• Xerographica's Avatar
    01-16-2018, 02:05 PM
    The group that receives the modern medical care will have the largest survival rate. Regarding testing the Visible Hand... it's just a committee... or a dictator. Congress is just a committee. There are plenty of other committees... such as the PTA. Your boss isn't a committee... he's a dictator. The point is, society is full of Visible Hands. The problem is that nobody sees the point in trying to replace any of them with the Invisible Hand. Not sure if you saw this thread... We Win. In that thread I described the purpose of this website that I created... IdeaPlug.org Ideas/links/pages are ranked by spending rather than by voting. Right now I'm IdeaPlug's treasurer. Let's say that you want to be the treasurer. Can I solely decide that you shouldn't be the treasurer? If I did this, then I'd be a dictator. I don't want to be a dictator. From my perspective, it's better for the market to decide whether you should be IdeaPlug's treasurer. So you'd make your case, message me the link and paypal me your valuation. I'd update the website. If nobody opposes you, then you'll be the new treasurer.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-14-2018, 08:37 AM
    Xerographica started a thread We Win in Grassroots Central
    Imagine a 10k race. The race is a contest. The point of the contest is to rank the runners by speed. Now imagine an idea race. It's also a contest. The point of the contest is to rank the ideas. However, we're not interested in how fast an idea is, we're interested in how useful it is. We want all the ideas to be ranked by usefulness. The thing is, unlike runners, ideas don't have legs. This means that ideas can't rank themselves by usefulness. Ideas need to be ranked by people. So the fundamentally important question is... how, exactly, should people rank ideas? Here are some options... 1. The Democratic Hand (DH): voting 2. The Visible Hand (VH): committee 3. The Invisible Hand (IH): spending
    0 replies | 158 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-11-2018, 12:44 PM
    The violence of government taxation? So in the world that you live in... the tax collector is the bad guy? He's the villain in your story? The thing is, it's not like he's doing his job for free. He's getting paid to do his job. The IRS's funding is entirely determined by congress. So is congress the villain in your story? The thing is, every congressperson is chosen by voters. So are voters the villain in your story? Voters are the villain in my story. Taxpayers are the victim in my story.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-08-2018, 01:20 AM
    Coercion is just one of the many things that the government supplies. Right now taxpayers don't have the opportunity to decide for themselves how they divide their tax dollars between coercion and everything else that the government does. But this aspect is identical to Netflix. Subscribers don't have the opportunity to decide for themselves how they divide their subscription dollars between horror movies and all the other content. The issue is supply and demand. The demand for coercion is unknown like the demand for horror movies is unknown. Since the demand is unknown, how can the supply possibly be correct? Netflix and the government are both command economies. What would happen if Netflix became a market economy? In this case, subscribers could decide for themselves how they divide their dollars among the content. The demand for content would be known and the supply would adjust accordingly. If Netflix proved that the Invisible Hand is superior to the Visible Hand, then this would be relevant to the government.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-07-2018, 04:39 PM
    From my perspective, the issue isn't whether the administration of protection is public or private. The issue is the accountability. You seem to agree... In the private sector we use our money to keep administrators accountable. If you hire a security company to protect your business, and they fail to do so, then you are free to fire them. You have the freedom to stop giving the security company your money. The security company knows this. This knowledge provides the security company the maximum incentive to protect your business. It can be generalized like so... money is a measure of usefulness. The more useful a security company is, the more money it will receive. In the public sector, on the other hand, we use voting to keep administrators accountable. If you don't think the police are adequately protecting your neighborhood... then you can certainly call and complain to the police and the city council and the local newspaper. But really the only real action you can take is try and "vote the bums out". This method is incredibly defective. As a pragmatarian, I want to apply the private sector's method to the public sector. People would still have to pay taxes, but they could use them to measure the usefulness of public servants. If you think the police are useless, then you wouldn't give them any of your own tax dollars. The more taxpayers who agreed with you that the police are useless, the less tax dollars the police would receive. However, the police really don't want less funding. Nobody wants less funding. Everybody wants more funding. This is what would provide the police and all the other public servants with the maximum incentive to be more useful to taxpayers.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-07-2018, 05:05 AM
    You said that your scientist friend is a conservative. Does he also believe that the government is entirely unnecessary?
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-06-2018, 10:36 PM
    Conservatives do not want to abolish the government. Any conservative who does want to abolish the government is not a conservative. He is an anarchist. Perhaps he is an anarcho-capitalist. In any case, he is definitely not a conservative. Conservatives do not want people to choose where their taxes go. Any conservative who does support this is not a conservative. He is a pragmatarian. Anarchists and pragmatarians are the only people who do not perceive the need for the Visible Hand. Does David Friedman perceive the need for the Visible Hand? Nope. He is an anarcho-capitalist. Does Gary Johnson perceive the need for the Visible Hand? Yup. He is a libertarian.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-06-2018, 06:03 PM
    You will have to be much more specific. Please specify exactly which statement you doubt... 1. Our country is currently a mixed economy. 2. We have a market economy (Invisible Hand) in the private sector and a command economy (Visible Hand) in the public sector. 3. Socialists, liberals, conservatives and libertarians all believe that we need to have a Visible Hand.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-05-2018, 08:55 PM
    You said that your friend is a conservative. Here's a list of all the people who believe in the effectiveness of the Visible Hand... 1. Socialists 2. Liberals 3. Conservatives 4. Libertarians Here's a list of all the people who do not believe in the effectiveness of the Visible Hand... 1. Anarcho-capitalists
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-05-2018, 04:21 PM
    This is a pretty good and short video about falsifiability... It's especially good because it uses Marxism as the main example.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-05-2018, 04:05 PM
    Your conservative friend, by definition, believes in the effectiveness of the Visible Hand. Has he ever scientifically tested his belief? Has he ever shown any interest in scientifically testing his belief? Please ask him and let us know what he says. Here's what I just wrote to a liberal... ************************** You and the conservative both believe in the effectiveness of the Visible Hand. However, the fact of the matter is that the effectiveness of the Visible Hand has never been scientifically tested. The conservative that I replied to did not reply back and say, ďIíd hate to believe in bullshit, Iím very motivated for the Visible Hand to be scientifically tested.Ē Instead, he did not reply back at all. Obviously heís not at all interested in scientifically verifying the accuracy his belief.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-03-2018, 12:13 PM
    In nearly all cases, the real reason that anybody is retarded about anything is because of central planning. Central planning is the root of the problem. We have to strike the root.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
  • Xerographica's Avatar
    01-03-2018, 10:05 AM
    Here's part of my Medium response to a conservative... ************************** Of course, in order to be a conservative, you must, by definition, have a natural aversion to science. Which is really strange given that one of the very best stories in the Bible is all about science. The Israelites werenít quite sure whether Baal or God was the real god. So Elijah devised a simple test. He would pray to God, the prophets of Baal would pray to Baal, and whichever god responded with fire would be the real god. Why did it matter whether Baal or God was the real god? It mattered because, if youíre going to make significant sacrifices to a god, you actually want even greater blessings in return. Otherwise, your sacrifices are simply a waste. The Bible isnít a fan of waste. Nobody is a fan of waste. Even liberals arenít a fan of waste. They hate getting ripped off just as much as the next person. Nowadays nobody who is truly anybody debates whether God or Allah or Shiva or Buddha is the real god. Instead, the significant people, the people who actually matter, such as the Nobel prize winners, debate whether the Visible Hand or the Invisible Hand is the real god.
    27 replies | 775 view(s)
No More Results

