• Theocrat's Avatar
    Today, 09:31 AM
    TER, I want to point out an assumption that you've made in your statement above. When you accuse CL of "not addressing this topic as a Christian, but more as an Israelite of the Old Testament," you are assuming that Israelites were not Christians under the Old Covenant. But if that were true, then it would mean that no Israelite was connected to the Messiah by faith (which would include church fathers like Abraham, Moses, and David). In effect, you are creating a false dichotomy between the people of God in the Old Testament and the people of God in the New Testament, even though both groups worship the same triune God. If you want to understand how the laws in the Old Testament apply today, then you have to study them through the eyes of Christ (cf. John 5:45-47), since Christ was the One Who established them with the Father and the Holy Spirit in the Old Covenant. Thus, the ethical principle imbibed in laws such as the ones in Deuteronomy still remain true and relevant for all people today (since Christ has all authority in Heaven and on Earth ). Even the apostle Paul compared New Testament Christians to Old Testament Christians in 1 Corinthians 10:1-4, illustrating that God interacts with His people the same way through covenant blessings and curses. So, you have no Biblical basis to make contrasts between Christians in the New Testament and Israelites in the Old Testament, as if God's Law had authority over the latter group but not the former. The laws do apply today, but in the greater revelation from Christ in the New Covenant, it takes greater wisdom to understand how they apply today. Once again, all of the laws in the Old Testament have an ethical implication to them, and ethics are eternal since they reflect the character of the triune God. Thus, CL has every right to discern and develop civil laws from laws in the Old Testament. Otherwise, the alternative is appealing to the relative morality of secular humanism (atheism) to frame civil statutes.
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:41 PM
    http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/city-of-phoenix-to-consider-closing-hiking-trails-during-extreme-heat The proposal would have Phoenix trails closed when the temperature reaches 110 degrees or higher. "Under the proposal, hikers would also not be allowed to bring dogs on trails when the temperature is at or above 100 degrees. The city has not said what consequences would be for people who violate these rules if they’re put in place." the nanny state is happening in Az. This is the first time living here I have ever seen such a law proposed for parks . This state is quickly taking a nose dive into socialism and statism.
    15 replies | 103 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:42 PM
    http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/32257692/at-least-4-hikers-died-during-record-heat-in-arizona these people have no clue..."water water water" has nothing to do with core body temperatures. UGH...the city should stop promoting hiking for families.its not a family activity in the desert period.
    15 replies | 236 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:27 PM
    http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/city-of-phoenix-to-consider-closing-hiking-trails-during-extreme-heat The proposal would have Phoenix trails closed when the temperature reaches 110 degrees or higher. "Under the proposal, hikers would also not be allowed to bring dogs on trails when the temperature is at or above 100 degrees. The city has not said what consequences would be for people who violate these rules if they’re put in place." the nanny state is happening in Az. This is the first time living here I have ever seen such a law proposed for parks . This state is quickly taking a nose dive into socialism and statism.
    15 replies | 236 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    06-28-2016, 10:00 PM
    2 replies | 188 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 09:11 AM
    I believe in the decentralization of power, which is a Biblical principle, first derived in Genesis with the formation of the tribes of Israel (I don't have time to delve deeply into that, but it can be proven). So, to answer your question, I would advocate a system that is similar to what we had in our early republic, where local, state, and county governments are formed by Christians from various denominations to assess how crimes should be punished within their respective jurisdictions. So, for example, if a Presbyterian is living in a county full of Roman Catholics, and those Catholics have laws which he believes do not square with Biblical justice, then he can find another county where there are mostly Presbyterians and from there, they can work together to apply God's Law based on their Biblical convictions. That's what we had in the earlier days of America, with entire states being composed of one Christian denomination from another state of a different Christian denomination. It's one of the reasons why the First Amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," because their definition of "religion" was related to Christian denominations, understanding that each state was by and large composed of a particular Christian denomination.
    70 replies | 1187 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:51 AM
    Because if you want to have a just society, then there needs to be an absolute standard for determining what is just and unjust behavior. Once you have established that, then you can deal with how unjust behavior ought to be punished. Why is that? Because God desires holiness from His creatures, not just internally but also externally, which is why God expects us to put away evil from society as it emerges. And, of course, evil is defined by God's Word, not majority opinion nor by current trends of acceptable behavior.
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:45 AM
    If you're a Christian, then you should already know how one determines what governments God has ordained. That's why we have disciplines such as Biblical and systematic theology to delve into the subject on what the Bible teaches about the nature of government. But it is a topic that can be ascertained, and it is one that no other worldview (secular humanism, Islam, etc.) can account for.
    70 replies | 1187 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:24 AM
    No, it doesn't make me an anarchist; it just means that I hold to the view that God rules society, and therefore, He is the One Who delegates authority (those who minister to others) and sets their jurisdictions within a civilized society. That's why an elite subset of society should never manipulate the rest by force. All people should be self-governed by God's Law before they take any position of authority within God-ordained governments (family, church, and state) to ensure that an elite group do not take over society by their own whims. When that happens (as it is currently in American civics), then it is a good indication that people in positions of authority are not self-governing themselves in God's Law.
    70 replies | 1187 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 01:22 AM
    The only way we can answer the question, "Should X be criminalized," is by, first, answering, "What does God say about X?" The two questions go together, when we are discussing what sexual sins should receive civil sanctions. But, of course, it takes wisdom to understand how to apply those sanctions in our modern world, and that can be challenging at times, I admit. But, nonetheless, it still needs to be considered when we're assessing public policy and its relation to sexual taboos. Another thing to keep in mind is that the page marked "New Testament" in our Bibles is not inspired by God. That fact is very important because when we are talking about continuities and discontinuities between the Old and New Covenants, we need to realize that the Old Testament laws still applied when the New Testament was being written. Thus, the authors' approach to how Old Testament laws would apply to them in their own day would not have been riddled with many of the assumptions that we face today in modern Christianity (with ideas such as the "Two-Kingdoms Approach," "Law vs. Gospel" dichotomies, Dispensationalism, and other concepts which inherently but inadvertently pit the Old Testament against the New Testament). Unfortunately, you, yourself, are guilty of those very approaches to the New Testament, which is why you fail at understanding how the Old Testament applies to us today. Remember, "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness..." (2 Timothy 3:16). If sexual acts were condemned with civil penalties in the Old Covenant, then those penalties apply civilly, in some way, in the New Covenant. Otherwise, you would have to say that God made a mistake when He decreed those sexual acts as punishable by civil law under the Old Covenant. But, once again, it takes wisdom to understand how they apply today because the world has changed since the times of the Old Covenant. But the moral indictment against certain sexual behaviors does not change because moral laws are eternal, by nature.
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 12:48 AM
    Ronin, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about in relation to Paul's theology. It's funny how you consider yourself more educated about the relationship between Jesus and Paul when world-renown Biblical scholars, such as N.T. Wright, have been applauded for their research and writings about Paul's life and theology. If you have any serious, objective interest in how Paul's theology was consistent with Christ's doctrines, then I recommend that you watch this lecture from one of the best Pauline scholars in the world, and learn something:
    42 replies | 546 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:20 PM
    What "uncontrolled systems" are you referring to, fisharmor?
    70 replies | 1187 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:16 PM
    Exactly, erowe1. That's all Ronin Truth does. He can't give a definitive, comprehensive rebuttal to anything in which he disagrees with. All he knows how to do is copy and paste links. That's why his credibility, especially in these kinds of discussions, is always suspect because of his laziness and ignorant flippancy of facts that he has no intention of researching. He seriously needs to leave these forums and stick to playing Solitaire online or something.
    42 replies | 546 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:56 AM
    Christians have provided evidence that Paul affirmed the doctrines of Christ. It's just that people like yourself refuse to accept the evidence.
    42 replies | 546 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:53 AM
    The claims that Jesus was an anarchist and that Paul was a statist are simply anachronisms. As such, they make both of your assertions moot points, so there's no need to argue with you about the merits of your claims.
    70 replies | 1187 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 04:37 AM
    When you read much of the literature in favor of anarchism, it seems that anarchism starts off with 5 basic assumptions, philosophically speaking: Truth is relative. Life is random. People are basically good. A person can change his own life if he chooses to. The goal of life is self-satisfaction. Building a civic/economic philosophy on those basic assumptions opens the door wide open for an elite group to manipulate society very easily, in my opinion. Thus, anarchism (no matter if it's anarcho-capitalism, anatcho-communism, anarcho-primitivism, or any other school of thought) cannot solve the problem of having an elite manipulating and ruling over society.
    70 replies | 1187 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 03:47 AM
    3825 replies | 163667 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 03:08 AM
    The Accountant seems like it's a movie mixture of The Bourne Identity and A Beautiful Mind. Nonetheless, I still want to see it.
    1048 replies | 52690 view(s)
  • Cowlesy's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 10:01 PM
    I. Am. Stunned. Floored.
    469 replies | 10152 view(s)
  • Rothbardian Girl's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 05:33 PM
    This is really sad and unexpected. RIP.
    7 replies | 354 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:48 AM
    The bottom line of this discussion is determining whether or not it's good to have laws prohibiting sexual behaviors, in general, and prostitution, in particular. It seems to me that you believe local, state, nor the federal governments should have laws prohibiting sexual behavior. If I'm correct about that, then are you for repealing laws that prohibit sexual acts like rape, child molestation, and bestiality because they have been codified by civil magistrates? I'm just trying to understand where your thinking is on that.
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:27 AM
    Where did Christian Liberty ever say, "Comply or cooperate with my judgment, or I will murder you," as it pertains to prostitution?
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:25 AM
    If you're a Christian, then you should have a moral problem with bestiality. If you don't, then you need to study the Scriptures to see what God thinks of it. Now, my reason for asking you about bestiality was to simply show that you do pass judgments on sexual behavior, just as Christian Liberty does. There is no neutrality about it. That brings me to your statement: There is no religious neutrality in public policy. The rejection of a Biblical application to public policy is just the adoption of another religious authority, which in our current state of affairs is secular humanism. Some group of citizens will be judged and sanctioned by the law, based on the religious foundation of those who create laws. That's why homosexuals, for example, are using state and federal legislatures to impose their morality upon Christians (and other groups) through "hate crimes legislation." Once again, that's just a reflection of someone's religious worldview. It's simply inevitable.
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 06:41 AM
    Okay, maybe I misunderstood you, so let me back up and ask if you have a problem with sexual acts like bestiality.
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 04:13 AM
    29 replies | 384 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 03:52 AM
    It doesn't matter which of the two tod evans was referring to because both of them are judgments of a sexual act. That was simply my point. Now, concerning how that relates to this thread, as Christians, we know the Bible teaches that God is sovereign over His creation, which means that He has authority over every aspect of human life. So, when we are discussing public policy about certain behaviors which are public taboos in our society, then our first question to ask is, "What has God said about it?" From there, we use wisdom from the Scriptures to understand how that behavior ought to be dealt with in society by all levels of government (self, family, church, and civil) in order to please God.
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 02:24 AM
    My point is that you have a moral declaration about a particular sexual behavior, and that declaration is, in fact, passing judgment upon those who engage in the act (which, in the case I quoted you from, was bestiality). In fact, everyone passes judgment on sexual behaviors. I'm sure that no one here accepts that rape is a moral sexual behavior. But, hey, if there is no God, and thus, there is no ultimate ethical standard for sexual behavior, so, therefore, humans are nothing more than evolved bags of meat with electricity running through themselves, then some people can't help their sexual preference to rape others. And we can apply that same reasoning to other sexual behaviors. So, then, where is the room to judge any sexual behavior, if God hasn't set up some rules for standard sexuality? Thus, the prerequisite in this whole discussion is marked by one simple question: "By whose standard?"
    156 replies | 1864 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 01:24 AM
    .308 is designed for hunting. 30-ought 6 is designed to have a trajectory that tumbles slightly down so that you can hit a target over a hill without having to fully see it...if you know what to do
    36 replies | 722 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 01:21 AM
    If your rifle is for self defense and combat, forget it. Scopes are useless. Get an m1a scout for close quarters to mid range(preferred), or fully loaded model for distance, with classic picatinny peep hole sights with lateral and vertical adjustment for wind and distance accuracy. Forget scopes...., red dot is garbage. Your rifle is only as good as your instinct.
    36 replies | 722 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-22-2016, 08:31 AM
    Bachmann must have been inspired by Trump's "Two Corinthians" speech:
    33 replies | 530 view(s)
More Activity

