CaptUSA
Member

Expect her to get another bump outta this. Such a shame.

Trump’s whole strategy was wrong going into this debate. He’s debating her. He should have just debated the deep state and kept calling her their latest puppet. And then every time she said anything, he could say, “yeah, this is what your handlers want you to say” and then move on to his plans and why the deep state hates him.

And literally opening herself up to, “yeah, Goldman Sachs and the Cheneys are backing you! Because you’re just a puppet for them!”

Right? Or censoring free speech? Or transgender woke crap. There’s so much, but he’s not hitting anything.

Maybe it’s just me, but feels like Trump is blowing this. He’s hitting all around the targets, but he’s so inarticulate trying to get the point across.

Thank you. You said it better than I did.

And.......that video has now been taken down.

Snopes finds a way to say it's false: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-planned-parenthood/ "FALSE: You see, she left office 2 months before her team completed the work and brought the charges!!" Relevant pic tax:

Please provide evidence that this will do anything. They stopped voting in Ukraine - do you think the Ukrainian government fears its people? I work tirelessly against the leadership of the Depts of Energy and Transportation. My vote at the polls matters very little, but the people who are assigned to run those organizations matter a great deal. Granholm and Buttigieg or Secs selected with the help of RFK, Tulsi, etc.??? Heck, even Rick Perry was VASTLY better than Granholm. What about the Court? Gorsuch or Ketanji? It's very easy to sit back and say you don't care which people are running what, or that there shouldn't even be this department or that, and I'd probably agree with you on the latter. But in the real world, there will be people in these positions making decisions that affect your life. My vote won't decide which people get to decide, but I don't think that casting a lot is any worse than abstaining.

I haven't forgotten who financed the creation of The Jab. No confidence.

My introduction to James Earl Jones. You old African! I've found you! The second movie I saw him in.

They're just trying to convince people the GOP is now suddenly friendly to humans. The DNC is committing suicide. The GOP will soon be the only face of the Uniparty. Opposition? Criminal. Soon everyone will pay lip service to the GOP. We won't have a choice. Yeah, Harris is worse. By design. The only person who could possibly be worse than Trump would have to be paid, because that takes a lot of work and self-humiliation.

:rolleyes: Once again... "My guy" isn't running. Also, once again... There are WAY more effective avenues than voting. Also, also, once again... There IS going to be an administration running the agencies the next four years. There is a chance that the heads of these departments are gone and that the new heads could be chosen in part by RFK, Tulsi, and others. Placing a single lot on that side of the scale makes an infinitely small more of an impact than keeping my lot in my pocket. Neither option is doing much, but in the aggregate, both will have a greater impact than rewarding the incumbents.

That and in a way it doesn't matter who's president, democrat or republican, because they don't actually run anything. Kind of the opposite point PAF seems to think was being made. Glenn Greenwald isn't close to being a republican.

Oh look. We have another case of someone who hates actual facts even when they aren't actually against the position he is trying to advance, that there are some cases of illegal immigrants voting, but they don't go bat guano crazy as what he would prefer. The Trump appointed AG in the Northern District of Aalbama actually got one indictment and rather than be happy about that you want to bitch about it. Typical. There are illegal votes, just not proof of millions of them. And there is reason to be careful in moving forward because white people who have been here for generations have been falsely put on the list.

Gentlemen, please take a listen to this: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?567950-Love-Loss-Liberty-and-Legacy-with-Rep-Thomas-Massie I'm not trying to convince you that you should vote. I am only trying to convince you that other good people can see some value that you may be missing.

When the GOP -- and especially the RNC -- hands you a "monkey wrench" on a silver salver and says, "Here, chuck this in The Machine™ with our compliments!" you know what will be on that platter. Not worth getting upset over either way. There are about a million better ways to introduce wrenches into the system than voting in this farcical psyop masquerading as an election.

Man, you really put a lot of importance on voting. I harbor no illusions that voting (or not voting) will save anything. That's not how our system works. But there is an opportunity, if enough people want to, to throw a monkey wrench into the cogs of the machine. It won't bring the whole machine down, but it'll upset the machine operators. That's worth 15 minutes of my day. ETA: I think what's really behind this is that you think not voting gives you some moral high ground and I'm threatening that concept of yourself. But really, you can do whatever makes you feel good. I'm just saying that just because everyone doesn't come to your same conclusion doesn't mean that they've been duped.

Two things can be simultaneously true. First, this two party system is corrupt to its core and elections are not going to fix it. Secondly, that one of these two parties IS GOING to be making decisions and hiring people and setting administrative policies that WILL affect our lives. So, while we're working on the first part, it does us no additional harm to try to leverage the second part as a way to break down the barriers of the first part. Remember, one of these administrations is going to have executive power for the next 4 years - that harm is already baked in. It's going to happen no matter who you vote for or if you don't vote at all. So, I'm taking that as a given and looking down at the second layer and asking myself, which administration gives us a possibility of throwing a monkey wrench into the cogs of the machine. Will it destroy the entire machine?! You'd have to be an idiot to expect that! But can it cause damage and fault lines that people will notice? There's a chance. Thinking that voting is some magic tool, rather than simply casting your lot, is just silly. If you don't want to cast a lot, or you want to write-in Ron Paul (like I usually do), or whatever else, that's great! But I'm taking a different tack.

Are you sure about that?

The last time we talked about this I landed on "He should have just Spartan kicked her." There's really no such thing as a "good shooting" in my book because something has gone wrong to get to that point. (I guess shooting a deer when you're hungry is a good shooting but that's besides the point). I think there should have been a trial of the officer who should Ashley Babbit or at the very a public adversarial hearing where he had to explain himself. I don't buy the "It's obviously murder" argument that Tucker Carlson and others gave who seem to always want due process and "wait for all of the facts" for every other officier involved shooting. (I'm not sure what Tucker has to say for the officer who has now admitted he shot Sonya Massie in the face because he took "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus" to be a threat.) As for the point of the Babylon Bee sketch, I get it. I'm just making a counter point. It's misleading. And everytime I've seen Fox News cover January 6th being "peaceful" the only show the peaceful parts. CNN only shows the violent parts. Same in reverse for the BLM protests. Dr.3D hit the nail on the head. There were two sets of protestors on January 6th. There were two sets of protestors for the BLM protests. Both sides have people who can honestly say that the protests they were involved in were peaceful. And I'm certain there were government provecetures who inflitrated both groups. And in both groups there were people who were not with the government who got carried away with the violence because they were gullible and impressionable. And that is how you divide and conquer. Go all the way back to the Tea Party protests which were followed by the Occupy Wallstreet protests. Both groups were made about the same thing yet both groups saw the other group as the problem. There is an old video that I can't find now of a Sarah Palin supporter who just couldn't believe Palin supported the banker bailouts. We're so easily manipulated it's not even funny.

Go ahead and refuse to play if that's the way you want to play it (see how you're still playing? "if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice") I won't disparage anyone for their strategy here. But we WILL have an administration setting rules and spending our money next year. I'm not a "lesser of two evils" type of person, but I know which administration will have a better chance of causing the machine heartache.