16 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Xerographica, if you could save me or an AnCap from a fire, who would you choose? What would be the opportunity cost?
  2. View Conversation
    What do I do if I get on everyone's ignore list?
  3. View Conversation
    Why isn't there a pragmatarian wikipedia page!?!?
  4. View Conversation
    Who is your favorite philosopher?
  5. View Conversation
    What is the best way to live a pragmatic lifestyle?
  6. View Conversation
    I love you in a platonic way
  7. View Conversation
    Did you notice that my avatar is a xerographica flower? In your honor sir
  8. View Conversation
    What would you say is the best way to advocate pragmatarianism? I'm very excited about all this. So so excited!!!!!!
  9. View Conversation
    Should I make a blog too??
  10. View Conversation
    I'll make sure to get your blog out there as much as possible...after all, it would suck for you to be a one man army. And two is better than one.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 16
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About Xerographica

Basic Information

Signature


Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,320
Posts Per Day
0.50
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
16
Most Recent Message
04-01-2012 09:58 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 11:37 PM
Join Date
11-16-2010
Referrals
1

2 Friends

Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

01-16-2018


01-11-2018


01-07-2018


01-06-2018


01-05-2018


01-03-2018


04-13-2017


04-12-2017


04-07-2017


02-28-2017


12-27-2016


11-06-2016


10-31-2016



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast