Tab Content
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 06:03 PM
    I must respectfully disagree. Meaning is important. Precise meaning is more important. The article is FAIL because a most fundamental aspect of basic communication was omitted. If the article works for you, then I am happy for you. As for me, it fails. He needs to go back and try again. Just my opinion. If the message is as you claim, he could have written it in just about that many words.
    13 replies | 239 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 06:00 PM
    What a load of presumptive crap, assuming the more modern sense of "demagogue". Trump has yet to demonstrate himself a demagogue in the pejorative sense. He may well so prove, but as yet he has not.
    4 replies | 154 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 05:56 PM
    Thread title = oxymoron. Government and logic are mutually and violently exclusive.
    2 replies | 81 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 05:55 PM
    Not sure why you seem to have a bur under your saddle here. Dunno who pissed in your cornflakes this morning, but it wasn't me. Or perhaps I am completely misunderstanding your meanings here.
    13 replies | 239 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 05:49 PM
    Your "law" fails. Why? Because of the presumptive basis, which cannot be supported as a mandate. To wit: Firstly, it is not a principle. It is a mandate. The two things are very different. As a mandate, it fails for a few reasons. Firstly, it has the "pulled out of a rabbit's ass" quality about it. It is NOT fundamental. It is NOT self-evident. Is is merely a commandment of a very apparently arbitrary nature that anyone with an IQ above that of a boiled turnip is going to sense and reject, if for no other reason than they are having it forced upon them. This is FAIL^FAIL, or FAIL-plex. It is simplistic, making no distinctions for variance of context. Shall I love my neighbor as he fixes to stab me through my heart with a 10" kitchen knife? By the strict semantic construction of your "principle", I am law-bound to stand still and let him have my life.
    445 replies | 62632 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 05:32 PM
    That was pretty good. Thanks.
    1 replies | 61 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 05:06 PM
    Article is not bad, however, there is a glaring omission that pretty well spears its practical utility. Nowhere does the author define "unity". How can we know of what he writes if he has not rigorously defined the core term about which the entire exposition is built? Some may balk at this, thinking this some case of pedantic splitting of hairs, but I assure you it is no such thing. When one considers "unity" with some care, it becomes immediately clear that the term may apply to a nearly endless list of possibilities. Is he speaking of unity such that all people love chocolate ice cream, believe in the same God, use precisely the same sex positions, drive the same cars, hate the same baseball teams? Without a clear, precise, correct, and complete definition of "unity", the article actually remains devoid of sense, all superficial appearances to the contrary notwithstanding. Communications. It's not as easily done well as so many seem to think.
    13 replies | 239 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 04:57 PM
    Government is disapprove.
    13 replies | 239 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 04:45 PM
    Valid point.
    13 replies | 660 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 04:01 PM
    I see no reason that I should be the only one to suffer. And yes, I will one day exact my revenge upon those who exposed me to this toxic waste, for it is a crime against humanity. FTW.
    4326 replies | 205637 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-26-2017, 09:52 PM
    http://freedomisobvious.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-method-of-rule.html “It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.” ― James Madison My knowledge of history is far from complete, and while I do not know when men began employing the Method of Rule by Policy, I do know that the Romans used it. The Method fell from common use after Rome's fall, but appears to have regained popularity with the rise of the so-called "nation state". The kings of yore were typically ill-educated and generally lacked a sense of long term, all-encompassing strategy to ensure their legacies survived the ages, despite the efforts of some to establish perpetuities. Therefore, their dynasties rarely lasted beyond a very few generations. It was not until the rise of the nation-state, which corporatized governance, that governmental "dynasties" began to stabilize over many generations with the potential to continue in what for all practical purposes is perpetuity. The Roman Church is perhaps the preeminent example of the potential for longevity of well managed corporate governance. The Third Reich is an equally good example of what happens when such governance loses its way, or comes against forces it cannot resist, despite seemingly very promising beginnings. The Soviet Union and Red China are examples of how flagrant tyrannies are able to accomplish endless horrors and maintain themselves for extended periods well beyond the span of an ordinary lifetime. As is typical in basically all cases of political power, governance becomes corrupted in one way and degree, or another. The motives are as numerous as the stars and though we may generously assume the best of intentions, the propriety of the plots driven by such intentions is rarely very good.
    1 replies | 125 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-26-2017, 02:28 PM
    Belated, but check.
    31 replies | 598 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-26-2017, 02:23 PM
    Emphasis on "known". :)
    5 replies | 215 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-26-2017, 02:19 PM
    Depends on how one views "winning". Irrelevant. Mighty white of you.
