Tab Content
  • jkr's Avatar
    Today, 04:04 PM
    for the LAST fkn time ALPHABET IS GOBBERMINT the rest is bukkaki theater
    9 replies | 162 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:13 PM
    You see, Trump is playing (4x-3y)^2=5z Chess. He's really going to stick it to those swamp people by cutting expenditures over a decade, you know, after he's out of office and the Republican Party is still in control because Trump supporters will have elected fiscally-responsible members in both chambers of Congress, and then we'll also have low illegal immigration because his wall will not only stave off illegal immigrants, but it will be paid in full because Congress will be responsible enough to balance a budget, and the Democrats will realize that Trump's spending cuts really helped the economy, in the long run.
    53 replies | 1372 view(s)
  • jkr's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:58 PM
    fkn seems that way...
    73 replies | 1549 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:39 PM
    I'm all for buying gold, silver, etc. and investing in industries all over the world. My point is that Trump isn't interested in exposing and curtailing what the Federal Reserve is doing to our money supply, even by a simple audit.
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:36 PM
    No, actually, it's not a derailment because the point is that Joe Walsh has missed the point entirely. It's not a Socialist versus a con man; it's a Socialist versus a Socialist. Period. The video that was posted at least illustrated how Trump's tax policies did nothing to strengthen the purchasing power of the Dollar. But, of course, you missed that point because you just wanted to go on an apologetic rant for Trump. Also, I didn't advocate electing Sanders, and I don't believe things are lost. My belief is that whether we elect Trump or a Democrat, we're stuck with Socialism moving forward. Trump is just driving us off the cliff by "following the Speed Limit," whereas someone like Sanders would drive like we're on the Autobahn.
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:17 PM
    Right, because you don't want to deal with root causes and have to face the fact that Trump's Socialst, monetary policy is destructive to his fiscal policies.
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:10 PM
    You know what's stupid? Someone defending a person who calls for cuts to interest rates from the Federal Reserve, which increases inflation even more. Trump has attacked the Fed, not for its QE utilizations, but because they aren't willing to drive interest rates even lower than they are now.
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:50 AM
    That's a lie. If Trump truly wanted countries to "pay their fair share," then why didn't he honor Iraq's resolution to have U.S. troops leave their country, and go through with his sanction to have Iraq pay the U.S. back for the air base there?
    53 replies | 1372 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:37 AM
    We're not going to get rid of Socialism by electing more "Donald Trumps." People like him have no intention of shrinking the size and scope of the federal government, and just because they take a longer time to bring us towards a full socialist society doesn't make them better than others who would step on the pedal to it. They're both heading in the same direction, just at different speeds.
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:34 AM
    It starts by repentance, turning away from ideas and principles which we know aren't going to advance the preservation of God-given rights. Clinging to individuals and organizations which hold to views that are contrary to preserving our rights (such as rights to own whatever firearms we wish, rights to the fruits of our labors without government interference for its own unbiblical and unconstitutional ends, etc.) don't rid us of Socialism. In fact, they drive us closer to it, by increments.
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • jkr's Avatar
    02-26-2020, 09:31 PM
    NO ONE BUT PAUL !!! hows that?
    7 replies | 141 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    02-26-2020, 08:50 PM
    Interesting article I ran across; I won't post any of the charts because I don't want to get banned like Zip. Read more here: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-so-many-black-voters-are-democrats-even-when-they-arent-liberal/
    16 replies | 279 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    02-26-2020, 08:22 PM
    ...Or how about we just stop supporting Socialism, period?
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • jkr's Avatar
    02-26-2020, 07:47 PM
    mmt
    2 replies | 165 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    02-26-2020, 07:39 PM
    That video needs to be posted in the "Top News" portion of the forums, just to remind all of the Trump supporters here that we already have a Socialist in the White House.
    79 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    02-26-2020, 07:33 PM
    76 replies | 1642 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    02-26-2020, 06:55 PM
    Where did I say anything about giving up? Choosing not to be involved with the Republican Party doesn't equate to surrendering. There are other parties out there, after all, with better platforms and more principled members, looking for support. That's also not to mention that there are local, county, and state elections which are more important than just federal ones. But you're the one out here trying to rape a political party that doesn't want your ideas inside her. What's even worse is that you're compromising little by little on your own principles, all in the name of "trying to save the party," by settling for less. You keep bringing up this defeatist notion about "someone coming in to take over what's yours," and yet, ironically, that's what you're doing from the perspectives of those in control of the Republican Party. So, by your logic, what should the neoconservatives do to keep people like you from taking over what's now theirs?
    76 replies | 1642 view(s)
  • jkr's Avatar
    12 replies | 312 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    02-25-2020, 09:04 PM
    He was in fear for his life.
    12 replies | 271 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    02-25-2020, 05:43 PM
    Actually, that's not true. http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Religion https://johnsonsdictionaryonline.com/religion/
    76 replies | 1642 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    02-25-2020, 12:25 PM
    This. +rep
    76 replies | 1642 view(s)
  • jkr's Avatar
    9 replies | 276 view(s)
  • jkr's Avatar
    4 replies | 308 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    02-25-2020, 07:16 AM
    What we need to do is merge the Constitution and Libertarian parties to stop splitting our vote.
    76 replies | 1642 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    02-25-2020, 06:52 AM
    What evidence do you have for these baseless claims?
    49 replies | 1346 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    02-24-2020, 06:11 PM
    In a free market, you stop supporting a product/service whenever the quality or price of that product/service doesn't suit your demand. That's when you find another good product/service that's in competition and meets your demand. That's the beauty of voluntary associations. There comes a point where an organization becomes so far removed from its core principles or promises that it no longer is worthy of patronage. It has become so corrupt that trying to clean up its corruption becomes a waste of time. The Republican Party is just at that state. You can stay and try return them to their principles, values, etc., but it will only be rape. They don't want certain views and ideas to permeate their party, and the infrastructure is such that they fend off any reformation that seeks to usurp their power. That doesn't produce any tangible results, either. The fact that Ron Paul Forums, of all places, is infested with Trump supporters reveals whom has influenced whom in the Republican Party. It's not the neoconservatives who have compromised on their principles; it's those who claim to be Ron Paul supporters. You haven't changed a thing in the Republican Party, but the party has changed you. This isn't Ted Cruz Forums. This isn't Ben Carson Forums. This isn't Mike Huckabee Forums. This is Ron Paul Forums. I'm not going to apologize because we're in a place where there's a high standard of expectation for consistency in the principles of small government, sound money, a noninterventionist foreign policy, and most of all, the protection of human life at all stages of development. You guys have forgotten where you are. Supporting candidates like Donald Trump is not going to change a damn thing on the federal level because people like Donald Trump don't care about libertarian principles. They say what they want to get what they want, plain and simple. Some of you are so desperate to be relevant on the federal level that you're willing to eat the crumbs on the floor of the Republican Party. And in chewing on their scraps, they ignore you to go about business as usual, waiting every 4 years to give you a plate at their table just to remind you of "what a good boy you've been." So, like our Founding Fathers did when they dissembled themselves from England and formed their own independence, there is no retreat; there is simply the reemergence of a better order, founded on sure principles in which the last organization failed to uphold or ended up hating.
    76 replies | 1642 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    02-24-2020, 05:36 PM
    No. I can't find any document where any of the Founders attributed their ideas of a free, Constitutional republic to other religious worldviews such as Humanism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, or any other one. They were pretty zealous that they founded the country on the principles of the Christian Faith. I think they feared more of one denomination becoming the dominant sect over the federal government than they were of another faith (like Humanism or Islam) taking over.
    76 replies | 1642 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    02-24-2020, 06:48 AM
    How is it not clear what he meant? How is that antisemitic? Even if it's wrong, even if it's paranoid batshit loony toons, how is it antisemitic? These neocon equivocators would have us believe that the Israeli government is Israel, and AIPAC is the Israeli government. Stuff and nonsense.
    17 replies | 521 view(s)
More Activity

