Schifference
Banned

Pfizer, Moderna, Bill Gates, CDC, DARPA... seems the MIC was on board with their directives and all of the travel bans and lockdowns, they even masked up and mandated the jab too. Money is the driver, which facilitated the largest transfer of wealth to the upper 1%. They really don't care by what means. I'm not sure how he could make any enemies while he helped line their pockets. Unless you mean: they hate him across the finish line.

Which is it? Which side of "stop when me when you've heard something you like" are you on? 1. A man of peace and trade who doesn't favor one foreign side above another. or 2. Pro ban, sanction and tariff, China and Iran are enemies, Israel is our friend.

You sound like you’re arguing against US intervention in Iraq after 9/11… it’s not that simple. Unlike the US, Israel actually has missiles flying into their country on a semi-regular basis. What is simple is asking ChatGPT why they did it and what they targeted. Before you respond with "Ahh hah!! It says "PRE-EMPTIVE"!!" Again, not that simple.. it's not like it's pre-emptive, like they've never shot missiles at them before. More like a guy punches you, and then you punch him as he is winding up for his second punch.

I don’t see much turmoil between Italy and Aruba, or New Zealand and Costa Rica, or Mexico and China. I see all the turmoil caused by the USofA. Is there a way to isolate from the US government, without having it hunt you down to take your money?

I do believe that the nationalist-communists finally found the Golden Key: Get some loud-mouthed billionaire who donated millions to Hillary, Chuck Rangel, Kamala Harris and other high profile democrats, who wanted to KICK Tom Massie out of the Republican Party BTW, who spent $8 Trillion in a single term, let a bullet whiz his ear, go back to destination, and Voilà - they got their selves some more convert voters. Pure awesome :up::tears: Just remember: make certain that you have that "R" after the name, otherwise it won't work :tears:

1842718538307395615 https://x.com/pearlythingz/status/1842718538307395615

Certainly we should not have troops in Syria or be bombing Syria.. but they are their neighbors. I don't give a flying fuck anymore if Israel bombs their neighbors who are attacking them. They are at war.

I didn't say all Muslims, certainly not all Iranian Muslims, but it seems to be a majority of those in Gaza and a decent amount of the more extreme believers in other places.

Certainly not the people living in Israel.. I also think Mossad was involved in 9/11. But so was the CIA.. and Saudi Intelligence.. maybe even MI6, who knows. Again, that's not the people living in Israel, the Jews, the Christians, the US or even Saudi Arabia or the UK.

That would have been more credible if he had not ordered a drone-assassination of an Iranian commander and 6 others, ripped up an existing treaty, and taken $100 Million from a pro-Israeli donor. Ron Paul never would have done those things. Furthermore, he was "anti-war" during a "global lockdown" to allow for the largest transfer of wealth. He is a businessman, after all. We Lose, They Lose: A Reagan-Trump Fusion: If Trump-Reagan fusionists take the helm in a second Trump administration, stockpiling canned goods may take on a renewed importance.

Trump is in Butler again today? Awesome! I'll do my shopping in Youngstown instead! It's cheaper there anyway! Thanks for the heads up!

Or he just supports Israel.

TheCount linked to Vance's dossier from the Trump campaign on another thread. I doubt you read the hundreds of pages, but let me quote this part for you, there is actually quite a bit in there on this topic: If you can't find that to be highly preferable to our other options, I really don't know what to say.

Adam Dick ain't no Ron Paul.. That statement actually sounded eerily similar to what Ron Paul has said about Israel in the past. Which is that we should stop funding Israel, then it is up to them to do what they think they need to do to defend themselves. The author here took a vague statement made by Vance about supporting our allies and did some mind-reading to conclude that he meant use all of our military might and send all of our soldiers to do whatever Israel wants us to do..

