Tab Content
  • dannno's Avatar
    Today, 02:12 PM
    What the fuck are you talking about? The whole point of this thread is that Trump changed his position, which is incorrect, Trump has never changed his position. Trump has always said that we would re-negotiate a trade deal with Mexico, and with Canada. That is still his position. Whether he re-negotiates NAFTA and calls it NAFTA or whether he abolished NAFTA and re-negotiates a new trade deal with a different name or the same name is totally immaterial, he has always been open to taking WHATEVER route was necessary in order to re-negotiate the trade deal. Until you can show me where Trump has changed his mind regarding re-negotiating the trade deal with Mexico and Canada, which you can't, his position has not changed. His tactics have changed, but his goals and his position on the issue has stayed the same.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Today, 02:09 PM
    LOL.. ya.. the media that said every single day for 2 years that Trump is "literally Hitler" and lied about everything he said and twisted it into something he didn't mean every single day in order to make him look bad, handed him the election.. I hate to break it to you, but they were attempting to hand the election to Hillary.. One would think that was glaringly obvious. If you think they were trying to give Trump the Presidency, by attacking him every day, do you have any idea what kind of conspiracy that would entail? Do you have ANY evidence? I think almost everything is a conspiracy, yet this one is literally out of the park, I just can't see how that could be organized an executed like that for the purpose of getting him elected.. and the other big question, why?? Who cares? Why not just let them battle and let Hillary or Trump win? Why did Trump have to win? What advantage does that give them over Hillary? They would be able to get way more globalist shit done with Hillary.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:41 PM
    What is wrong with high interest rates?
    42 replies | 470 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:50 PM
    Yes, and that all could have easily fallen apart if Trump didn't react how they wanted him to react to their false flag attack, which was very likely planned the day before Gorsuch's nomination on purpose. You think Trump is the only one trying to play 36D chess here? The deep state has been doing it for centuries, that is where we learned this shit from.
    49 replies | 547 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:14 PM
    lol.. you are so wrong it is absolutely ridiculous. Again, the advantages Trump gained had NOTHING to do with Syria. One of my liberal friends who HATES Trump with a passion told me the next morning how glad he was that Trump bombed Syria. This friend represents the general sentiment of the brainwashed leftist media. The mainstream media completely changed their tune on Trump, and all the Russian stuff they were trying to use to impeach him totally disappeared. He gained massive political capital with the two biggest and most powerful countries in the world. The most important part of Gorsuch's nomination, which is the confirmation, WENT THROUGH the day after the bombing. It doesn't matter when it was scheduled, the fact is he got it through and it can easily be argued that bombing Syria may have brought some deep state reps to vote for Gorsuch's nomination. And the bombing only lasted 15 minutes, and it was an empty airbase. It may as well have been a dream.. I was and am against it on principle, but man, I'm not sure there has ever been a more successful military mission in the history of the world..
    49 replies | 547 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:55 PM
    See, this is exactly what I was talking about. Semantics. You need to think about what I'm actually saying here a little deeper. Ask yourself: What is NAFTA? Is it any treaty, in the past, present or future between the US, Canada and Mexico that is called "NAFTA"? Or is NAFTA the CURRENT treaty between Mexico, the US and Canada? The truth is, you can refer to EITHER of those as NAFTA, and so can anybody. That leads to a lot of confusion, but it is the nature of language. So if Trump wants to re-negotiate the treaty between Mexico, the US and Canada, and still call it NAFTA, then we would effectively withdraw from the current incarnation of NAFTA. So in some regards, the title of the infowars article is correct. But the title of the infowars article is NOT correct from the perspective that Trump has always, and will always intend to have some sort of trade agreement between the US and Canada and the US and Mexico in place, and it may very well end up being called "NAFTA". Again, it depends on the definition of "NAFTA" that is being used and both definitions are correct. Now the other question is, if there is going to be a treaty between the US, Canada and Mexico, does it matter if the trade agreement is called NAFTA? Maybe to the mainstream media, but no, in reality it doesn't matter. What matters is the contents of the trade agreement, not what the name of the trade agreement is. Just like The Patriot Act was no more patriotic because of it's name, but it did change people's perception about what was in the bill. So in the infowars report, when it says Trump wants to withdraw from NAFTA, they are saying that he wishes to withdraw from the current incarnation of NAFTA and re-negotiate a trade agreement. That was Trump's position 20 or 30 years ago, it was his position a year ago, it is still his position today. No amount of propaganda will change that - but you can change people's perception of things very easily, which is why it is important to be careful.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:30 PM
    I didn't say zerohedge is fake news, I am saying they are using fake news as their source to report a lot of BS stuff lately. Honest people can get caught up in bullshit. I mean, nobody has come up with an argument to what I said originally - and that is - Donald Trump has NEVER wavered on his position on this issue. Re-negotiate trade deals. Pretty simple. Zerohedge needs to get back to its anti-MSM roots instead of embracing the MSM. Ron Paul has done a pretty great job of avoiding the MSM bs while criticizing Trump.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:27 PM
    ........right But like in the video I posted in the other thread on the topic, Ron Paul would still vote for the tax cuts. I guess if you just read headlines rather than listening to the content, you would never know that..
    42 replies | 470 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:23 PM
    It was insinuated with your "Make NAFTA Great Again" comment. It never was great, Trump never thought it was great. I don't even think America was great, but it has been pretty good. I would like to see Trump make American pretty good again, as opposed to watching Hillary reign over some hellish communist landscape. If you had said "Make NAFTA Great" that would have been a reasonable comment. I'd prefer to abolish NAFTA, but if that is not going to happen I wouldn't mind seeing it re-negotiated by the man who wrote The Art of the Deal.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:19 PM
    Pretty sure he was glad Trump beat Hillary, although I don't think he thinks there will be as significant of a difference as we will end up seeing once Trump curtails our foreign policy. Dude, all I'm saying is that Trump has always had the position that he wants to re-negotiate our treaties with other countries, and that is still his position. Is that NOT accurate?
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:16 PM
    I dunno, it might upset some people.
    42 replies | 470 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:09 PM
    Zerohedge used to be one of the best altmedia news sources out there.. ever since they went anti-Trump, they have been caught often falling into the same bullshit narratives as the mainstream media. Very sad.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:06 PM
    Actually Trump never thought NAFTA was a good deal, but hey, buying into the latest horseshit mainstream media piece has been really popular the last couple years, including sadly, around here.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:03 PM
    What are you talking about? When did Trump say he wasn't going to re-negotiate our trade deals? When was that NOT his position? I'm pretty sure he has held the exact same position on this issue for almost 4 FUCKING DECADES or more, so why the fuck are you continuing to listen to the lying bullshit mainstream media? It's not good for your brain.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:59 PM
    This is all fake news, he hasn't changed anything. Trump has always said he will re-negotiate trade deals like NAFTA. That is and always has been his position. It's in his speeches as a candidate, and it is contained in the article above. The media likes to play games with semantics... when Trump the candidate says he doesn't like NAFTA and wants to re-negotiate, the media would say he wants to abolish NAFTA, and not bring up anything about the re-negotiation. When Trump the President says he doesn't like NAFTA and wants to re-negotiate, the media says he flip flopped.. It's fucking retarded, I recommend not listening to a single word from the mainstream media.
    35 replies | 415 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:14 PM
    What the fuck are you talking about? Do you have any idea how much political capital was gained by attacking an empty airbase for 15 minutes? They stopped talking about the Russia scandal, China and Russia have his back, North Korea is crawling into a hole.. The mainstream media started treating him like an actual President instead of "literally" Hitler. Gorsuch was "literally" nominated the day after the attack!!!
    49 replies | 547 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:53 PM
    Focus on taxes now, this may be a strategy to get the tax plan passed. When the health care battle comes up again we will see if this is true.
    45 replies | 697 view(s)
  • JK/SEA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:20 PM
    i suggest a nice camo paint job.
    16 replies | 299 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:02 PM
    He would probably say "the executive branch" because he thinks that Donald Trump is the biggest problem with the government, lol.....
    84 replies | 824 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:31 AM
    lol.. you are making a mountain out of a 15 minute attack on an empty airbase..
    49 replies | 547 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:18 AM
    Hmm ya, I dunno he is probably exaggerating a bit but he is correct about the broader point.
    40 replies | 678 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:56 AM
    Can somebody tell me where in the video he talks about this? It's not at 18:45
    40 replies | 678 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:49 AM
    Did he really claim that he wasn't a showman? Because I thought even AJ had brought it up before. Certainly many of his fans have been trying to explain that since I can remember in 2007.. Again, that has nothing to do with the facts he is presenting, it just has to do with the fact that he is getting on camera every day for hours on end and has to entertain an audience. So he really hates the New World Order, but sometimes he might have to psyche himself into being in warrior mode for several hours a day every day. You didn't think there was some showmanship involved all along? I mean, we know he really is like that, we've seen him at it and seen his early material and know how he really feels but he has to get on camera and entertain an audience day after day. So how much is really him and how much is him being a showman, playing himself as a character to present his material is still up for debate.. but remember he is in a custody battle.
    104 replies | 1911 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:47 AM
    You support taxes :confused:
    15 replies | 562 view(s)
More Activity

