Tab Content
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:42 PM
    As I wrote before, mama dropped her on her head. Also recall I mentioned VALID reasons. This nonsense fails to make that cut. And if you can't think clearly enough to speak as if you were not an imbecile, then perhaps it is best you hold your noise.
    35 replies | 452 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:50 PM
    Wow... those people are demented in a spectacular way. I have a theory about feminists and so on: their mother's dropped them on their heads as infants. ETA: These people ought to be beaten verily. Why? Because. If they don't need reasons of better validity, then neither do I.
    35 replies | 452 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:02 AM
    ​That's the spirit!!
    34 replies | 907 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:55 AM
    Hooboy...
    34 replies | 907 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:05 AM
    Lesbotus of Borg. YEEEESH...
    35 replies | 452 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:04 AM
    Obama of Borg... fits so well, it's scary.
    35 replies | 452 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 AM
    The only surprising thing there is that the issue came to fore so late. I'd have thunk it would have reared its genetically misshapen head five or more years earlier as the Age Of Obama took to bloom, what with all the yenta-like emphasis on bitterness, envy, and the hatred that is the product of such parentage. Nothing new there, save the level of directness of expression. Prior, the calls of "burn the witch!" against individualists had been shrouded in a fog of the tacit, always hinting in some manner reminiscent of a weakly-scented fart. Apparently, that is no longer the case. "They're" coming out, guns blazing. After all, what have they to lose in the wake of the apparent shellacking they took, this past election? I suspect for many of the ilk, their very mortal existences on this earth seem threatened, what with all this talk of efficiency, shrinking government, and so forth. Forget that none of it is likely to become real; the merest toehold by which their shrieks may be claimed valid is all that is required precisely because shrieking is all that such people do. They are shrieking. They define it. They are made of it, which leads me to wonder what will happen to them should the day of ultimate victory arrive for Themme. On that, the frabjous day, shall the shriekers not only have become unnecessary, but dangerous to Theire victory and the new status quo? Once the city is taken and secured, are those men with all those guns not become something of a potential threat, left idle and with no further purpose to which one might apply them, given the severe limitations of their utility? I have to admit that there is a morbid little corner of me that would like to see that day, if for no other reason than to witness Themme turning on the useful idiots upon whom they so heavily relied to do most of the heavy lifting in the building of the Final Empire. The looks of astonishment by those imbecile "progressive" lapdogs and other stooges who today make so many strident noises about "social injustice" etc., would have to be truly impressive in pure entertainment value. To watch them being corralled and silenced once and for all by the very authorities they so faithfully served as so many fluffers in a giant low-rent global porn production, would prove most satisfying; especially the part with the cattle cars. I'd like to see just one more cattle car episode, only this time hosting those who actually deserve such rewards. Not very charitable of me, but why should my largesse extend to those who contributed so devotedly and with such dedication to the theft of my freedoms? I could watch such people literally burn alive and feel nothing but a sense of justice in the event. Gettin' old... and really mean. Don't care a whit about it, either. :)
    35 replies | 452 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:52 AM
    ​Muh Freedumb.
    90 replies | 10664 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:52 AM
    Did nobody teach you NOT to ask that question? Verily and forsooth shalt ye get the answer you least wish.
    90 replies | 10664 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
    Oh, OK. Sorry, but your timbre was opaque to me. Call me dense.
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-28-2017, 07:12 PM
    This is the sort of lunacy that leads to bloody revolutions where entire classes of people are murdered. So let them keep pushing this nonsense. The day may come when all this freakish stupidity will be put to ends. If such a day comes, it will be spectacularly ugly in result and many innocents will pay for the sins of the guilty. THAT is reason sufficient that we all need to be well educated, carry the right attitude about things such as respect for our fellows, and be MURDEROUSLY intolerant of those who would steer us astray from the most basic proprieties. But we choose otherwise and the cycles continue, always resulting in huge massacres. This has been the history of Empire; why should it be different now?
    28 replies | 423 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-28-2017, 07:07 PM
    What a load of crap. First of all, the degree of risk is immaterial. Secondly, who determines "minimal"? The language you cite is utterly devoid of semantic value. It talks a lot, yet says nothing. FAIL.
    7 replies | 223 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-28-2017, 02:24 PM
    That's only one sound. That other one is the sucking noise made by intelligence fleeing the planet the way the residents of Tokyo fled Godzilla. Oh, but it will. It will. Ga-RON-tee.
    44 replies | 823 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-28-2017, 02:18 PM
    I can see it now... some tranny trepanning his perineum every month for 3 lousy day's pay.
    5 replies | 132 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-28-2017, 02:08 PM
    What on earth are you talking about?
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-28-2017, 07:57 AM
    Were black helicopters involved?
    15 replies | 494 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-28-2017, 06:14 AM
    Two things. 1: The bolded is almost certainly false. 2: Anyone that clueless has no business as janitor at a middle school, much less being POTUS.
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 06:09 PM
    Perhaps Trump is seeing this racket for what it is, is saying "screw this", and will work to ensure he is not re-electable.
    11 replies | 333 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 05:32 PM
    I mistakenly trusted the cite of the study as being that which was alleged. Having now read the report in summary fashion, I agree that the cite did not accurately describe the nature of the study, at least so far as I have been able to cursorily determine. See how easy it is to own up to one's errors? It makes you a better human being. It bespeaks honor and honesty, not to mention a stout ego vis-à-vis a huge puffed up cruller. The very man who has given you the lesson has augmented it with a real-life example in practice of that which he preaches. Learn from it and make good your wicked self before your fellows. That all said, your assertion that soy proteins do not make their way into the eggs of birds fed on soy products has yet to be demonstrated. Not saying you are wrong, but only that you have provided no evidence to suggest that you are correct. My birds are grain- and grass-fed. Our eggs are fabulous, BTW. As for cults, here is one. Enjoy:
    16 replies | 388 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 05:16 PM
    I guess my sarcasm vaporized prior to hitting paper, so to speak. I suck at subtlety because I'm so subtle, nobody knows what in hell I am really saying, including myself most of the time.
    16 replies | 388 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 05:14 PM
    Certainly, and that is precisely why I responded as I did, to underscore the reality of what such a move would mean going forward... even though today "forward" == "backward". :(
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 01:57 PM
