the populace the right to elect their representatives annually . . . lest this body should be too much under the influence and control of their constituents, and thereby prove the "weatherboard of our grand edifice, to show the shiftings of every fashionable gale,"-for we have not yet to learn that little else is wanting to aristocratize the most democratical representative than to make him somewhat independent of his political creators. We have taken away that rotation of appointment which has so long perplexed us-that grand engine of popular influence. Every man is eligible into our government from time to time for life. This will have a two-fold good effect. First, it prevents the representatives from mixing with the lower class, and imbibing their foolish sentiments, with which they would have come charged on re-election.
    13 replies | 577 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    12-11-2018, 11:02 PM
    I've heard more cogent and rational reasons given for voting for junior high school class presidents.
    45 replies | 1044 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    12-11-2018, 10:52 PM
    LOL Ignoring the two major national parties doesn't result in representatives not being elected by the people. And California puts more stuff up to a direct popular vote than most states. Yes, California is descending into mob rule. But in mob rule, bad as it is, power does reside in the citizenry. Why do you always call for the federal government to step in whenever something you don't like happens in a state? Hasn't federal micromismanagement done enough harm? If California mob rule is ruining your life, move off the Left Coast. Then maybe you can have a reasonable perspective on it.
    8 replies | 254 view(s)
More Activity

2 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Man, I find myself agreeing & loving every post of yours that I read. You've impressed me.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 2 of 2
About CaptUSA

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
3
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Phone Bank Worker
Copywriters:
Proofreading

Signature


"And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works." - Bastiat

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." - Voltaire

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
10,972
Posts Per Day
3.96
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
2
Most Recent Message
02-28-2012 04:25 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 08:36 PM
Join Date
05-17-2011
Referrals
0

6 Friends

  1. acptulsa acptulsa is online now

    Member

    acptulsa
  2. Ender Ender is offline

    Member

    Ender
  3. erowe1 erowe1 is offline

    Member

    erowe1
  4. osan osan is offline

    Member

    osan
  5. r3volution r3volution is offline

    Member

    r3volution
  6. tfurrh tfurrh is offline

    Member

    tfurrh
Showing Friends 1 to 6 of 6
View CaptUSA's Blog

Recent Entries

My personal story (pt2)

by CaptUSA on 02-24-2016 at 09:57 AM
Among my many interests was electricity and I decided that I wanted to change how the industry operates. Understanding the free market as I did, I was pissed that the coolest discovery in the history of mankind was being regulated to death by the government. I wanted to change that.

I found a job as a part-time temporary meter reader. My girlfriend went ballistic that I was quitting a salaried job for a part-time temp job, but I had complete confidence in what I was doing. Meter

Read More

Updated 02-26-2016 at 07:57 AM by CaptUSA

Categories
Uncategorized

My personal story (pt 1)

by CaptUSA on 02-24-2016 at 09:55 AM
I’ve never used this blog feature before, but since people have wondered (and asked) about my personal story, I figured it was best to do it in here rather than the forums.

It may come across as anecdotal, but I assure you that this same type free market story is working itself out all over the country and the globe. Even in the face or increasing government interference.

I was born in Western PA the third of four boys. When I was still a baby, the second child died

Read More

Updated 02-26-2016 at 07:51 AM by CaptUSA

Categories
Uncategorized

11-30-2018


10-31-2018

  • 04:49 PM - Hidden

04-06-2018


03-17-2018


02-05-2018


07-28-2017


06-30-2017

  • 07:55 PM - Hidden
  • 06:54 PM - Hidden

06-06-2017


04-28-2017


09-30-2016


07-19-2016

  • 12:27 PM - Hidden

05-04-2016


Page 1 of 141 1231151101 ... LastLast

12-13-2018


12-12-2018


12-11-2018


12-08-2018


12-07-2018



Page 1 of 141 1231151101 ... LastLast