Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 11:00 AM
    Do you consider China socialist? They have billionaires. But you're missing the point of the Ananias and Saphira story. The people around them were VOLUNTARILY giving up private property! That's the point that you refuse to even acknowledge with your circular reasoning. In your mind, as long as someone can have private property, everybody by definition must have private property. That's simply not the case. People can be voluntarily socialist. They can even allow people in their company who aren't voluntarily socialist. Ananaias and Saphira experienced the social pressure to conform to those around them who were selling everything and holding all things in common, by pretending to sell everything and hold all things in common. If things were the way you're trying to pretend they were, there would have been no reason for A & S to pretend.
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:55 AM
    Good for you! You never would have joined the fellowship of early Christian believers in Jerusalem. And guess what? That would have been okay! Seriously, it would have. Believers outside of Jerusalem still largely kept whatever wealth they had. In fact, that's how they were able to participate in the "great donation" when Paul collected alms for the church in Jerusalem. Now someone might say "Those lazy Jerusalem Christians! Living off the Christians in Asia Minor!" But there was a very good reason not to be wed to land in Jerusalem. Some forty years after the ascension of Christ, Jerusalem was destroyed! The same Bible that extolled the virtues of each man having "according to his need" (main maxim of socialism) also said the Lord gave to His servants "each according to his ability" (the maxim of free market capitalism). Anyway, the question isn't "Do you want to give up everything you own" but rather "Would you like to participate in something that is collectively owned as opposed to privately owned?" Like....say...cryptocurrency. If you put your money in a traditional "bank" you're putting your trust in something owned by BankOfAmerica or Citibank or Goldman Sachs etc. Who owns the various blockchains? Nobody? Everybody? Oh, but many you're luddite like Anti Federalist. Okay. He's long complained about the ability of "big tech" to censor the private property they own. Like me, he misses the days of USENET. Guess what? USENET was collectively owned. Yeah, the servers were privately owned and each server could control who could log into it and what news groups to participate in, but other than that it was a free for all. (It still kind of sort of exists). Which brings us to Web 3.0, which is shaping up to be a compilation of crypto and USENET. Steemit (I think I learned about this from danno), is (was?) a blogging platform on a blockchain. It actually suffered a 51% attack (I think). So the faithful "steemit injuns" moved on to greener pastures and created It's more resilient to a 51% attack, boosts two different video sharing platforms, several different blogging platforms, some games, decentralized finance etc. All without a central authority or "owner."
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:38 AM
    :rolleyes: Wiki? Really? From the freaking dictionary. Definition of socialism 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods 2a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state 3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:36 AM
    You're allowed to be wrong. Right. And there's more than one usage for the word "socialism" just like there's more than one usage for the word "capitalism." By the way, the game you and B4L are playing is the same game I see socialists play with the world "capitalism." I define capitalism as anything other than the current crony corporate capitalism and they are quick to say "But that's not capitalism." Ummm.....yes it is. And what the early church did in Acts 2 was a form of socialism whether you are willing to admit it or not. It also has an established meaning that is EXACTLY the way I'm using it.
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 02:55 AM Abstract Mass shootings are a particular problem in the United States, with one mass shooting occurring approximately every 12.5 days. Recently a “contagion” effect has been suggested wherein the occurrence of one mass shooting increases the likelihood of another mass shooting occurring in the near future. Although contagion is a convenient metaphor used to describe the temporal spread of a behavior, it does not explain how the behavior spreads. Generalized imitation is proposed as a better model to explain how one person’s behavior can influence another person to engage in similar behavior. Here we provide an overview of generalized imitation and discuss how the way in which the media report a mass shooting can increase the likelihood of another shooting event. Also, we propose media reporting guidelines to minimize imitation and further decrease the likelihood of a mass shooting.
    32 replies | 449 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 02:42 AM
    Jordan Peterson had a pretty long discussion about this. While he agree with your point about "living up to one's potential causes income inequality", he went on to say that in a healthy society there is some way to balance that out. And that way doesn't have to be statist. For example he mentioned the native Canadian tribes ancient tradition of the "pot latch" where chiefs who had accumulated lots of stuff where honored by how much they gave away. the-uncomfortable-truth-behind-economic/2efb0363d6cc3b8e9c12babce4154c66f4c0c01d The Hebrew religion also had something to balance out income inequality. It was the Year of Jubilee. That year all family land that to be returned to the original owner, debts were cancelled, and Hebrew slaves were freed. (See: Interestingly enough, the Lord Himself claimed ownership of the land and that's why it couldn't be permanently sold, except for houses inside walled cities. (Leviticus 25:23 ¶ The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me.) Instead, we have a society where the government ultimately owns the land. Don't pay your taxes? Lose your land. Make a bad business deal? You can lose your land. One of your cousins twice removed decides he wants to sell his 2 acre share in the family 2,000 acre plot because he wants to buy his trophy wife that boob job and butt lift she wants? You guessed it, you can lose your land. There are some aspects of the Hebrew religion still in our law such as debt forgiveness through filing for bankruptcy and prohibitions on usury...with loopholes where people still charge usury anyway.
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 02:19 AM
    Uhhhh....nope. Not even kind of true. They got wiped out because they had no immunity to European disease and hadn't invented gun powder. Even the "civilized" tribes like the Aztecs and Incas who had European style feudalism got wiped out.
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 02:11 AM
    Because....that's what it actually is. Why does the accurate label bother you? And why do you describe a voluntary agreement as "temporary?" Just because people can voluntarily leave something doesn't mean they must. But, technically, everything is "temporary" even empires. There is no reason a group of people cannot indefinitely share resources. This entire planet "shares" the ocean. I recall that not too long ago people on this forum where vehemently arguing against the "L.O.S.T." treaty as statist overreach. Do you think billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates should be able to buy up the ocean?