    18 replies | 1008 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-25-2017, 05:33 PM
    I'd not thought of it explicitly in that way, but now that I see it in writing, its truth speaks to me in clear voice.
    75 replies | 1201 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-25-2017, 06:21 AM
    Asshole cops busy asshole-copping, as usual. Asshole cops busy asshole-copping, as usual. Asshole snowflake, busy asshole-snowflaking, as usual. Note the horse-shit assertion of targeting. Even if he were clearly NOT targeting (most likely true) the delicates, those dishonest little pussies would still say he was in order to see the "state" come down on him as hard as possible.
    75 replies | 1201 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-24-2017, 09:30 AM
    Someone's got a place for sale in Clendenin, which was pretty well wiped out by the flood last year. Photos show house on high ground and no apparent damage. Looks like a decent place, brick-faced single story. I have no connection to this property or its sale. Just thought I'd pass on the information in case anyone is interested. It's posted on Fedbook. I will get contact info for anyone interested. I am pretty sure you can get it for less than the asking price. Clendenin got spanked in a really big way, but it seems the people are determined to rebuild. The supermarket got wiped out and has reopened, which is a good sign. About 20 miles out of Charleston.
    3 replies | 135 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-22-2017, 11:11 AM
    I made a bad move in '02 when I passed up a Lancair for $58k. Built by an old Boeing engineer, everything was perfect. Even had an MT screw. Lately I've been jonesing to fly again. Perhaps one of these days.
    115 replies | 2655 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-22-2017, 10:45 AM
    Cheaper, too. $140K for a Chevy. What idiot does that?
    115 replies | 2655 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-22-2017, 10:37 AM
    Never did any rotary wing in the seat. It's always been $$$. Good luck with it, and may you never experience VRS.
    115 replies | 2655 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-21-2017, 08:55 PM
    Statistics has gotten a bad rap because of ignorant people who don't understand what they are, as well as those who misuse them in deceitful ways. That's the deceitful misuse of the label "statistics" applied to something that is decidedly NOT statistical. Have you ever studied statistics? I would guess maybe not. Regardless, properly applied statistical methods show the incredible power in their ability to predict. I've seen it firsthand in my professional life more times than I could count. The operative term here is "properly applied". What you are complaining about is the aforementioned masquerade of bullshit as valid statistics. Your complaint is eminently valid. The only problem, so far as I can see, is that you are painting with too broad a brush. I will add that it can be difficult to know when something being presented as "stats" is valid vis-à-vis nonsense, whether intentionally done or through ignorance. I will add that there is another dimension to "statistical" thinking as a way of looking at the broader patterns that one may observe in the world. The understanding of basic distributions, as well as what is meant by the "mean", sigmas, standard deviation, z-scoring, and that sort of thing is extremely useful in understanding how large populations work. Understanding the mean and how it defines things is very helpful in understanding what one is looking at in the broader senses. You say you saw good stuff in the peace movement. I'm sure your experiences are valid, but I do not think your conclusions are quite right. If the peace movement was so wonderful, why then are we more warlike than ever? Hell, at least with WWII we can claim to have been attacked. From Korea onward, we have done little other than invade foreign lands and murder people by the millions. If the peace movement had been so great as you claim, I would have thought the American people would have taken the war machine by the balls and put it out of business for all considerations save those where the land was under direct attack. So perhaps I am misunderstanding something in your position that, were I to see the light, I would alter my view. If you can help me there, please give it a whirl.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-21-2017, 02:35 PM
    As for the jargon, I use it precisely because it describes the truth with accuracy and precision. Looking at the world and describing it in statistical terms, where appropriate, is the way one sees the truth of things and separates it from the noise. It is so very easy to be confused by noise, which is why I have dedicated some nontrivial portion of my life to discovering my methods of noiseless analysis. Confusion by noise can be demonstrated in countless billions of exchanges between human beings daily precisely because it is so common and the method of using statistical eyes can be so powerful when used properly. The statistical view doesn't apply to all situations, but those where large populations of people are in question, it oftentimes does and that is why I use it. My purpose in engaging in these conversations is not to show how smart I am - I am not terribly smart in fact - but because I like getting to the truth of matters I think important to the quality of our lives. I like giving examples of how to see through the bullshit that flies all around us - bullshit that obscures truth and keeps the vast and overwhelming majority of the people of this world impotently chasing their tails. I choose my methods because they work and I want to share them with everyone. Just as I have been able to see what others here have done in terms of their apparent analytic methods and add them to my own, everything I do here I offer for the world to make its own, for whatever they may be worth. Don't take anything I write here personally, because I don't offer it in the spirit of being mean. You think the peace movement was a wonderful thing. The idea of it is - on that you and I agree as I assume we do on the value of peaceable relations between all men. We depart where the notion ends and the subsurface realities underpinning the real-world events begin. This isn't about winning - at least not for me. It's about better understanding the world around us.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-20-2017, 08:17 PM
