In 1980 the Republican Party couldn't have been more united behind Reagan. That's far from the case for Trump. Also, the daily free negative Carter message on TV about the 50 Americans held hostage in Iran for over a year through election day, title "American Held Hostage", Hillary will not be getting.
Irrelevant rubbish is all you have. And if you actually cared about Christians, you wouldn’t be putting out such Islamophobia, because it's what helps fuel the wars and intervention in the Middle East that Arab Christians as well as Moslem's are victims of.
Actually, Hillary hasn't been Commander-in-Chief either. We have no doubt Trump hasn't been a non-interventionist in the 50 years of his adult life. He could be more interventionist than Hillary as President. A non-interventionist has no business voting for either.
His blog and Facebook don't have articles, only a link to his videos. Someone who respects you doesn't require you to spend a boring hour listen to him cover one topic. He surely doesn't/can't do the same for his viewers.
Imperialism/interventionism has long included the murder of family members. There’s nothing he’s said or done in his 50 years of adult life to indicate he has any problem with that. Further, many of the dangers to the US he see's are not real.
The burden of proof is on those calling him a libertarian. Also, his biggest admirers are far from libertarian on economic freedom. Property rights to them is a virtual, if not, dirty word.
When Rand Paul gets $51 million ($10 million in 1974 dollars) from the government, let us know.
Good heavens. The first association of Ali in this thread with the term libertarian was someone saying he was a "true Libertarian". And since you're pushing the issue, here's a relevant fact I knew from memory: