• heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:42 PM
    As we've been through a bazillion times on this and threads like it, it's about voluntary. I don't mind voluntary associations to protect property, life, liberty, etc. If you think this is egalitarian and unrealistic as communism, you should examine closely constitutionalism. (not the unrealistic and irrational promises, the practice) ;)
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:02 PM
    If you don't read the thread, of course not. Not sure why, but W/E. If you've produced the first sound legal theory behind Constitutionalism and are just hiding it from the masses for lolz, that's not very nice. ;) :D All they've got going for them is bullshit on stilts.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:48 PM
    Wut? You've gotten extremely, ridiculously specific and detailed answers. You just don't want to fucking read. You want to be spoon-fed. It's y'all CONstitutionalist minarchists who have yet to come up with a coherent legal theory after 200+ years of opportunity to work on it.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 09:25 PM
    That was a great interview from Sen. Paul (not that I'm surprised). He schooled those panelists so much that they looked like they were ready to leave for recess. Their questions were loaded and misleading, but Sen. Paul still knocked them out the park. I'll bet they had to Google "economies of scale" after his interview. :D
    13 replies | 423 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 05:25 PM
    Sounds about right. I haven't done a head count lately. I'm a busy boy.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 05:23 PM
    ^^From the guy nobody takes seriously anymore... :D LOLOL
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 03:54 PM
    Flawed analogy. The minarchists' "machine" still only exists on paper. It's 5% built and they tinker with it in the garage as they go along. They haven't even got an actual coherent theory to explain it in a rational way.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 02:52 PM
    Wut? Noez, you caught teh full retard from NC!!!! :eek: :( :'( WE MUST STOP THIS BEFORE IT SPREADS!!! :eek:
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 02:14 PM
    Nonsense. Anarcho-capitalists are realists. (and I'm a Voluntaryist, not an ancap) Minarchists are in utter denial of praxaeology and history. They are very utopian-though not to the extent of anarcho-communists.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 11:56 AM
    People already do this, tho. They just link to a thread(s) where the question has already been answered. Happens all the time. Welcome to the world of forums! :)
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 12:18 AM
    :eek: I GUESS THEY WANT YOU TO DO IT MANUALLY NAO? :p TYPE IN "THE A-TEAM RE-SELLER GROUP" INTO THE SEARCH BOX THING AND YOU'LL FIND IT.
    1990 replies | 74077 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 12:16 AM
    UR REVIEWS AS A BUYER, YOU MEAN? IDK IF THEY HELP US AS SELLERS, BUT IT COULDN'T HURT. I HAD THE SAME POSITIVE BUYER RATE (100%) AS YOU WHEN I STARTED. :cool:
    1990 replies | 74077 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-17-2017, 12:13 AM
    LIFESKILL: SET UP A STORE WITH THE VOLUSION PLATFORM. PRETTY NIFTY SO FAR. GOT TO WAIT TILL MY ORDER IS FULLY PROCESSED BEFORE I CAN BEGIN REALLY CUSTOMIZING AND GETTING IT READY FOR CUSTOMERS.
    1990 replies | 74077 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    30 replies | 595 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    10-16-2017, 05:22 PM
    I was just about to post this. https://insiderlouisville.com/metro/citing-marijuana-overdoses-in-colorado-bevin-says-he-will-never-legalize-pot-in-kentucky/ seriously, Bevin? You don’t have to be all pro-pot we know you need the socon votes, but repeating the lies and BS false propaganda? Yeah no. That’s messed up. You could have just maintained a States-Rights position, claimed that the people didn’t want it, let the legislature override you, and been looking for another job after the next election. Instead you chose to go eyeball deep into the reefer madness propaganda. Bad idea.
    28 replies | 543 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-16-2017, 12:17 AM
    :rolleyes: "danke" means "thank you" in German, ya dunces.
    20 replies | 252 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-16-2017, 12:06 AM
    Haven't read it since I was 14. Now I have to read it again...
    5 replies | 134 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-15-2017, 11:46 PM
    duplicate post for some reason. :/
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-15-2017, 11:41 PM
    You've proven yourself to be worth no significant effort. (is it my fault you lack reading and viewing comprehension skills? If you had them you would understand the system, bro) I reserve serious effort for thoughtful and intelligent adversaries (i.e. erowe). The only reason I bothered with this thread as long as I did is that it shows onlookers the failures and fallacies of statism generally and the Murican statism in particular that you endorse.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-15-2017, 07:59 PM
    I'm trying to help enlighten you so you don't have to ask questions that have already been answered a million times, son. Be a man and study shit for yourself.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-15-2017, 07:58 PM
    It's the wrong question because it has nothing to do with how private courts work. You can have your own agency if you want, but if you and I don't contractually agree to be bound by said agency, your agency has no authority WRT me.
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    10-15-2017, 07:51 PM
    08/03/2005Robert P. MurphyIn a recent article, I discussed the possibility of private, competing security agencies. I took for granted the background rule of law (or lack thereof), and merely made the relative argument that a monopoly institution of violence (i.e. the State) would not aid the achievement of a working consensus on legal norms, and that in fact (as history shows) government-controlled societies are certainly susceptible to civil war. In the present piece, I will elaborate on how law itself could be efficiently and equitably produced in a private setting. PRIVATE JUDGESWhether society is in anarchy or under the domination of a State apparatus, individuals will always have disputes. Although most arguments are settled between the parties themselves, some disagreements are too serious for such resolution. In such cases, the disputants (in anarchy) can turn to a judge, who is simply a person who agrees to render an opinion on their dispute. Although many anarchist theorists link private judges with enforcement agencies in their expositions, we should keep in mind that the two are conceptually distinct. In its essence, a private judicial ruling is just that—one person’s opinion as to who is right, and what he or she is owed, in a given dispute. One major difference between private and State judges is that the former only entertain cases when both parties submit to the “jurisdiction” of the judge. (In contrast, one or both parties in a State court case may strongly object to the judge and/or jury who will decide the issue.) Cynics of private law may consider this proposal as ridiculous—the very idea that a rapist or bank robber would agree to plead his case before a third party, ha! However, this glib dismissal overlooks the fact that most disputes in modern commercial society are not between an “obvious” innocent and an “obvious” malefactor. Rather, it is often the case that both parties to a dispute genuinely believe themselves to be in the right, and would be happy to make their cases in front of a disinterested third party. Another consideration is that, without the government monopoly and selection of judges based on political pull and demagogic appeal, a crop of professional judges would arise who were, well, quite judicious. (Any unmarried female judges would quite truly be the fairest maidens in the land.) When reading their previous opinions on cases in which they had expertise, people would recognize their excellence, and say, “Wow, that was a great ruling! When I first heard the evidence, I thought the plaintiff was right, but after Judge Barnett explained it with his analogies, the defendant is obviously not guilty.” In anarchy, people would demand judicial services for all the reasons that people desire law itself: They would want to satisfy their desire for abstract justice, but they would also want to foster predictable business relationships, as well as enjoy a good reputation among their neighbors. Let’s consider a concrete example. Suppose Mark Johnson owns a store and he breaks the arm of Gary Owens, a customer. Owens proceeds to tell all his friends (and anyone else who will listen) that he was minding his own business when Johnson attacked him. Now in the standard view (and even to some extent that promoted by anarcho-capitalist writers), unless Owens belongs to a protection agency himself, he has no recourse. But this is simply not true. It is bad for business if Owens runs around telling people he was brutally attacked, and if Johnson does nothing to rebut these charges. If people give any validity to Owens’ story, they will shop elsewhere. Even beyond the pecuniary aspects, if Johnson is at all a normal human being, he will feel uncomfortable at social events if people are whispering about the tale behind his back. Consequently, Johnson will publicly invite Owens to bring his charges to any reputable judge who ...
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    502 replies | 6218 view(s)
More Activity

