Occam's Banana
Member

I don't expect to hear much out of BLM for a while. Their sponsors want the blacks to seem to be happy as larks down on the plantation, because Master Joe loves them all so much. Of course, when they stop lining up for Master Joe's magic vaccine because everyone they know who took it is dead, they might get incited to start shooting each other again. I hate seeing people get played, but people are being talked out of listening to the likes of me.

It depends on how much controversy the media can manage to milk this for. If enough people are like, "Meh. That asshole was asking for it, because baby hostage", then nothing happens. But Antifa/BLM types have become sufficiently unhinged that even that may not matter anymore. We'll just have to wait and see.

I'd say his thirteen hour filibuster of 2013 was pretty assertive. But I don't see this as self-serving. I see this as one of the two or three of the hundred senators who actually does his job.

Clearly, Rand Paul is seditious scum and a tool of the Democrats.

Police shooter was on the force for 4-years. I'm gonna bet he was a vet of Afghan or Iraq. No hesitation. Calm, cool, collected. One shot, one kill. With an hostage at body level. Not a Spec. Force operator though. The sling was deployed. Most Specs. know to bind the sling with "Ranger Bands" so it doesn't get caught up on anything. Guessing just a 16-20 yrd shot. Just observations.

Sure. Why not? Happens all the time. You don't need a lawyer to answer that, just someone who paid attention to the two O.J. trials.

That's because he is reading them uncritically. That's the whole point. He isn't trying to take sides. (You know, sort of like how actual journalism is supposed to be done ...) So ... he's "biased" because he isn't being critical of Dominion, but is just reporting the details of Dominion's suit and the specific allegations Dominion is making? :confused: How does that work? :confused:

From the quotes in my OP “The Chief Justice’s absence demonstrate that this is not a trial of the president, but one of a private citizen,” Paul said in an address to the Senate floor Tuesday. “Therefore I make a point of order that this proceeding, which would try a private citizen and not a president, a vice president or civil officer violates the Constitution, and is not an order.”

Well, the bad news for every sane person in the country is it didn't take a supermajority to table Rand Paul's motion to dismiss, so you'll get your trial. But it does take a supermajority to remove, so even if they could, they clearly won't. I hope it keeps them out of our hair all the rest of the session. That said, you didn't answer my question either. Turn up your hearing aid, get out your specs, whatever it takes. Where in the Constitution does it say the Senate can conduct an impeachment trial of a private citizen and remove him from office?

Didn't exactly win any awards for intelligent question of the year, did it? So, we're the Senate. What are we expected to vote on, here? Whether to remove him from office? Too late.

Chop wood. Carry water. Embrace the suck.

Agreed, turn off the Tee-Vee and make something, anything........

Fucking read the article. Or research others. Or just fuck off with your bullshit.

Throw all the spoiled brat hissy fits you want. All the other trumpcucks saw him roll up the Constitution and slap Impeachment II upside the head with it. They'll support him heart and soul. At least until their attention spans expire.

Bullying and fighting is supposed to be a normal part of growing up. Eliminate it at your child's risk. How can one know compassion if he doesn't know brutality?

Not bad for a traitor prone to dereliction of duty, eh? Where in the Constitution is there a provision for impeaching private citizens, again? Quotes, please.

Dominion is Suing Rudy Giuliani for $1.3 BILLION! Lawyer Explains - Viva Frei Vlawg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NFPsrtG2LY

Expect? So what you're saying is, you can and do think ahead beyond the end of your nose, and you expect others to do the same? Your privilege is showing.

That was my first thought as well. God knows how this will play out in the Marxist media organs, more than likely it will be ignored, like the fact that the vast majority of mass shootings are done by colored people. But it could go any way I suppose...but there are always after lessons to be learned: Lesson #1 - From the perspective of Bolden's baby mama - "Do not call cops". I don't know what led up to this, aside from a four day drug bender, but I would be willing to bet a year's salary that Mrs. Bolden was not being calm, quiet, non-threatening and non-combative, trying to do her best to talk Bolden down in the final minutes before he drew his gat and starting popping caps all over.

Not really. He was physically able to over-power her and grab the toddler. He CHOSE to pull a gun, fire off some shots and attempt a car-jacking and use his son as a shield. After the fact.

Stay healthy. Of course, staying healthy involves not obsessing, because that causes stress, and stress will kill you. Easier said than done? Not really. Just keep doing what you're doing, with one exception. Turn off the (insert string of cuss words) television.

Well, he had the kid. After slamming her to the pavement. He chose to then pull a gun, fire off some shots, and it would seem, pull a car jacking. He chose poorly.

You're sort of quoting her out of context, in a way, so to speak. You should have embedded a video. Dumbass statements always sound more intelligent when spoken with a British accent.

You tried to make the objective fact more precise. Kudos. I can't think of a single thing to add.

Ding we have a winner! Although #2 is a close second. Although there is this... Which, had it been a Sheriff, or Deputy, I'd give more praise.

You said the thread title is objective fact. But even the section that appears to have been written by Dominion's lawyers says they're redacting "claims falsely stating that there is credible evidence that Dominion acted fraudulently." So clearly the thread title should list the alleged credible evidence as the indirect object, not Dominion. Yes, that's splitting hairs. But I have a frizzy head full of split ends that I didn't have until I woke up this morning and began talking to you, so deal with me.

Don't be ridiculous. Nitpicking every utterance of a person with senile dementia would simply take up too much time, space and resources better devoted to educating you about all the well considered, brilliant things he's doing. Don't be doubleplus ungood, comrade.

Commentary should be completely removed from reporting, in whole. These two services should not exist within the same entity.