Tab Content
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 10:10 AM
    Correct me if I am wrong but I didn't see anybody say the thief tried to run him over. The Public Servant (Praise him!) jumped in front of the car, pulled the weapon and shouted for the thief to get out of the car. In response, the thief turned his wheels to the left and tried to pull away from the curb. I am totally on the side of the shooter here. But I didn't see anybody say the thief tried to run the PS over.
    72 replies | 919 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 10:03 AM
    Those are covert CIA operations, you know. I cannot prove it but I know I am right.
    4 replies | 64 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 05:41 AM
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180612185204.htm
    1 replies | 49 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 04:57 AM
    Esther 4:14 (KJV) 14 For if thou altogether holdest thy peace at this time, then shall there enlargement and deliverance arise to the Jews from another place; but thou and thy father's house shall be destroyed: and who knoweth whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this?
    654 replies | 32585 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:42 AM
    Because you understand the Constitution better than they guy who actually wrote it. Got it. :D
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:34 AM
    called. it. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523327-Trump-to-start-US-Space-Force&p=6642262&viewfull=1#post6642262
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:22 AM
    And before you make a snide remark about flintlocks and quill pens, the Framer's original intent was that the right to bear arms extended to the equal armament common to military use, and the original intent of freedom of speech extended to all manner of expression. Whereas the original intent of the Army was a land based combat force, and the Navy a sea based combat force. Original intent is a thing. maybe you should look it up.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:18 AM
    Voyager sent linguistic messages in all human languages.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:17 AM
    The Constituion clearly authorizes two Departments. Army, and Navy. This covers land and sea. If they want a force for the Air, they need to amend the Constitution. If they want a force for Space, they need to amend the Constitution. Original Intent. The Framers did not originally intend aircraft and spaceships.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:08 AM
    .... until there is a 'public' on Mars, which seems to be in the works as we speak, so his point remains.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:06 AM
    lol! out of ammo...
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:05 AM
    You don't get to wish whatever you want into the Constitution. The Constitution authorized two branches. An Army branch and a Navy branch. Any military force must either reside under one of the two Constitutionally authorized branches, or a Constitutional Amendment must be made to amend the Constitution to authorize a third branch. This isn't rocket science, and I know you are smarter than this. Is this deliberate, or is this just an example of Trumgasming?
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:58 PM
    So yeah, you are claiming to understand the Constitution better than the guy who wrote it. James Madison wrote in The Virginia Report, 1800, by the Virginia House of Delegates, that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:54 PM
    All of this was during James Madison's Presidency. Again, the guy who actually....wrote....the Constitution: From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Marine_Corps#Establishment_of_the_modern_Marine_Corps
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:51 PM
    You should demand a refund from your history professor. That base in Georgia that James Madison established in 1811 for Marines to operate out of? Yeah, you didn't know anything about that at all, did you?
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:50 PM
    LMAO! James Madison wrote the Constitution, but Swordsmyth here understands it better than the guy who...you know...actually wrote it... John Adams signed the Act into law to form the Marines in 1798. James Madison served 1809-1817 and continued to utilize the Marines in 1811. Clearly the guy who wrote the Constitution thought they were Constitutional.... Because they were organized under the Constitutional Department of the Navy. smdh.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 PM
    No, the Army and Navy provisions are organizational. The Army Air Corps was organized under the Department of the Army. The same people who wrote the Constitution also created the Marine Corps and put them under the Department of the Navy. Are you claiming that the same people who wrote the Constitution did not know how to understand the words that they, themselves wrote?
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:41 PM
    The Marine Corps was raised up by an Act of the Continental Congress on 10 November 1775, and then again in the Constitutional era on 27 March 1794. The Marines were used extensively as an “Army Afloat” for amphibious raids and land marches like the assault on Derna right from the start. Their role did not actually depend on the Navy from the origins of the organization. If what you were claiming was correct, then Congress would have formed the Marines as a “Water Army” branch instead of putting them under the Department of the Navy in order to retain full Constitutionality. The proper method of Constitutional interpretation is Original Intent. The same people who wrote the Constitution had already dealt with the formation of another kind of military branch, and we can see that original intent in that act. Only two military departments are authorized in the Constitution. If you want more than two, amend it. I happen to agree that that we need an Air Force. Until we amend the Constitution, it needs to remain under the Department of the Army.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:23 PM
    Why not have 80 Departments of the Army? You are doing the the exact same bizarre interpretation dance that gave us the FDA, Department of Education, the Drug War, Wickard v Filburn and more. That’s not the way the Constitution is supposed to work. You can’t just retcon whatever you want into the Constitution. That’s how the Swamp operates.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:18 PM
    That sounds like justification for anything you can dream of. After all, the drug war is just a function of interstate commerce, right? Sorry, words have meaning. You don’t get to run around changing the meaning of words in order to shoe-horn whatever the hell you want I to the Constitution. That’s how the left is trying to neuter the Second Amendment. “Regulated” and all that. Article 1 Section 8 authorizes ONE Army and ONE Navy, so even if we took your absurdity as an “Air Army” it still doesn’t work. The provision is organizational, not connotative. When it was the Army Air Corps it was under the Department of the Army and therefore Constitutional. In order to become it’s own organizational branch it requires a Constitutional Amendment. This should be blatant on it’s face. Don’t get carried away by wishful thinking.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:05 PM
    Just because the government does it, doesn’t automagically make it Constitutional. In order to have a US Air Force that is not the Army Air Corps, requires a Constitutional Amendment. If you seriously got an Air Force out of Article 1 Section 8, then I don’t think I’ve got anything to help you.
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:03 PM
    And I’m the a-hole for recognizing it in 2015....
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:56 PM
    Pretty sure this requires a Constitutional Amendment...
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    4 replies | 64 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:16 PM
    She admits she cheated on him.
    2 replies | 84 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:48 PM
    http://realfarmacy.com/bad-antibiotic/?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
    1 replies | 74 view(s)
  • francisco's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:26 PM
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:59 PM
    ... or, "Hey! This is a great way to Waste Money and make people think they are safe from the Terrible Secrets of Space!". Pak Chooie Unf
    81 replies | 640 view(s)
  • luctor-et-emergo's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:40 PM
    I don't like those things. Luckily I have been avoiding them all my life, successfully. Especially lucky since I've worked in construction. :D
    20 replies | 295 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    5 replies | 97 view(s)
More Activity