12 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    All is well
    34 weeks and counting, can't wait!

    Felt so great to write in Ron Paul tonight!!!
  2. View Conversation
    miss you too!!
  3. View Conversation
    awww i vous manquez trop ma chérie! Je suis prego et nous fixer notre maison et il vient d'être mouvementée, je suis très fatigué et aller au lit plus tard le 9 habituellement lol, comment es-tu mon amour?
  4. View Conversation
    I miss you! Mwah!
  5. salut christelle

    take a look at my new thread and please bump it up

    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...04#post4159804
  6. View Conversation
    où avez-vous été mon amour?
  7. View Conversation
    Thanks for the friend request. It is a pleasure to know you. Пока! ~Матвейчик~
  8. View Conversation
    Your home address, I cannot put it in an emailable format. I will have to mail it to France.
  9. View Conversation
    ~ hugs and kisses ~
  10. View Conversation
    Пожалуйста!
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 12
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About Christelle

Basic Information

About Christelle
Interests:
Freedom and Peace

Signature


"A long terme, c'est nous qui l'emporterons... La botte cessera un jour de marteler le visage de l'homme, et l'esprit de liberté brûle avec tant de force dans sa poitrine qu'aucun lavage de cerveau, aucun totalitarisme ne peuvent l'étouffer. » -Murray Rothbard.

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - Ron Paul (The Revolution: A Manifesto)


"Be the change you wish to see in the world" -Gandhi


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63yLEXQAKJQ

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
94
Posts Per Day
0.04
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
12
Most Recent Message
11-06-2012 05:43 PM
General Information
Last Activity
11-09-2016 03:02 AM
Join Date
03-23-2011
Referrals
0

23 Friends

  1. Adam Kokesh Adam Kokesh is offline

    Member

    Adam Kokesh
  2. Bsouljah Bsouljah is offline

    New Member

    Bsouljah
  3. bwlibertyman bwlibertyman is offline

    Member

    bwlibertyman
  4. conway conway is offline

    New Member

    conway
  5. Cowlesy Cowlesy is offline

    Moderatorus Emeritus

    Cowlesy
  6. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  7. Esoteric Esoteric is offline

    Banned

    Esoteric
  8. forsmant forsmant is offline

    Member

    forsmant
  9. GunnyFreedom GunnyFreedom is offline

    Agent of Freedom

    GunnyFreedom
  10. heavenlyboy34 heavenlyboy34 is online now

    Member

    heavenlyboy34
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 23
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...