102 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    BTW, you call me bro? Now?
  2. View Conversation
    No kidding... but is he being honest?
  3. View Conversation
    If he is being dishonest, I will call him. If he is changing his identity, I will honor that. He never would reply.
  4. View Conversation
    Don't worry. Mods do not enter the religion forum unless alerted. It might as well have been a PM.
  5. View Conversation
    Okay. I didn't know he had been banned. I thought he was sock puppeting for the sake of it. I will let it go. But he is being an idiot.
  6. View Conversation
    Can you give me a link to the thread in question?
  7. View Conversation
    Your inbox is full. I just wanted to say I appreciated that fiery defense of the Gospel!
  8. View Conversation
    Oh. LOL. I get it now. I so rarely use the "visitor message" feature that I wasn't following you. You were talking to FF and not me. Makes perfect sense now. Carry on. As for what he was saying you weren't being consistent on, it was the fact that at first you said the Bible doesn't say have a relationship with Jesus (actually it does) and then you shifted to "The Bible doesn't say the gospel is have a relationship with Jesus" (It doesn't....but nobody on this board said it does). Why it's who hard for you to just admit that I don't know. If you are looking for exact language says that...well where does it say grace is irresistible?
  9. View Conversation
    Ummmm....huh? What are you talking about? Where did I say anything about you being consistent or not consistent with FF? And I don't even know what OTC is. I've seen you and him talking about it.
  10. View Conversation
    "Oh, the Bible is "bullshit"?" Nope. Are you implying that the only thing you have to contribute to threads are Bible quotes? Your non-Biblical observations (and there are many) coupled with your choice to use Bible quotes to derail threads (which I'm fairly sure was not the original intent of any of the authors OR the Divinity behind them) are what is bullshit. Get thee behind me, Satan, and get on my ignore.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 102
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
About Sola_Fide

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
31,482
Posts Per Day
9.05
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
102
Most Recent Message
11-24-2016 10:18 PM
General Information
Last Activity
07-23-2019 06:25 PM
Join Date
08-20-2010
Referrals
1

22 Friends

  1. Christian Liberty
  2. crhoades crhoades is offline

    Member

    crhoades
  3. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline

    Member

    DonVolaric
  4. Dripping Rain Dripping Rain is offline

    Member

    Dripping Rain
  5. Eagles Wings Eagles Wings is offline

    New Member

    Eagles Wings
  6. I<3Liberty I<3Liberty is offline

    Member

    I<3Liberty
  7. James Madison James Madison is offline

    Member

    James Madison
  8. jkr jkr is offline

    Member

    jkr
  9. LifeLibertyPursuit
  10. Lucille Lucille is offline

    Member

    Lucille
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 22
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

01-27-2020


01-13-2018


11-10-2016

  • 07:26 PM - Hidden

11-05-2016


10-28-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 72 1231151 ... LastLast

09-02-2018


08-21-2018


04-24-2018


01-22-2018


01-21-2018



Page 1 of 72 1231151 ... LastLast