Today, 05:26 PM
Yeah. But at the same time about the same percentage are against gender affirming care for minors and against and are also against biological men on women's sports teams. That may seem odd until you realize...
^That. All this talk about "anti gay laws" being past is just that....talk. I was ambivalent about gay marriage until I read the Bob Jones University case in law school. BJU lost its tax exempt status for banning interracial dating. The reasoning of SCOTUS was the executive branch had desegregated the military, the judicial branch had struct down "separate but equal" and congress had passed the 1964 civil rights act. With all 3 branches acting against segregation, that showed that it (segregation) was against public policy and tax exempt charities exist to promote public policy. One of my church members was in the same class and we both realized "With this ruling our church's colleges and universities could be in hot water over sexual orientation discrimination." I asked the professor about that and he said "Oh, that will never happen because..." and he gave some answer that made no sense. Sure enough, Obama allowed gays in the military, SCOTUS struck down DOMA, and transgender rights were snuck into the Obamacare act. And Biden investigated several Christian universities over sexual orientation discrimination. Ultimately a Clinton appointed judge, of all people, threw the lawsuit out.
Connect With Us