• Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 11:48 AM
    I'd say he'd had it long enough to know it didn't have rabies.
    5 replies | 21 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 03:46 AM
    Right now the FAA seems to be hampering SpaceX over "safety concerns" and the effect of sonic boom on seals while at the same time NASA is counting on SpaceX to fix Boeing's mess which left two astronaughts stranded on the space station. I'm not sure how that helps "the people."
    76 replies | 2388 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 03:29 AM
    How the hell did we end up where the Democrat id bragging about working for John McCain and bringing America to the bring of WW 3?
    16 replies | 7787 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:28 PM
    I think the FAA making it almost impossible for SpaceX to test launch it's new booster rocket at a time when Boeing's obvious failures have astronauts trapped the space station waiting for a SpaceX rescue. See: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?568383-SpaceX-vs-the-FAA&highlight=SpaceX
    10 replies | 380 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:23 PM
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/peopleandplaces/she-sang-for-obama-now-she-sings-the-anthem-for-trump/vi-AA1tgExD?ocid=anaheim-ntp-feeds&pc=DSJS&cvid=844a9a7a472f457b947427db800104ad&ei=8 To be fair she's sang for every from Bush until now. And she might sing for Kamala if Kamala wins. But Kamala's so hateful she might not keep up that tradition even though the singer is a (fellow?) black woman.
    0 replies | 66 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:21 PM
    I have a video I need to post that shows a black leftist commentator who is not voting for Kamala Harris (she's voting for Jill Stein) but is still pointing out that Kamala seems to be making a last ditch push for suburban white women to overcome her drop in support among blacks and Hispanics. Y'all been worried about the minorities when it's your women that are the problem. And I know you already know this. Michelle Obama's latest screed wasn't aimed at blacks but aimed at women in general to get their men in line to go vote for Kamala and then if they don't to "cancel" their man's vote with their own. Of course....she must not have done well in math. If someone is already voting for Kamala and they find out someone else is voting for Trump they can't cancel that person out by doing what they were already going to do anyway.
    9 replies | 238 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:49 AM
    :rolleyes: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?567788-Whitney-Webb-EXPOSES-Kamala-Trump-Israel-And-More!-(Interview)&highlight=trump+blackrock Trump adopted Blackrock CEO Larry Fink's economic plan for COVID which was written before COVID. And, contrary to your false claims, Trump followed Fauci's advice on COVID to the letter including downplaying COVID when Fauci downplayed COVID and then locking down the country when Fauci said lock down the country and ultimately clearing the regulatory obstacles for rapid (untested) vaccine production through Operation Warp Speed. Kamala Harris is also taking orders from Blackrock. Yes there are some distinct differences like the war end Ukraine. I fully expect Trump to end that. But Trump is an empty suit that can be whatever people need him to be at the moment. He endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2008. The Clintons talked to him about getting more invovled in Republican politics just weeks before he ran for president. The good thing about Trump isn't Trump. It's the aspirations of the people who support Trump. Some of them are good (RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard), some are not so good (Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton). I can't think of anyone who supports Kamala Harris that I respect. (Bidens, Obamas, Bushes, Cheneys).
    5 replies | 331 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:40 AM
    Well to be fair I Ron Paul said he was going to do this after not doing it for 4 years when he was president I don't think a lot of people would have faith in Ron Paul. Yep, what he says here is great. That track record though. But we shall see. I suspect Trump will end the Ukraine war quickly and end sanctions on Russia but I guess he doesn't feel comfortable coming out and saying that. Those two steps would go along way to cutting inflation. See: https://www.businessinsider.com/us-russia-sanctions-impact-dedollarization-oil-inflation-war-ukraine-2024-5
    64 replies | 990 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:27 AM
    So....income tax = war? Sounds like a great reason to scrap the income tax in favor of tariffs.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:17 AM
    You're arguing through projection.
    1021 replies | 154262 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 10:25 AM
    :rolleyes: It's already handled on an indivudal basis! And TBH this thread proves it. Despite your continued dishonest claims, none of the rumours about Haitian immigrants eating cats or dogs or geese or whatever have been confirmed. And while nobody doubts that Haiti has systemic problems of crime and poverty and we see the gangs roaming the streets and apparent canabalism in Haiti, that hasn't happened as a result of Haitians coming to the U.S. Clearly the vetting system worked. Contrast that to the Venezuelan gangs taking over apparent buildings. Because of the Trump / Biden policy of regime change in Venezuela there is no vetting of Venezuelan migrants. See: https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/experts-say-vetting-migrants-from-certain-countries-is-nearly-impossible-venezuelans-arrests-bronx-new-york-criminal-history-laken-riley-georgia-murder-arrest-alejandro-mayorkas-biden-administration Why do you think Trump wants to change the subject to Haitians supposedly eating cats and dogs? The Venezuealan migrant crisis both in terms of numbers and in terms of the lack of vetting is partly his fault! We should quit trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government, restore diplomatic relations, start getting criminal background checks on the Venezuelan migrants already here and prioritize those that fail for deporatation.
    1021 replies | 154262 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 10:15 AM
    So how much trade is "minimal trade?"
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 10:13 AM
    I agree on no war.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 10:13 AM
    I gave you links to the fact that the latest and greatest chips require rare earth minerals that are currently not in abundance in the U.S. Apparently you didn't click the lins. This has nothing to do with what America and or can't do but what America does and does not have. That said, the Congo would probably be better off without the strip mining that's going on to provide these rare earth minerals so go ahead and starve Timmy.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:42 AM
    1021 replies | 154262 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:40 AM
    No trade with anybody. Got it.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:38 AM
    So starve Timmy, become like ancient China, and use slower computers than the rest of the world. Got it. Sounds like a plan!
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:33 AM
    I suppose if you're only going to access the internet with outdated PCs and forget buying smartphones. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/15/how-conflict-minerals-make-it-into-our-phones.html https://masterinvestor.co.uk/economics/the-microprocessor-and-rare-earth-metals-crunch-hits-home/
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:18 AM
    We traded less with Japan and according to TheTexan's ChatGPT generated response that led to war so you're full of shyt. Edit: And it appears that the problem is you don't understand the term "entangling alliance." Let's use a practical example. We trade with China and we trade with Taiwan. But we have an entangling alliance with Taiwan and not with China. If China invades Taiwan we have kind of, sort of committed ourselves to defending Taiwan. On the flip side we have not promised to defend China if they were attacked. You can have trade without an entangling alliance. Now, here's what you don't understand about protective tarriffs. They always benefit somebody. Our embargo with Japan resulted in greater entanglement with the countries Japan was fighting. But hey, if you want zero trade at all at least that is an argument.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:16 AM
    :rolleyes: Confirmed by fake court documents cited by the New American? Yeah right! Whatever dude. And you just destroyed your own argument. "Few questions asked." Well...that's handling it on an indivual basis by definition. Should there be more questions? Maybe.
    1021 replies | 154262 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:04 AM
    I haven't heard anybody say that trade of any kind doesn't have any negative effects. That's a straw man argument. And for the record I'm not philosphoically against tarriffs per se. But your arguments about trade do not make the case that protective tarriffs somehow prevent war. Easiest example is Japan and Wolrd War 2. It was the restriction on trade as put forward in your argument that helped lead to war.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 08:03 AM
    Protective tarriffs against countries you don't like = more entanglements, not less. Trump isn't pushing for tarriffs against Great Britain...or Saudi Arabia....or Israel. If there had been any protective tarriffs leading up to WW 1 they would have been against Germany just like we had an embargo against Japan leading up to WW 2. Reality is the exact opposite of what you're arguing. But if you want to have zero trade with any country like ancient China did, at least that's an argument. (Starving Timmy TheTexan). The result was that China, which had led the world in innovation (i.e. the invention of gunpowder) fell behind the rest of the world. Pick your poison. (Or your chocolate).
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 07:01 AM
    A rejection of obviously horrible Kamla Harris isn't the same as an endorsement of every idea floated by Trump.
    49 replies | 2002 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 06:57 AM
    I'm sure it had nothing to do with protective tarriffs one way or the other.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 06:54 AM
    Of course it can be handled on an invidual basis and it is handled on an individual basis all of the time. But even on a group basis, the fact that people are more concerned about unconfirmed reports about cats than actual real problems (gangs taking over apartments for example) speaks volumes.
    1021 replies | 154262 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-31-2024, 06:52 AM
    Nothing in your wall of text has anything to do with protective tarriffs. Not unless you think protective tarriffs on British goods somehow would have changed anything.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-30-2024, 07:06 PM
    Actually the reverse is true. The U.S. sought "entangling alliances" because the U.S. wanted the rest of the world to go along with their little scheme.
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    10-30-2024, 04:04 PM
    And who went to the U.N. to demand the sanctions? The U.S. of course! Anyway this is all irrelevant because apparently you don't want trade at all. Starve fat Timmy to death!
    108 replies | 3323 view(s)
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    thanks man!
  2. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
  3. View Conversation
    Well she reads the blog.

