Deborah K
Member

..

All illegals vote this way, and all Hispanic citizens hate all illegal immigrants. And I'm the one collectivizing people. So, you think Trump's going to let you mow them down? Why? He signed budgets allocating money to import them, and has promised to make them all legal if they go to his new federal government university. This is your definition of "unalienable"?

If you want to gaslight people into believing he didn't say that multiple times, maybe you should be the one trying harder? Or, at least, don't post vids of him saying multiple times what you claim he didn't say...

He said multiple times that "the dollar" (not "the new dollar" or "the old silver dollar", just "the dollar") must remain the world's reserve currency at all cost. That's like "replacing" the war in Ukraine with a war on BRICS. He's essentially promising WWIII to preserve the Fed.

What he said is, he's going to "replace" sanctions with tariffs (as if there's a major difference) in defense of the Federal Reserve and the Petrodollar. Were you hoping nobody watched the vid?

Reality, for those who like to stay in touch with it: https://www.ncregister.com/news/hispanic-voters-gop-drift-2024-4nadu8st Bloodthirsty. And wrong. Dead wrong.

Can you explain how that could possibly come out looking like this? Remember, kiddies, the FY2021 omnibus was signed by the sitting president on December 27, 2020... https://www.ncsl.org/state-federal/fy-2021-omnibus-appropriations-bill

Or you can save yourself thirteen minutes of your life and watch this one instead: Spoiler: Trump is Aunt Yola, and feeds from the same oat trough as Geopolitics.

Yes. He didn't say what you think he said. I don't care what Tim Pool thinks he said. I actually listened to what he said, and he didn't say that. You celebrity worshippers will fill in any gaps with whatever you want to hear, but aren't hearing. The only thing y'all do quicker is toss what they do say and do, but you don't want to hear, out the other ear. Yo. He made it sound like he was going to appoint RFKJr. as some kind of special counsel. He didn't promise it, but said something along those lines. Do you think Leon Jaworski was "in" the Nixon "administration"?

I prefer getting mine from random anonymous skeptics who have no direct knowledge of what's really inside the heads of the people he poo-poohs.

Says who? Trump, who isn't known for keeping what campaign promises he does make, hasn't even promised that. Who convinced you it's going to happen? Does Tim Pool pick cabinets now?

Only if you either love hypocrisy in our elected officials, or don't care about it, or know someone still belaboring the illusion that the Democratic Party somehow values peace.

Trump didn't do shit. With huge amounts of free publicity from the same MSM who had all of us in their faces screaming, HIS NAME IS RON PAUL! SAY HIS NAME! Trump rode the wave we created. Nothing more. We created the wave and the MSM was his surfboard. All Donnie Darko did was replace Ron Paul's intelligent commentary and workable solutions with clichés and third elementary school playground bluster, and get himself carried to the White House by a level of publicity unsurpassed until the Vax came along.

1 Corinthians 15:33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

PS: What is meant by the question of whether 9/11 is still important? Three thousand people were murdered. There is no statute of limitations applicable. I recently learned that my thought that nobody I knew was in the towers was wrong. I saw some documentary on the event and lo and behold there was Rich Eichen, one of my old associates, who'd survived the day. It was very strange seeing him like that. Now I wonder whether there was anyone else. I think the film was titled "Surviving 9/11" or something like that. Actually it may have been a series. Anyhow, it was strange in any event.

Trump's only real error laid in his failure to keep asking pointed questions of Harris. Harris was dead meat at her own hands. Let's recap just broadly. Firstly the moderators sucked the big gay tuna. Their work was so artlessly transparent, I was torn between pitying them and wanting to be on their firing squads. If ABC has any epsilon of credibility before the "debate", they sure as hell had none of it left at the end. They tossed creampuffs at Harris and failed to follow up in the wake of her utter bullshit responses and outright failures to answer what had been asked. They took a markedly different tone and approach with Trump, their hostility thinly masked. Harris spoke in nothing but vagaries clearly intended to have an emotional effect. Trump's other mistake was rising to Harris' bait. Bad move, but now water under the bridge.

Yes, that's another aspect of being pro-life. Trump believed all the lies that the vaccines were safety-tested, that they were 100% effective against COVID-19, and, most egregiously, that he was responsible for the success of getting the vaccines out through "Operation Warp Speed." He gambled with the lives of desperate Americans, and like you've said, to this day, he prides himself in getting the vaccines pushed through.

And it's not just about war. He financed the jab and has never renounced it. I don't care if it's politically expedient or not. They're still pushing that jab in television commercials you and I are paying for. Anyone who can't stand up against it I have no use for.

Yes, I know that Trump has done way more public engagement than Kamala. My point is Trump was outsmarted by a really stupid candidate because he allowed his own ego to get the best of him and fell into her traps. And it's his ego which will be his undoing, just as his ego kept him from being judged by Republican Primary voters in his refusal to participate in those debates.

It's a single issue which is connected to a network of other positions. That single issue is pro-life. To be pro-life means that you care for the preservation of innocent life both inside and outside of the womb, and that incorporates the prohibition of conflicts and wars which will lead to the unnecessary, if not, unethical, termination of civilians who have nothing to do with posing a national threat. It has been shown countless times that the nation-state of Israel is using certain events to justify a campaign of genocide towards an ethnic/national group of people who are not terrorists. As a Christian, I'm against any candidate who will support another nation killing my people (that is, Palestinian Christians) for political and religious reasons. Trump's unadulterated support of Israel offsets his commitment to end the conflict over in Ukraine and Russia, even if he claims, "I just want the dying to stop." He wants to stop the killing of Ukrainian and Russian lives, but he's okay with Palestinians (and even Israelis) being killed because "Israel needs to be feared by her enemies again." Therefore, as a "sInGlE-iSsUe VoTeR," I feel justified in not supporting Trump at all, and I'm sick and tired of people like you trying to justify "voting for the lesser of two evils."

Four. Don't forget New York kicking a Kennedy off the ballot for trying to honor the very state.

I'm sure no one is surprised by evidence that they intend to steal it again.

And that's why we can't have nice things. I'm not saying I'm right and you two are wrong. What I'm saying is, that's why the human race can't have nice things. Like Republicans, we'd rather preserve hell and our place in it than take a leap. Don't have evidence. Do have this: It's a strange psyop that convinces anyone that Trump is such a Guard, given his record.

Buy more guns, of course, and do your best to elect the one who won’t grab ‘em. :)

Are you kidding, Theo?? He has done a ton of rallies. Sometimes, multiple ones a day. He has had interviews and not taped, edited ones, a town hall, and many open question and answer multiple hour press deals. That is the exact opposite of Heels Up, Harris.