yadranko
Member

When your team has the ball, you get 4 "downs", or plays, in football. The first play is first down, then second down, third down and fourth down. But if you go a total of at least 10 yards on those plays, then it goes back to first down and you get to keep going toward the endzone. On the 4th "down", typically there will be a punt to the other team, or if you are close enough to the endzone you can go for a field goal kick for 3 points, or if you are like 1 or 2 yards away from getting your 10 yard "first down" and desperate for points you might play the 4th down to try get that last couple yards and reach it.. but if you don't get to the 10 yard minimum on your fourth down, the other team gets the ball wherever you ended up.. which is typically why you would punt the ball down the field as far as possible on fourth down, to the other team, so they have to go all the way across the field to get their touchdown. The guys on the "line of scrimage" in the middle are the "linemen" and they have rules, for example, the offensive line is trying to defend the quarterback or the running back from being tackled. They aren't allowed to "hold" the other players with their arms, like hug them, or grab them, etc.. they have to use their body and arms to "block" them. So let's say it's third down and 4 yards to go to get the first down, the tv screen will say "3rd and 4". Let's say they are in the middle of the field on the 50 yard line and they pass the ball for 15 yards, it is caught and they are tackled. That would be a first down.. but the ref throws a yellow flag for a penalty on the offense, holding, 10 yard penalty. They would have to go back 10 yards from the original line of scrimage, so they would be back on the 40 yard line for the other team and they would have to go 14 yards on the next play, otherwise they would likely need to punt the ball. The head referee would get on the mic and say, "Holding. Offense. 10 yard penalty. Replay 3rd down" However, it's a really important play toward the end of the game, the coach doesn't think there was actually any holding and so the coach asks the refs to "review" the footage. There is a small limit to how many times you can do this. The refs review the video footage and find the coach was correct, there was no holding, the ref just had a bad angle and thought there was holding.

Good thing he became a Republican ;)

What's your source on Alex Jones saying every single person in Bilderberg is evil? I thought he always had moles inside Bilderberg. What's an assault weapon? Is this an assault weapon?

Any of those people still alive are in their 80s or 90s... their offspring and people they have trained to take over are a combination of retards, over-zealous fascists and also probably some people who are actually on our side.

I think he made the same mistake a lot of people here make. He thinks everybody who is rich is evil, i.e. Peter Thiel. Many people here think everybody holding power is evil, i.e. Donald Trump. What he missed, because he doesn't understand economics and money, is that crypto isn't a ponzi.. it's an exit strategy. Trump isn't a pawn of the deep state, he's not a massive psyop... he's an exit strategy. There are a lot of rich people and a lot of somewhat powerful people who understand what's going on and are ready to sweep the rug. There are also a lot of brainwashed leftists who have no idea what's going on, unfortunately. That's the wildcard.

I'm more of the view that the kleptocracy was very powerful for a very long time, but they had kids, their kids had kids, and they are retarded. Many of the OGs have died off. Now they are trying to hold it together and are losing control, now they are like a cornered animal, lashing out with their lawfare against Trump and desperate attempts to keep it together. Hopefully they don't start WW3 over it.

As others have mentioned, I too heard this story on Art Bell.

Normally, no, they wouldn't. Same with Trump being able to go to his Supreme Court case, or to his son's graduation. Which is what makes this all so obvious.

Any judge and DA could do that to anybody regardless of whether or not they are guilty, regardless of whether they disobeyed any court orders. And if Trump goes to jail because he went to his son's graduation, or to his Supreme Court oral argument hearings, it will be his own "fault" too, right?

One of the families was saying that when they heard Hillary Clinton talking about AJ and Sandy Hook during the election, they thought that he was still on his podcast talking about it and making money years later.. when in fact he tried for several weeks to NOT talk about it, while documentaries with millions of views were all over the internet.. his audience was DEMANDING he talk about it, all he did was a couple interviews, decided to drop it right away and never talked about it again. The families never watched the show, had no idea what they were even suing him over. AJ wasn't allowed to defend himself in court. It was all a big setup to knee cap him, that is what they admitted it was from day one.

If they already got it, then what's the problem? Sounds like AJ already handed it over to his attorney, did his attorney screw something up? He sent them a mountain of data and they expected AJ to be on top of everything that was sent as well as be 100% familiar with all of the data he has? Sounds pretty ridiculous to me.

2 hours later... 1779364803787571651 https://twitter.com/SpinninBackfist/status/1779364803787571651

Judge: "Turn over all your documents" Alex Jones: "Ok, here you go" Judge: "There's more documents you need to turn over" Alex Jones: "That's everything Judge, I don't have anything more to turn over" Judge: "No, there is more to turn over, you just haven't turned it over yet"

While many Republicans love them some FISA... other Republicans are trying to reform FISA... MTG is fighting alongside Massie to kill FISA.

Forced the house to come in to actually vote on bills by declaring role call when there's like a dozen people in the room so the people can better hold their politicians accountable by knowing how they voted? Before it was only Massie who would do such a thing.. so they just met when he wasn't there, he couldn't do it by himself. Now they have a team. Help oust speakers who break their promises on not doing omnibus bills is another.

She once appears on TimcastIRL with Thomas Massie.. they are very close.

^^ That's the old map.. They updated it for the movie. Tim Pool discussed it tonight on his show, and he is right. I knew I had a bad feeling about the movie even though it claims to be "non-partisan". The President is obviously being depicted as a Trump or a "Trumper".. The say that he treats the press the same as the enemy.. He disbanded the FBI and is in his third term.. The Director said he was "fascist" and apparently the Director is from the UK, lol.. In the updated map, instead of the Western Forces, the PNW is depicted as "The New People's Army" and they are called "Maoists" in the film, so apparently China took over that area.. California and Texas end up uniting as the "Western Forces" who end up taking out the fascist leader of DC and the loyalist states.

The movie takes place probably about 20 years in the future. The older woman became famous getting some photos at "The Great Antifa Massacre" when she was in her mid-20s. They try not to make it a "partisan" film, hence the map below, Texas and California uniting in one faction. It does try to be a sort of warning against actually having a Civil War, it doesn't glorify anything. The President tries to make some patriotic speeches, carrying out the "Founding Father's vision", etc, etc.. nobody seems impressed.

No. *SPOILER ALERT* They assassinate the President in the end, and nobody is upset about it. Just got back from seeing it. Mostly saw it for research purposes, not entertainment value. Not bad I guess..

bump