Tab Content
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:41 PM
    Ah... I'm slow, but you've probably figured that out by now.
    19 replies | 2036 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:30 PM
    With which one?
    19 replies | 2036 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:20 PM
    I think we are all to blame. The history of America is the ultimate human tragedy, and not because of <URP> <DERP> slavery. Once free of the king's immediate clutches, we should have become as wild and ravening predators, ready to bring to death anyone from "government" who dared so much as suggest some measure that would in even the least measure tiptoe upon the rights of free men. But we had everything against us. Our general Christian/Jewish upbringings and the mannerliness of those cultures pretty well guaRONteed we'd no become the monsters we should have been in response to the least measure of "governmental" trespass. Then there was the thousands of years of breeding to the king's halter. One does not escape that so easily. Then there are the deep and manifold flaws of the Constitution which we have failed to correct. Each successive failure built upon all those of the past, and now here we stand. Some of it could perhaps not have been helped, given the overall circumstances, but I think most of it could have. We chose.
    19 replies | 2036 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:55 PM
    Let us assume this is not only true, but that we are working with a reasonable definition of "selfishness". So what? Here you are parroting one of the left's most repulsive talking points - their endlessly idiotic tirade in condemnation of "selfishness". Surely you can do better than this... if you wanted to. Meaningless, substance-free assertion. What are you peddling here? Oh do go on while I break out my one-inch violin.
    19 replies | 2036 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:01 PM
    Your argument founds on assumptions false, and ignores the conflict between the granted power and the inherent right. Where a granted power conflicts with an inherent right, there is no argument to be made in favor of the power over the right. The very notion of holding a granted power above an inherent right tap-dances merrily past absurdity. My rights trump any "governmental" power. Period. My rights, and yours, are inherent to what we are. "Government" powers are synthetic and perforce arbitrary. It should require no hint of rocket surgery to dope out which of the two stands supreme. Proponents of the opposite view can rant and fart and vomit their idiocies contrary to glaring truth until the cows come home - to put a synthetic, and frankly a bullshit power above the inborn rights of a man, any man, is raving insanity. It is stupidity so wild as to defy words.
    11 replies | 453 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-29-2023, 02:06 PM
    I think I covered the possibilities. The "big one" would be a constitutional amendment, the toughest to pull off, but SCOTUS-proof. Fixed that fer ye.
    11 replies | 453 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-28-2023, 07:06 AM
    You can't even be serious. There is no possible way that this was accidental. Not even the remotest possibility exists. It is high likelihood, but in this case the carried risk is also high, if optics are in any way important to SCOTUS, which history seems to suggest they are not. The out would be this: SCOTUS hears relevant case, decides correctly, and Congress then destroys what little credibility remains them and does just as you suggest. The reql question would then rest once again with SCOTUS, after which and assuming the right outcome, would leave Congress in a bit of a bind. I would not, however, trust them to give up so readily. They could attack this at a policy-level, which would be a sucky remedy, but still would perhaps be better than nothing. I would expect them to attempt an Amendment which, if successfully ratified, would de-ball SCOTUS on the question. That would be the ultimate as it would by definition be "constitutional".
    11 replies | 453 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-28-2023, 06:47 AM
    A couple of observations. Let us begin with the relatively trivial point of "error". This was no error of omission. When properly considered, anyone with an IQ will immediately see that the implications of those sixteens words are quite literally staggering, and I cannot overstate this point. This omission was by all means intentional and malevolently committed, make no mistake about that. Whether the Reviser took it upon himself to commit this most heinously treasonous omission for which he should have been drawn and quartered, or some third party strong-armed him into it, the actual Law (and I intentionally capitalize "Law" because in this case the statute qualifies as such) remains what it is and by all means must be restored to perfection. This should be demanded in shrieking stridency by every American on the planet, regardless of political affiliation. Even the lefties should be out burning down cities or whatever the hell it is they do these days, to make their voice heard on this matter. Secondly, and in a way more significantly as hinted at above, the implications of the restoration of these sixteen words are beyond mere numbers. What those words do is to reiterate and reinforce the specifications of the BoR with great force. The implications are deep, broad, and extend to the visible horizon, touching literally everything in our current jurisprudence. It destroys ALL unconstitutional Acts passed into statutory law. It even destroys the Article I power to tax. A man walking armed down a Manhattan street, arrested and charged for violating Sullivan, could then sue the pants off the city and bring criminal charges against basically everyone involved in the crimes committed against his sovereign rights.
