Tab Content
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:52 PM
    . See California Wants To Become The First State To Offer Free Health Care To Illegal Immigrants May 22, 2018 ” California lawmakers are poised to make the state the first in the nation to expand Medicaid benefits to adult "undocumented" immigrants, at a cost of more than $3 billion per year to California taxpayers.” Not only has California’s communists/socialists and progressives in government enslaved its citizens into financing the economic needs of illegal entrant’s children, now they want to extend that tax slavery to finance the health-care needs of adult aliens who have broken our laws and invaded America’s borders.
    1 replies | 56 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-14-2018, 04:52 PM
    And the majority of voters living in Jersey seem to enjoy that piece of crap, crapping on them. JWK The unavoidable truth is, our Fifth Column social democrat political leaders’ plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by confiscating the paychecks of millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-14-2018, 02:40 PM
    You are not allowed to enter the United States illegally. 10-15 million and growing. JWK
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 05:42 PM
    Yes. Especially when they are designed to switch the subject. McInerney stated: "It worked on John . That's why they call him 'Songbird John'" FoxNews banning Lt. General Thomas McInerney, for stating a fact: "It worked on John . That's why they call him 'Songbird John'" is very troubling to me as it indicates FoxNews has jumped on the politically correct bandwagon. As stated at the top of the thread: ”McCain's U.S. Senate office could not confirm the authenticity of the recording, but one McCain aide, speaking on condition that his name not be published, told New Times the following: "Senator McCain has spoken candidly for years, in media interviews and his own memoir, of making a false confession tape after being tortured as a POW in North Vietnam. Although his 'confession' was coerced by days of extreme physical abuse, he always regretted it."
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 04:07 PM
    What do your posts have to do with FoxNews submitting to political correctness and banning a guest for stating a fact? NOTHING! JWK
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 01:50 PM
    It's absolutely amazing how political correctness has found its way into FoxNews Channel. Aside from that see: Vietnam POW Activists Called McCain ‘Songbird’ and ‘Manchurian Candidate’ Among groups who oppose John McCain, the most serious charges come from a small but fervent cadre of Vietnam POW/MIA activists who accuse him of being a collaborator during his time in the Vietnamese POW camps. They call McCain “Songbird,” and say he received special treatment. Some in the POW community even believe he was brainwashed like Raymond Shaw, the character played by Laurence Harvey in “The Manchurian candidate,” who was used as a tool by the communists to destroy America from within.
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 12:33 PM
    Your above quote has nothing to do with why FoxNews banned McInerney. The subject of the thread is about FoxNews going politically correct and banning someone for stating a fact. JWK .
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 12:27 PM
    And they used torture to get McCain to make a propaganda recording. So, in that particular instance, torture worked, as stated by McInerney. JWK
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 12:24 PM
    :rolleyes: What was stated by McInerney is as follows: "It worked on John . That's why they call him 'Songbird John'" JWK
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 12:10 PM
    In McCain's case, torture worked well enough to get him to make a propaganda recording. Is that not what McInerney pointed out while on FoxNews? JWK
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 11:53 AM
    What does your nonsense have to do with what McInerney said on FoxNews? JWK
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 10:43 AM
    I appreciate your candor. And I agree, the good people ought to leave and let the communists, socialists and progressives suffer the consequences of their own doings. JWK American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 10:21 AM
    Go back and read what I posted. I was crystal clear in my position. It is not a stain on McCain's record to confirm he was tortured into making a propaganda recording. It is a stain on McCain's record to lie that torture does not work. JWK
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 09:30 AM
    And FoxNews banned McInerney for stating a fact, and did so for politically correct reasons. JWK
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-12-2018, 09:14 AM
    . I know this is a sensitive issue but truth must be told! See Fox News bans retired general after McCain torture comments May 11, 2018 ”A spokesperson told the Washington Examiner that retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney is no longer welcome on Fox News and Fox Business Network after he said torture worked on McCain, a former prisoner of war in Vietnam.
    33 replies | 460 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-11-2018, 08:11 PM
    But there are citizens of New Jersey who are sick and tired of it. You did write: This is exactly what these "good people" wanted. And they are gonna get it, good and hard. I doubt if the "good people" want this crap. Why do you suggest they do? JWK
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-11-2018, 02:08 PM
    You don't count the people of New Jersey who did not vote for progressives as "good people"? Who are the good people as distinguished from the bad people in your mind? JWK
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-11-2018, 05:39 AM
    The good people of New Jersey need to start draining the swamp in Trenton and free themselves from its socialist/communist/progressive slave masters. JWK The citizens of New Jersey are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade New Jersey's borders to give birth.
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    05-10-2018, 07:36 AM
    SEE: Phil Murphy signs bill to let unauthorized immigrants get college financial aid May 9, 2018 ”A New Jersey college student's immigration status will no longer play a factor into whether that student is eligible for certain in-state financial aid.” Jersey’s Socialist Governor Murphy went on to say “This is the world's melting pot where people in every part of the globe can come here in the hope of a new life" It is absolutely stunning that the force of government taxation has been so perverted these days by our Nation’s Fifth Column Socialists that it now violates the very purpose for which a just and equal government is created. "Under a just and equal Government, every individual is entitled to protection in the enjoyment of the whole product of his labor, except such portion of it as is necessary to enable Government to protect the rest; this is given only in consideration of the protection offered. In every bounty, exclusive right, or monopoly, Government violates the stipulation on her part; for, by such a regulation, the product of one man's labor is transferred to the use and enjoyment of another. The exercise of such a right on the part of Government can be justified on no other principle, than that the whole product of the labor or every individual is the real property of Government, and may be distributed among the several parts of the community by government discretion; such a supposition would directly involve the idea, that every individual in the community is merely a slave and bondsman to Government, who, although he may labor, is not to expect protection in the product of his labor. An authority given to any Government to exercise such a principle, would lead to a complete system of tyranny." ___ See Representative Giles, speaking before Congress February 3rd, 1792
