• Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:54 PM
    Sounds like a very dangerous job.
    35 replies | 2333 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:35 PM
    With all the laws on the books, there's gotta be something they can bust him for.
    261 replies | 8025 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:21 PM
    Looks like they have already been bought by somebody else.
    261 replies | 8025 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-10-2022, 01:21 PM
    This Sir, is why the Native Americans were not used as slaves by the settlers. They secured their liberty and refused to be slaves.
    16 replies | 886 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-09-2022, 04:07 PM
    Man, I wish they had kept the kids away from the piano.
    1 replies | 74 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-09-2022, 02:25 PM
    Yeah, us rural folks know where Little Debbie lives.
    3 replies | 236 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-08-2022, 06:04 PM
    The opposition is getting desperate.
    261 replies | 8025 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-08-2022, 05:37 PM
    Dr.3D replied to a thread The Trump Dump in U.S. Political News
    I think it says, "Bullwinkel is a dope."
    32 replies | 667 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-08-2022, 03:31 PM
    Dr.3D replied to a thread The Trump Dump in U.S. Political News
    So where it the proof of who put that stuff in the toilet?
    32 replies | 667 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-08-2022, 12:35 PM
    He's just upset that Trump doesn't start enough wars to keep his company working.
    36 replies | 1413 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-06-2022, 01:04 PM
    So did I, that's why I had to check if this story was from the Bee. Edit: I checked and there are multiple sources saying the same thing. Now I have to wonder if Soda Pop will also be affected.
    16 replies | 326 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-05-2022, 07:55 PM
    Wasn't he the guy who said there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
    36 replies | 1413 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-05-2022, 06:49 PM
    Maybe they need to go back to the old fashioned way and let fermentation do the carbonating.
    16 replies | 326 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-05-2022, 03:39 PM
    Might have been texting.
    24 replies | 257 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    08-02-2022, 07:02 AM
    I dislike that the government is involved in "medicine." Pfizer needs to be boycotted.
    7 replies | 281 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-01-2022, 10:21 AM
    Trump can't even admit that he was wrong to have Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx as part of his COVID response team, not to mention that he was seriously in error for rushing vaccines through his treacherous "Operation Warp Speed."
    116 replies | 3637 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-01-2022, 09:55 AM
    The problem is people like Howard Dean are playing to the ignorance of their voting base because abortions haven't been banned in the states where Democrats are in control. In fact, in my current state, we're receiving the abortion clinics which have been expelled from nearby conservative states, so abortions will be more available in my state within the coming year, which is an absolute atrocity. The fact that so many rank-and-file Democrats are ignorant of the actual effects of the Roe v. Wade overturn and are willing to be manipulated into thinking it's a "women's rights" issue is despicable.
    40 replies | 1721 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    07-31-2022, 04:49 PM
    It's already twice the price it was last year.
    9 replies | 272 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    07-30-2022, 12:24 PM
    The Ukraine army hopes we do nazi what they are doing.
    796 replies | 47502 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    07-30-2022, 11:37 AM
    That would be added cricket meat. Ever been on a cricket drive?
    16 replies | 386 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-29-2022, 07:37 AM
    You said "LMAO Yea I can see it now as you two post sexually explicit TikToks." together. You seem to be okay with it. That's sick.I can just imagine the sick double dating now." So you threw out an accusation based on nothing and then pulled it back. Okay. Let's be clear. I don't even have a TikTok account. And I no more approve of anybody posting anything on TikTok than you approve of a man giving a woman he knows has been drinking a ride home....to his house and then having sex with her. Or...maybe you do approve of that. Maybe you've done that. I don't know. You seem to be adamant that laws which punish said behavior when it turns out the drunk woman was actually under age are "tyrannical" and "akin to Jim Crow" even though (I think) you are against such behavior? Or maybe you support such behavior? I mean, if you REALLY think that my insistence that these "sexually explicit TikTok videos" (which haven't even been defined) are a reason for the law to terminate parental rights means somehow that I'm all for posting sexually explicit TikTok videos, then by your own TWISTED logic, you support having sex with drunk women you don't know that are much, much older than you. Here's something about drunk people. Even when the "consent", sometimes they don't have a freaking clue about what they are doing. I've never been drunk. But I've been around a lot of drunk people as an Uber/Lyft driver. I once got a phone number from a really hot lady who liked how nice and polite I was. I sent her a text the next day. She didn't respond. I know why. She probably didn't even remember giving me her number. Drunk sex is dangerous. You might catch HIV. You might get a woman you don't particularly like pregnant. You might find yourself afoul of statutory rape laws. It's like drunk driving. You didn't mean to hit that pedestrian but... No it's not. It's about a politically connected father who manipulated the system. See: https://www.foxnews.com/us/woman-forced-give-up-daughter-rapist-pay-child-support "He's well-connected," Abelseth said. "He's threatened me multiple times, saying he has connections in the justice system, so I better be careful, and he can take her away anytime he wants to. I didn't believe him until it happened."
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-29-2022, 06:39 AM
    In other words, you know you're full of crap. Here's the cliff notes version since reading is not your strong point. There is NO honest correlation between Jim Crow and statutory rape laws. Jim Crow punishes MORAL behavior. That's why they were open to attack through civil disobedience. Good MORAL people could, in good conscience, violate Jim Crow laws by drinking at white only water fountains and refusing to give up their seats on a bus. Statutory rape laws punish inherently IMMORAL behavior. Having a one night stand with a woman that clearly is much younger than you, has been drinking and you really know nothing about except she's hot is IMMORAL behavior. Yes we've all done IMMORAL things. And those IMMORAL things have consequences. The consequences of this IMMORAL behavior for this man is that he had a baby by a woman who's lifestyle he doesn't like, and based on the laws of his state he could become a convicted rapist. If you don't understand the difference between laws that may be unfair but punish IMMORAL behavior and laws that punish MORAL behavior then you are sorely lacking in the ethics department.