    11 replies | 453 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-27-2023, 06:13 AM
    Cue Rand Paul assassination in 4... 3...
    32 replies | 2011 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-23-2023, 04:57 AM
    I find it interesting that a guy like Epstein failed to employ one of the simplest, most obvious, and effective strategies imaginable to ensure his life against the supposed fate he suffered in a jail cell just as the camera(s) coincidentally failed. Had I been in his place I would have proceeded as follows. I would have secured the services of at least six lawyers whose job it would have been to release all the various evidence into the public domain, including all the major national papers, etc., upon my demise. Each new victim of mine would be alerted to the fact that I had multiple agents in my employ who would be doing this. They would not be made privy to the nature of those agents, their number, names, and so on. Only that they existed and not to test me on the matter. After the first contact with such agents, there would be no further contact. They would be paid on an ongoing basis to maintain their end of the agreement. I would establish a separate site onto which they could login, where they would see naught but a button that was to be pressed in the event of my demise, delivering all data to various sources. This way, the guilty would be exposed no matter what. I find it interesting that a man as treacherous as Epstein would not have concocted a plan at least this good, if not better. Perhaps he did? Perhaps he is not at all dead? However unlikely it may seem, when one is holding in his hands the balls of so many powerful people, it becomes a little more than difficult to accept that he was so incredibly blind in this most critical respect, regarding his own crimes. against those victims. Was he buried? Cremated? Just curious. If the latter, add a few more grains of suspicion to my plate.
    5 replies | 281 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-19-2023, 08:43 PM
    RE: the FBI's shenanigans. The question this raises in my mind is why has the FBI done what it has done and continues to do. The trivial answer of "corruption" is unsatisfying. The real question is who is behind it all? Who is driving the FBI in this manner? Who is the nameless person or people who are pulling the strings for real?
    11 replies | 719 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-17-2023, 07:30 PM
    Wish I could say otherwise, but that's a sucker bet. Sigh.
    11 replies | 719 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-17-2023, 12:45 PM
    I read the exec summary. The findings were aptly described as "sobering". Will there be any prosecutorial action in response? I'm not holding my breath.
    11 replies | 719 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-14-2023, 09:00 PM
    osan started a thread Gloria Alvarez in Open Discussion
    This is a good girl.
    1 replies | 115 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-13-2023, 04:13 PM
    If you see that MSM is dying, then guaRONtee Theye also see it. Consider that Theye are not going to just let themselves be defeated and I fully believe that they are precisely the sorts to see the entire world burn if they cannot have it. Finally, consider that MSM is a mere tool for Themme and that they will use it for as long as they must to achieve whatever plateau- or ultimate-goal they have set for themselves. Since Theye hold all the material power that counts in that they can keep the MSM artificially afloat for as long as they are able, the "collapse" you assume to be coming, isn't in the way I assume you to be imagining. By the time the "collapse" comes, which I assume to mean that effectively nobody is paying attention any longer, Theye will either be ready to spring the coup de grace, or will have already done so, in either case meaning the collapse is meaningless. By then, whether it has happened, it will make no matter to Themme. Theye will be in position or will have won the ultimate battle for dominion and we will be in need of more Preparation-H than even God could produce. So don't go looking for that as any sign that salvation is nigh, because short of Jesus stepping out of a crack in the sky, we are going to be ready for a fork. I'm thinking we may already be there, given what I see happening all over, every day. Hopefully, I'm wrong about everything.
    11 replies | 721 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-13-2023, 01:05 AM
    In this scheme of energetic government, the people will find two sets of tax-gatherers—the state and the federal sheriffs. This, it seems to me, will produce such dreadful oppression as the people cannot possibly bear. The federal sheriff may commit what oppression, make what distresses, he pleases, and ruin you with impunity; for how are you to tie his hands? Have you any sufficiently decided means of preventing him from sucking your blood by speculations, commissions, and fees? Thus thousands of your people will be most shamefully robbed: our state sheriffs, those unfeeling blood-suckers, have, under the watchful eye of our legislature, committed the most horrid and barbarous ravages on our people. It has required the most constant vigilance of the legislature to keep them from totally ruining the people; a repeated succession of laws has been made to suppress their iniquitous speculations and cruel extortions; and as often has their nefarious ingenuity devised methods of