    Also I'm trying to understand why she thinks Rand is pro-choice.

    Why not talk about it?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About John Taylor

Basic Information

Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Fund Raiser

Signature


The evils of the protecting-duty, may undoubtedly be graduated by compromises, like those of every other species of tyranny, but the folly of letting in some tyranny has in all ages been fatal to liberty. A succession of wedges, though apparently small, finally splits the strongest timber. ~John Taylor of Caroline, Tyranny Unmasked

We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box. ~Congressman Larry McDonald.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3,909
Posts Per Day
0.73
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
07-04-2010 06:24 PM
General Information
Last Activity
03-05-2015 01:18 PM
Join Date
02-06-2010
Referrals
0

14 Friends

  1. Acala Acala is offline

    Member

    Acala
  2. BamaFanNKy BamaFanNKy is offline

    Member

    BamaFanNKy
  3. BlackTerrel BlackTerrel is offline

    Member

    BlackTerrel
  4. Brett Brett is offline

    Member

    Brett
  5. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  6. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline

    Member

    Dr.3D
  7. FrankRep FrankRep is offline

    Member

    FrankRep
  8. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  9. Kregisen Kregisen is offline

    Member

    Kregisen
  10. pahs1994 pahs1994 is offline

    Member

    pahs1994
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 14
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...