CPUd has the right idea (confirmed my suspicions), but wrong motive - clearly they are doing it to play up the victim card. That's why it wouldn't surprise me if a lot of the twitter handles involved are fake.
Huh, I guess maybe that is it, it looked like they were bringing in tweets from the author to the site directly so I wasn't sure why he would have the triple parentheses unless he added them to his handle himself, to play up the victim card.
Half or more of these twitter handles could be fakes anyway.
I'm not sure of your point here, but I have certainly meant everything that I have said.
What there is certainly some room for basic banter in threads there is validity in having discussion and analysis on this topic, which can be done without supporting Trump. While the site does not support Trump it is foolhardy to dismiss everything he says, or in this case, the 7 point plan he presents. It's worthy of analysis to ID points of possible value and points of weakness. This analysis will provide intellectual value and help people understand good policy. That still doesn't mean one has to or should support Trump even if he has some good points on some issues.
Could we please get some more analysis on these points? Are any more details provided?
lol... I don't have the app in the OP, but his name is coming up with the triple parenthesis nonetheless.. They are really playing this stuff up.. Don't fall for it, they are still the establishment. I don't know if Trump is any better, or if he is establishment too, but it's kinda weird seeing a guy like you licking their boots.
I don't know if I really consider myself alt-right. There are a lot of issues I agree with people on who are considered alt-right, but the problem is it is a very broad term that I don't think has a specific enough definition. I think there are quite a few issues I disagree with many who are considered alt-right, although again I don't know if alt-right has a very defined system of beliefs.
Again, it makes little difference to me whether you watch them or not, if you keep making posts that can easily be refuted using facts, reason and evidence that are contained in Molyneux videos then I will continue to reply to your quotes with them to benefit others who are reading the forum.
If you had a more open mind and were actually willing to learn from Molyneux, not that you have to agree with him on everything (I certainly don't), but at least you would be less inclined to make posts with egregious errors that are easily refuted with a Moynuex video. And at that point, if you disagreed, you could at least attempt at putting forward a valid argument.
Molyneux has been consulting with many experts in the field of IQ and race for over a year now. All you have to do is go to youtube and type in Molynuex Race IQ and you will get several videos that you can watch and educate yourself on the topic and decide for yourself.
Or you can sit around and keep asking where we are giving these people IQ tests.
I don't care if you don't consider him an expert on anything, because his shows are the most well researched shows that I have seen anywhere on the internet or any medium and he interviews and consults with some of the best experts on a wide range of topics. This is a forum that a lot of people read, not just you, so I'm going to provide the best information available to help prove my case. If you are going to talk about people that were here before us trying to make some point that doesn't make any sense in light of new evidence, then I'm going to point that evidence out. If you don't want to look at the evidence, then you can go forward in life continuing to make factual errors and other people who are interested in learning the truth will eventually leave you behind because your points will come across as totally invalid to those willing to continue their education.
I posted that link at a liberal site and according to them Judge Nap is a lying sack of crap who doesn't have a clue. Of course nobody there is on my side of htis but here is the link in case someone wants to come help me:
I honestly don't think CA will be able to beat what Uncle Sucker is going to force VW to pay me.
Of course, the whole thing is ridiculous...
Five tenths of a percent...that is what the difference is: 92.2 percent vs. 92.7 percent reduction in NoX.
This is not about anything more than an enraged Uncle Sucker punitively hammering a corporation that had the stones to, for short time anyway, tell Uncle to get fucked.
I think she just doesn't want to pay for them.
When LE was talking about how back in the day immigrants needed to add value in order to immigrate here, essentially she was saying that they needed to be able to support themselves, or they would go back to their native country. Now they have welfare, so they don't need to add value to society to remain here.
What part sounds right? The part about Jewish people having a large presence in the media?
The rest of the article is pretty much BS. The app doesn't do anything it says it does. All the app does is take reporters with Jewish surnames and put triple parenthesis around them. It doesn't seek out articles with Jewish authors to go harass, you have to already be looking at the article. At least that is how it is described.
Whenever I see the media trying to convince people not to vote for Trump, it's always the dumbest arguments. I can't figure out whether they are trying to manipulate people with these stupid arguments or whether they are secretly trying to get smart people to vote for Donald Trump.
I don't want to vote for Donald Trump, I don't know his motivations, he has authoritarian tendencies and his positions are a little shifty. But the media with their stupid arguments, and these god awful threads posted by CPUd several times a day wears me down a lot, I have to keep reminding myself I can't vote for Trump just because of all the bullshit coming out against him mostly from the mainstream media.