Tab Content
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:46 PM
    Poppy field guards and mining corporation guards.
    94 replies | 3750 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:32 PM
    That's a neocon group. Easiest way to see what a org is really about is to research their executives and board members bios and look for the common links that show where their ideologies meet up. In that case, connections to neocon politicians and Catholic (Jesuit) educations are predominant.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:24 PM
    You don't get what's going on but I don't think you want to, either. No point in arguing with you further. I'm sure this will end well and Trump is looking out for you. Have a nice day.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:12 PM
    No, it's not even close to an 11. I can still post links to things on FB (not that I use it much any way) that are not agenda-approved. I have no doubt whatsoever that it will not be allowed shortly and any links containing keywords the FCC disapproves of will be automatically blocked or shadow-blocked. You ain't seen nothin yet homie.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:02 PM
    Granted, this is a quote from Mui but what part of this do you not understand? "According to Mui, the White House plans to empower the FCC to write guidelines for American social media companies to help them determine what content should and shouldn't be removed." I may not always nail the plan exactly but I'm usually very close. Let me be really clear and simple for you: CENSORSHIP OF NON-APPROVED MEDIA WILL RAMP UP FURTHER. Is that easy enough to understand?
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:34 AM
    But then how can they use it as a scapegoat for the next executive and legislative overreaches while getting conservatives to accept it as "winning"? It's always good to remember that Red Donnie's commonly used Twitter handle is his "personal" account. potuS is the official handle. Everything that is posted to his personal handle is for social engineering purposes, mainly Republicans. That doesn't even make sense. I already posted that the EO will (reportedly, since not officially confirmed yet) give the FCC the power to blacklist anything it wants and social media outlets must comply or face the threat of legal action, if Congress rolls back 230 protections for anything deemed a social media platform (see Gaetz bill). If a private company wants to censor something, that is for the private company to decide, NOT the government. It's nothing more than creating a legal justification for Deep State sponsored social entities to censor anything not deemed Deep State approved.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:12 AM
    Does the phrase "Camel's nose under the tent" mean anything to you? I guess in your conservative/libertarian world, it's a good thing to further empower government :rolleyes: It was bad enough that I speculated lawsuits/prosecutions arising out of various non-profits. Instead it's even worse since now it's the actual Feds empowered to do so, with the never-runs-dry-of-ink money printer behind it to fund the FCC and DoJ. Surely, this guy will be very concerned about maintaining an environment of free speech for Trumpkins and alternative media. Education Harvard University (BA) University of Chicago (JD) ------------------------------
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    And here it is: "Conservative" Trump expanding the role of government by unleashing the FCC on anything deemed to be "social media". It's about eliminating that pesky lefty bias, ya know, not about censoring inconvenient information by the central Ministry of Truth. Surely this will end well for speech in general. https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/white-house-plans-empower-fcc-regulate-american-social-media-giants Next, watch to see what Gaetz' legislation does to further stifle speech and the Covid-19 "Cause of Action" that PAF posted. This is all about silencing agenda non-compliant independent websites and information that doesn't conform to NBC/FOX/MSNBC/CNN approved narratives.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 11:53 PM
    It all depends on how they define "social media" in the legislation. I think it's obvious that RPF would qualify as "social media". The word "media" doesn't exclusively mean media in the sense of how CNN, Fox, etc are "media". https://www.dictionary.com/browse/media 1. a plural of medium. (d21: social mediums....mediums for people to be social with each other) 2. (usually used with a plural verb) the means of communication, as radio and television, newspapers, magazines, and the Internet, that reach or influence people widely Medium: 1. an intervening agency, means, or instrument by which something is conveyed or accomplished: Words are a medium of expression. 2. one of the means or channels of general communication, information, or entertainment in society, as newspapers, radio, or television.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 11:25 PM
    This censorship agenda piece was also disclosed in Bill Gates' "Event 201" coronavirus exercise from 2019, before anybody ever heard of Covid-19. Shutting down "certain parts of the internet" to "combat misinformation" regarding a coronavirus pandemic was part of the plan. Hilarious sidenote regarding Event 201 and Covid-19. Here's the USAToday's attempt to debunk that Event 201 had anything to do with Covid-19. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/03/26/fact-check-bill-gates-backed-pandemic-exercise-didnt-predict-covid-19/5081854002/ Such crazy talk from crazy people because, you know, they didn't call it Covid-19 during Event 201. Therefore not related and most definitely not planned. Everything else fits but THEY DIDN'T CALL IT COVID-19 SO IT'S CRAZY TALK. :tears:
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 10:13 PM
    Hold on, I heard it was gay people that caused Katrina. Now you're telling me it was Mexicans? It's getting so very hard to keep track of all the other people I should blame for everything that happens.
    69 replies | 2003 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 10:07 PM
    With you cheerleading it the entire way while they do it. Cuz Messicans gonna get ya! Wait, damn Messicans do use a lot of cash, don't they? Surely we must ban cash, install tracking devices everywhere and build limited distance travel autonomous cars so Jose and Maria don't get too uppity. It's the only way to be safe from their tacos and music that sounds a bit too much like polka sometimes.
    69 replies | 2003 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 09:55 PM
    Yeah I added something about AJ before I even read your reply. I'm pretty sure he's controlled opposition now but would make a very public example to scare the small website operators. Technically, the BoR only restrains government, not corporations. This is why the original 13th Amendment to the Constitution prohibited lawyers (titles of nobility, aka 'Esquire', a british lawyer title) from holding public office but that was memory-holed in the aftermath of the Civil War and old 13th erased and replaced with the new 13th. These days, shell corps and 501s are created to avoid the appearance (if only on paper) of the government violating the BoR. The paper corp/501 does the actual dirty work. 99.9% of what's going to today is nothing more than "lawfare" and that is what the Founders wished to avoid with the original 13th Amendment.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 09:53 PM
    LOL omg you're not seriously suggesting that the Agenda 2030 control grid is being installed because of Mexicans, are you? :tears:
    69 replies | 2003 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 09:42 PM
    For website operators like you: This EO, Gaetz' legislation and the "Covid-19 Cause of Action" legislation that PAF posted a thread on are very possibly complementary components. A new "Cause of Action" is the creation of a new legal justification to sue or prosecute an entity/person, which didn't previously exist. It will be wise to see what is defined as "social media" in that legislation. Do you allow comments on your posts, for instance? That could broadly be considered "social media". Depending on that legal definition enshrined in the legislation, it very well could mean that websites like yours could be sued by some newly created "anti-disinformation non-profit org" for posting content that is suddenly illegal under the new Cause of Action. It could also mean that social media outlets would have a newly created justification to censor anyone linking to your site on FB. "We support your speech but we don't want to be sued!" *wink nod* eta: Thinking on this a bit more, my last sentence will probably be the most common usage of this new censorship agenda, with actual suits/prosecutions being reserved only for the most egregious "offenders" aka the "made examples of" offenders. The creation of a new justification for the main social media outlets to censor anything not agenda-compliant. After this is passed, watch for a high profile "example" like Alex Jones being sued that can be splashed across headlines everywhere as a tool to scare the small website operators.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 09:21 PM
    Republicans Democrats blah blah blah. *yawn*
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 09:16 PM
    Not true. The origin of the "Karen" meme was among blacks, according to pretty much every source on the topic. I agree that it's been spun to apply to any white woman who doesn't agree with someone else, such as the vaccination topic. I think the meme has its place, however, since there definitely are "Karens" out there, but the interpretation of the term has become flexible and ripe for spin. When I apply the label (as rare as that is) it is applied to shrill authoritarian white women that wish to use force against someone else, regardless of race, to enforce their opinions, especially by using someone else as the enforcer. That is the widely accepted origin of the term.
    45 replies | 841 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 09:05 PM
    It's ok if you can't put 2 and 2 together to see where this going. Trump doesn't have authority to issue any direct EOs regarding what Twitter/"social media" does but Congress does and Gaetz already let the cat out of the bag as to what the agenda is. Whatever Trump's EO says is to soften up Republicans for the incoming assault on free speech that Congress is cooking up. You haven't figured out how this works yet?
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 08:12 PM