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-29-2022, 12:04 AM
    What were the two sexually explicit TikToks I posted? I don't even know how to post TikToks on here. :confused: What were these sexually explicit TikToks that you said I posted, which I don't even know how to post, talking about? I know AF posted something from TikTok that was shown on news stations that I found disturbing but not pornographic. She didn't force any of the men she slept with to sleep with her. You didn't accuse her of rape. You accused her of being "slutty." You can't accuse of her of being "slutty" and then turn around and give the dad a pass on something that was both slutty and illegal. You don't want government tyranny unless it's being used against women. Take away the mom's parental rights for being "slutty" while giving the dad a 100% pass for being a whore himself. If the dad hadn't been a whore along with the mom then they wouldn't even have a child together and be in this mess. But he did. And in doing so he broke the law. And then he tried to bring the law down on the head of the mom. For a while the judge agreed, then after the judge got public pressure he reversed himself. Now the dad's being investigated for rape and based on all of the public pressure, because public pressure drives some prosecutions (ask Bill Cosby), him could very well get convicted. No clear winners hear. Stupid move on dad's part. He should have kept it in his pants and failing to do that lived with the fact that he ended up with a slut for his child's mother.
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-28-2022, 11:56 PM
    Jim Crow was inherently immoral. Telling someone he shouldn't have sex with a drunk woman in a bathroom if he hasn't gotten to know the woman enough to know whether or not she's over 18 isn't inherently immoral. Even with a fake ID, if he had taken the time to know the object of his sexual desire before banging her he could have found out she was under 18. He chose to pleasure himself at the moment. I disagree with the law, but I don't find it inherently immoral. Likewise I disagree with 3 strikes laws but I don't find them inherently immoral. Someone who has two strikes and then chooses to commit another crime is taking a stupid risk. Britney Griner, the WNBA star that went to Russia with her medical marijuana oil and got busted right before the war started, took a stupid risk. I disagree with Russia's law, but it's not inherently immoral the way Jim Crow was. There is a saying. If you live in a glass house, don't throw stones. If in your younger years you were being a male whore (having bathroom sex with someone you just met) and it turns out your whoring was actually illegal, you probably shouldn't throw stones at your now adult baby's mama letting men sleep over (legal), being married multiple times (legal), letting your 14 y/o daughter make out (not have sex) with her 17 y/o boyfriend (legal), letting your 14 y/o daughter post non-pornographic, but sexually suggestive, videos on TikTok (legal), and "sexting" said 17 y/o boyfriend (unless she was sending nudes which the article does not say, that's still legal). As Ender pointed out, all of this could be better handled without involving the courts. First, if you don't want to have to share custody with a woman that makes whorish decisions, then do the traditional thing and save sex for *gasp* marriage. If the sweet virgin church girl you had a baby with leaves you and starts acting whorish (and I know of a case where that happened) then you have a right to complain. Otherwise you got what you should have been expecting. Then if you get divorced, try to work out as much as you can in the parenting plan. One more thing about Jim Crow. Rosa Parks was not the first black woman to refuse to give up her seat on the bus. But the other black woman (women?) before her had record(s). I you plan to get into a tangle with the legal system expect your past to come up. If your past coming up can put you in legal jeopardy, maybe you shouldn't fight that battle.
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-28-2022, 11:34 PM
    But you think it's okay for a 30 year old to have sex with a drunk 16 year old? You don't think that's whorish on the part of the dad? You're sick. Edit: And I didn't ask you to take my advice. I gave you facts about so called "lack of medical evidence" in rape cases.
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-28-2022, 11:32 PM
    I'd be a better dad than you would be. You would excuse her rapist and then turn around and demand she give him full custody over their child for legal behavior you deemed slutty.
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-28-2022, 11:30 PM
    Relevant to this entire discussion: https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/louisiana-statutory-rape-laws.htm Mistake as to the Child's Age In Louisiana, as in most states, it is not a defense to a charge of carnal knowledge of a juvenile, aggravated rape, indecent behavior with a juvenile, or sexual battery that the defendant did not know that the child was underage. This is so even if the child lied about his or her age or looked older. (La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14:42, 14:43.1, 14:80, 14:80.1 14:81 (2018).) I'm not saying that's what the law should be. I'm saying that's what it is.
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-28-2022, 11:15 PM
    You should read this before attempting to respond because you don't know what you are talking about. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1881730/
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-28-2022, 11:14 PM
    Work on your reading. Those were the allegations that the dad was sexually abusing the daughter. That has NOTHING to do with what happened to the mom. The medical evidence is indisputable that the mom was 16 at the time, rape under Louisiana law, and that she had been drinking. What's in dispute is whether or not she was passed out when he had sex with her. Now he's freaking out because his daughter is making out with a 17 year old, which is totally legal, and post non pornographic videos on TikTok. (By definition TikTok doesn't allow porn. Not everything that is sexually suggestive is porn). Also lack of medical evidence doesn't prove the mom lied. Sometimes there is no medical evidence of molestation even though it happens. Please read this paper before you respond again so you can have some clue as to what you are talking about. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1881730/
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    07-28-2022, 11:02 PM
    The person making the mountain over the molehill is the dad. He's the one that went for full custody because his teenage daughter was making out with a teenage boy when he had sex with her drunk teenage mother when he was a grown ass man.
    149 replies | 3049 view(s)
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    thanks man!
  2. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
  3. View Conversation
    Well she reads the blog.

