I even know some theonomists who want to put open FV proponents to death. Which may be "tyrannical" or whatever, but the point is they certainly don't believe in it.
I still want to know where I've actually denied the law-gospel distinction. You seem to be equating pietism and rejection of the civil sphere with an acceptance of faith alone.
Sola, I get that you think there are a lot more hereies out there than most of the rest of us do. But, do you not realize that Biblical theonomy is one of the most libertarian systems there is? It seems like you forget this a lot, especially for someone who used to be a recon. Do you really think we all just secretly support tyranny and enslavement?
I saw your post on the thread about Rand Paul not being discussed on Reddit and so I wanted to tell you about the first and ONLY Rand Paul Supporters Community on Google+! Group members will be informed of how they can help the campaign without spending money, online polls, and stories about what Rand is doing so that you can share Rand easier! Please click "Preview Community" below and JOIN! Let's Win This Thing!
Could you answer my OP here? http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...-refuted/page3 I know its more tempting to answer Catholics and EOs, but still
Well, that's cool that you get to go to Las Vegas for a while. I think it's always good to travel, even if it's while on business trips!
I'd love to read it! If it's not safe to post publicly, please send me a copy if you don't mind.
Try this? https://www.facebook.com/RandPaul/vi...3002694206107/
You can't even play a sarcastic game correctly. Maybe that's why you're a glorified hotel clerk.
You've been exposing yourself for a long time now. I just attached a few facts to your insecure exaggerations.
Nice attempt to play it off with the sarcastic Yeah, you got me!, card. It was about the only card you could play.
Good choice, considering your other options.