Tab Content
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    24 replies | 356 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    24 replies | 356 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 08:49 AM
    5 replies | 274 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:20 PM
    4946 replies | 271452 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    67 replies | 1100 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:46 PM
    MofA: Acosta and Assange CNN asked the court for a preliminary restraining order against the White House revocation of Acosta's 'hard pass'. It was granted today based on case law related to the Fifth Amendment due process argument. Preliminary orders are not final judgments. … left open the possibility that the White House could seek to revoke it again if it provided that due process, emphasizing the "very limited" nature of his ruling and saying he was not making a judgment on the First Amendment claims that CNN and Acosta have made. The judge seems to thinks that the White House was justified but acted in a too chaotic manner when it revoked Ascota's 'hard pass' without citing rules or regulations. It is most likely that the White House will now create such rules pertaining White House access and press conferences. It will then use those to again limit Acosta's access. … A number of other media organizations supported the CNN case by filing amicus briefs. … The more the media engages on his site, the more will the White House push back by creating stricter regulations. These regulations, once they are laid out, will be used against all media. If not by this administration then by the next one. It would also be nice if these first amendment defenders would take up a real first amendment case … Julian Assange, the publisher of Wikileaks, has been indicted by the Justice Department for publishing truthful information about illegal and outrageous behavior of the U.S. government and U.S. politicians. I don't see any of those who defend the obnoxious behavior of Acosta, taking a first amendment stand in the case against Wikileaks and Assange. … The indictment of Assange is a grave threat to press freedom. Where are the editorials defending him?
    196 replies | 3339 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    24 replies | 356 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:15 PM
    Glenn Greenwald: As the Obama DOJ Concluded, Prosecution of Julian Assange for Publishing Documents Poses Grave Threats to Press Freedom THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT inadvertently revealed in a court filing that it has charged Julian Assange in a sealed indictment. The disclosure occurred through a remarkably amateurish cutting-and-pasting error in which prosecutors unintentionally used secret language from Assange’s sealed charges in a document filed in an unrelated case. Although the document does not specify which charges have been filed against Assange, the Wall Street Journal reported that “they may involve the Espionage Act, which criminalizes the disclosure of national defense-related information.” Over the last two years, journalists and others have melodramatically claimed that press freedoms were being assaulted by the Trump administration due to trivial acts such as the President spouting adolescent insults … or banning Jim Acosta from White House press conferences due to his refusal to stop preening for a few minutes so as to allow other journalists to ask questions. Meanwhile, actual and real threats to press freedoms that began with the Obama DOJ and have escalated with the Trump DOJ – such as aggressive attempts to unearth and prosecute sources – have gone largely ignored if not applauded. But prosecuting Assange and/or WikiLeaks for publishing classified documents would be in an entirely different universe of press freedom threats. Reporting on the secret acts of government officials or powerful financial actors – including by publishing documents taken without authorization – is at the core of investigative journalism. From the Pentagon Papers to the Panama Papers to the Snowden disclosures to publication of Trump’s tax returns to the Iraq and Afghanistan war logs, some of the most important journalism over the last several decades has occurred because it is legal and constitutional to publish secret documents even if the sources of those documents obtained them through illicit or even illegal means. The Obama DOJ – despite launching notoriously aggressive attacks on press freedoms – recognized this critical principle when it came to WikiLeaks. It spent years exploring whether it could criminally charge Assange and WikiLeaks … It ultimately decided it … could not do so, consistent with the press freedom guarantee of the First Amendment. … such a prosecution would pose a severe threat to press freedom because there would be no way to prosecute Assange for publishing classified documents without also prosecuting the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and others for doing exactly the same thing. …
    24 replies | 356 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:52 PM
    14 replies | 993 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:08 AM
    2 Navy SEALs, 2 Marines Charged with Murder of Green Beret Two Navy SEALs and two Marine Raiders are facing murder charges in the 2017 death of U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Logan Melgar in a house in Mali, according to charge sheets obtained by USNI News. The SEALs and Marines are all charged with murder and obstructing justice in the June 4, 2017 death of Melgar. The charge sheets accuse the four of breaking into Melgar’s room, binding him with duct tape while a SEAL choked Melgar to death and then lying to investigators about what had happened. … While the redacted charge sheets provided to USNI News neither identify the SEALs nor the Marines, a 2017 Army Criminal Investigation Command report identified the SEALs involved in the incident as Petty Officer Antony DeDolph and Chief Petty Officer Adam Cranston Matthews. According to the CID report, a witness said DeDolph admitted he had “choked Logan out” after he and Matthews bound Melgar with duct tape. A medical examiner ruled Melgar’s death a homicide by asphyxiation. None of the suspects are in pretrial confinement.
    11 replies | 1041 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:05 AM