    Also I'm trying to understand why she thinks Rand is pro-choice.

    Why not talk about it?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About John Taylor

Basic Information

Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Fund Raiser

Signature


The evils of the protecting-duty, may undoubtedly be graduated by compromises, like those of every other species of tyranny, but the folly of letting in some tyranny has in all ages been fatal to liberty. A succession of wedges, though apparently small, finally splits the strongest timber. ~John Taylor of Caroline, Tyranny Unmasked

We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box. ~Congressman Larry McDonald.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3,909
Posts Per Day
0.86
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
07-04-2010 06:24 PM
General Information
Last Activity
03-05-2015 01:18 PM
Join Date
02-06-2010
Referrals
0

14 Friends

  1. Acala Acala is offline

    Member

    Acala
  2. BamaFanNKy BamaFanNKy is offline

    Member

    BamaFanNKy
  3. BlackTerrel BlackTerrel is offline

    Member

    BlackTerrel
  4. Brett Brett is offline

    Member

    Brett
  5. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  6. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline

    Member

    Dr.3D
  7. FrankRep FrankRep is offline

    Member

    FrankRep
  8. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  9. Kregisen Kregisen is offline

    Member

    Kregisen
  10. pahs1994 pahs1994 is offline

    Member

    pahs1994
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 14
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...