devil21
Member

Theft then redistribution. Socialist. Ponzi then redistribution. Socialist. Every dollar is someone else's debt and is managed from a central bank.

Taxation is socialist. Social Security is socialist. Debt based money is socialist. It's all forced confiscation and redistribution. Try again?

That's what all the stuff you pull out of your ass on a daily basis points to, that's all.

Yeah that must be it. Couldn't be that he has principles that he sticks to and recognizes a corrupt snake oil salesman when he sees one. Gotta be the Deep State(tm).

The Keynesian economic system is already a very socialist system. We just spend a lot of time, effort and energy lying to each other and ourselves about it.

The price of gold was $133 and silver around $4 when RP started his Congressional career. He's invested in various gold and silver items (bullion, miners, etc) since at least that time. Indeed he has made some money from his books too. If you can point out where he was later paid by companies he pushed business to as a Rep then you'd have a point. Absent that, you're playing the what-about game and not very well.

Please let us know when you see some. Thx.

Government handing out free drugs to prevent something? Sounds a bit like vaccines in pill form. Yeah thanks I'll get right on that one asap. /s

I didn't watch the vid but if there's no mention of Agenda 2030 then it's a gloss over.

I'm not sure I'd make the leap that the "right" candidate lost, based on those two bolded parts, just sayin...

That's a good point. So far, the trend has been Trump's associates getting the steel bracelets, not the Clinton's. Though of course there's plenty that donate to both parties to curry favor as earlier posts show.

Swap agreements can be made with any holder of a currency, not just "the US" (whatever that means). Any entity holding dollars or yuan or whatever can enter a swap. I don't know if that's what they're doing, just pointing out that it is possible that pure currency speculation via derivatives can be a reason. I've mentioned before that the Chinese have been quietly pledging T issues for dollar "loans", which they aren't paying back, and presumably are using to fund purchases here, though you won't find that publicized anywhere. There's a lot going on behind the scenes.

Mr. Hornberger will be visiting the local LP meetup on Dec 11. I plan to ask him to do a short video interview so if anybody has any questions they'd like me to ask him, post them here. In the absence of your questions, I'll ask him some of the kind of questions that media won't ;) devil21 doing video interviews of candidates? I'm not sure the world is quite ready lol.

China issuing dollar bonds can be for multiple reasons. A common reason that sovereigns issue foreign currency bonds, aka borrowing in foreign currencies, is pure derivative speculation, hoping to profit in currency terms from movements in the foreign currency to domestic currency ratio. Perhaps China is making a huge bet on a dollar devaluation? After a dollar devaluation, they'd enter a currency swap agreement to exchange the dollars back out for a different currency and lock in the currency profit. Any way, point is that dollar borrowing doesn't mean China is relying on the dollar for any domestic operations in dollars. This kind of stuff is the bread-n-butter of derivatives speculation.

You sure about that? You sure you want to stick with that? You really do just make it up completely as you go along. The fact that China has inked trade agreements with Brazil, for example, in their respective national currencies is easily verified by 3 seconds of web search.

China already has trade agreements to import food products from other countries, such as Brazilian soybeans, and no, the agreements don't require gold payments. Gold-backed digital currency soon perhaps but not literally shipping gold to Brazil for soybeans or shipping gold to Russia for oil. Good lord. The stuff you come up with sometimes.... :rolleyes:

LOL How a Texas insurance lobbyist ended up in the anti-swamp Trump administration https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/article/How-a-Texas-insurance-lobbyist-ended-up-in-the-12240445.php At least he's not a Hahrvard gent, I guess.

He's the only analyst that I really take seriously these days. Thanks for posting.

Seems like a good time to bump this thread and add a new post. https://www.yahoo.com/news/six-european-countries-join-barter-system-iran-trade-022501492.html ----------------------------------- You got your answer Bern ^^^^^

Let's not get carried away. Neither of them would be mistaken for Jeffersonian writers or orators. Let's just enjoy Ol' Joe being a hilarious trainwreck without any consideration of "the left" or "Trump". Some things are better untainted by partisan propaganda.

Finally! Muh FISA report is being released this coming week!

A false choice and a strawman. It's quite possible that killing people isn't the goal of Gardasil. Slowing reproduction rates, on the other hand....well.... US birth rates falls for 4th year in a row...not enough to replenish population https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/u-s-birth-rate-falls-4th-year-row-n1091446 Depopulation is most definitely part of Agenda 2030 and is even heralded on the Georgia Guidestones. eta: Trump's own SecEnergy Rick Perry signed an EO in 2007, 12 years ago, mandating Gardasil for kids in TX. Those same kids are now of standard child bearing age. And population growth is down since the years of his EO in one of the most populous freedom loving states in the country. Hmm....the legislature pushed back and "vacated" his EO (did it really?) but it demonstrates that vaccines aren't necessarily about killing people, per se, but instead considered part of depopulation agenda via reduction in birth rates. ---------------------------------

I wish I could do that but every thread related to the LP quickly becomes a smear fest by the resident GOP xenophobe spokeshandles pushing some variation of divide and conquer. Thread about Hornberger....<insert RP quote that intends to contradict and divide here>. Rinse and repeat.

Post the whole quote if you're going to quote Dr. Paul. Don't cherry-pick one sentence. The full quote, since some here cherry-pick that sentence to make it sound like he said something he didn't. He most certainly didn't approach it like the LP bashing Trumpers try to imply he did. No walls, no deportations, no ICE squads, no FEMA camps, etc. Dr. Paul's full quote is very much in line with LP platform https://www.lp.org/platform

The statement alone doesn't, you're right. But the result has been that every post or article about Epstein now implies or outright states that he was murdered and that is the false choice being presented.

Yep, as expected, you won't do it, because you only post what you're fed to post during your shift.

Epstein isn't dead. The "dead Epstein" pics released were obvious photoshop jobs and not even good attempts. The purpose of the "Epstein didn't kill himself" meme is to deflect from that fact and present a false "choice" of how he died, suicide or murder, when the real story is that he didn't die at all.

Easy way to clear it up: Plug the origin link into google translate and post the translation.