Tab Content
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:39 PM
    According to a companion article, Trump said he wanted Bernie's campaign to put up the money. I didn't interpret it that way. Did anyone else? http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/26/trump-chickens-refuses-debate-sanders-bernie-pays-10-million.html
    29 replies | 395 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:47 PM
    Tech company offers the $10 million charity donation http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/27/tech-company-calls-trumps-bluff-offering-put-10-million-sanders-debate.html
    29 replies | 395 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2016, 02:15 PM
    That's where the history outline link I posted previously helps in understanding what exactly happened. The 16th wasn't ratified because it wasn't added to the original Constitution. It was an amendment to the corporate US Constitution (aka addition of a corporation bylaw) and didn't require official ratification as the original Constitution required. It's technically not a good argument to say the 16th isn't valid because it wasn't ratified......because it was never required for it to be ratified. It's not the same Constitution as the Founders wrote!
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    70 replies | 1024 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2016, 01:43 PM
    Just like the mouthpieces from the last go round he will never be seen or heard from again. Nothing but interchangeable Fed pumper cheerleaders. Only thing I wish Peter would do is start to point out how this is all planned, instead of reinforcing the FALSE narrative that the Fed is "clueless" and all of this stuff is unintended consequences. The Fed folks knows EXACTLY what they are doing. They've been doing it for over 100 years now.
    14 replies | 602 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2016, 01:09 PM
    That was clear from day one. The media doesn't give SNL host spots to people they don't want to promote. Trump was nothing but a trojan horse from the day of his declaration speech in front of a paid crowd. It was the entire media that gave him the largest platform possible to herd the sheep from.
    70 replies | 1024 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-27-2016, 12:57 PM
    Don't forget $40 million vacations for the whole family.
    36 replies | 479 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-26-2016, 12:57 PM
    He just contradicted his campaign chair's statement about female/minority VP and said during ND press conference that he'd likely pick a female or minority VP. He doubletalks and flip flops so much he makes Mitt look principled.
    36 replies | 479 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-25-2016, 10:21 PM
    Come on, everyone that has studied 9/11 at all knows it wasn't only Saudis or only Americans or only Israelis. It was formulated and carried out by them all working together. CIA, Mossad, Saudi GID, and probably others. Saudi royals and Israeli leaders are much closer aligned (both genetically and politically) than most people realize and of course American PTB are buddy-buddy with both. So if Saudis are saying "US did it", US is saying "Saudis did it" (though neither point to Israel....funny that) then there's something bigger going on and this is a manufactured cover for something else. That something else is ending the petrodollar peg imo.
    23 replies | 188 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-25-2016, 08:42 PM
    Yeah, you're right, not related at all. I confused one 9/11 snafu for another 9/11 snafu. End result will be the same. 28 pages revealed, suits commence, Saudis dump dollar assets thus killing petrodollar peg.
    23 replies | 188 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-25-2016, 03:51 PM
    Strikes me as creating a reason for the Saudis to dump their dollar holdings, as they threatened to do if the authorization to release the documents were passed.
    23 replies | 188 view(s)
  • ronpaulhawaii's Avatar
    05-25-2016, 02:35 PM
    Interested
    24 replies | 425 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-25-2016, 02:58 AM
    Isn't Peter due for a Bilderberg meeting soon? Hell, this was probably filmed at Bilderberg...there were some rumblings that BB was held in secret last weekend at the Westfields Marriott like they usually do in Pres election years.
    4 replies | 194 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-25-2016, 02:54 AM
    We still gotta live in this little fiefdom. Nothing wrong with comprehending all of the angles and knowing where to penetrate. Regarding the court cases you keep asking about, I will maintain that few have actually taken the proper steps and made the proper claims to truly become a "nontaxpayer".
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-24-2016, 03:05 PM
    Self proclaimed as God's servants. If Lloyd Blankfein is a measure of a servant of God (he's doing God's work, dontcha know) then excuse me for not putting much faith into what those that claim to be servants of God are up to. Never mind that your God may not be someone else's God. God is internal to each human. Following someone else's vision of God means you're a sheep.
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-24-2016, 12:35 PM
    nm, that's heading down that strange road.
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-24-2016, 11:15 AM
    I could ask what you think is liberty loving about bondage, secret contracts and hidden agendas but this thread would take a really strange turn if we go down that road. Written by some dude.
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-23-2016, 04:14 PM
    Says the guy copying and pasting other people's writings as if they are his own. Never mind that the text you posted comes from a tax lawyer's website. I'm shocked that someone that swore a BAR oath to uphold the bankruptcy proceedings of the "United States" (Inc.) on behalf of the Crown bankers writes articles calling tax protestors crazy and cultish. :rolleyes: Btw, your avatar of a Roman statue of an ancient god that is housed in London is quite telling....you wouldn't happen to be an occultist lawyer, would ya? Mithra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mithra Gee, contracts and bondage. What a surprise!
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-23-2016, 03:48 PM
    You posted it, not me. Next time post a link if you're posting someone else's writing.
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-23-2016, 02:24 PM
    You forgot the link. http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2016/04/is-tax-protesting-a-cult/
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-23-2016, 02:19 PM
    Hillary's speech was the same at each office. "Thank you for this check. Bye."
    12 replies | 270 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-23-2016, 01:50 PM