    Speaking only for myself, I am saying it describes the mean of the movement. It was the result. What difference does it make that you may have been off on one of the tails of the distribution? It means NOTHING. Why? Because it is the MEAN that defines what that movement is. The MEAN dictates the quality and character of the gestalt, which in turn leads to whatever outcomes are to be realized. Fliers like you are irrelevant, unless the Gaussian is so narrow that your qualities closely reflect those of the average man's. From what you have written, I deeply doubt that it was the case. I was there and I watched closely. Those people were simplistic thinkers, wholly incapable of squeezing out an original thought of their own, even if it was that they had to go take a crap. As for the smart(er) members of that movement, all I can say is that they both had no palpable effect on outcomes because the cows were running the slaughterhouse. So it appears. You seem to think great things happened. I am of a very different mind on that point. About the best thing to come out of that era was the music. No sane and decent man can argue against Jimi, and if they do, I will beat them with an iron bar. :) Interesting choice of words. Firstly, Nixon was a neurotic and a crook so no, I was not a fan.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-20-2017, 07:14 PM
    Are you for real? AuH2O gave a very clear account of his points and all you have done is respond as if instead of "apples", he'd written "oranges". What brand of trollery is this? If he writes 'A', respond to 'A' instead of 'Z', which has no connection to 'A'.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-20-2017, 11:00 AM
    Agreed. We may call them "globalists".
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-19-2017, 11:49 PM
    Nicely done. Have to spread it around before I can give it to you again. Good God, that didn't quite come out sounding right. Some idiot is now going to think we're set to get married... perhaps in NY state. Ugh.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-19-2017, 11:47 PM
    You read like a textbook communist here. I will not speak for him, but my read is that he is advocating for self defense, most likely against an implacable foe for whom the only response is to wipe them out because nothing less will remove the threat.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-19-2017, 11:43 PM
    In some cases, I am sure it is. It is the nature of things where humans are concerned. People communicate like absolute crap these days, on average. Honestly, I am surprised they are able to order a pizza and manage not to have a low-yield nuke delivered. While we display manifold flaws, it is possible to train people to manifest fewer of them and in less egregious degree than commonly found. But that takes work, determination, smarts, self-control, courage, etc.: all qualities that act in opposition to the entropy that is our basic nature. Most people simply do not want to live their lives that way. Why bother when it is so much easier to be a slacker - to feed all the worst qualities in oneself, rather than oppose them in favor of those the better? Ugh... really? The "peace" movement was absolute nonsense; a gloablist contrivance pursuant to Theire goal of one-world government. How does one approach the objective of global dominion in a world where sovereignty is so very popular? War. Incite, invoke, and finance war on all sides such that all are threatened by it; all are drained by the losses personal, national, and financial. These things were all laid out in black and white by men like Nathan Rothschild, Jacob Schiff, and so forth. They have been exposed time after time over the past 200+ years. Theire dialectic is pure Hegel and what we see today meshes to it without flaw. I strongly suspect the "peace movement" was part of this lunacy. If it wasn't, then its rise, especially given the timing, constitutes one of the most impossible coincidences in all human history. Wear people down with enough war, so the theory goes, and they will submit to any tyranny that promises with a straight face peace and safety and no more dead children. What has transpired in the United States these past 50 years is textbook bolshevism at work. It could not fit the blueprint any more perfectly. If anyone wants to believe it is coincidental, then by all means go ahead, but I doubt it would be the right move. What leads you to believe this? What is the evidence? I am sure you are correct in some cases, but methinks you cast a bit too broad a net here, but perhaps I am mistaken.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-19-2017, 05:33 PM
    I promise you that you and your wife are doing the greatest possible honor to your issue and that they will live to thank you for it. Krishnamurti:
    57 replies | 4306 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    06-19-2017, 05:17 PM
    No. What one needs study are the outcomes. Men have started movements which promptly took on lives of their own and left them in the dust, and even killed them at times. Results are all that matter. Intentions mean nothing and count for the same. Great intellects with valid messages count for nothing when the wad of humanity takes what they offer and mangles it into some ravaged, maimed thing wholly unrelated. That is what went on with the hippies. THAT is where the statistical mean fell and THAT is what counts. Great men are irrelevant when the mob mutates their ideas into stupidity that leads to evil results.
    323 replies | 8410 view(s)
More Activity