    Mali: Two Navy Seal Team 6 Members Under Suspicion of Strangling Army Green Beret in Mali "No one has been charged in Sergeant Melgar’s death, which a military medical examiner ruled to be a homicide — strangulation, said three military officials ... The death has been shrouded in mystery, and the biggest unanswered question is why Sergeant Melgar was killed. “NCIS does not discuss the details of ongoing investigations,” Ed Buice, the agency’s spokesman, said ... The uncertainty has left soldiers in the tight-knit Green Beret community to speculate whether the killing might have been the result of a personal dispute among housemates gone horribly wrong or whether Sergeant Melgar might have stumbled upon some illicit activity the SEALs were involved in, and they silenced him. ..."
    11 replies | 1041 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 07:07 PM
    Don't worry they'll be plenty of chances to fail more audits. All this means, obviously, is that the Pentagon just needs more money.
    35 replies | 425 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 06:58 PM
    22 replies | 624 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 01:32 PM
    He's actually right. Project Veritas got the scoop on all the illicit tactics.
    3 replies | 107 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 01:23 PM
    1054413419565076486 1054425537169391616
    20 replies | 306 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 01:08 PM
    1063080419606749185 1063084452685836288 1063096776620527616 1063087237011668992
    20 replies | 306 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 01:01 PM
    With no idea how to pay for it. But it sells well among the arithmetically challenged.
    3 replies | 94 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 12:57 PM
    From AmericanThinker: Avenatti seems to be spiraling into a vortex of trouble, on the hook for millions of dollars in damages, his client Stormy Daniels required to pay court costs to President Trump, and his law firm evicted from its offices for nonpayment of rent. Now he faces felony violence charges and must demand consideration he denied to his foes.
    20 replies | 306 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 12:03 PM
    She is more street smart than Trump is.
    57 replies | 616 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 10:00 AM
    Lucky France. they can be so overt about their government censorship. In the US, they are more subtle and have to embed deep state enterprises like the Atlantic Counsel to partner with Facebook to do their wholesale banning and censorship for them.
    2 replies | 112 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 09:49 AM
    Sure sounds great. Wish we had a free market.
    43 replies | 510 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 09:24 AM
    A $trillion here, and a $trillion there, and pretty soon you are talking about real money.
    19 replies | 269 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 09:13 AM
    Poynter comments on that issue of Acosta's lack of journalist integrity: "Jim Acosta’s encounter Wednesday at a White House press conference was less about asking questions and more about making statements. ... Acosta asked the president if Trump had demonized the caravan of Central Americans trekking toward the United States, ending his exchange by stating, “It is not an invasion.” If Acosta had asked “What about that seems like an invasion?” he could have both sought an answer ... Acosta asked. “Do you think that you demonize immigrants?” To which the president answered, “No.” A better question might have been, “How do you respond to the criticism that you are demonizing certain types of immigrants, namely poor immigrants?” But then Acosta’s questions ended and his statements began. “Your campaign had an ad showing migrants climbing over walls,” ... “They are hundreds of miles away, that’s not an invasion.” ... A briefing is not the same as a cable news wrestling match, where sides shout at each other. Acosta should have handed over the microphone. ..."
    196 replies | 3339 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 08:57 AM
    This BBC article has same take on Acosta - a spoiled little brat: "Jim Acosta was called on by the president to ask a question. … And when he'd finished asking one, he then asked another - with interruption follow-ups in between. It was only when he attempted his third question - or possibly fourth depending on how you define the follow-ups - that the president got angry and asked him to sit down. … I'm pretty sure Acosta never intended to "mistouch" the young female intern. He was just trying to hold on to the mic. … What happened in that room was not the ultimate fight for press freedom. … This was a bloke sitting in a room full of colleagues who were all trying to ask questions too. This was a man who'd had his turn and had been told he couldn't hog the whole time. … The president took CNN's question and then took more. And when he tried to move on, he couldn't. Once the Acosta incident was over, he went on to take questions from journalists from all over the world - for a total of 90 minutes. ..."
    196 replies | 3339 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    26 replies | 257 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    20 replies | 306 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 06:45 AM
    AZJoe replied to a thread Target: Gaza in World News & Affairs
    36 replies | 348 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 06:39 AM
    11 replies | 637 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    11-15-2018, 06:28 AM
    107 replies | 1880 view(s)
More Activity

6 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
  2. View Conversation
    Clean up your mailbox... it's full
  3. View Conversation
    Clear your mailbox
  4. View Conversation

    Join these new libertarian-leaning forums we have going on here
  5. View Conversation

    Donate to Thomas Massie with $20.12 or something bigger!

    For Liberty!
  6. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF!
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 6 of 6
About AuH20

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):


“Force the normies into taking sides. At the moment they are just like "meh, I am minding my own business" retreating culturally into their private bubbles and "safe-spaces" since they don't understand what is going on. When the actual "us vs them" starts, they will be forced to fight or they'll die.” - Anonymous Poster


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
09-11-2017 07:04 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 09:17 AM
Join Date

5 Friends

  1. AZJoe AZJoe is offline


  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline


  3. compromise compromise is offline


  4. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline


  5. silverhawks silverhawks is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 5 of 5


  • 10:16 PM - Hidden
  • 05:47 PM - Hidden










No results to display...
Page 1 of 177 1231151101 ... LastLast








Page 1 of 177 1231151101 ... LastLast