evading the force of those laws: in the struggle they have generally triumphed over the legislature. It is a fact that lands have been sold for five shillings, which were worth one hundred pounds: if sheriffs, thus immediately under the eye of our state legislature and judiciary, have dared to commit these outrages, what would they not have done if their masters had been at Philadelphia or New York? If they perpetrate the most unwarrantable outrage on your person or property, you cannot get redress on this side of Philadelphia or New York; and how can you get it there? If your domestic avocations could permit you to go thither, there you must appeal to judges sworn to support this Constitution, in opposition to that of any state, and who may also be inclined to favor their own officers. When these harpies are aided by excisemen, who may search, at any time, your houses, and most secret recesses, will the people bear it? If you think so, you differ from me. Where I thought there was a possibility of such mischiefs, I would grant power with a niggardly hand; and here there is a strong probability that these oppressions shall actually happen. I may be told that it is safe to err on that side, because such regulations may be made by Congress as shall restrain these officers, and because laws are made by our representatives, and judged by righteous judges: but, sir, as these regulations may be made, so they may not; and many reasons there are to induce a belief that they will not. I shall therefore be an infidel on that point till the day of my death. This Constitution is said to have beautiful features; but when I come to examine these features, sir, they appear to me horribly frightful. Among other deformities, it has an awful squinting; it squints towards monarchy; and does not this raise indignation in the breast of every true American? Your President may easily become king. Your Senate is so imperfectly constructed that your dearest rights may be sacrificed by what may be a small minority; and a very small minority may continue forever unchangeably this government, although horridly defective. Where are your checks in this government? Your strongholds will be in the hands of your enemies. It is on a supposition that your American governors shall be honest, that all the good qualities of this government are founded; but its defective and imperfect construction puts it in their power to perpetrate the worst of mischiefs, should they be bad men; and, sir, would not all the world, from the eastern to the western hemisphere, blame our distracted folly in resting our rights upon the contingency of our rulers being good or bad? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty! I say that the loss of that dearest privilege has ever followed, with absolute certainty, every such mad attempt.
    4 replies | 427 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-13-2023, 01:04 AM
    In preface I state outright, categorically, and without a hint of equivocation that Patrick Henry was the greatest American ever to draw breath. Much as I respect the likes of Jefferson, Adams, and so forth, Patrick Henry put them all to shame for his understanding of liberty and his stalwart refusal to compromise on even the least shred of that which is sacred and which must be defended to the death, our God-given liberty. Such is my affection for the memory of this man, I would trade my life right here, right now, were God to offer the opportunity to restore him to the world as himself, for I have nothing to offer humanity, while he held everything of relevance to the topic in his palm. While famous for his "Give me liberty or give men death" speech, the one he gave in 1788 is readily its equal, if less verbally pyrotechnic. Nonetheless, he expressed with fine eloquence and clarity the reasons that the architecture of the proposed constitution was a structural disaster. Would that I could attain even a single-digit percentage of his stature on these, the most critically important aspects of human existence. His brilliance was matched only by his courage, for he spoke largely as a loner in the face of a raft of men whose true intentions and capacities can only be called into question, given the glaring error they made in signing that document with ironically absent authority to speak for free men. That such worthy men universally meet with dead-ends, and often with ignominy, leaves me in a state of wanting to sit in a corner and tear the hairs from my head in anger at the defilement and discounting of courage and integrity and honorable, sane, and correct wisdom. And so without further ado...
    4 replies | 427 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-12-2023, 11:11 PM
    ^^^ An effective declaration of war on our freedoms and property, yet nobody puts a slug in her? One more time: this is war. What do people do in war? Must it be spelled out? Are there other solutions available to us? If so, we're not using them because that nitwit is still occupying her seat, as is the case with most such office holders from sea to shining sea. It seems clear that the people whom she represents want things as she sees them. But I am quite certain not all of them are on board, so what of their wishes and their rights? This is why war is upon us. Nobody in their right mind gives a shit whether the majority of people in Denver want to live like communists. They do, however, care about the disinterested minority who continue to cherish their freedom and their rights. They are the reason the great mass of Americans should be rising up and making it clear to all traitors to liberty either to step off or lose their lives. Can nobody see that they are felons committing very mass-scale felonies