    You make a declarative statement that is impossible to misinterpret. You are demonstrated to be in error. You then backpedal with an old trick - "oh it's so small, it it meaningless".
    16 replies | 388 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 01:32 PM
    Therein the greater risk. As I wrote, such exercise of power left unchallenged has a way of leading to more of the same. Some precedents are impossibly dangerous, and yet doing nothing is at least equally so, if not more. What does one do when the population is so indescribably ignorant on the average, so divided, so apathetic, corrupt, cowardly, and greedy that they cannot or will not come together in agreement on the most basic elements of how life shall be? What does one do, given all that plus the fact that there are vested interests so deeply entrenched and accessing of the real power of the throne, so to speak, that not only can they set into motion that which we all claim to hate, but nobody will step up to put it to ends? How much can a president really do in this context? How much can he do when Congress is so basically corrupt that men like Paul, Massie, and Amash constitute a proportion suggesting of a mosquito's fart in a hurricane for influence and the power to bring "real" change? That is why I brought up the notion of martial law as being the LEAST UNLIKELY path to the end in question. They are all unlikely. None of them seem very hopeful at all, but martial law seems the least hopeless... which is really saying next to nothing. That all said, a truly good man in proper control of himself, given the minimal conditions, could perhaps pull off such a move. But once again, the precedent will have been set such that we all pretty well know that the next time a president will deem the situation sufficiently dire, he will repeat the performance. That might be OK, but what if it were another Obama who decided that we are at such a pass that we can no longer afford the BoR? We MUST have socialism for the greater good. He pulls that rabbit out of his ass and then where are we? Dangerville. Slavetown. Fuckitsburg. We're done. And yet, to continue this way... are we any better off, as the general population becomes ever softer, more ignorant, and corrupted?
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 01:10 PM
    I hope your characterization is correct. I do agree that some acts merit response, but that is only one side of the coin. The other relates to the precise nature of the response. I have no idea who was killed, or how many were. I can only hope that most, if not all, were bad guys. Trump may be just another bad guy, but if he is not, he is staring down the maw of an endlessly dangerous beast which appears to want war and more of it. Pissing in that creature's cornflakes takes either a complete absence of brains or a pair bigger and of more brass than the average bear can claim. I hope Trump proves the latter, but in that case it will surprise me no whit to find his brains have been used to decorate some sidewalk, somewhere, before much longer. Interesting times.
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 06:15 AM
    You are on my ignore list, but something told me that you were going to respond in some unintelligent and dishonest manner. Sure enough. I will say this once and only once, as it has not been my habit to make such statements: you are as a punk of the lowest rent, and dishonest in the deal; apparently lacking the basic language skills to properly parse my statements. Nowhere did I say or imply that I hoped he would do such a thing. You assassinate your own credibility. Do the world a favor.
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 06:04 AM
    I must once again register my irritation with this policy of **'ing out words. This is supposed to be a LIBERTY forum. It is supposed to be a place for rational adults to come together and discuss the various issues. I don't see how the policy of infantalizing words accords with adult discourse. Hell, even Q U E E R has become a normalized terms - the Q U E E R S use it all the time. I can see censoring the pejorative use of the term, but the blanket suppression makes no sense. I thought this is why we have moderators. And what about use of Q U E E R to describe things wholly unrelated to gay? Honestly.
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 05:57 AM
    Seems to belabor the obvious, but at least its out there. Is the Boston Globe considered "mainstream" the way the Times is, or is it some fringe production? The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum. But if it came to that, I would very quietly remove as many troops from foreign soil as possible without arousing too much notice and set them to work, Tet-style, from sea to shining sea. I would shut NSA down and put the engineers to work on every building with all assets in place. I would do the same with CIA. You literally would have to kill all the higher ranking employees and destroy all the infrastructure with explosives and fire in one fell swoop in order to be effective. After that, all troops come home. All foreign bases closed and demolished prior to abandoning the sites - burned to the ground and into fly-ash. New policy: we mind our own business henceforth, but be ye sorely aware that any move by any foreign power will be met with strict non-equivocation. That would be aimed mainly at China and Russia. We can trade if it please you, but we will destroy you in toto if you make the least gesture to mess with us. After the 12 month adjustment period in the wake of the elimination of all social progreams, during which I am sure thousands of Americans would have to be killed due to rioting, martial law is lifted and we go on as a freer land... or so the theory goes.
    71 replies | 1209 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 05:28 AM
    That's the bit that buggers my brain. Jones is such a mixed bag. The man has (had?) the ears of so many people and IMO he blew it with spectacularity with his inconsistent behavior. I recall a time when he went all apey in an interview with that Piers Morgan über-phag. What he said was essentially correct, but his going off like a frothing idiot before the camera seemed too scripted... as if he and Über-Phag agreed to it before the cameras rolled. Even so, what does it say about the man if he has not the will or capacity to control himself before millions of people who were presumably and actually paying attention to what he was saying? It appeared almost deliberate an attempt at assassinating not so much himself, but his message; to destroy the credibility of the very idea of questioning orthodoxy. This mix of good and bad, credible and wild idiocy makes it damned nearly impossible to assess the man with precision and accuracy. As is often the case in such matters, the mere appearance of impropriety sets people on edge with respect to trust. How does one trust a man who at 8AM cuts the very picture of rational and honest composure while at 10, reduces himself to a ranting, spewing lunatic? Aside: who the hell is Bill Hicks? Yes, I am indeed that ill-informed. I have no idea who he is, why he looks so much like Jones, or why I should care. Any and all help is appreciated.
    64 replies | 1242 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    03-27-2017, 05:17 AM
    My wife gets news from work (United Airlines) frequently. Lately, there has been a rise in the number of child-trafficking intercepts by flight attendants. They are actually trained to recognize the telltales. Just a few days ago wifey showed me the latest story. Apparently the children are so terrified, they don't dare speak out, what with threats made against themselves and their families. Some are apparently drugged, as well. To think that this sort of shit goes on in the 21st century should not surprise me, and I suppose it doesn't. But it sure as hell makes me angry, and few things manage that with me. I adore children and have no stomach for this sort of thing. If this pizzagate shit is true, just imagine the piles of bodies they must have built over the years. What else could one do with them when finished? Send them home? Perhaps they are raised to adulthood to be later harvested for body parts? OK, I just freaked myself out.
    64 replies | 1242 view(s)
More Activity