    My research indicates that it was prior to that, with the Organic Act of 1871 that created the corporate District of Columbia. Take a look at this timeline if you haven't before. The contents line up as well as any I've seen based on my own research. http://www.teamlaw.org/HistoryOutline.htm smh You can't truly be this obtuse. How many times do I have to type it? The CAPITAL LETTER NAME is the corporation. The bank account is in the CAPITAL LETTER NAME. Alimony is private banker credit (with user fee) deposited to a bank account of the CAPITAL LETTER NAME corporation. Most humans unknowingly take responsibility for the CAPITAL LETTER NAME (using the benefits but also taking on the liabilities) and take responsibility for the taxes assessed to the CAPITAL LETTER NAME. You (the living human) doesn't receive alimony. The CAPITAL LETTER NAME corporation does. I realize this is a difficult abstract concept to grasp for someone that isn't familiar but damn....
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-23-2016, 03:20 AM
    Constitutional arguments are a losing proposition in court because the Constitution is no longer the law of the land and therefore not "law" in courts. Courts are commercial courts under UCC, not common law. Like I said, it's all commerce now. The Constitution is only a guideline but is not binding. How many know that the original Constitution wasn't only replaced with a new Constitution but an entire amendment was removed before it was replaced? The history of this land mass known as America (but is really United States Inc.) isn't what most people believe it is, because they are taught LIES from day one.
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 09:32 PM
    There is the "corporation" right there in the definition and I already explained how most humans are not "individuals", per that definition under the IRC, but are rather representatives of corporations (the all capital letter name) by unknowing consent. Sure, a "person" can be an individual under that definition but under the IRC most "persons" are not individuals. The human is a representative of the corporate entity that the tax is being assessed to. The tax is not being assessed to the human, it is being assessed to the corporation. That definition can call a "person" a monkey with a hat on but if there are no monkeys with hats on then what difference does it make? Btw, you're taking angelatc's route of picking out minutae to argue over and acting like it negates the entire post. That's a sign of intellectual dishonesty and a losing argument. That is a fair enough assessment, however where most screw up is that showing up in court in the first place generally means admitting to being the representative of the corporate entity that I described in my last couple posts. Judge: "Are you erowe1?" erowe1: "Yes and here's my argument....."
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 03:52 PM
    Bingo. Legally, a way to avoid the private credit of the bankers and therefore the user fee attached must be included in statute. Otherwise it is an unconscionable contract which can not be enforced since there is no other choice. Everything is based in commercial contract law now. No one can force you to enter a contract and using the banker's private credit is agreeing to a contract even if you don't realize it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. I don't personally have a problem with private credit and user fees but I do wish people were able to make an informed choice in the matter instead of being brainwashed into it and then being hamstrung when they run afoul of something they didn't even realize they were agreeing to. Lawful money is legal tender but legal tender isn't necessarily lawful money. Private banker credit is legal tender but is not lawful money unless it is specifically notated as lawful money per 12USC411. A FRN is lawful money IF handled in accordance with 411. If not in accordance then it is only legal tender, with user fee attached. Now we're getting to the meat. This should be fun. A 'person' means a corporate entity, not a flesh and blood human. The key is to realize that the english that the average person speaks is not the english that a lawyer (someone that drafts legislation, for example) speaks. What Joe Blow interprets as a person is not what a lawyer interprets as a person. This is why Romney said "corporations are people". Under legal terminology, he is correct. The corporate entity 'person' the IRC refers to is the all capital letter "person" that everyone sees on their tax bills, their drivers license, their credit cards, etc. That all capital letter "person" is not the living human that carries those items around. The living human is (usually unknowingly) the representative of the all capital letter corporate entity that is created when the human's certificate of live birth is turned over to the state. The state sends it on to the Feds, who turn it into a financial instrument and then turn it over as collateral to the bankers. Since practically everyone is securitized in this way as collateral against the debt, it means that practically everyone is actually a federal employee, since they are working to repay debt that the government accrues. Now 6331 should make more sense.... I'm sure you'll say that's all crackpot theory or whatever but it is historically factual and goes on every day.
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 10:31 AM
    Oh, so because there are political prisoners then being in the right is pointless and the knowledge should be forgotten and ignored? I'm glad the Dali Lama, Nelson Mandela, Ron Paul and others didn't take that approach. The world will turn into a very ugly place (see my post by William Cooper about the NWO) if everyone thinks like that. There's something to be said for not making oneself a martyr and we all put up with the bullshit to various extents but attacking the messengers seems like really bad form and only further supports the tyranny. The thieving bankers appreciate angelatc, erowe and others defeatist posts, I assure you. A blast from the past for old RPFers:
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
  • devil21's Avatar
    05-21-2016, 10:44 PM
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6331 Could it be that most people are employees of the United States (Inc.) but don't know it? Hmm...
    210 replies | 4463 view(s)
More Activity
About JVParkour

Basic Information

Signature


Forget Ron Paul 2012- RON PAUL FOREVER!

Check out my zazzle store- http://www.zazzle.com/jvparkour*

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
749
Posts Per Day
0.27
General Information
Last Activity
04-13-2014 04:57 PM
Join Date
09-04-2008
Referrals
0

6 Friends

  1. devil21 devil21 is offline

    Member

    devil21
  2. gonegolfin gonegolfin is offline

    Member

    gonegolfin
  3. llepard llepard is offline

    Member

    llepard
  4. ronpaulhawaii ronpaulhawaii is offline

    Moderator

    ronpaulhawaii
  5. Theocrat Theocrat is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Theocrat
    Theocrat
  6. Tink Tink is offline

    Member

    Tink
Showing Friends 1 to 6 of 6
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...