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 02:05 AM
    Tell that to all of the Indian tribes who banded together and fought to defend their collective happy hunting grounds. In fact a strong argument can be made that there's more incentive for a group of warriors to band together to defend they land they own together than to band together the defend they land they all own individually.
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:18 PM
    423 replies | 27425 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:54 PM
    Are you sure about that? Mutualism, as a variety of anarchism, goes back to P.J. Proudhon in France and Josiah Warren in the U.S. It favors, to the extent possible, an evolutionary approach to creating a new society. It emphasizes the importance of peaceful activity in building alternative social institutions within the existing society, and strengthening those institutions until they finally replace the existing statist system. As Paul Goodman put it, "A free society cannot be the substitution of a 'new order' for the old order; it is the extension of spheres of free action until they make up most of the social life." Other anarchist subgroups, and the libertarian left generally, share these ideas to some extent. Whether known as "dual power" or "social counterpower," or "counter-economics," alternative social institutions are part of our common vision. But they are especially central to mutualists' evolutionary understanding. Mutualists belong to a non-collectivist segment of anarchists. Although we favor democratic control when collective action is required by the nature of production and other cooperative endeavors, we do not favor collectivism as an ideal in itself. We are not opposed to money or exchange. We believe in private property, so long as it is based on personal occupancy and use. We favor a society in which all relationships and transactions are non-coercive, and based on voluntary cooperation, free exchange, or mutual aid. The "market," in the sense of exchanges of labor between producers, is a profoundly humanizing and liberating concept. What we oppose is the conventional understanding of markets, as the idea has been coopted and corrupted by state capitalism.
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    53382 replies | 644190 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:43 PM
    Correct. Incorrect. The early church in Jerusalem was a kind of "libertarian socialism." Acts 2:44-45 44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
    34 replies | 165 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:45 PM
    A Very Nasty Woman - Part Of The Problem #861 On this episode of Part Of The Problem Dave and Robbie take a look at the recent revelations about Hillary Clinton's involvement in the Donald Trump/Russia collusion Hoax. This episode was recorded on 5.23.22
    268 replies | 62442 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:36 AM
    No....because I never took the first shot.
    4 replies | 96 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:13 AM
    Very informative on so many levels. I wonder how many kids not only get pushed into being trans because their parents freak out about them playing with the wrong gender toys, but also get pushed into being gay? Maybe play should just be looked at as play. In general dysphorias are correctly looked at as mental conditions. For example body integrity dysphoria where someone things he or she should be an amputee. People with B.I.D. report feeling "whole" after cutting off a limb.,desire%20of%20the%20affected%20person%20to%20have%20a But nobody would suggest amputation as a "treatment."
    2 replies | 73 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:27 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Globalist again.
    5 replies | 160 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:24 AM
    Bumpfire stock ban through executive order, red flag law proposals and pushing for assault weapons bans before and during his presidency were all moves in the WRONG direction. But I do appreciate the money for the HBCUs, the First Step Act, and Trump's attempt at reparations with the Platinum Plan. So he wasn't all bad.
    26 replies | 848 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-23-2022, 10:48 AM
    Yes. But President Zelinsky is Jewish. Therefore if you oppose the neo Nazis that he's supporting you must be antisemitic.
    7 replies | 137 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-23-2022, 10:43 AM
    Obama brought home troops and deployed troops. Trump brought home troops and deployed troops. Obama did more drone bombings than Bush. Trump did more drone bombings then Obama. Using your same argument someone logically could ask the question "Do you miss Obama." The truth is they all suck.
    26 replies | 848 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-23-2022, 10:39 AM
    Thank you for the infographic. I think I'll turn this into a sticker for gas stations. It's much more informative than the "I did that" stickers.
    24 replies | 836 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-23-2022, 10:36 AM
    A) It's disgusting that they have "The Honorable" in front of her name. She's not a judge. She's a cabinet secretary. B) This should be an impeachable offense.
    24 replies | 836 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    05-23-2022, 07:24 AM
    I have no idea whether getting rid of these dams is wise or foolish. Probably, as in most (all ?) things, it is a trade-off in which the net value can be judged only subjectively. But what is certainly foolish is making the decision contingent upon federal permission - especially the permission of whatever troupe of overweening clowns happens to be in the White House at the time. If California is making the wrong decision, then it should do so in spite of, not because of, the approval of the feds. IOW: California should at least "dare to be stupid" on its own recognizance.
    4 replies | 216 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    53382 replies | 644190 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    05-22-2022, 06:38 AM
    4 replies | 390 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    53382 replies | 644190 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    05-21-2022, 02:54 PM
    The Ministry Of Truth Falls - Part Of The Problem #860 On this episode of Part Of The Problem Dave and Robbie discuss the abrupt end to the Biden Administration's abruptly canceled ministry of truth, and a silver lining of hope that comes from this victory for liberty. We also take a look at George Bush Jr. and his recent freudian slip, and finally, Peter Doocy brings the heat once again to the Whitehouse's new professional liar Karine Jean-Pierre. This Episode Was Recorded On 5.20.22
    268 replies | 62442 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    53382 replies | 644190 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    05-21-2022, 02:14 PM
    92 replies | 5790 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    05-21-2022, 01:46 PM 1527521228688445442
    1091 replies | 87884 view(s)
More Activity
About cjm

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed state:
Political / Activist Bio:
Ron Paul 2012: Donated. Knocked doors. Made phone calls. Recruited delegates to district conventions.

Karen Kwiatkowski 2012: Volunteer coordinator, data manager. Knocked doors, made phone calls.

GOP 2012-2016: Treasurer of local unit. Chaired several unit committees. Chaired nominations and credentials committees during mass meetings. Member of district resolutions committee and sergeant at arms, 2016 6th CD convention.

Rand Paul 2016: Served as 6th district co-captain for ballot access petitions. Circulated petitions.

Other: lots of local and State stuff that doesn't fit the RPF activist paradigm. Contributed <$100 to many liberty candidates, including forum members Massie and Kellogg.
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a &quot;Stand with Rand&quot; badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Campaign Manager, Phone Bank Worker
Collateral Writer, Editor, Proofreading, Typing, Researcher
Computer and Technical:
Programmer, WebMaster, Unix Guru, SQL/Database Expert


My Medical Records are Private

"If a man says he'll get something done, then he'll get it done. You don't need to keep reminding him every 6 months." --phill4paul


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
General Information
Last Activity
05-21-2022 10:48 AM
Join Date

9 Friends

  1. devil21 devil21 is offline


  2. jmdrake jmdrake is offline


  3. kcchiefs6465 kcchiefs6465 is offline


  4. mad cow mad cow is offline


    mad cow
  5. Mike T Mike T is offline

    New Member

    Mike T
  6. Occam's Banana Occam's Banana is offline


    Occam's Banana
  7. Okaloosa Okaloosa is offline


  8. Tillett4Liberty Tillett4Liberty is offline


  9. Voluntary Man Voluntary Man is offline


    Voluntary Man
Showing Friends 1 to 9 of 9











No results to display...
Page 1 of 21 12311 ... LastLast












  • 12:44 AM - Hidden


  • 10:30 PM - Hidden
  • 04:26 PM - Hidden





Page 1 of 21 12311 ... LastLast