Goodlander and Tang Williams to face off in 2nd Congressional District
https://www.sentinelsource.com/state_news/goodlander-and-tang-williams-to-face-off-in-2nd-congressional-district/article_0e0bc178-7064-11ef-ba32-8bef14c98690.html
{Claire Sullivan | 11 September 2024}
Maggie Goodlander, a former Biden administration official, rode her national political connections to victory Tuesday in a bitter battle for the Democratic nomination in the 2nd Congressional District.
Goodlander will face Republican Lily Tang Williams, a rental property manager, in the first open race for the 2nd District seat in more than a decade.
https://x.com/ajtourville/status/1834212840376344899
1834212840376344899
Australia threatens fines for social media giants enabling misinformation
https://www.reuters.com/technology/australia-threatens-fines-social-media-giants-enabling-misinformation-2024-09-12/
{Byron Kaye | 12 September 2024}
Breaches face fines up to 5% of global revenue
Livestream in three hours or so:
Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard Fights With Dolton Trustees For Control.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk9N_isqapc
{Nate The Lawyer | 12 September 2024}
Special Board Meeting
So your justification for Harris being held less (read: "not at all") accountable by the "moderators" of the "debate" for her lies is ... an ancient and moldy quip that originated as a joke about politicians in general (long before Donald Trump ever even made the scene) - precisely because politicians in general (of which Kamala Harris s one) are so notorious for being liars - but specially repurposed to apply to Trump, but not to Harris?
Ummm ... okay.
Sorry, but no goalpost-move for you!
The issue at point is the on-the-spot, real-time "fact checking" by ABC's "moderators" (LOL) which was applied to Trump's lies, but not to Harris' lies - not some after-the-fact article from an entirely different venue. The latter does absolutely nothing to excuse the former.
Dave Smith | Debate RECAP | Part Of The Problem 1168
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t-YQQZFxqA
{Dave Smith | 11 September 2024}
On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by co-host Robbie "The Fire" Bernstein to discuss everything about the presidential debate, where key shots were missed by both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, bias on behalf of the moderators, previous debates and presidential seasons, and so much more!
Why Trump Won the Debate
https://odysee.com/@mises:1/why-trump-won-the-debate:5
{Mises Media | 11 September 2024}
On this episode of Radio Rothbard, Connor O’Keeffe joins Tho Bishop to talk about last night’s debate. How should we think about the political circus? Will any of it matter in November? And what should we think about the corporate press’s role in the current election? Tune in for this and more.
@mises:1/why-trump-won-the-debate:5
Kamala FAILS At The Debate
https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/kamala-fails-at-the-debate:9
{Actual Justice Warrior | 11 September 2024}
In this video I discuss Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump at the 1st and possibly only debate between Trump & Kamala. I explain how despite Trump not destroying her. She didn't get what she wanted out of the debate & immediately demanded another chance.
Sources:
Full Debate: https://www.youtube.com/live/VgsC_aBquUE
Harris Debate Strategy: https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/harris-campaign-says-muted-mics-handcuffed-their-debate-strategy/
EXCLUSIVE New Footage and UPDATES of Warrantless Entry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksQPi9fwkEE
{LackLuster | 11 September 2024}
Help Adele Fight This:
- GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/571bfc67
Riverside Sheriff:
- https://www.facebook.com/riversidecountysheriff/
Not to give the U.S. or Israel a pass for anything, but I'm pretty sure there are quite a large number of people in North Korea and China with grievances about jackboot thuggery that are at least as legitimate (and quite possibly more so).
Of course, it's the jackboot that happens to be on your own neck that's always the most troublesome - but even so, of the four, I know which boot I would prefer (at least, so far).
So then ... it's not okay for you to say or imply things that are not empirically factual (such as that someone else said or implied that New York is in the Midwest) in service to your "emotional truth"? (Or is it okay, but only if the first person who said it was not a "literal neo-nazi" ... ?)
Ah, I see ...
So it's okay for you to go around saying or implying things that are not empirically factual (such as that someone else said or implied that New York is in the Midwest) in service to your "emotional truth" - but when people you disagree with do that sort of thing, they're "neo-nazis".
Got it. :up:
I am curious about one thing, though: do you actually consider their "neo-nazism" to be empirically factual - or is it just something that is "emotionally truthful" for you?
The "confusion" you previously expressed - and to which I previously replied - was your pretense that anyone had somehow said or suggested that "New York is in the Midwest". So this is a nice attempt at a goalpost-moving bait-and-switch. I'll give it a 6.5 out of 10.
Unfortunately, as to your present "confusion" (wink-wink), I have to go back to being disappointed again.
I mean, "undocumented migrants" don't "seem to have anything to do wit Haitians, refugees, or immigrants"?
Really?
Come on!
I agree.
Also, "narcissistic" doesn't mean "not charismatic".
Beyond gratifying his own ego, Trump has no principles (as I've mentioned more than once elsewhere).
And that still puts him ahead of much of his political opposition, who have bad principles.
Cenk is really just a performance artist - sort of like a left-progressive version of Alex Jones.
I can't take him seriously enough to hate him. In fact, I don't even dislike him that much. He's too entertaining - especially when he goes off on one of his rants (and the more unhinged those are, the better - just like with Alex Jones).
Find latest posts
View Articles
View Blog Entries
Connect With Us