against the free people of America with their despotic tyrannies, and that all propriety pursuant to our natural, God-given liberties dictate they should be ousted from office and from our shores, or even killed outright? When a robber threatens you on the street, what is the proper response? All else equal, you remove his ability to pose that threat, which usually means delivering to him grave bodily injury, or taking his life which he has forfeited by his own choice. This is right, proper, and just action. So why, when a "politician" issues an equal threat in equally felonious fashion, do we routinely and dare I say universally, kowtow like quivering serfs? HELLO?! We deserve what we tolerate. The "government" isn't doing the right things, so we have no recourse there. What will it take to make people act in their own better interests, in the interest of liberty? I have asked this question many times in these fora: will Americans ever show even the least epsilon of self-respect and stand in effective material opposition to those who defile us through the trespass of our rights? I have expressed my dolefully offered suspicion that the answer is "no", and thus far I am proven correct. We as a people have no respect for ourselves, and no real love for our children (all indignant protest to the contrary notwithstanding), demonstrated and proven by our idle tolerance of every outrage heaped upon us while we give the old "can't fight city hall" shrug of our slouched shoulders. The cancers of wokeness and transgenderism, with parents allowing their five year olds to make life-destroying choices are but two examples of the wild idiocies now being normalized, the results of which will one day come back to haunt the race of men.
    18 replies | 1317 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-12-2023, 11:08 PM
    Those "liberals" are eating your lunch and removing your rights. You'd damned better start taking them seriously.
    18 replies | 1317 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-12-2023, 11:05 PM
    I hope you prove correct. In the meanwhile, I will keep my powder dry.
    2 replies | 329 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-12-2023, 08:13 PM
    ^^^^^^^^^ What he wrote.
    3 replies | 340 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-12-2023, 08:05 PM
    Psalm 22 They gaped upon me with their mouths, as a ravening and a roaring lion. I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint. My heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels. My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws. And thou hast brought me into the dust of death.
    2 replies | 192 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-12-2023, 07:30 PM
    Take a step back, zoom out, and calm yourself. Remove the noise that comes at you and, having zoomed out to a 50K foot view of things, take in the broad totality of what you see in terms of what is being fed us. Forget the details and pay attention to the broad category. You should be seeing train-loads of... let us call it absurdity, mixed with everything repugnant to human perception. This is what we are being fed. Perversion of the good, morphed into obscenity. Daily it is something new, yet familiar, as someone takes and destroys that which is good, to be broadcast to the world, altering the common perception in subtle and possibly irretrievable ways. In all this, Theye are testing us. Theye have been testing us for decades, perhaps longer. I still see people posting, or hear them saying that when this evidence or that comes out, Theye will be quaking in their boots. No, they won't. Theye are testing us, and to date we have proven ourselves unworthy of our innate freedom as we idle away in the face of this most obvious assault upon our most basic sensibilities. Wokeness. Gender idiocy so blatant, it leaves me wondering how our heads have not exploded years ago. The list goes on, seemingly without end. Theye test us with the release of all these perversions, inversions, and revolutions of the good and normal, then wait for our reactions. Theye are betting that we will do nothing to stop them, and thus far they have been proven 100% correct. In my estimation, Theye have little to no fear of us, precisely because they have been poking and prodding us for a very long time, while we respond as corpses. Crimes and other outrages are paraded before us brazenly, as if to taunt us to dare and do something about it, knowing after all this time that we will not. Theye almost certainly stole two elections, we did nothing. Consider Trump's threats to bury the lot of Themme. Either Trump lies and Theye know it, or Trump must be prevented from becoming the 47th president of the United States at any cost. If this be the case, then Theye will steal the '24 election and I would expect it to be very blatantly carried forth, yet another test and taunt. When the accusations arise, Theye will stonewall in equal blatancy, and we will do nothing.
    2 replies | 329 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-11-2023, 04:55 PM
    Precisely.
    3 replies | 304 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-11-2023, 02:42 AM
    https://freedomisobvious.blogspot.com/2023/05/hypocrisy-is-root-of-all-crime.html Words never cease to amaze me, not only in their meanings, but in the dangers they pose when their semantics vary over time, most often from mis- or abuse. My purpose here is to demonstrate how hypocrisy is the basis of all crime, yet the original meaning of the term makes references other than that which I intent. To wit, Samuel Johnson's dictionary of 1785 defines hypocrisy as "dissimulation with regard to the religious or moral character." Dissimulation, in turn, is "the act of dissembling; hypocrisy." Do note the circular definition. Dissemble: "to play the hypocrite; to use false professions; the wheedle." Note again the circularity.
