Tab Content
  • osan's Avatar
    10-15-2020, 09:18 PM
    I find that a likely correct take. These guys are sneaky in their use of language. They tell you exactly what they intend in ways that lead far too many people to interpret their words otherwise. Humans.
    58 replies | 1931 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-14-2020, 01:33 PM
    Who is going to stop Themme?
    1 replies | 467 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-14-2020, 01:32 PM
    And this leads me to wonder a mite about Trump's hand in all this. He must know what is going on - he is, after all, an MBA and from the school right across the street from where I did mine. Could be that he's simply unable to alter what is surely the bipartisan tide of borrow and spend. Were he to stop what has been done since at least the late 1930s, the house of cards would crash into a great smoldering heap. At the very least there would be a solidly unified bipartisan call for his head on a pike, replete with impeachment, trial, and defrocking. What I wonder is whether he sees a way out of this that doesn't result in fifty million or more dead Americans. Could be possible sell/manufacture our way out of the debt? It's not as far-fetched as it may sound on the surface. Contrary to popular belief, we can indeed continue to go on like this indefinitely so long as people remain able to feed, clothe, and house themselves decently.
    1 replies | 290 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-14-2020, 01:23 PM
    Meh... 'tis all good. Had I a dime for all my incoherent moments, I'd be a lot wealthier than I now find myself.
    58 replies | 1931 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-13-2020, 10:24 PM
    PS: Apparently not in Ill-Annoy... never mind.
    2 replies | 186 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-13-2020, 10:21 PM
    Came across the wire about 20 minutes ago - the fools finally got some sense. Cue left shrieks of "RAYcis!!" in 4... 3...
    2 replies | 186 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-13-2020, 09:38 PM
    Actually, no. The question turns on the premise of who's right v. the wrong. The sovereignty of the individual, as well as the absolute nature of the principles of proper human relations, all of which are readily demonstrable as being objectively correct, define the right. Anything else is provably wrong. The relativism of the progressives is utter nonsense. Given this, those who not just refuse to accept objectively correct principles of such relations and who endeavor in materially effective ways to bring insurrection against those who live by those principles, forfeit their claims to life for precisely the reason that they strive to violate those very claims held with equal authority by their fellows. Exterminating such people is no different that a man who shoots and kills another who attempts to bring him harm. Equal rights, non-aggression and all that apply only where relations are properly and mutually respectful. The moment a man departs from such relations, he places himself in immediate peril of his very life. It matters no whit whether he does so seriously or in jest. It matters no whit whether he does so in words or more physically obvious and substantive actions. The moment one issues a threat against the property rights of another, he places his life in the hands of others and if he loses it, the doleful result rests with him solely. That is why proper manners and respecting interpersonal boundaries are so vitally important to free people. The casual ways in which people approach and treat one another is anathema to liberty. Sadly, that casualness is abetted and even advocated by law (at least in America). I could go on about the how's and whys, but that stands to be a long discussion. WE caused it. Remember, "government" doesn't really exist.
    58 replies | 1931 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-13-2020, 09:17 PM
    This should surprise you in no way, given the events of the middle section of the twentieth century. It is a sad truth that the average human is a beast, only that is a gross and unjustifiable insult to beasts the world over. Human beings are the most dangerous creatures on this planet... and probably on many, many others as well. I can think of nothing so terrifyingly dangerous as a frenzied mob of humans. If you want to see a prime depiction of this, however fictional, watch the scene from The Sand Pebbles when Steve McQueen's little coulie helper is being chased by the raging mob, only to be caught, trussed up, and his chest laid open with a blade as the first gesture of blind, raging hatred just before the fun was to really begin, prompting Steve-0 to take up a Springfield and put a bullet through the poor caught bastard's heart for the sake of mercy. Oh, and in case you're wondering what life may be like after Nov. 3, consider that someone has authored a "guide" for the left that people of that bent may organize and disrupt and destroy, ostensibly in defense of free and fair elections. If you want to read it for yourselves, go here: Stopping the Coup: The 2020 Guide - Google Docs , part of the raft to be found at The Disruption Project These people are serious, well funded, sly as foxes, apparently eager to employ useful idiots as canon fodder, and therefore extremely dangerous. Will they act on their claims and other assertions? I've no clue, but I would never assume that they are hot air.
    58 replies | 1931 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-13-2020, 08:59 PM
    Tempting to roll one's eyes at this, but this is how things went in places like Russia, China, and the many others that resulted in well over 250 million corpses at the hands of state-driven mobs gone wild, as well as its formal enforcers who were often employed to "tidy up" those mobs once their purposes had been fulfilled. All that in the course of about fifty years, which is a whole boat-load of murder. A curiously open-ended way of putting things, interpretable so broadly, so variably. What, I wonder, did he actually mean by it?
    58 replies | 1931 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-08-2020, 08:07 PM
    Gee, how do I put this. Ah yes, I believe I've got it... Fuck you.
    4 replies | 1135 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-05-2020, 10:35 PM
    BURN IT DOWN! Cue "protester" and Democrat calls to preserve CIA,DIA,NSA just because Republicasn want them dissolved in 4... 3...
    15 replies | 1194 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-05-2020, 06:35 AM
    There, I said it. From a purely normative, philosophical standpoint, secession is 100% pure, unadulterated FAIL. Before any of you recoil in horror, hear me out. This will be uncharacteristically short. America came together ostensibly to celebrate the basic freedoms of all men. To secede is to concede tyranny for some, which while perhaps a practical solution of sorts (a poor one, IMO), it is a show of moral cowardice and logical error to abandon those who would have freedom to their tormentors. "Well", some say, "those who are left in a blue state can just move away!" Sure they can, another practical solution based in the moral cowardice of those who claim to be freedom loving people. But ask yourself this: why should free men be forced into making the decision of either fleeing what is rightfully theirs and living under the Tyrant's boot heel? Why is that force morally superior to that of the Tyrant's? Why is it NOT morally reprehensible to concede the will of the Tyrant? Why is it morally and logically sensible to grant tyrants their space and latitude to be tyrants over free men? Just because we can do something, it does not follow that we ought.
    8 replies | 513 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-04-2020, 10:01 PM
    Exactly. We could have it in a matter of days, were enough of us willing to do what it takes. Humans.
    17 replies | 786 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-04-2020, 09:59 PM
    If that is in fact so, I can only assess that move as a gross miscalculation. It doesn't seem in Trump's character. Then again, politics seems to turn just about everyone to shyte.
    261 replies | 7810 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-02-2020, 09:41 PM
    Possibly. Humans.
    261 replies | 7810 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-02-2020, 06:37 PM
    I suppose, but the effect was largely lost on millions of people due to the cringe-factor. Trump carried himself very poorly, to my grave disappointment. I would have stood back and given Biden all the rope he wanted. I would not have interrupted him even once. The "left" would have had to work world's harder to make him the bad guy, not that it would have changed any of the extremists' minds. But people on the fence, a non-trivial factor in the coming election, may well have been put off. Let us hope they saw through the noise, but given how dopey the average guy is these days, hope is the most I can muster, and only in very small quantities. We need to see a president worthy of the appellation and not a NYC pugilist.
    261 replies | 7810 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    10-02-2020, 06:26 PM
    Sadly, Trump did it to himself. This is a smart man, so leading me to wonder why he did it. Is he really so weak in his ego that he could not see what he was doing? It is difficult to believe it, especially given that he really is a decent man. Is he playing another strategy? Plausible, but I don't see how it could be of real advantage. Trump made several righteous points, but being all flustered (understandable, given four years of unending shit he's received), but his delivery and apparent toss of self-control made lots of people cringe. What was needed that night was not Trump the Brawler, but Trump the Commander In Chief. All he had to do was sit quietly back and let Biden do his work for him. The only saving grace was that Biden was a bigger train wreck than Trump, but cold is that comfort. And as always, it is not so much what one says, as how he says it. Trump really dropped his balls on this one. I turned it off a mite past halfway as it was giving wifey and myself a giant headache. Another thing about the "debate" is that it wasn't. It was structured as a Q&A session - basically a live interview of each candidate. How the hell were Trump's peopleso inept as to accept that format? Are they idiots? Screw me, I cannot for the life of me fathom how it is that people so incapable of basic analysis are allowed to be in charge of a taco stand, much less a nation - ANY nation. We live the very definition of absurdity. In a proper debate format a thesis is defended by one side, attacked by the other. The sides fight it out, not with insults but logic, facts, and proper reason.
    261 replies | 7810 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    09-29-2020, 10:08 PM
    I suppose we could say Trump "won", but he disappointed me deeply. Wallace is a disgrace to humanity and should be beaten with iron bars. His bias against Trump wasn't even ineptly masked, demonstrating to me the depth of his contempt for the viewers. He was on Trump a lot more than Biden. His questions were lame and open-ended, rather than pointed. Wallace also seemed to feel it necessary to preface every question with a rambling preface that was so clearly biased against Trump. Ask your fucking question and don't editorialize in your weak attempts to paint Trump into corners, which is precisely what he did. Biden called Trump a "clown" and Wallace was there with his Biden kneepads allowing it to skate. That all said, Trump let Biden get under his skin - VERY bad move IMO - and took the bait. He should have kept it under control at all times no matter what the lies and deceit. One thing he said to Wallace that I liked was "I guess I'm debating you now". HA HA HA... Wallace is a turd. Biden is a turd. If they do this again, Trump needs to get his ass and head wired tight together because he should have slaughtered Biden with both hands behind his back.
    261 replies | 7810 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    09-25-2020, 01:13 PM
    And out come the rubber bullets, pepper-fog, and ultimately the bullets. If you think the oinkers won't open fire with live ammo on such a group of resisters, you are being naive.
    17 replies | 786 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    09-25-2020, 01:11 PM
    It's as if being a brain-damaged idiot is a requirement for being "left".
    189 replies | 7028 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    09-25-2020, 01:09 PM
    Department of Redundancy Department x 3. I've been acquainted with a fair number of lesbians and of all of them only two can I say for certain were not lesbian because they hated men. The rest were all of the "kill all the men" religious denomination.
    189 replies | 7028 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    09-25-2020, 11:57 AM
    Let us all hope this is the case, which would be great news. Get him in treatment within the golden hour window and prognoses tend to be pretty good these days.
    149 replies | 7330 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    09-24-2020, 12:49 PM
    Oh no they didn’t. Someone needs to reread with greater care.
    25 replies | 846 view(s)
More Activity