This is the problem, you don't separate the Iranian people from the Iranian government. The fact that Netanyahu did just that means a lot, he's saying the people of Iran are good, the government is bad. The fact he is using libertarianesque/nationalist arguments toward the Iranian people (don't send your money off to fund wars and terrorism far away, keep it and make your own country better) sounds pretty good to me. I have no idea, he also said he is friends with school shooters. What are you talking about? I didn't say I'm going to go to your house with a gun and take your money and send it to Israel. I'm not even talking about sending my money to Israel. It's more like rooting for a football team, I'm going to root for the good (or at least, better) guys who aren't trying to wipe out the other side.. who aren't going in to massacre peaceful people at a music festival, etc..

Ron Paul Institute by Adam Dick Oct 3, 2024 It was wonderful news to many people last week when word came that Julian Assange would speak publicly this week. For a long time it seemed that such a day would never come as Assange suffered in harsh conditions in a British prison under the threat of extradition to the United Sates where he would likely remain captive in similar harsh conditions until death. The good news came in June that Assange had struck a deal to return as a free man to his home country of Australia. Yet, Assange did not come out in public to speak after returning to Australia. He focused on recovering the best he could from the torment imposed on him for exposing the US government’s dirty secrets, including related to wars. In his introductory remarks as his Tuesday testimony at a Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights meeting of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) in Strasbourg, France, Assange addressed his recent maltreatment and his ongoing effort to recover from it, stating:

Show me where any Muslim leaders are making statements like this about Israel... 1840740049299583355 https://x.com/i/bookmarks/all?post_id=1840740049299583355

Lol, pretty sure you have it backwards. The Palestinians want to completely eradicate the Jews from Israel and get "their" land "Palestine" back which they believe belongs all to them. I've had a shifting opinion on this over the years. I used to really like Ahmadinejad. I think he's right about a lot of things and wrong about a lot of things. But he is very intellectual and I feel like I could actually sit down and have a reasonable discussion about our disagreements. I have yet to see anyone else like that in their leadership. I doubt you could have an honest conversation with any of them. It wasn't long ago, a little over a year, I thought Israel needed to play nice too, but when Hamas went in and started slaughtering a bunch of hippies at a music festival, civilians, women and children, I'm done. I've seen what the kids in Palestine learn, they are infected with a virus. The majority of Palestinians are infected with this virus, and I don't know if there is a cure. Some Israelis are pretty extreme as well, but at least when they would go to bomb civilian buildings that housed Hamas military and equipment, they would flare the building, announce the bombing.. then Hamas would hold the civilians hostage inside the building to die, so they could use the deaths as propaganda to get more funding from Arab nations, whose goal is to eradicate Israel.

Agree. I'm just hoping that it doesn't involve another full-blown war. Because at that point, many innocents die, 'Merika stands together and unites, as we suffer more prolonged ramifications rather than a fresh start. I know it's not politically correct but I see Trump doing another historical repeat just like Bush W the "peace candidate". He's too wrapped up and knee-deep in Israel and Water-Front Property. Which will line his/elites pockets while emptying mine.

Trump's agendas have been nationalistic, not individualistic, and he will do whatever he believes is good for the Empire, not you or me. He is among the elite who was responsible for the largest debt increase of any president in history, as well as the largest transfer of wealth from the low/middle class to the upper. Now that the plandemic is over, which resulted in untested jabs and immunity for the pharm complex, and bans on travel which put the MIC on "temporary hold" to allow for "global compliance", the MIC is once again open for business. Perhaps reread the thread to look for the out in the open hidden clues and one can easily speculate where this is heading. On top of that, people don't just give over $100 Million just to be generous. Not counting the neck tie. Too much thought is put into "but it's against Kamala!" and that is where the flaw is. Look at Bush W the "peace candidate" and see where that got us. Because back then, people completely ignored all of the the signals and voted for him anyway.

Didn't Ron Paul vote excitedly for Reagan on his first run? I think he was less excited in 1984.

Scott Adams, who did test at genius levels on the IQ test, voted for Jimmy Carter in in 1976. Like you, he no longer votes, but for different reasons. Jimmy Carter was such a bad President, he felt somewhat responsible for choosing such a horrendous candidate and decided he wasn't fit to make those kinds of important decisions. However he does advocate for candidates, like Trump, for those who are willing to throw their hat in the ring.

Whiskey and cigars.