    3 replies | 304 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-10-2023, 05:44 PM
    Way back when, I had many gay acquaintances and a couple of gay friends. One of the latter was Dave Cain. We met in his friend's Jag when they picked me up hitching up El Camino in the Bay Area in 78. Dave was a wealthy real estate broker in the area, drove a Ferrari Boxer (which I creased against a large Caddy one night when he decided he was too drunk to drive) and we became good friends. Dave was always polite with me and never once tried anything cute. I was straight, he knew it, and he respected that boundary. Well, one day at his house he disclosed to me that his "lover" was a 16 year old boy. Dave was 44 at that time. He went on and on about this kid and then went on a diatribe about how the "community" was, and had been for long years, actively recruiting young boys. Dave was very candid about the whole deal and I kept smiling, all the while my inner voice was going, "what the fucking fuck?" He wasn't the only gaymo to tell me this. In all, about half a dozen different people I'd known had confided the precise same thing: the gay "community" had every intention of growing its numbers by targeting the young. Now, just for the sake of clarity, they were not talking of little kids, say twelve or younger, but thirteen was definitely on the menu for them. Basically, the moment you sprout those pubes, you were fair game for recruitment. So when these degenerates tell you that they aren't coming for your children, know in your heart of hearts that they are lying at you through their teeth and with straight faces. They need to be removed from the society because they represent clear and present threats to all children. This tolerance bullshit has gotten entirely out of hand and I am thinking it is time to stuff those people right back in the closets whence they came. Personally, I'd send them all to China. They owe us.
    194 replies | 11187 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-10-2023, 05:32 PM
    It would seem only natural, things in this world being what they tend. And yet, those reactions often go wildly wrong, turning just causes into horrors. This is a valid concern. Consider the "terror" that was the ultimate result of the French revolution. Ousting that jerk-off king was one thing. Lopping the heads of the aristocrats simply because they were aristocrats was what turned the whole affair into grand crime. The people became precisely that which they claimed had assailed them. Having so become, they invalidated their cause and so far as I am concerned, I'd have not shed a tear had Louis slaughtered the lot of them. Devils murdering devils suits me just fine. It is clear that this so-called "society" is not meant by Themme to survive. Theye want it rent asunder, limb from limb. I'm old and closing in on the end of my existence, so I'm having an increasingly difficult time caring.
    194 replies | 11187 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-09-2023, 01:09 AM
    When I see people like this, the fact that any parent allows them in the same room with their children leaves me wanting to tear out my hair. People like this need to be peeled. Barring that, they need to be put into cells for the rest of eternity, never to be seen or heard again. The Constitution bars cruel and unusual punishment, but I contend that for people like this there is no punishment sufficiently cruel. Destroying the innocence of a child should be met with the most grave cruelty to make Vladimir Tepes weep tears of joy and envy.
    194 replies | 11187 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    05-09-2023, 12:58 AM
    I'm assuming this is Vancouver WA and not Canada, given nobody was saying "aboot". I used to live in Vancouver and loved it there, but the cops were ALL useless assholes, and here I much apologize to the useless assholes of the world. When Jessie Lopez stole my wallet and ran up some $8K in charges on my card in about 4 hours time, buying up every package of ephedrine in the Portland metro area, once I ID'd that little scumbag, I went to VPD to have them arrest him. Those worthless imbeciles showed no interest, viewing me as a nuisance, which I generally am, but not that time. Oddly, when I called up the Multnomah county prosecutor (Lopez had committed many of his crimes in PDX), they were very interested in him as he had multiple felony warrants issued and had been looking for him for two years. I testified to the MC grand jury as to what had transpired and Portland cops came over the river into Vancouver and arrested him with not inconsiderable swearing and threats of grave bodily harm if he so much as twitched. I admit to my amusement and satisfaction at this, not to mention the 2+ year sentence he received in good old Coffee Creek state prison for his offenses against myself. He got more for the other crimes to which he plead. I did, however, have to move in the face of threats to Seshat by his friends, all of whom were criminals. Had any harm come to her, I would have been obliged to go hunting and in those days, unlike now, I'd have made very red work of it and then ended up in prison myself, so it was just easier to move, which we did and lived happily ever after. :) So yes, Vancouver cops make clinical idiots look like rocket surgeons and moral degenerates look like pinnacles of human virtue. What I saw of that female porker in no way surprised me, though I now feel the need for dramamine.
    194 replies | 11187 view(s)
More Activity