127 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    I just bought the book. I cannot wait to read it. Thanks!!
  2. View Conversation
    ....
  3. View Conversation
    You're welcome, Darlin'. <3
  4. View Conversation
    {Hugs!}
  5. View Conversation
    I am just getting over some respiratory crud, but doing well all and all. Yeah, this LaVoy Finicum is tragic. Alex Jones has reporters up there right now, and they are trying to get in to talk with the militia to try to get them out unharmed.
  6. It's me??? LOL. Sorry! I'll fix it.
  7. I'm kind of a pack rat when it comes to messages, never want to delete anything just "in case".

    My mailbox said 98/100 full, didn't realize that the two message receipts I had count too so, guess it was full thanks for the heads up.

    ---

    LOL nevermind, guess it's not me.

    "Deborah K has exceeded their stored private messages quota and cannot accept further messages until they clear some space."
  8. View Conversation
    ....
  9. View Conversation
    ....
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 127
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
About Deborah K

Basic Information

Signature


Diversity finds unity in the message of freedom.

Dilige et quod vis fac. ~ Saint Augustine

Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
Above all I think everyone needs to understand that neither the Bundys nor Finicum were militia or had prior military training. They were, first and foremost, Ranchers who had about all the shit they could take.
Quote Originally Posted by HOLLYWOOD View Post
If anything, this situation has proved the government is nothing but a dictatorship backed by deadly force... no different than the dictatorships in the banana republics, just more polished and cleverly propagandized.
"I'll believe in good cops when they start turning bad cops in."

Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
In a free society there will be bigotry, and racism, and sexism and religious disputes and, and, and.......
I don't want to live in a cookie cutter, federally mandated society.
Give me messy freedom every time!

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
17,983
Posts Per Day
4.52
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
127
Most Recent Message
02-16-2016 06:46 PM
General Information
Last Activity
03-11-2016 03:25 PM
Join Date
07-27-2007
Referrals
1
Home Page
http://www.paulfestival.com

86 Friends

  1. A Son of Liberty A Son of Liberty is offline

    Member

    A Son of Liberty
  2. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  3. AdamT AdamT is offline

    Member

    AdamT
  4. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  5. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  6. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
  7. BeFranklin BeFranklin is offline

    Member

    BeFranklin
  8. Birdlady Birdlady is offline

    Member

    Birdlady
  9. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  10. brushfire brushfire is offline

    Member

    brushfire
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 86
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...

11-23-2017


01-08-2017


06-19-2016


03-09-2016


03-08-2016


03-07-2016


03-06-2016