2 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Pozdrav Yadranko. Verovatno necu nastaviti sa pisanjem dok ne budem imao vremena za kvalitetnije tekstove. U svakom slucaju hvala na interesovanju!
  2. Freedom is spreading around the world: http://www.slobodaiprosperitet.tv/en Campaign for Freedom and Prosperity in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 2 of 2
About yadranko

Basic Information

About yadranko
Biography:
citizen of the World
Interests:
computers, robotics, history, cultures, politics, cooking, home improvement, gardening, outdoors, ..
Occupation:
unemployed
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Campaign Manager
Copywriters:
Speech Writer, Editor, Language Skill, Researcher, Reporter
Graphics:
Photographer, Web Designer / Developer, Flash Artist
Video and Audio:
Videographer, Video Producer
Computer and Technical:
Programmer, WebMaster, Unix Guru, SQL/Database Expert, Social Network Developer, Scientists and Engineer, Telecommunication
Transportation:
Driver

Contact


This Page
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?21894-yadranko&s=ed1140ec32e67e5aece64f13588a309c
Instant Messaging

Send an Instant Message to yadranko Using...

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
23
Posts Per Day
0.01
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
2
Most Recent Message
03-12-2013 10:18 AM
General Information
Last Activity
02-20-2017 01:49 PM
Join Date
10-20-2008
Referrals
0
Home Page
http://www.slobodaiprosperitet.tv/en

6 Friends

  1. dannno dannno is online now

    Member

    dannno
  2. JK/SEA JK/SEA is offline

    Member

    JK/SEA
  3. Jovan Galtic Jovan Galtic is offline

    Member

    Jovan Galtic
  4. LibertyManiacs LibertyManiacs is offline

    Member

    LibertyManiacs
  5. malkusm malkusm is offline

    Member

    malkusm
  6. VUK VUK is offline

    Member

    VUK
Showing Friends 1 to 6 of 6
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...