eduardo89
Banned

Okay, but this one really is fake ... (I think) ...

A Dozen Cops Have Been Charged After a No-Knock Raid Killed a Couple and Their Dog https://www.vice.com/en/article/93w857/a-dozen-cops-have-been-charged-after-a-no-knock-raid-killed-a-couple-and-their-dog Trone Dows (26 January 2021) The 2019 incident in Houston kicked off an investigation leading to murder charges and the discovery of an elaborate scheme to steal overtime pay. When a Houston couple and their dog were killed during a botched no-knock drug raid in 2019, the incident kicked off an investigation leading to murder charges and the discovery of an elaborate scheme to steal overtime pay—for a total of 12 officers now indicted. Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg announced Monday that Houston PD officer Felipe Gallegos has been charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of 59-year-old Dennis Tuttle and his wife, 58-year-old Rhogena Nicholas, killed in a January 2019 drug raid on their home. The couple’s dog was also killed, and several officers were shot in the chaos. Gallegos is the second officer, after officer Gerald Goines in 2019, to be charged with the deaths of the couple. If convicted, Gallegos could be sentenced to life in prison.

Especially 8:36

Great videos.. I was about 10 when the fall that rocked the world happened, and my favorite bands when I was 10-13 years old were basically all the ones he talked about.. Guns n Roses, Metallica, Nirvana, Alice in Chains, Stone Temple Pilots, Smashing Pumpkins, etc.. Funny that he mentioned the first album that rocked the world was the Metallica Black album, that was the first CD I ever purchased. The unfortunate part was I was too young to go to all the live shows.. Tho my mom was cool enough to take my friend and I to an Offspring concert when we were about 12 or 13. My friend's dad lived in Iraq. One day in the mid-90s his dad came and took him back to Iraq. Never heard from him again. Hope he is ok.... I wanted to go see Guns n' Roses, Metallica and Ice-T when I was 10, parents didn't let me I was pissed. This is what happened: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-10-01-me-41-story.html

You knew this one was coming ... https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1354151861192941573 1354151861192941573

https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1354225176385302530 1354225176385302530

https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1354223766956437509 1354223766956437509

https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1354232235856175118 1354232235856175118

It depends on how much controversy the media can manage to milk this for. If enough people are like, "Meh. That asshole was asking for it, because baby hostage", then nothing happens. But Antifa/BLM types have become sufficiently unhinged that even that may not matter anymore. We'll just have to wait and see.

Clearly, Rand Paul is seditious scum and a tool of the Democrats.

That's because he is reading them uncritically. That's the whole point. He isn't trying to take sides. (You know, sort of like how actual journalism is supposed to be done ...) So ... he's "biased" because he isn't being critical of Dominion, but is just reporting the details of Dominion's suit and the specific allegations Dominion is making? :confused: How does that work? :confused:

Dominion is Suing Rudy Giuliani for $1.3 BILLION! Lawyer Explains - Viva Frei Vlawg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NFPsrtG2LY

Pfffftt!! That's all in the past. Fact checking will no longer be necessary. They promise ... https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1353879721361219584 1353879721361219584

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Brian4Liberty again.

You do not know that with 100% certainty. They could be 100% accurate statements and we do not have the information currently to prove otherwise. All we have is a claim from one side, and a claim from the other side. The claims should be reported, but they should be reported as claims. Do you know how they were reported? I would think most publications would report those as claims to begin with, as opposed to fact.

So before you think they were lying, now you think they are telling the truth? The truth is, they do not know the statements to be 100% true, so they are now reporting them as false to avoid the lawsuit.. that is independent of what they actually think the truth is.

I don't think they know the statements to be false, they just have a claim from the other side that they are false, and a huge lawsuit to avoid.

I don't know who they are (or will be). I wish I did. Perhaps they don't exist. Perhaps they never will. (That is why I said, "It is to be hoped ...") Perhaps they are the same people who would be needed to implement & enforce any of the measures you mentioned as part of your "easy answer" in your previous post.

I already got mine.

Are you a mind reader? It is much more likely they published statements that they believed to be true (or are true, or mostly true).

From another thread: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?549951-Did-Joe-Biden-just-have-his-quot-Hillary-Clinton-Coal-quot-moment

From another thread: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?552282-Germany-Weighs-Electricity-Rationing-Scheme-To-Stabilize-Its-Now-Shaky-Green-Power-Grid