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
13,251
Posts Per Day
5.00
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
10
Most Recent Message
08-04-2016 07:33 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 08:44 PM
Join Date
12-26-2009
Referrals
1
View osan's Blog

Recent Entries

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Global War On Terrorism: Are We Winning?

by osan on 03-25-2017 at 07:19 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
Short answer: If you are still fighting it you are losing it.
After 26 years, I'd have to agree.
Categories
Uncategorized

Guns and Marijuana in Missouri

by osan on 01-02-2017 at 08:51 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Mach View Post
"castle doctrine," which permits homeowners to use deadly force against intruders. The revised law will allow invited guests, such as babysitters, to use lethal force.
I find it amazing to consider just how hopelessly corrupt a land we are, and have been for so very long a time when I read things like this. To think not only that some people would dare usurp the authority to remove those which are the most obvious prerogatives of free men, but also that we as a people would

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

RP: Who Brought the World to the Brink of World War III?

by osan on 10-17-2016 at 11:14 PM
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
We did.
and

Quote Originally Posted by PierzStyx View Post
Uhm, no. Not all of us. Only most of the countries involved. We few radicals and rebels do what we can to prevent it. Whether that works or not still doesn't change whether it is our fault or not.
To which I responded thusly:


The number of people out there who are putting their asses on the line is vanishingly small. My statistical assessment therefore stands. To wit...

The fact is this: we failed from the earliest days.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

How to defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct?

by osan on 04-15-2016 at 07:22 AM
Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
How would you defend liberty and property in a stateless social construct? The use of private security firms is a stock answer, but let’s consider some more detail. Consider the following situations…
And it has its problems. It is a partial answer at best.


1) A band of thugs is going around robbing people, how do you defend your home from invasion?
By killing them to eliminate them from the book of immediate and potential future threats to others, including

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

03-27-2017


03-04-2017


02-19-2017


01-11-2017


09-29-2016


08-01-2016


07-28-2016


06-02-2016


04-16-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 59 1231151 ... LastLast

03-29-2017


03-28-2017


03-27-2017


03-26-2017



Page 1 of 59 1231151 ... LastLast