Yesterday, 07:45 PM
This psyop is a beauty, isn't it? You start out saying I might be right, then within four dozen words you're slapping me with accusations of being "triggered", which to me means "throwing a hissy so I'll be treated like a victim", questioning my mental health and slapping derogatory alt-right labels on my thought process. Thanks, brother.
But thank you for laying off preaching long enough to actually cite the evidence that has you thinking otherwise. I'm happy to look at it, myself. Yes, I'm sure there are plenty of powerful politicians who hate his guts. If you've been taking acting classes and playing unsatisfying roles very well indeed for decades in hope you might someday play King Lear, but a producer picks some software engineer in off the street to play that role, you will resent it. These are very ambitious, very selfish, very arrogant people. Of course there are rivalries. But that doesn't mean the show won't go on, or that the guy speaking the King Lear lines isn't acting a part.
It doesn't matter how much hatred there is within this gang. You and I still ain't members of it. The top members of the Bloods may be vying for the top dog slot. But you know they'll set that aside long enough to mug us.
I am not saying you don't see what you see. I'm just wondering why, instead of having a serious look at what I see, you prefer to use language like "triggers your neurotic TDS". You might find an explanation that fits all the facts if you keep an open mind. Do you think these people are encouraging libs to use words like "triggers" and conservatives to use acronyms like "TDS" to foster intelligent conversation?
Connect With Us