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
15,254
Posts Per Day
3.86
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
10
Most Recent Message
08-04-2016 07:33 AM
General Information
Last Activity
10-16-2020 04:34 PM
Join Date
12-26-2009
Referrals
2
View osan's Blog

Recent Entries

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Guns and Marijuana in Missouri

by osan on 01-02-2017 at 08:51 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Mach View Post
"castle doctrine," which permits homeowners to use deadly force against intruders. The revised law will allow invited guests, such as babysitters, to use lethal force.
I find it amazing to consider just how hopelessly corrupt a land we are, and have been for so very long a time when I read things like this. To think not only that some people would dare usurp the authority to remove those which are the most obvious prerogatives of free men, but also that we as a people would

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

RP: Who Brought the World to the Brink of World War III?

by osan on 10-17-2016 at 11:14 PM
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
We did.
and

Quote Originally Posted by PierzStyx View Post
Uhm, no. Not all of us. Only most of the countries involved. We few radicals and rebels do what we can to prevent it. Whether that works or not still doesn't change whether it is our fault or not.
To which I responded thusly:


The number of people out there who are putting their asses on the line is vanishingly small. My statistical assessment therefore stands. To wit...

The fact is this: we failed from the earliest days.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

How to defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct?

by osan on 04-15-2016 at 07:22 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
How would you defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct? The use of private security firms is a stock answer, but let’s consider some more detail. Consider the following situations…
And it has its problems. It is a partial answer at best.


1) A band of thugs is going around robbing people, how do you defend your home from invasion?
By killing them to eliminate them from the book of immediate and potential future threats to others, including

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

10-13-2020


05-14-2020


03-18-2020

  • 02:58 PM - Deleted Posts

02-24-2020


09-13-2019


09-02-2019


06-16-2019


10-10-2018


05-16-2018


04-06-2018


03-17-2018


03-14-2018


03-13-2018


03-07-2018


02-25-2018

  • 01:28 AM - Hidden

06-13-2017


05-08-2017


05-03-2017


04-13-2017


03-27-2017



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 106 1231151101 ... LastLast

10-14-2020


10-13-2020


10-06-2020


10-05-2020


10-04-2020


10-03-2020


10-02-2020


09-29-2020


09-28-2020


09-25-2020


09-16-2020


08-22-2020


08-01-2020


07-28-2020


07-26-2020



Page 1 of 106 1231151101 ... LastLast