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
13,701
Posts Per Day
5.00
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
10
Most Recent Message
08-04-2016 07:33 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:03 PM
Join Date
12-26-2009
Referrals
1
View osan's Blog

Recent Entries

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Guns and Marijuana in Missouri

by osan on 01-02-2017 at 08:51 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Mach View Post
"castle doctrine," which permits homeowners to use deadly force against intruders. The revised law will allow invited guests, such as babysitters, to use lethal force.
I find it amazing to consider just how hopelessly corrupt a land we are, and have been for so very long a time when I read things like this. To think not only that some people would dare usurp the authority to remove those which are the most obvious prerogatives of free men, but also that we as a people would

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

RP: Who Brought the World to the Brink of World War III?

by osan on 10-17-2016 at 11:14 PM
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
We did.
and

Quote Originally Posted by PierzStyx View Post
Uhm, no. Not all of us. Only most of the countries involved. We few radicals and rebels do what we can to prevent it. Whether that works or not still doesn't change whether it is our fault or not.
To which I responded thusly:


The number of people out there who are putting their asses on the line is vanishingly small. My statistical assessment therefore stands. To wit...

The fact is this: we failed from the earliest days.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

How to defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct?

by osan on 04-15-2016 at 07:22 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
How would you defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct? The use of private security firms is a stock answer, but let’s consider some more detail. Consider the following situations…
And it has its problems. It is a partial answer at best.


1) A band of thugs is going around robbing people, how do you defend your home from invasion?
By killing them to eliminate them from the book of immediate and potential future threats to others, including

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

06-13-2017


05-08-2017


05-03-2017


04-13-2017


03-27-2017


03-04-2017


02-19-2017


01-11-2017


09-29-2016


08-01-2016


07-28-2016


06-02-2016


04-16-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 70 1231151 ... LastLast

06-28-2017


06-25-2017


06-21-2017


06-20-2017


06-19-2017


06-18-2017


06-16-2017



Page 1 of 70 1231151 ... LastLast