Deborah K
Member

https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1623180401656094720 1623180401656094720

https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1623502891964063746 1623502891964063746

https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1623539992105562113 1623539992105562113

1 John 3:21-22 Beloved, if our heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward God. And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.

Nice to have you back.

Sir you are not being inclusive and have been reported! How dare you forget those perfectly innocent ARMED ROBBERS who wear NYLONS over their faces when they are LIBERATING those evil convenience stores and banks of their ENSLAVED DOLLAR BILLS! /sarcasm

Attacking Kamala Harris is probably by design. They want someone more like Jocinda Ardurn (who has since resigned since her mission was accomplished), that DID lock everyone down, did everything in her power to FORCIBLY make people take the lethal Vaxtermination Shot, everyone hated her guts, and thats what the globalists expected Biden and the Kamel to do. The only people that matter that Biden and the Kamel failed is the GLOBALISTS. They do not care about the people. Globalists want a CONTROLLABLE DICTATOR. Kind of like where HITLER went wrong. Hitler was NOT CONTROLLABLE. Biden is just incompetent.

Agreed. Not dead yet. Very close but not dead. Im also smelling some Double Deception. These people are NOT even Communists. I think it is a group of people that truly bear NO LABEL and switch their own PERCEIVED LABELS so they never receive blame for their actions. I think associating themselves with Communists of pick a country is to shift blame to the party and not themselves. Then we are supposed to come running back to the same group of individuals when they switch their labels. Its obfuscation of the REAL ENEMY. The goals are clearly stated what they want. A society that is not stable and can not survive. And they NEVER represent the will of ANY people, yet at times are able to achieve high positions of power in their victim government. Then once that govt is used up and they achieve their chaos, they change sides yet again and do the exact same thing to their next victim.

Probably more than any other element, hubris was responsible for Germany's defeat. I think it would be fair (but arguable) to say that Germany's military (aside from long range bomber capacity - their only long range bomber was the Heinkel 111, a twin engine platform that could barely make England from western Germany and back) was the most effective and deadly of the European front, with the American military probably coming in a very close second (although a good argument could be made that the American military did a far, far better job in fighting a two-front war than Germany ended up doing). German military leadership gained a head of confidence with their sweeping early victories in Poland, Sudetenland, and especially in their devastating conquering of France in a matter of weeks, and became convinced that they couldn't be stopped. They sent the Wehrmacht into the Soviet Union in the Spring of '41 without an adequate long term plan in the event that objectives were not achieved before Winter, which in that part of the world at that time could start as early as early October. At that point, materiel foundered, soldiers froze and starved, and their fighting capacity was utterly diminished. Leadership would refuse to disengage from absolutely unwinnable engagements like Leningrad, the advance on Moscow, and particularly Stalingrad, where they lost an entire army and one of their better general officers in Von Paulus. The Soviets threw men and equipment at the Germans in volume. They didn't outfight the Germans, they overwhelmed them. In the meantime, Germany was facing the second front of the American invasion in North Africa, which lead to the invasion of Italy, and then inevitably the D-Day invasion, which, once the beachhead was established within basically 2 days of the invasion, it was effectively all over but the crying for Germany. The Panzer and Tiger class tanks were nearly unstoppable. Their kill to loss ratios were unreal (I don't have the numbers off the top of my head, but both platforms took a lot more than they lost). Their only weakness was that they were slow, and that is how the American Sherman tank was able to eventually defeat them - through volume AND speed. There was no defeating a German tank face to face for any Allied tank. The only chance a Sherman (or, Shermans) had was to outflank the German tank and attack the thinner armor on the backside of the tank. A Panzer or Tiger entrenched and with its flanks protected was virtually invincible. Allied tanks would have to draw them out in order to defeat them. The Germans also innovated using AA artillery as anti-armor, and it was devastating. The 88 mm AA field cannon did a lot of damage to Allied armor.

You're also right that build quality generally left a lot to be desired. The same can be said of the Klimov, their unlicensed copy (that's pronounced "ripoff") of the Rolls Royce Merlin.

It certainly was, by an American named J. Walter Christie, in America, for the U.S. Army. But he was, as engineers go, a starving artist, and didn't have enough money to bribe the government to buy his design. Which was SOP at the time; just look at how much the government paid GM to develop the lackluster Allison V-1610, and at how Sloan's GM treated politicians at the time. Desperate for cash during the Depression to survive, Christie went shopping for buyers for the design, and found one in Stalin. Perhaps the dictator was motivated by a feeling that he was stealing something from the U.S. Army. In any case, he very rarely made a better investment.

https://twitter.com/LBR_TY/status/1623156468366118917 1623156468366118917

Colossians 3:9-10 Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him.

https://twitter.com/TCBnole/status/1623057207242661893 1623057207242661893

https://twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1622582330769518593 1622582330769518593

..

https://twitter.com/JeffKirdeikis/status/1623085083346472960 1623085083346472960

Or maybe the thread title should say, developing more mutations again. https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1622960172972015616 1622960172972015616

There were one hell of a lot of rubber used during that war. The Allies would have been slowed down considerably if they hadn't been able to get as much of it. The first equipment used to make synthetic rubber was built during the war. A lot of supplies had to move and planes had to land before that was available in any quantity. The war hinged on a lot of vital factors.

Meanwhile, here's my state of the union address:

If they had made bigger nuisances of themselves than they did, nothing could have helped them but re-surrection.

Now, see, this is the sort of organic plant growth enhancement product Zippy used to keep us supplied with. "Technological advances make your life better faster than inflation makes it worse. So stop whining, troll."

Apparently so, which I find odd,given I do nothing much to protect myself. Don't bother with VPN tunnels or anything like that.

Well, then. Since they didn't mention the thing until civilians saw it and shared that information, isn't it logical to assume that this isn't a distraction, but rather something from which they're more likely to be trying to distract us? Shouldn't we be willing to entertain the possibility?