    https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/election-meddling-rule-enforcing-twitter-execs-under-fire-anti-trump-postings And Republicans will cheer hooray! This is actually backdoor legislation to allow lawsuits against websites like RPF, where inconvenient speech is still allowed and not (usually) censored. Currently, RPF can't be sued for the content posted on the site and maintains immunity under the same section 230. Since FB, Twitter, etc are Deep State sponsored creations and large components of stock markets and future agendas (see: Facebook's Libra cryptocurrency), they are not at risk of being shut down or seriously impeded in any material way. They do, however, make for useful excuses to pass statutes that will then be enforced against everyone else.
    126 replies | 1103 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 08:02 PM
    I can't wait to see how they cram ALLLLLLL of this shit they're introducing right now into the next "stimulus bill". McConnell already admitted that the GOP will fold to yet another "stimulus bill" soon. Everything from the TRACE Act, to whatever this crap contains, and every other piece of legislation that PAF has been posting lately. "Hey sheep, here's another $1000 for you to blow on Amazon while we pass all this other boot-stomping-on-your-face legislation. Go buy yourself a new toaster and some Boeing shares on Robinhood."
    4 replies | 143 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 07:51 PM
    13(3) does not grant authority to purchase ETFs, period. ETFs of defaulting bonds is icing on the cake. Read 13(3) and the qualifications required for the Fed buying bonds. It explicitly states that the taxpayer shall not be put at risk and that the issuer proves it is not otherwise insolvent. Obviously neither of those circumstances have been met, if indeed the Fed now is on the hook for ETFs that contain bonds that are already insolvent. The whole reason they had to buy was because no one with any sense would lend money to companies that were likely to go out of business. The whole thing is a giant violation of the Fed's charter. "The Fed can only loan, it can not spend." Creating a money laundering shell company to spend newly created money into the stock market directly is not a loan. It is spending. Irrelevant since the Fed is violating 13(3) by this whole operation. Whether they "make" money (a ridiculous statement on its face for obvious reasons...that's all the Fed does is "make" money) is irrelevant.
    171 replies | 21900 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 07:38 PM
    That excuse would probably fly if there wasn't currently a Gaza-esque Agenda 2030 movement control grid being built INSIDE the proposed walls and locked down borders you advocate for. Perhaps it's good to have open borders so someone can flee such circumstances if they choose? As Ron Paul said, walls can be built to keep people in, instead of out.
    69 replies | 2003 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 01:58 PM
    In other news, Trump administration currently briefing President on plans to Lock Her Up and Build The Wall, prior to November election. Unnamed sources declined to share details but said "Sooooooon."
    94 replies | 3750 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2020, 11:46 AM
    Depends on which side of the wall you're on, doesn't it? Ask Gazans how great walls are... No surprise that hasbaras want walls here too, while the rest of the internal control grid is built out.
    69 replies | 2003 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-26-2020, 03:57 PM
    Why do you care? You're clearly not even American yet are so very, very concerned with American borders. Who's paying you to shill here, hasbara?
    69 replies | 2003 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-26-2020, 03:38 PM
    I can't write this enough: PEOPLE WHO "REGISTER" THEIR BUSINESSES WITH THE VARIOUS LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS ARE LEGALLY TURNING OVER OWNERSHIP OF THE BUSINESS, WHETHER A CHURCH OR A LAUNDROMAT MATTERS NOT, TO THE GOVERNMENTAL CORPORATION IT WAS REGISTERED WITH. THIS SINGLE ACT OF REGISTRATION AND THE SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A "BUSINESS LICENSE" IS WHERE THE GOVERNMENTAL CORPORATION DERIVES THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO ABRIDGE THE CONSTITUTION UNDER THIS CURRENT CORPORATE LEGAL SYSTEM. IOW, THE GOVERNMENTAL CORPORATION IS SHUTTING DOWN ITS OWN PROPERTY, NOT INFRINGING ON YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. STOP SIGNING AWAY YOUR RIGHTS PEOPLE! The Bible does not say, "Wherever you find two or more people gathered in my name, you will find me, as long as you applied for a TAX ID first and a license." The courts will never outright explain this justification for their (government as a whole) jurisdiction in the first place since that gives away the secret keys to the kingdom, so to speak, but it is true.
    57 replies | 1850 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-26-2020, 11:18 AM
    Congress looks more like the Politboro every day.
    14 replies | 293 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-26-2020, 11:03 AM
    Just the run-of-the-mill erasing of history. Move along, nothing to see here.
    40 replies | 748 view(s)
More Activity

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
23,240
Posts Per Day
4.98
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 12:46 PM
Join Date
08-15-2007
Referrals
0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

05-14-2020


04-19-2020


04-16-2020


04-10-2020


04-09-2020


03-26-2020


03-24-2020


03-22-2020


03-11-2020


03-05-2020


03-04-2020


03-03-2020


12-20-2019


11-15-2019


09-09-2019


08-27-2019


08-23-2019



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 210 1231151101 ... LastLast

05-28-2020


05-27-2020



Page 1 of 210 1231151101 ... LastLast