    27 replies | 490 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-29-2018, 04:29 PM
    Perhaps I ought to us Fifth Column judges and Justices? JWK Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism, Hollywood, and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary
    5 replies | 174 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-28-2018, 07:00 PM
    What does your post have to do with the subject of the thread? Just curious. JWK
    5 replies | 174 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-28-2018, 09:49 AM
    One of the Supreme Court‘s “inventions” used to impose its will upon the people unknown to those who framed and ratified our Constitution, are various tests the court has created which are now used to circumvent and set aside the documented intentions and beliefs under which the various provisions of our Constitution have been adopted. These “tests” began to appear and gain a foothold during the Warren Court of the l960’s. One such test was the "rationality" test under which a law being challenged had to withstand the court’s judgment that the law in question was “rationally based” or “reasonable” to survive the court‘s review. Of course, this allowed specific members on the court to switch the subject from what is and what is not constitutional during litigation, to a question having nothing to do with its constitutionality. Whether rational or not, a law which violates the Constitution cannot be justified as being constitutional if it is rationally based! Likewise, if a law is not rationally based it is not the Court’s job to second guess the wisdom of the legislature or our Constitution! To do so is to usurp legislative authority and ignore the separation of powers in our system of government, not to mention how such action negates the very reason for elections, which, in most cases, is to change public policy via appropriate legislation. For example, imaging for a moment that a black male was denied employment by a state government based upon his race and the court, in spite of the 14th Amendment’s limited protection against state imposed race discrimination, upheld the denial of employment because the local government presented an “exceedingly persuasive justification” for not hiring the black male. This is what these tests are about, creating a platform for members on the Court to ignore identifying and enforcing the intentions and beliefs under which provisions our Constitution were adopted and impose their personal whims and fancies upon the people as the rule of law using flowery terms and phrases to justify ignoring the will of the people as expressed in a written Constitution! By the early 1970’s the Court using a variety of invented “tests” , started to appear which blatantly ignored the documented intentions and beliefs under which various provisions of our Constitution were adopted, and went on to impose a majority of the Court’s own ideas of social justice, fairness and reasonableness as the rule of law. Some of the early cases which demonstrate the Court’s attack upon the text and documented legislative intent of our Constitution’s provisions which gives context to its text, and imposing its will as the rule of law using these newly created tests are Reed vs. Reed 404 U.S. 71 (1971), Frontiero vs Richardson 411 U.S. 677 (1973), Craig v. Boren 429 U.S. 190 (1976), and Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, (1973). It is also important to note that the ACLU and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was a volunteer for the American Civil Liberties Union in the 1970’s, were both active in these cases and assisted the court in engineering clever words and phrases in conjunction with “tests” which were designed to parse words and circumvent the very intentions and beliefs under which the 14th Amendment was adopted.
    5 replies | 174 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-25-2018, 10:30 AM
    We are told that Obama’s nuke deal is not a treaty but a “Sole Executive Agreement”, and therefore, it does not require a two thirds approval vote by the United States Senate to have the force of law. Of course, this assertion raises an immediate red flag because there is no mention in our Constitution delegating a power to the president to make a “Sole Executive Agreement” with foreign governments. As a matter of fact the limited power granted to the President in our Constitution regarding deals with foreign governments is stated as follows: The President “… shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur…” So, what is meant by the word “treaty” as the word was used and understood by our founders, and requires a two thirds approval vote by our Senate to have the force of law? In Federalist No. 64 Jay defines a treaty as a “bargain” . He writes: ”These gentlemen would do well to reflect that a treaty is only another name for a bargain, and that it would be impossible to find a nation who would make any bargain with us, which should be binding on them ABSOLUTELY, but on us only so long and so far as we may think proper to be bound by it.”
    6 replies | 124 view(s)
No More Results

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Hi I'm Chowder

    I saw your debate with Wild English nut-job Rose with the Fair Tax. Man you tore him apart!

    Anyway I want to say thanks for the info you posted on the Hannity Forums. I used to be a neo-con but I saw the light around December of last year.

    I also used to support the fair tax and really thought for a while it seemed like a good idea. But your statements have changed my mind.

    Thanks man.

    -Chowder.

    P.S Where is your sources for the info, I would like to read them more closely or did you rely mostly on the Constitution: the one document our Politicians ignore except for Ron Paul.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About johnwk

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,898
Posts Per Day
0.53
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
05-18-2011 11:03 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 03:44 PM
Join Date
07-19-2008
Referrals
1

1 Friend

  1. Weston White Weston White is offline

    Member

    Weston White
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

04-06-2018


03-17-2018


03-14-2018


01-26-2017


No results to display...
Page 1 of 24 12311 ... LastLast

05-14-2018


05-12-2018


05-11-2018


04-29-2018


04-18-2018


04-17-2018


04-14-2018


04-13-2018



Page 1 of 24 12311 ... LastLast