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
16,345
Posts Per Day
3.33
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
10
Most Recent Message
08-04-2016 07:33 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 07:42 PM
Join Date
12-26-2009
Referrals
2
View osan's Blog

Recent Entries

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Guns and Marijuana in Missouri

by osan on 01-02-2017 at 08:51 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Mach View Post
"castle doctrine," which permits homeowners to use deadly force against intruders. The revised law will allow invited guests, such as babysitters, to use lethal force.
I find it amazing to consider just how hopelessly corrupt a land we are, and have been for so very long a time when I read things like this. To think not only that some people would dare usurp the authority to remove those which are the most obvious prerogatives of free men, but also that we as a people would

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

RP: Who Brought the World to the Brink of World War III?

by osan on 10-17-2016 at 11:14 PM
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
We did.
and

Quote Originally Posted by PierzStyx View Post
Uhm, no. Not all of us. Only most of the countries involved. We few radicals and rebels do what we can to prevent it. Whether that works or not still doesn't change whether it is our fault or not.
To which I responded thusly:


The number of people out there who are putting their asses on the line is vanishingly small. My statistical assessment therefore stands. To wit...

The fact is this: we failed from the earliest days.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

How to defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct?

by osan on 04-15-2016 at 07:22 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
How would you defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct? The use of private security firms is a stock answer, but let’s consider some more detail. Consider the following situations…
And it has its problems. It is a partial answer at best.


1) A band of thugs is going around robbing people, how do you defend your home from invasion?
By killing them to eliminate them from the book of immediate and potential future threats to others, including

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

02-01-2023


01-15-2023


11-13-2022


10-31-2022


09-27-2022


09-21-2022


09-03-2022


05-28-2022


04-25-2022


03-26-2022


12-20-2021


12-08-2021


09-25-2021


09-23-2021


09-08-2021


08-17-2021


02-13-2021


12-21-2020


10-13-2020



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 129 1231151101 ... LastLast

06-01-2023


05-29-2023


05-28-2023


05-19-2023


05-17-2023


05-13-2023


05-12-2023


05-10-2023


05-09-2023


05-07-2023


05-05-2023


05-01-2023



Page 1 of 129 1231151101 ... LastLast