41 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
  2. View Conversation
    Saw this and thought of you:

  3. View Conversation
    Eek...double post
  4. View Conversation

  5. View Conversation
  6. View Conversation
  7. View Conversation
  8. View Conversation
  9. View Conversation
    itunes has "Tron Uprising" pilot episode for free in HD right now !woot
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 41
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About Brandywine

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" icon by your name.)

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
43
Posts Per Day
0.02
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
41
Most Recent Message
04-30-2013 03:41 PM
General Information
Last Activity
06-10-2016 05:32 PM
Join Date
04-22-2011
Referrals
1

11 Friends

  1. CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica is offline

    Member

    CaptainAmerica
  2. Coola Coola is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via MSN to Coola
    Coola
  3. Cowlesy Cowlesy is offline

    Moderatorus Emeritus

    Cowlesy
  4. Gage Gage is offline

    Member

    Gage
  5. Jeremy Jeremy is offline

    Moderator

    Jeremy
  6. Johnnymac Johnnymac is offline

    Member

    Johnnymac
  7. malkusm malkusm is offline

    Member

    malkusm
  8. Neil Desmond Neil Desmond is offline

    Member

    Neil Desmond
  9. Rothbardian Girl Rothbardian Girl is offline

    Member

    Rothbardian Girl
  10. Roxi Roxi is offline

    Member

    Roxi
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 11
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...